1
Section 1: Overview of the Evidence-Based Project
Introduction
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the highest reported sexually transmitted
infections (STI) within the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[CDC], 2012a). The rate of vaccine administration among adolescent males is much less
than among females. According to the CDC, 2012b, 20.8% of adolescent males (11 to 17
years of age) have received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, and only 6.8% have
completed the entire HPV vaccine series. There are approximately 79 million Americans
living with HPV. The CDC (2014b) has estimated that 14 million new HPV infections
are diagnosed each year (men and women combined). There are so many new HPV
infections that all sexually active men in the United States will contract at least one type
of this virus annually (CDC, 2013a).
The issue of HPV transmission among males is overwhelming, and current
estimates are that over 400 men will develop penile cancer, 1,500 will develop anal
cancer, and 5,600 will develop oropharyngeal cancer each year (CDC, 2014b). The
lifetime costs associated with treating chronic STIs, including HPV, is approximately $16
billion. Since HPV is one of the most commonly acquired STIs, it is one of the most
expensive to treat, due to the volume of new infections that are diagnosed each year
(CDC, 2013b). Many adolescents will be exposed to HPV within the first year of
becoming sexually active (Daley, 2011). As a result, the need to improve HPV
vaccinations among adolescent males is a public health issue that health care providers
must address during clinic appointments.
2
This project was based on the needs of the community (Kettner, Moroney, &
Martin, 2013). Nurses are expected to understand the community in which they reside
and practice professional nursing. Understanding the community refers to the health
status as well as any potential threats to health and safety (American Nurses Association
[ANA], 2001). According to a nurse at a health care facility in a rural town in Texas,
primary health care providers have identified underutilization of the HPV vaccine as a
public health problem (H. Jeffreys, personal communication, September 8, 2013). One
potential threat to the health of the identified rural community is the spread of STIs.
Health care providers must address this public health issue during clinic appointments,
such as those appointments for seasonal illnesses and annual school physicals (H.
Jeffreys, personal communication, August 5, 2014). Health promotion and disease
prevention requires a variety of complex interventions from all health care providers
within the community. This scholarly project addresses a public health issue that is
focused on the individual patient, the family unit, and the community.
Background
Researchers have identified over 100 different types of HPV (McCutcheon,
2009). Of these different types, approximately 30 are known to be transmitted sexually.
An individual may have an active infection with more than one type of HPV at the same
time. When compared to other STIs, HPV cannot be cultured. Diagnosis is often made
upon physical examination with most individuals being asymptomatic. Once the HPV
infection is present, there is no cure, and the focus of treatment is to control the number
of visible lesions, regardless of the anatomical site (McCutcheon, 2009).
3
HPV prevention should include more than the vaccine. The male adolescent may
require education on the appropriate use of condoms. In addition, it is also important for
the adolescent to understand that HPV infections can spread to areas that condoms do not
protect, such as the pubic area (Jordan, 2008). It is equally important to teach parents of
male adolescents the importance of HPV and STI prevention (McCutcheon, 2009).
Vaccinating males against HPV can be effective not only for the male, but for
each sexual partner. Effective inoculation requires a series of three injections that should
be administered over a 6-month period. The effectiveness of the HPV vaccine is
approximately 89.3% if the entire vaccination series is completed (Campos-Outcalt,
2012). The CDC recommends that the vaccine be administered before the initiation of
sexual activity (Johnston, 2011). The vaccine recommended for maximum protection is
the HPV4 vaccine that is designed to protect individuals against HPV Types 6, 11, 16,
and 18 (CDC, 2011). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
recommends that the vaccine be administered to males between the ages of 11 and 21
years. Additionally, the vaccine should be administered to men between the ages of 22
and 26 years who are known to have sex with men or who are infected with HIV
(Campos-Outcalt, 2012). For the purposes of this project, the focus was on parents of
adolescent males between the ages of 11 and 17 years.
The CDC is the foremost authority on communicable diseases and the vaccines
that can prevent those diseases in the United States. There are no federal or state
regulations in the United States that mandate the HPV vaccine for all adolescents. Many
health care providers continue to present the HPV vaccine as an optional vaccination as
4
compared to those vaccinations that are required. As a result, this leads to missed
opportunities for vaccination. Additionally, health care providers are reluctant to engage
in discussions regarding HPV and the vaccine, and parents become hesitant and reluctant
to accept the vaccine (Stokley, 2013).
A person should not be vaccinated in some extenuating circumstances. First,
anyone who has had a severe or life-threatening reaction to any component of the vaccine
should not be vaccinated. Second, pregnancy is a contraindication for vaccination. Last,
a person should not be vaccinated who is moderately or severely ill (CDC, 2014b).
