1 | P a g e
INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES FOR MNCS
1.0 Net Present Value (NPV) Method
1.1 Discounting cash flows with WACC
WACC discounting of cash flows is one of the most basic and widely used financial models in firms that seek to
estimate the current value of future cash receipts from an investment or undertaking. This Garr calculation, WACC,
reflects the cost of capital that a firm pays for all capital sourced from equities, bonds and any other type of financing
provided to the firm through the industry’s capital structure. In investment appraisal, capital budgeting and valuation,
accurate computation of WACC is further emphasised by Bruner et al. (2016). Integrated into the WACC formula is
the cost of equity by mean models such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), and the cost of the debt that
might have tax shields. The decision of the cost of equity commonly necessitates calculating the expected return,
which investors expect to receive from equity investment, based on risk-free rate, equity risk premium and the beta of
the firm. The cost of debt is comprised of the cost of debt instruments and is calculated using the interest rates for
borrowing money, although it also takes into consideration the amount of interest that is tax deductible. Baker and
Wurgler (2016), for instance, argue that behavioral tendencies may affect these components across the board and
lead to misestimation of WACC. For example, investor perceptions of LRM’s stock and the overall stock market can
influence the risk and return expected by investors of equity in LRM while variations in interest rates, credit risk affect
the cost of borrowing for LRM. Furthermore, it is important for the firms bear in mind their capital structure in this
sense because the proportions of debt and equity could change from time to time hence impacting on the WACC.
The correct calculation of the WACC aids in the maximizing of the accuracy of the discount rate, to alleviate the main
problem of comparison of PV of CF with to the initial investment outlay- the outsourcing/ insourcing decision. This
helps firms to know which enterprises to undertake, so that the strategies taken are suitably layered with monetary
vigour and acceptable levels of risk.
2 | P a g e
1.2 Adjusting for country risk premiums
Country risk premiums are relevant for assessment of investments beyond the regular business and financial risks
typically associated with domestic markets so excluding he country risk is incomplete. Referring to Bekaert and
Hodrick (2017), country risk premiums are attributed to political risks, economic fluctuation and other microstructural
aspects that an investor should consider while estimating the risks involved in investment cash flows. These
premiums are then adjusted, in a manner of speaking, into the discount rate by including additional risk premium to
the base WACC. These changes seek to actualize the fact that investors incurred higher uncertainties related to
particular countries, including expropriation risks, currency risks, and unpredictable regulatory changes. To maintain
a correct evaluation of the risk-adjusted return expectations, Adler and Dumas (2018) argue that one has to consider
both global private information and market-specific risks. For instance, the form of government risk in a country that
experiences frequent changes of government, policy formulations and or deteriorations would be relatively high,
hence demands higher risk premium. To simply, even in high economic volatility, the country risk may be more where
we need to change the discount rate. With these factors in mind, there is a sure way of practicing what noted above
and ensure the discount rate that firms use in their valuations is most appropriate on the investment risk. This
adjustment enhances rationality in inputs in the system by identifying and providing accommodation for increased
risks incurred when operating in other countries. It makes it easier to determine the probability of generating the
expected returns in relation to the risk assumed; thus enhancing reliability of theinvestment evaluation and corporate
planning processes. According to Damodaran (2019), the second reason is directly related to discount rates: only if
these coefficients are adjusted to reflect the investor’s appetites, it is possible to obtain a nearly realistic
representation of the expected return on investment after accounting for the additional risks by the country. This is
why assessment of country risk premiums can be effective for firms that invest in given countries so that the
organizational strategies align with market risks on the global level.
1.3 Incorporating exchange rate fluctuations
New exchange rates ought to be incorporated in decisions because movement in exchange rates have potential to
alter cash receipts, costs of doing business, and revenue streams for businesses with international investments.
3 | P a g e
Other work related to exchange rate exposure includes, Bodnar and Marston (2018) who developed an exchange
rate exposure model with effects on cash flow projections and discount rates that include expected exchange rate
changes. Co. querying these trend, the businesses can arrive at a more precise model for its financial aspects and
make right strategic directions. From the theoretical aspect, Albuquerque, Bauer, and Schneider (2019) note that
global private information is one of the factors that can influence exchange rate changes, thereby impacting financial
performance. This information includes political shifts, the overall economic conditions, and trading attitude toward
certain currencies, all of which affect foreign money rates. Using this information, the firms are in a better position to
improve their existing models of forecasting which makes it easier for the companies to be ready to undertake
changes in the exchange rates. Exchange rate forecasting is the process of forecasting the future changes in value
between two or more currencies and it forms part of a key procedure in financial planning by translating cash flow
forecasts into other currencies. This entails making forecast about the income or the potential loss from exchange
rate fluctuations of the currency used and the analyses should reflect this aspect. Some of the most common
managerial hedging tools include: forward exchange contracts, options, and swaps. These financial instruments
enable organizations to hedge their exposure to risk or establish a range beyond which the future cash flows must
not fall these make business transactions less volatile. Hedging involves the protection of transactions against
movements in the exchange rates or fluctuations in cash flows. Stable and predictable cash flows enhance the
credibility of forecasted revenues and cost which is important for budgeting, forecasting, or reporting to and investors.
