. I think we all tend to use logic on a daily basis. We use it in our communication with
others. We use it with the decisions that we make throughout the day. We make choices
based on that logic.I am generally an optimist. The majority of my family tend to
pessimistic. This leads to disagreement on a regular basis. I then try using logic to explain
situations instead of letting there one side to an argument. Specifically with my husband,
when I attempt to logic he can get a little irritated. He feels I am not taking his side or
agreeing with him automatically. What I am doing, is not necessarily disagreeing, but trying
to get to see there are other ways to look at a situation. An example was recently. He had a
disagreement with a manager at his job a few weeks ago. They had a discussion on the
phone a few days ago and apparently the manager didn’t have a lot to say to him so he
assumed that the manager was still angry. I explained, that although that is one possibility,
there are others. Like, the manager could be having a bad day, or maybe he just got some
bad news. There are times, when my logic makes him less upset and that is really my goal.
An inductive argument is used to show the likelihood that an argument will prove true in the
future. The deductive argument offers a true premise which guarantees a true conclusion. As
you can see; the difference is that while one "may" lead to a true conclusion, the other, will
lead to a true conclusion. I use logic in general conversations daily when I ask my
subordinates to complete a required task by a certain time. There is no questioning what I
want to get done; there is no questioning, as to when it needs to be done. I have given them
the requirement; I need the Fourth Floor Conference Room vacuumed, trash removed, and
set up per the diagram I have given you by 10am. This does not allow for interpretation- this
is a deductive argument. Had a I given them an inductive argument; I need the Conference
Room cleaned and set-up. This argument doesn't tell them where I need the specific action
done in and has an open time. So if they completed the task, at anytime, and at any
conference room, the conclusion would be that they did what I asked. The difference
between inductive and deductive argument is that an inductive argument is not completely
true at the end and the deductive argument is more based on facts or true things, for
example, inductive argument: the day is cloudy it will probably rain, deductive argument: I
have an apple tree, therefore, it will give me apples. Logic will make things easier when
using properly, at work when we know that there is a cut off time for UPS to pick up the
daily shipments if we want a particular package to leave today it will have to be processed
before the cutoff time that will be logical and basically not doing it will create problems at
the end of the day it is very important to know the difference and recognized that both types
of arguments are used on a daily basis but will have to be balanced cannot use one or the
other all the time when ask if you will be on time for work cannot answer if I wake up on
time will probably be on time instead of waking up on time will assure that I will be on time
for work. An inductive argument assumes that something is likely. The conclusion will
usually be likely of the premise but not definitive. An example would be, "My friend likes
potato chips. I have an extra bag of potato chips. My friend would probably like it if I gave
my extra bag of potato chips to her." In deductive arguments the conclusion is true of the
premise. The premise are presented as facts. Then the conclusion is a sum of those facts. An
example would be, "I am a woman. I have brown hair. Therefore, I am a brown haired
woman." A most noticeable difference between the two arguments are that inductive
arguments assume something is likely and deductive arguments present factual premises. In
a general conversation I think that I use inductive arguments a lot. If something is likely then
I presume it may be true. I think deductive arguments are harder to come up with and
therefore not used in general conversation as much. I think rhetoric is used a lot in
conversation but they are not very logical. The structure of an argument matters because if it
is not specific enough then a conclusion can be harder to prove. It can confuse the other
person, be weak, or convey a false message. Be sure to present the argument in a logical
way that is understandable. If you made an argument that was not well thought through and
it involved another person then it could upset them. They could take it the wrong way or not
know how to solve the issue. Inductive arguments are just a partial truth; while a deductive
argument eliminates all other possibilities before coming to a conclusion/decision. I tend to
be a pessimist. I tend to not believe anything until I see it. I don’t trust a lot of people
because I have been let down so many times. As a result, I know now that I tend to use
inductive arguments a lot of the time. For example, most of the time, our IT team does not
follow through or give us a heads up when something has happened or is scheduled to
happen. And while times, unfortunately, it is true, it is not always true. I hope that I use logic
every day. I think that it is important to think things through before coming to any decision.