Among males, the long-term implications of contracting HPV are the
development of penile, anal, oral, and pharyngeal cancers (CDC, 2011). Vaccinating
males against HPV addresses a vital issue in preventative medicine. In June 2006, the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) originally approved the HPV vaccine for
adolescent females. The vaccine was marketed successfully to prevent cervical cancer
caused by four different types of HPV (CDC, n.d.). In 2009, the FDA approved the HPV
vaccine to prevent genital wart infections in males. In October 2011, the ACIP
recommended that the vaccine be administered to adolescent males for the prevention of
the above-mentioned cancers known to be caused by HPV (CDC, n.d.). However, parents
must give consent for their adolescent sons to receive the vaccination.
My role in this scholarly project was the development of an HPV educational
toolkit for parents of adolescent males. The need for this project was identified through
the CDC’s (2013) press release that urged all health care providers to work with state and
local health providers to increase the utilization of the HPV vaccine. Health care
5
providers at my practicum facility, as well as my mentor, were supportive of this
scholarly project and planned to implement the educational toolkit upon completion (H.
Jeffreys, personal communication, September 8, 2013). I developed an evidence-based
fact sheet to distribute to all parents of adolescent males in the clinic, referring them to
the facility’s website where the toolkit will be available, allowing parents to view the
information about HPV and the HPV vaccine before the next scheduled appointment.
Furthermore, this scholarly project supported the recommendation for primary prevention
in order to improve the health care outcomes of a community. Primary prevention
interventions are designed to change behaviors or beliefs (Friis & Sellers, 2009). Lastly,
this educational toolkit supported the emerging role of the DNP-prepared nurse through
the development of educational prevention resources within the community (Zaccagnini
& White, 2011).
Problem Statement
Since there was an identified need to increase the number of HPV vaccinations
among adolescent males, ages 11 to 17 years, and parents had to consent for the
vaccination, the problem statement for this Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project is:
There is a lack of understanding among parents of adolescent males regarding the
importance of being vaccinated against HPV.
Purpose Statement and Project Objectives
The purpose of this scholarly project was to develop an educational toolkit for
parents of adolescent males regarding the value of the HPV vaccine. An educational
toolkit can take many different forms. A toolkit may be written and may be accessed by
6
website. An educational toolkit is an intervention that is designed to provide patients and
families with the most current information and evidence-based resources in clinical
practice (Hopkins, DeCristofaro, & Elliott, 2010). The CDC urged health care providers
to work with state and local health departments to increase the utilization of the HPV
vaccine. It is imperative to teach parents of adolescent males the importance of receiving
this vaccine. The majority of the published literature emphasizes the importance of
immunizing adolescent females and to educate health care providers, but evidence-based
literature for parents is limited. There is a need to contribute to the current body of
knowledge that outlines the importance of vaccinating males. This project addressed the
development of an educational toolkit that will provide resources for parents on the
importance of protecting their male children 11 to 17 years of age against HPV.
For the purposes of this DNP scholarly project, the focus was on one objective
outlined in Healthy People 2020. Healthy People 2020 is an initiative that focuses on
health and wellness for all people in the United States. One of the objectives is to focus
on STI prevention (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2010). This objective
was directly related to this scholarly project. The project was designed to educate parents
on the benefits of vaccinating their adolescent sons against HPV.
Significance/Relevance to Nursing Practice
There are serious short-term and long-term consequences of not addressing the
issue of vaccinating adolescent males against the HPV virus, which may not be seen for
decades. The short-term consequences are most commonly associated with genital wart
outbreaks (Giuliano, Palefsky, & Goldstone, 2011). The most severe consequences are
7
associated with long-term HPV infections. The long-term consequences of HPV
infection are different forms of cancer. Those cancers include oral cancer, pharyngeal
cancer, anal cancer, and penile cancer (CDC, n.d.). No studies have identified a specific
timeframe between exposure to HPV and the development of a particular malignancy. It
may be decades before the long-term consequences of HPV are discovered (Jordan,
2008).
The financial implications of treating STIs, including HPV, are direct and indirect
costs that can approach $16 billion (CDC, 2013b). The direct costs are associated with
treating the genital wart outbreaks, and the indirect costs are associated with the medical
and surgical treatments associated with the long-term consequences of HPV (CDC,
2013b). Since HPV is one of the most common STIs and has a large number of short-
term and long-term consequences, it is one of the most expensive to treat (CDC, 2013b).
The financial implications may not be seen for decades since it may take this long for the
consequences of HPV to emerge (Jordan, 2008).