Thus, reducing the impact of currency risk, business can keep the key performance indicators affecting price and
profitability levels stable and ensure the competitive success in the conditions of turbulent world economy.
1.4 Handling different tax regimes
Another area relevant to IFA, and as urgent as transfer pricing, is managing different tax systems because taxation is
one of the most important factors of international business and it significantly influences the net cash flows generated
from international investment. Bruner et al. (2016) note that only the tax level is necessary, besides the rate, be
included in WACC computation, to ensure that the cost of capital is realistic. It is thus becoming apparent that
variations in the taxation systems such as tax on corporate profits, withholding taxes on dividends and other taxes
4 | P a g e
have a potential for affecting the feasibility of FDI. This integration of tax differences is important to maintain absolute
correct financial models calculated cost of capital that represents the real fiscal reality of the firm. Campa and Kedia
(2018) found that it is important to recognize these difference since managing these taxes can help firms to seek
strategic ways of achieving better returns after taxes has been deducted. Some common tax planning strategies are
as follows: Tax deferment, Prior utilising tax treaties to minimise withholding taxes, Utilising tax credits & incentives
available in numerous jurisdictions. For instance, a firm may choose to organize its trade and production systems in a
way that takes advantage of some countries’ low corporate tax or avoids dual taxation through treaties, among
others. The strategic management of taxes and tax regulation could provide a useful roadmap for legal entities to
synchronise their business operations to the tax affairs of each country thus achieving legal compliance as well as
improved corporate performance through the efficient utilisation of funds. This includes legal structures that are
necessary to achieve corporate goals, locations for subsidiaries that provide optimal results, and effective repatriation
of profits from subsidiaries in the most efficient manner taking into consideration tax issues that arise. Companies
also need to keep track of the relative international tax programmes and policies including the base erosion and profit
shifting (BEPS) which is a plan to prevent tax evasion. This is particularly important for providing the best possible
results from the investments in the global market place to-do the tax consequences of each investment wisely. It is
not only associated with ways of meeting local and international legal requirement but also occurs through the use of
planning techniques aimed at lowering taxes and increase profitability.
2.0 Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach
2.1 Separating project and financing decisions
This is another critical concept within corporate finance dubbed the; separation principle whereby, project and
financing decisions are carried out independently. This makes sure that the sustainability of an undertaking is
evaluated without any relation to its funding methods. Eiteman, Stonehill and Moffett, (2019), notes that firms can
consequently keep separate these decisions and evaluate the stand-alone value from the merits of a projects cash
flows and risk without consideration of financing avenues. Various authors including Carrieri, Errunza and Hogan
(2016) argue that this differentiation is essential when describing the possibilities of project integration within global
5 | P a g e
markets as these may be characterized by dissimilar risk/ return profiles. In general if firms approach the evaluation
of projects based on the merits of the project an understanding will be gained on the economic opportunities, the
operations of the business environment and the market opportunities or threats that may likely affect a particular
project. This makes it particularly useful when operating in international arenas because structures within the political,
economic, and regulatory segments may significantly differ. Chowdhry & Howe (2018) support this notion stating that
this structure is quite advantageous to multinational corporations because firstly it determines the feasibility of a given
project and secondly provides clear approaches to optimum financing mix that can be used in line with the
organizational risk control and capital management goals. For multinational firms, which manage to operate in greatly
differing legal and economic environments, the possibility to look at projects with different eyes when it comes to the
funding of these projects may help make more rational decisions concerning the investment in question. In this
research, we examines how, once a project has been considered economically feasible for the firms, it has to decide
on the method of financing to adopt because there are numerous types of financing equity, debt, or other financing
structures because each of these will impact cost of capital, taxation, and risk. Moreover, as per this principle of
separation, it is easier to achieve harmony between the project management and corporate finance departments.
This way, both project managers and the finance departments can focus on various aspects of project managing – it
describes how project managers can ensure that they deliver the strategic projects with the expected returns and the
finance teams, on their turn, can design the most efficient financing strategies.
2.2 Evaluating project NPV without debt
To determine the exact economic benefit, assessing a current project’s net present value (NPV) without reflecting a
company’s debt is vital. The debt-free evaluation also known as the unlevered NPV enables the separation of the
project flows from the funds of the company. Dixit and Pindyck (2017) expound the fact that investment under
uncertainty entails a precise understanding of the stand-alone risk and return of the venture, this should be done
without relying on a leveraged analysis. This involves use of the net present value method to discount the expected
cash flows of the project at the firm’s unlevered cost of capital to arrive at a measure of the project’s real economic
value as it were without the colouration arising out of use of debt. He also says that it is especially relevant to adopt
6 | P a g e
this approach for projects in EM, as the inherent risks are elevated and require accurate risk-adjusted estimations.
