Module 3 Journal Question: Evidence-Based Practices from a Public Health Perspective
nikkyvu
Module 3 Journal Question: Evidence-Based Practices from a Public Health Perspective
7 days ago
5
files (2)Module3JournalQuestion.docx
Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx
Module3JournalQuestion.docx
Module 3 Journal Question: Evidence-Based Practices from a Public Health Perspective
Describe the key determinants of population health and identify one evidence-based approach that evaluates the impact of healthy behavior (i.e., tobacco use, diet and exercise, or alcohol and drug use), clinical care (i.e., access to care and quality of care), or social and economic factors (i.e., education, employment, income, and family/social support) in a rural population and/or community.
Journal Response Expectations
Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.
Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx
Graduate Journal Rubric v1. Population Health and Person-Centered Care
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score
Claim/Quali
ty of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 8
Developme
nt/Connecti
on Weight:
%
40
/ 8
0
points
(0
pts
)
Response to
quiz question is
missing or inac
-
curate. Answer
is inaccurate
and does not
address the
prompt.
points
2.5
pts
(5.6
)
Response to
quiz question is
missing key el
-
ements.
Answer is par
-
tially inaccu
-
rate and misses
elements in the
prompt. Claims
are lacking in
-
formation to
be fully
thought out.
points
6.4
(6.4
)
pts
Response to
quiz question is
appropriate
and accurate.
Answer is ap
-
propriate and
responses to
the prompt.
Claims are
appropriate.
8
points
(8
pts
)
Response to
quiz question is
thorough and
detailed.
Answer is clear
and concise
and responses
to all aspects
of the prompt.
Claims are jus
-
tified and
plausible.
0
points
pts
)
(0
Connections
are either miss
-
ing or inaccu
-
rate in the
discussion.
5.6
points
(5.6
pts
)
Connections
are included by
missing key in
-
formation in
the discussion.
points
6.4
)
pts
(6.4
Connections
are appropri
-
ately and accu
-
rately
discussed.
8
points
)
pts
(8
Connections
are insightful,
reflective, and
completely
discussed.
Total
/ 20
Criteria
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaches
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Criterion Score
Writing &
Mechanics
Weight:
%
20
/ 4
0
points
)
pts
(0
Style is inap
-
propriate or
does not ad
-
dress given
purpose.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
-
ing, and
punctuation.
2.8
points
pts
)
(2.8
Style is some
-
what appropri
-
ate to purpose.
Repetitive me
-
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
-
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
points
3.2
(3.2
pts
)
Style is appro
-
priate to the
given purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
-
ied throughout.
Minimal me
-
chanical, typo
-
graphical, are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
points
4
pts
(4
)
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical, ty
-
pographical,
errors.
Overall Score
Level 1
0
points minimum
Level 2
14
points minimum
Level 3
16
points minimum
Level 4
20
points minimum
2/2
- For Excellentgrades only assignment 3
- Part 9 need help
- FIU BUL 6810 quiz 2 (100% Answer)
- Finance Course Project Executive Reports
- Finance Assignment - Down East Pharmaceuticals
- what are two of the major political challenges for humanity, and what are the alternatives for solving them? Be specific and give examples.
- Finance Case Study - PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT
- assistance needed
- HUMAN RESOURCES
- MGMT436 - APA Format, No Plagiarism, Original Work, A+++