I work with a great team and we listen to each other before deciding on anything. One
person can't think of all of the possible outcomes/roadblocks. That is why it is important to
have a great team surrounding you and to listen to everyone before making a decision. I
have found this week’s reading material about inductive and deductive arguments material
very interesting and insightful. My take on differences of each are that deductive arguments
stem from generalized facts which can often lead to a true specific conclusion, whereas
inductive arguments are based on generalized conclusions that use specific facts to support
an idea which may or may not lead to a valid argument. From my personal experience, I
must say that I use deductive reasoning more than inductive reasoning in general
conversations because I generally provide widespread statements to support a specific point
of view when having an argument or discussion on a topic. Arguments can be difficult in
and of itself, as they normally stir up strong emotions from each opposing side to convince
or persuade others that their point of view the correct choice. Using logic and structure could
have some negative effect on personal relationships and communication because the person
that uses such methods, can be perceived as a smart aleck or know-it-all, making the other
person feel insecure and that their point of view is weak, which can lead to an even bigger
issue. The main difference between inductive and deductive arguments is fact and
probability. With deductive arguments, the goal is to seek out validity/facts. With inductive
arguments, it's based on expectations or the probability of something being correct.In
regards to using logic in general conversation, I believe it's important to do. No matter what
environment I am in (work, home, or otherwise), I have found that deductive reasoning is
something that I automatically do. In my experience, when I have previously used inductive
reasoning, my arguments were weaker or altogether invalid. I avoid this when I use
deductive reasoning.I can't think of any negative examples in my life in which I have used
logic and structure. I think it has been very helpful in my relationships and communication
because I remain open-minded and seek out the truth/facts. I don't see a situation in which it
would be harmful to check the the validity of a premise/conclusion. Deductive arguments
are arguments based upon facts that are always true. Inductive arguments are arguments
based on probability, so they may or may not be true. Most of the time, I think logic should
be used in general conversation. If a person speaks with logic, more people will listen and
understand what is trying to be communicated. However, in a relaxed relationship when two
people understand each other, it is not necessary to use as much logic because good friends
will know when you are joking and when you are being serious.In a work related
environment it is vital to use logic and structure while communications. For example, if a
person in the workplace constructs a speech to give in front of a board of directors, it is best
to form their argument or motive for the speech and incorporate logic, structure and
deductive reasoning in order to get the point across and gain the attention of the people on
the board. With logic, structure and facts, the people on the board will know that you are
confident in your work and they will gain the confidence and acceptance in your work as
well. However, if I tried to use logic and structure in everyday conversations with my
Fiancé, he would get pretty upset with me for always trying to be right. There is a fine
balance between personal conversations and work conversations. They both have their place
and can be crossed at times, but it is important to know who you are talking to before you
structure a conversation. A Inductive argument includes strong support for the premises but
does not offer a guarantee of truth. Whereas an deductive argument, the premises are true
with a guaranteed truth of the conclusion.I try to use logic in my everyday general
conversations especially with co-workers; I have found that most people do what is best for
themselves therefore, when a co-worker comes to me with a complaint about our boss I ask
them to provide concrete examples of their complaint, this helps me to decipher if the co-
worker is being snide or truly has a valid complaint about our boss. My fiancé is a long-haul
truck driver and we communicate via text message daily; there are times when I answer him
in a way he feels is very short and therefore, he feels I am upset with him. I have learned
with him I need to use the acronym LOL or a happy emoji at the end of my messages, so he
knows I am not upset with him. Logically my fiance and myself both know I am not usually
upset. However, because he is gone for long periods of time on the road as well as being
alone, he needs that reassurance from me. Him bringing this to my attention, helped me
realize my text messages can come across a bit short not just with him but with others as
well. I am now more aware and reread a message before I send it to ensure I do not come
across in an abrupt manner. There are two basic types of arguments. One type is deductive.
In a deductive argument, if the premises are true then the conclusion must be true. The other
type is inductive. In an inductive argument, if all the premises are true then there is a high
probability that the conclusion is true; but that doesn’t guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
The premises offer support, not proof for a conclusion. An inductive argument can be altered
by obtaining new premises, but a deductive argument can’t be.
Logic is used all the time in conversations. Whether the conversation is simple or complex.