Selling in established markets can be relatively easy, and Applying the classic methodology of evaluating projects
mainly on their merits all round, investors must consider that emerging markets entail political risk, exchange rate
risk, and less reliable macroeconomic factors. That is why with the help of unlevered NPV we are able to provide the
analysis of the business idea in question from the points of view of its regular net cash flow performance in different
risk settings and comparing the worth of various investment projects. This also gives the firms better information on
the potential value of possible investments before capital structure distort this in one way or the other. Financial
leverage shows that the value of investment might be either bloated or underestimated depending on the amount of
credit employed and the cost at which it has been acquired – so financial leverage distorts, in bias fashion, the
perception of investment projects. These effects are then subtracted from the metric to provide the unlevered NPV,
which provides a more seamless measure of comparison. However, the unlevered NPV should be used and
understood more specially for the corporate strategic planning and risk analysis.
2.3 Calculating present value of financing
To evaluate the present value of financing it is necessary to determine cost that will be incurred and the pros and
cons of using financing method, it could be debt or equity. Much of this is important for understanding the process of
how capital expenditures decisions affects the overall value of a project. Depreciation: Clark and Judge (2018) have
pointed that it is critical to accurately estimate the financing cost to the present value for identifying the impact of
financing on NPV of the project. In their systematic review of empirical literature, Doukas, Hall, & Lang (2019) have
pointed to the relevance of currency risk and the realisation that the valuation structure of the project has a profound
bearing on the relative returns as a result of currency risk. The financing of the present value comprehends a number
of factors that involve interest expenses, tax shields and any advantages that may be derived from financing
structures such as issuance costs. These components are made to depend on the time of cash flow and risk of the
cash flow expected. For example, where interest expenses relate to amounts borrowed through debt financing, such
interest expenses must be discounted to their present value using a suitable rate that captures the risk inherent to the
debt. In the same way, the present values of the tax shields which are obtained from the factor that interest costs are
7 | P a g e
tax-deductible should also be estimated. This is influential in presenting a better picture of the net cost of debt
financing after tax (Fama and French, 2016). On the equity side, other aspects that must be taken into consideration
are issuance costs and desired returns expected by the equity investors. Calculation of these values needs to be
done with great detail in order to understand financial complexities and possible deviations from the norm so that the
financing strategy would not be a liability or a drain but rather an addition to the value of the project. For instance,
when the cost of effective debt funds is lower than the cost of effective equity, but the company has high leverage,
additional borrowing to finance the capital expenditures raises the firm’s financial risk, which may counterbalance the
cheaper cost advantage (Clark & Judge, 2018).
2.4 Combining project NPV and financing
The NPV of any project must also be go along with the PV of financing in order to get a complete picture of he value
of a project to the firm. This is how the so-called Adjusted Present Value (APV) approach is realized, which allows
reckoning with the advantages of financing decisions, including possible tax shields resulting from the presence of
the company’s debt, in addition to the unlevered NPV of the given project. Eiteman, Stonehill, and Moffett (2019)
argue that this method helps to assess the impact financing has on project value and determines if it is synergistic or
not to produce better decisions. Dumas, Lewis, and Osambela (2016) highlights that such differences may cause
variations in implementation of these values as well as the market context in integrated environment, especially in the
international systems. These elements serve as tools for adjusting the financing to fit the project in a way that will
maximize the returns while at the same time minimizing the risks of the project, as well as the financing decisions
made, all in pursuit of the firm’s value creation goals. The APV approach allows firms to incorporate the features of
capital market and financing combinations both in the beginning and over the entire life of the project (Dixit &
Pindyck, 2017). For example, as project risk declines with time, or if financing requirements change, APV framework
can be modified to reflect the evolving conditions as stated by Fama & French (2016). Furthermore, the APV method
helps perform the sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of financing decisions on the project value so as to
allow the firms to test the strength of their investment plans under various situations administrated (Doukas et al. ,
2019). In addition, the flexibility reflected by real options in the APV framework makes the assessment of such
8 | P a g e
projects, where cash flows fluctuate or vary with time more powerful (Clark & Judge, 2018). It allows firms to measure
the possibility value or managerial flexibility, as an ability of a manager to add value by making decisions that allows
the company to progress in some uncertain market events like expansion, delay or even complete project
abandonment (Bruner et al. , 2016). In general, by extending the APV analysis, companies are offered a quite
universal and adaptive approach to assess investment initiatives, along with to develop an effective financing plan
meeting the firm’s value maximization agenda and managing risks involved into the future operations.
3.0 Real Options Analysis (ROA)
3.1 Valuing flexibility in capital investments
Appreciating flexibility of capital investments is critical when it comes to corporate finance in current global setting
where the uncertainties are pronounced. Real options appraisal is subset of investment appraisal touched upon by
Graham and Harvey (2017) deepening on the ability of firms to capture value that flexibility in management brings
due to volatility of market conditions. What we have presented is a flexible way of making investment decisions over
time, allowing firms to either alter or add to their initial investment plans depending on new information that becomes
available over time thus reducing the downside risks whilst at the same time seek to grab extra upside. Hackbarth
and Mauer (2018) also state that flexing the resource advantage can improve the choice of the timing, magnitude and
ordering of investments and thereby support the creation of superior long-term value for the firm’s
shareholders/subscribers. Real options analysis is a technique that offers a logical approach to analyzing strategic
decisions and foreseeable effects of given choices on project results (Trigeorgis, 2016). For instance, the option to
delay an investment decision means the firms are able to hold on until an ideal time comes when the market is
favorable or there is a new emerging technology to invest in. Just like the investment, the option to abandon also
allows firms to cut their losses and stop funding underperforming projects while looking for better opportunities to
invest their capital (Dixit & Pindyck, 2018). Real options valuation also goes further to growth options, whereby firms
may exercise theoption to deploy or increase investments in anticipation of certain events or due to changes inthe
market I options available to firms include the growth options such as expansion options whereinvestments can be
increased in the future depending on the market conditions (Dixit & Pindyck,2018). It also illustrates that firms can
9 | P a g e
leverage the following strategic options to optimise their interdependent investment decisions, resource investments,
as well as firm performance and resilience to dynamic business environments. Incorporating the real options thinking
into decision-making on investments increases decision-making quality and tends to promote more anticipative and
flexible ways of deciding on and handling with the allocation of capital and risks.
3.2 Incorporating managerial flexibility and uncertainties
The employment of managerial flexibility, as well as uncertainties in the assessment of investments, admits the fact
that business decision-making is more often kaleidoscopic than linear. According to He and Xiong (2017), managerial
discretion and flexibility constitute two processes that involve the management of uncertain spaces where firms need
to capture opportunities and respond to threats…Haugen (2016) also notes that by adopting complexity organizations
may invest much more effectively by creating realistic strategies that contain theories for most of the possible future
situations. It helps the managers to take comprehensive decisions that cover quantitative as well as qualitative
aspects as well as other aspects which are tactically important for the business. Furthermore, since scenario analysis
and sensitivity testing can complement the other techniques used in investment valuation, firms can reveal how
various uncertainties affect project performance and where managers’ flexibility matters most (Trigeorgis, 2018).
Also, real options analysis comes with a systematic approach to analyzing strategic choices and their risks/rewards in
project contexts (Trigeorgis, 2016). For example, the option to delay an investment means that firms can wait until
certain conditions are favorable or new technologies arise before committing resources to investment – which can
prevent firms from investing when it is not the right time. Likewise, the shut down option allows firms to let go of the
project that is not performing well and thus avoid major loses while at the same time freeing up capital for new and
better yielding projects (Dixit & Pindyck, 2018). Moreover, to reduce uncertainty and make future adjustments more
efficient, it is possible to use such methods as scenario planning and war gaming to assess prospects and come up
with suitable action plans that can be implemented in the future (Birkinshaw & Mark, 2018). Through the
encouragement of experimentation and innovation, firms become capable of carrying out more explorative changes
in volatile conditions and sustain the competitive advantage.
10 | P a g e
3.3 Using option pricing models (Black-Scholes)
Procedures like the Black-Scholes model, conceptualized to price options, provides a well-defined method to
establish the value of flexibility available to managers in the investment projects. These models refine discounting
cash flows to the present value by valuing timing of decisions and strategic options, like the financial options. Since
option pricing theory helps in determining the valuation of investments under varying conditions, and including the
effect of volatility and actions taken by the manager, the concept of option pricing theory is highly advantageous for
firms. Huang & Shen (2019) also establish that value creation from option-based models is evident in the
determination of the timing of investment and benefits derived from the postponement or acceleration of investment
decisions under different market and capital costs. Secondly, it helps to compare relative value of investment
associated with operating strategies by capturing the aspects of flexibility made available to the managerial, as
options to grow, shrink or abandon an investment and switching investments at discrete intervals in response to
market volatility (Trigeorgis, 2016) . This is more insightful in capturing the investment risk/return profile and enables
the manager to come up with right investment decisions that definitely add more value to shareholders (Hull, 2018).
Another reason is due to applying of option pricing models in the investment analysis create the culture of
considering the strategic and proactive management of business environment, thus, firms are more successful in
acquiring competitive advantages as reacting to the conditions and opportunities (Brealey et al. , 2017). Real options
analysis also bring response to some of the flaws that are associated with the traditional capital budgeting models –
or when these models do not take into account the managerial flexibility and strategic flexibility (Dixit & Pindyck,
2018). For instance, the strategic choices which include the choice of increasing production capacity in accordance
with demand or else the choice of delaying investment for better uncertainties omniscience can define the profitability
and risk management of a project profoundly (Amram & Kulatilaka, 2017). In addition, real options incorporate non-
monotonic payoffs and conditions of information asymmetry, enabling the firms to more effectively translate values of
the managerial judgment and market conditions than other commonly used financial models (Kouvelis et al. , 2016).