It helps you to not assume everything we hear or are told is true as well as forming opinions
and judgments.In our lives we are constantly discussing and debating things with our
friends, coworkers, and loved ones. Without good use of logic and structure, relationships
can be affected negatively. There is a possibility that there will be miscommunication and
having weak or untrue arguments or opinions can cause frustration and hurt feelings between
people. To prevent this, I always try to stay open minded and ask lots of questions for
clarity.Inductive argument differs from deductive arguments simple because in an inductive
argument the premises may begin strong and seems to be true but doesn't hold any
supportive facts but partial truth but the deductive argument is an argument that holds
truthfulness of the conclusion and also provides supportive facts for the argument.On a daily
basis I am a logical thinker whether I am at home or at work. Most people would say it
depends on the current situation or the type of conversation they are having. I never really
thought about inductive thinking/arguments until now. I always have proof/facts that can
support my argument when I'm in my professional setting and even personal. Some people
just like the way the argument sounds because it sounds creditable without proof.When
using logic and structure it could interfere with my personal relationships and also me
communicating because i assume something is correct because it sounds good without facts
to support itself. For an example working the healthcare we depend on facts and truth. We
need supportive information and not something that sounds strong without facts. A lot of our
patient need supportive facts which will determine their decisions. I have great relationships
with my patients and they trust my word. We all communicate differently and we don't want
to ruin personal relationships because we lack communication skills. Inductive arguments
are when the premises can more than likely follow the conclusion, but act as support rather
than confirmation and proof for the conclusion. With inductive reasoning you will see key
words like "probable," "most likely," and so on. With inductive arguments, I like to think
that they able to host grey area because it is just support, it is not backing up the conclusion
by saying yes or no.Deductive arguments have premises that follow the conclusion. Rather
than acting as support for the conclusion, they are acting as proof for the conclusion.
Deductive arguments may have key words like "definitely" and "absolutely." The premises
of a deductive argument provide a guaranteed truth for the conclusion.
With most of my formal conversations, I always try to use logic. When using logic in a
conversation, you are practicing your reasoning skills and you are wanting it to be correct
reasoning. Whether you are faced with an issue that you are trying to resolve, or a problem
you are trying to solve with another person, or even for yourself, you want to use logic. That
includes open minded thinking, dismissing subjects or facts that have no relation to the
problem and taking into consideration what is in front of you and then continuing with
further research. Deductive arguments are presented with a premise/statement and then
researched for truth where inductive arguments begin with support and no proof, then
researched for theories/truth. I try to use logic when having conversations as logic is
important when trying to be open minded in the search for truth. Logic assists us in deciding
the difference between what is true and false. Logic and structure is important to form and
convey thoughts in an intellectual manner and helps us to build valid arguments while
offering supporting information. In everyday life we are constantly forming opinions and
arguing all sorts of different topics, without logic and structure in these arguments personal
relationships can be affected due to not presenting fair arguments or facts, which lead to bad
feelings and frustration. Lack of communication or poor communication skills can affect
personal relationships in a negative way, when someone is unclear of what you are trying to
say or the tone in which you are saying it feelings can get hurt. Asking the right questions,
having an open mind and being mindful of how you communicate can make your personal
relationships and communication a positive experience. Deductive arguments are arguments
that the premises guarantees the truthfulness of the judgement. While, inductive arguments
are arguments that the premises probably or maybe goes to the truthfulness of the
conclusion. Deductive arguments are thought to be true or false, in contrast inductive
arguments are merely stronger or weaker.I think depending upon the context of
conversations and who I am conversating with, I can use logic quite a bit in my
conversations. When you are simply talking about how someone's day has been, you can
easily use inductive reasoning depending on how they answer you to infer things about their
day that may or may not be correct.When using logic and structure it could affect my
personal relationships and communications by coming to wrongful conclusions from time to
time. This could affect my relationships negatively since I am assuming that what I probably
think is true. I think when communicating with people, especially ones you do not know as
well, using inductive arguments can be not the best way to approach things since they are
not always factual conclusions. Nowadays, communicating effectively with one another can
be hard since everyone communicates in their own way.