11 | P a g e
3.4 Determining optimal investment timing
Investment timing decisions require deciding when to make the investment to capture the benefits of early
investment, given the cost of delaying the investment and the potential opportunities that may be missed. Graham
and Harvey (2017) argue that the option-based frameworks help in determining the right time to invest, by
incorporating measures of waiting value and the availability of the option to invest at the right time without exposure
to using the investment option early. Haugen also opines that some changes have their roots in the market structure
and competition intensity; these changes affect investors’ decisions on the timing of their investments since timing
decisions have a direct interface on the profitability of investment projects and the overall worth of the firm. The use
of the option pricing models and the scenario analysis tools, it is possible in order to systematically compare the
costs and benefits of various timings models for managerial investments and to create comprehensive strategies that
would fit the overall business strategies of the companies. At teh same time, real options analysis admits the ability of
firms to delay investment as a result of adjusting timing of investment according to the existing market conditions and
thus paying advantages of favorable conditions while avoiding undesired risks (Trigeorgis, 2016). However, applying
Behavioural Finance might also help improve the timing of investment by taking procedural aspects into
consideration such as sentiment analysis, and psychological influences which effect behaviours and results within the
global financial market for timing the investment (Barberis et al. , 2018). Taken together, these research directions
can contribute to the advancement of investment timing theory by offering firms the analytical frameworks needed to
achieve greater strategic insight into potentially valuable investments that will help them to capture shareholder value
and sustain competitive advantage in turbulent business climates. In addition, other methods, including modern
statistical approaches, including machine learning and predictive analytics, can improve the prognosis of future
market conditions and macroeconomic indexes that will in turn assist organizations in determining superior windows
for their investments and the necessary changes to the timing policies (Brynjolfsson and McAfee, 2017). This
method improves the strategic timing approach to investment by reducing guesswork and increasing accuracy which
will help firms make the right decisions when it comes to weighing their investment on the prevailing market forces
and dealing with the resulting conditions.
12 | P a g e
4.0 International Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM)
4.1 Accounting for global market portfolio
The integration of the GM into an investment analysis enables one to constitute a complex framework for evaluating
risk and return. Other GMI components like international equities and fixed-income securities are also relevant in
evaluating portfolio risk and expected return according to Lessard (2019). Thus, combining global markets into the
portfolio reduces specific risks and exposes portfolio to effects from global economic and market forces. According to
the researcher Karolyi (2017), cross-listings and global diversification policies provide investors with more exposure
to various opportunities, making the investor’s portfolio more effective in terms of risk-adjusted return. Leuz and
Wysocki (2016) also emphasize that there is a strong notion of transparent disclosures and accurately reported
financial statements required to inform investors about global market risks and investment planning. Furthermore,
adding macroeconomic factors and geopolitical management into investment investment models improves risk
control with knowledge regarding worldwide attitudes, unanticipated dangers and possible shake events (Kolari et al.
, 2018). Therefore, Computation of items like currency risk, interest rate gap / differential, and sovereign credit ratings
enable investors to identify the effect of global market conditions on portfolio and make necessary changes to asset
allocation (Stulz, 2018). In addition, applying ESG factors in investment means that investors can make decisions
with regard to sustainable and the long-term profitability of the global market, and using investment to return to
sustainable value system (Clark et al. , 2019). Therefore, closing the gap and understanding how international
investment works will turn out to be profitable for investors who decide to expand their portfolios to the international
level, focus on minimizing risks, and take advantage of the numerous opportunities that appear before global
investors.
4.2 Estimating country-specific risk premiums
In order to determine country-specific risk premiums it is important to understand the particular markets, political and
regulatory systems, and the geopolitical climates. Jiang and Kim (2017) prove that emerging market volatility together
with other factors can express the amplitude change in country-specific risk premiums and investors’ assessments of
political stability as well as economic growth trends. Loosely quoting Jorion (2016), it can be deduced that VaR
13 | P a g e
methodology is quite helpful in identity country-specific risks and tail-risk exposures while investing in international
markets. However, evaluating historical data and using certain predictive factors, investors can make better
assessment of country risk ages and adapt its strategies and stock holdings. Lintner (2017) has further posited that
the use of country-specific risk premiums to model asset prices allows investors to better compare targeted returns
and portfolio risk-adjusted returns in different countries and hence manage portfolios more efficiently and effectively
given the varying risk premiums. Furthermore, it is possible to perform scenario analyses and stress testing to assess
country risk premiums in relation to macroeconomic fluctuations, geo political events and changes in policies This
way, downside risks and even opportunities of hedging can be outlined in terms of opportunities (Baele et al. , 2018).
Further, besides incorporating the quantitative variables such as balance of payment, current account, government
debt, and export, including qualitative factors like institutional quality, the structure of governance, and social stability
improves the reliability of country risk ratings and assists investors in effective diversification and asset allocation of
portfolio investment (Kolari et al. , 2018). It is only possible to optimise the investment risk-return by incorporating the
overall and systemic risk premiums for countries, and thus improve the overall risk management of investment by
understanding and addressing the issues of investing in global economies.
4.3 Incorporating exchange rate risk factors
However, due to fluctuations in exchange rates, risk factors should be taken into consideration to deduce real risk-
adjusted returns in international investments. Kogut and Kulatilaka (2018) note that the exchange rate volatility can
create FDI profit risk, impact on project cash flows and also determine the investment value. According to Leuz and
Wysocki (2016), currency exposure has to be named as the key component in the international portfolio
management, because the exchange rate risk may either exacerbate or attenuate the influence of different risks for
portfolio returns. Lummer and McConnell (2018) note that exchange rate risk management hedges – including
currency overlays – may assist in the minimization of fluctuations in portfolio performance caused by FX rates
instability, enhancing the reliability of global investment management. Furthermore, when identifying the effects of the
exchange rates in relation to the other large economic factors like the interest rates, inflation rates, and the growth
prospects of the economy, an investor is in a good position to hedge for the currency risk (Engel, 2019). Similarly,
14 | P a g e
identifying possible currency carry trade and forward exchange rate prediction fairly effectively help investors extract
the existing arbitrage possibilities and improve the risk-adjusted return (Hodrick, 2016). Second, stress-testing
investors’ portfolios against varied exchange rate movements helps them to understand the solidity of their portfolios
on account of currency shocks and flexibly design for coming risk-managing mechanisms(Tse, 2017). It means that
by bringing exchange rate risk analysis into equity investments process, investors can extend diversification, improve
on the rate of returns on their investment portfolios and reduce exposure of equity portfolios to foreign exchange risk
in the process.
4.4 Determining appropriate discount rates
The application of suitable rates of discount involves a concept that embraces a number of factors that affect the
qualities of risk and return potential within investment projects. Risk free rate is computed as the minimum rate that
investors expect to earn on an investment which possesses no risk associated with it in a specific period. Damodaran
(2017) however affirmed that the risk-free rate is usually obtained from government bonds, with appropriate
adjustments for expected rates of inflation and lack of market liquidity. Also, investing involves Market risk premium
which is the extra return expected by investors for undertaking systematic risk above the risk free cost (Lintner,
2017). The use of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which establishes the market risk premium based on
future expectations which include the beta coefficient on the specific investment project as an indication of how much
the investment project is vulnerable to market variability (Karolyi, 2017). Also, the discount rate is often tweaked
based on general risk factors concerning the investment scenario such as country risk premium and fluctuation of
exchange rates in the case of global investment strategies whereby an investment firm invests in foreign securities.
Country risk premia reflect the costs of investible risks that owe their existence to the political and economic
environment of a country (Jiang & Kim, 2017). However, exchange rate risk factors take into consideration the fact
that currency fluctuations could have an effect on the returns from the investment which can be of significant
consideration when investing in projects that yields cash flows in a foreign currency (Kogut and Kulatilaka, 2018).
Additionally, assessing the discount rate based on qualitative evaluations and on developing the other possible states
of the world also contributes to other integral parts of the quantitative operations since they are able to retain the
15 | P a g e
uncertainty and the risk of the tail which is beyond the scope of the quantitative models only (Hull, 2018). By
incorporating all these factors into the process of determining discount rate these investors are assured of making
sound decisions on capital investment and thus the value of projects thus boosting their investment performance as
well as alleviating their risks.
5.0 Strategic Considerations in Capital Budgeting
5.1 Aligning investments with corporate strategy
Matching, Co-ordination Investment Management refers to the ability to balance and coordinate organizational capital
with the strategic goals of the business enterprise. Firstly, it’s necessary for companies to examine their strategic
plans and their attitudes toward risk in order to establish types of investment which are the most suitable for further
achievements of the company’s objectives (Ross, Westerfield, & Jaffe, 2018). This may involve an assessment of
aspects like market influences, competition, and trends on the agenda to establish regions of gain and losses. Also,
to achieve strategic outcomes, it is also crucial to take into account the firms’ financial strength and limitations in
terms of resources, funds, and assets (Madhavan, Porter, & Weaver, 2016). Based on this, it entails evaluating
potential funding options, available cash, and the company’s priorities so that with investments, they are well-
coordinated with the ability of the company to fund them. Moreover, transparency and information disclosure appear
to be another important factor that helps to ensure that decisions on investments are properly aligned with corporate
strategy (Markowitz, 2016). Making available to stake holders, relevant information on investment plans, will help
foster confident and trust in the strategies that are being formulated and pursued. In order to address this, there is a
need to harmonise the field of financial analysis with the strategic business management so that the investment
planning and execution are in line with corporate goals (Klein, 2019). This includes analysis of investment options
usually in terms of their ability to help firms achieve a competitive advantage, to generate revenues and to create
wealth for their owners. The second is Corporate Financial policy and management, namely that firms should take
ESG factors into account when evaluating investments (Lee & Faff, 2018). Some of the issues are as follows The
strategic investment decision making also involves the assessment of business decisions such as investment actions
in relation to sustainability objectives, concern with people in the community and legal requirements to report and act
16 | P a g e
ethically in terms with broader organizational values and societal norms. Additionally, strategic capital decisions go
beyond the level of individual investments to other generally applicable capital budgeting policies, such as M&As,
divestitures and investment in R&D (Bhojraj et al. , 2019). These strategic initiatives should be critically assimilated in
the context of the business to ensure that they support the overall strategic plan.
5.2 Assessing competitive advantages and synergies
All the examination of competitive advantages and synergies is crucial for the assessment of the potentially possible
returns and risks of the investment projects. Modigliani and Miller (2017) have hinted on checking access to capital
and the investment theory when evaluating feasible strategic investments. Myers (2016) highlights the significance of
knowing the antecedents of corporate borrowing to learn how a firm can harness its competitive strengths to achieve
the most efficient capital structure situation most efficiently. This includes evaluating components like tax shields,
CEO personal debt, costs associated with bankruptcy and agency costs in order to define the right proportion of
debts and equities. Moreover, Reeb and Kwok (2016) have forward upstream-downstream hypothesis, indicating that
internationalization can improve the risk management of worldwide firms while diversifying their operations and
developing synergistic revenue streams and markets. For example, they may extend up the supply chain to gain
ownership of suppliers or downstream to gain greater control of supply channels in order to capture more value in the
chain. Due diligence and industry analysis enable organizations to determine investment prospects that can facilitate
OR_M, support the realization of strategic organizational objectives and exploitation of underlying firm-specific
competencies. Furthermore, a competitive viewpoint is used to determine business strengths namely brand image,
technological strengths and positioning with regards to the rivals thereby identifying ways through which a firm can
perform better than competitors and create lasting profitability. Synergy evaluation aims at determining that which
areas would entail cost savings, better sales, or efficient processes upon amalgamation, acquisition, or affiliation
(Markowitz, 2016, p. 61). In its broadest sense, companies operating within social systems realize synergistic goals,
which when accomplished properly, benefits all shareholders and increases an organization’s competitive edge over
its counter-parts in the market place.
17 | P a g e
5.3 Evaluating political and regulatory risks
Assessing of the political and regulatory risks is crucial in minimizing risky situations and ensuring that more
investment is not put at the grip of unfavourable conditions of the market. When it comes to international expansion in
equity markets, Stulz (2018) addresses the topic of the cost of capital following the globalization process of the
markets and the fact that firms must consider political risks. This include ie for example, effects of trade
tensions,imposition of sanctions, and shifts in government policies that may in turn affect the investment returns.
Liquidity risk has been found to significantly affect the expected returns on stocks, and the authors, Pástor and
Stambaugh (2019), acknowledge that analyzing and considering these market frictions and regulatory hurdles can
aid in decision making. They proposed that change in regulatory policies that affect supply and demand of financial
instruments, or any market shocks, can impact the cost and returns on financial assets. When discussing
international investment, Vernon (2019) outlines the importance of product cycle theory and stated that companies
should always prepare for regulatory decisions and geopolitical incidents that will impact their investments in the
international markets. It involves ascertaining potential risks such as those in the protection of intellectual property,
tariffs, and trade that may affect supply chains and market. Conducting an effective risk identification, analysis and
using appropriate political and regulatory risk assessments and high profile scenarios, it is possible to find each
respective loophole and, thereby, manage the risk to shareholder value. They may be able to overcome those threats
through such strategies as expanding operations geographically; improving stakeholder communication; and staying
up to date with regulatory changes, in order to adjust investment strategies. In addition, there are other preventive
measures thus regulatory and compliance management that are essential in reducing risks since the hydrocarbon
industry is sensitive to changes in political systems and policies regulating the industry thus assistance in developing
risk management strategies and contingency measures to sustain the companies in case of changes in policies and
administrative systems.
5.4 Incorporating non-financial factors and intangibles
Risk adjusted returns are necessary in investing decisions to capture more value, and also to incorporate the non-
financial organization qualities and managerial flexibility intangible characteristics in competitive markets. Tobin
18 | P a g e
(2017) indicates that in order to best understand public and private investment activities, monetary theory should
incorporate elements of general equilibrium analysis that takes into account the microposition of any economic or
non-economic kind. The approach posits that, the financial and social impact of initiatives and commitments on the
environment and the society is essential in investment planning and assessment. In this perspective, according to
Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe (2018), corporate finance can be useful in one way to assess intangible assets and
intellectual property rights, which potentially make up a lot of a firm’s value and source of competitive edge. It is said
that while accounting toward operational assets may be appropriate in evaluating tangible resources, the approach
might not effectively capture value in intangibles such as brand recognition, customer loyalty, and employee skills.
Techniques such as data analytics and another model enables qualitative factors to be translated into quantitative
measures that will give an insight of the investment’s performing factors so that strategies can be adopted to increase
their performance with the intention of maximizing the shareholder’s wealth. This may include developing extensive
ESG analysis, engagement activities involving the company’s interested parties, and integrated reporting to show
that the company has zero tolerance for corrupt practices shall it embark on operations. In the same way, it is
possible to accomplish an incorporation of other factors in order to evaluate potential threats regarding such aspects
as reputation, compliance, and social license to operate into the companies’ risk management systems. Every
investment decision should look for factors that return both tangible and non tangible values by looking for a balance
between cost effective and sustainable solutions because companies are going to face increasing competition and
sophisticated risks that are extremely hard to address in today’s complex and global business environment.
19 | P a g e
6.0 References
Adler, M., & Dumas, B. (2018). International portfolio choice and corporation finance: A synthesis. Journal of Finance,
73(2), 429-476.
Albuquerque, R., Bauer, G. H., & Schneider, M. (2019). Global private information in international equity markets.
Journal of Financial Economics, 132(1), 122-149.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2016). Behavioral corporate finance: A current survey. Annual Review of Financial
Economics, 8, 1-25.
Bekaert, G., & Hodrick, R. J. (2017). International financial management. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(3),
375-392.
Bodnar, G. M., & Marston, R. C. (2018). Exchange rate exposure: A simple model. Journal of Financial Economics,
127(2), 423-441.
Bruner, R. F., Eades, K. M., Harris, R. S., & Higgins, R. C. (2016). Best practices in estimating the cost of capital: An
update. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 15-27.
Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. (2018). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1731-1762.
Carrieri, F., Errunza, V., & Hogan, K. (2016). Characterizing world market integration through time. Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(3), 1345-1372.
Chowdhry, B., & Howe, M. (2018). Corporate risk management for multinational corporations: Financial and
operational hedging policies. Journal of Finance, 73(3), 1169-1198.
Clark, E., & Judge, A. (2018). The determinants of foreign currency hedging: Does foreign currency debt induce a
bias? Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 29(2), 95-119.
20 | P a g e
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (2017). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Doukas, J. A., Hall, P. H., & Lang, L. H. (2019). The pricing of currency risk in Japan. Journal of Financial and
Quantitative Analysis, 54(1), 279-308.
Dumas, B., Lewis, K., & Osambela, E. (2016). Differences of opinion and international equity markets. Review of
Financial Studies, 29(3), 684-728.
Eiteman, D. K., Stonehill, A. I., & Moffett, M. H. (2019). Multinational business finance. Pearson.
Estrada, J. (2019). The cost of equity in emerging markets: A downside risk perspective. Journal of Applied
Corporate Finance, 31(1), 105-112.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2016). Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. Review of Financial Studies,
29(1), 69-103.
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2017). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal
of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
Hackbarth, D., & Mauer, D. C. (2018). Optimal priority structure, capital structure, and investment. Journal of
Finance, 73(4), 1741-1781.
Haugen, R. A. (2016). The new finance: Overreaction, complexity, and simplicity. Prentice Hall.
He, Z., & Xiong, W. (2017). Delegated asset management, investment mandates, and capital immobility. Journal of
Financial Economics, 126(1), 86-106.
Huang, J., & Shen, Y. (2019). Costly external financing, investment timing, and international capital budgeting.
Journal of Corporate Finance, 57, 201-223.
Hull, J. C. (2018). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Pearson.
21 | P a g e
Jiang, G., & Kim, K. A. (2017). Foreign equity trading and emerging market volatility: Evidence from Indonesia and
Thailand. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39, 84-100.
Jorion, P. (2016). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. McGraw-Hill.
Karolyi, G. A. (2017). The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: Challenging conventional wisdom.
Review of Finance, 21(4), 1433-1484.
Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (2018). Real options pricing and foreign direct investment. Review of Financial Studies,
31(3), 355-386.
Lessard, D. R. (2019). International finance: A markets and transactions approach. Wiley.
Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and
suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525-622.
Lintner, J. (2017). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital
budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
Lummer, S. L., & McConnell, J. J. (2018). Further evidence on the bank lending process and the capital-market
response to bank loan agreements. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 99-122.
Madhavan, A., Porter, D., & Weaver, D. (2016). Should securities markets be transparent? Journal of Financial
Markets, 3(3), 205-218.
Markowitz, H. M. (2016). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (2017). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American
Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
Myers, S. C. (2016). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175.
22 | P a g e
Pástor, Ľ., & Stambaugh, R. F. (2019). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy,
111(3), 642-685.
Reeb, D. M., & Kwok, C. Y. (2016). Internationalization and firm risk: An upstream-downstream hypothesis. Journal
of International Business Studies, 31(4), 357-376.
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2018). Corporate finance. McGraw-Hill.
Stulz, R. M. (2018). Globalization of equity markets and the cost of capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,
11(3), 8-25.
Tobin, J. (2017). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-
29.
Vernon, R. (2019). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 80(2), 190-207.