The health care system in the United States is one of the most expensive and
costly in the world (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2009). Unfortunately, a decrease in the
cost of health care treatment is not foreseeable. The result of high costs may be a loss of
life for those who cannot afford health care treatment. Treating genital warts and various
forms of cancer is costly, much more than the cost of the vaccine itself. The average cost
of the quadrivalent vaccine is $130 to $140 per dose. Three doses of the vaccine are
required to complete the vaccine series. Parents need to speak with the health care
provider in order to determine if the HPV vaccine is covered by insurance. However, if
8
the child is uninsured or underinsured, the federal Vaccines for Children (VFC) program
covers the HPV vaccine at no cost to the parents. The VFC program will cover children
up to the age of 19 years (Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 2013).
Project Question
All health care providers have a responsibility to improve prevention efforts due
to rising health care costs (Ridenour & Trautman, 2009). Practicing preventative
medicine is essential during a time of health care uncertainty. Preventative medicine
begins with patient education. Professional nurses have a responsibility to provide
education to patients. The ANA’s Code of Ethics reinforces nurses’ responsibility to the
public. Nurses are expected to provide interventions that will promote health, wellness,
and meet the specific needs of all patients. Such interventions include patient education.
Patient education is not only necessary and important, but it is an expectation and a duty
outlined in the ANA’s Code of Ethics. In response to this public health issue, the
question that framed this scholarly project was: What evidence-based resources are
needed to develop an educational toolkit designed to educate parents of adolescent males,
ages 11 to 17 years, about the benefits of HPV vaccinations?
Evidence-Based Significance of the Project
When creating a project that addresses issues related to sex and STIs, researchers
should be prepared to receive a wide variety of opinions and emotions. A discussion of
sex and STIs can be an emotionally charged topic for parents (Wilson, Dalberth, Koo, &
Gard, 2010). Emotional triggers may be parents not knowing how to talk to their
children about sex, being embarrassed to discuss sex, and family dysfunction regarding
9
sex (Wilson et al., 2010). Organizations that support projects of this nature are primary
practices for women and pediatrics as well as health departments across the United
States. The target population (parents) should be aware of the purpose and goals of the
project. The purpose of this disclosure was to improve the long-term goal of the project,
which is the completion of the HPV vaccine series (Hodges & Videto, 2011).
In order for health care providers to promote health and wellness, they must
provide education about vaccines for adolescent patients and parents. As researchers
publish new research findings in peer reviewed journals, it is critical that the medical
community as well as the public receive this information. Health care providers, who
provide the public with the most current evidence-based practice, can dispel any
misconceptions regarding the importance of vaccines (Niederhauser & Baker, 2011).
The reasons why adult men seek HPV vaccination may be much different from the
reasons why parents would want to vaccinate their son. Adult men are more concerned
with preventing genital wart outbreaks, and parents are more concerned with preventing
long-term consequences of HPV (Jones & Cook, 2008). Additionally, information in the
toolkit can be modified to include the latest evidence-based literature as well meet the
cultural needs of the community (Paterson, Sock, LeBlanc, & Brewer, 2010). For this
reason, a toolkit for parents will allow health care providers to communicate the most
current evidence-based practice.
Educational toolkits can be utilized to disseminate evidence-based information
found in the literature. The information gained from a literature review can provide a
framework for the care of the adolescent male, in particular, vaccination against HPV that
10
can offer self-protection and partner protection for a lifetime. A toolkit can organize
evidence-based information about HPV, the vaccine, and ways to overcome barriers to
the HPV vaccine. Information contained in the toolkit can affect target behaviors
(Savarimuthu et al., 2013). It is necessary to identify and examine barriers of the desired
behavior before designing and implementing the toolkit. Additionally, an educational
toolkit, along with scripted talks, can encourage and enhance open discussions regarding
difficult subjects, such as sexual activity, whether between parents and adolescents,
between health care providers and parents, or between health care providers and patients
(Perrin et al., 2010).
Educational toolkits have proven successful in a variety of clinical settings. Use
of toolkits can bring change as well as prevent disease (Hopkins, DeCristofaro, & Elliott,
2010). Toolkits organize information in a way that is less overwhelming for the parents
of adolescent males. Should the parents become overwhelmed with the presented
information, they can access smaller sections of information and return to the toolkit at a
later time (Paterson et al., 2010). As health care changes, the role of nurses is becoming
increasingly important. Nurses are expected to take a leading role in health care reform
(Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2009). In order to lead this change, there will need to be a
strong focus on preventative medicine. An educational toolkit can have a positive impact
on health care for entire communities and populations by assuring that all parents of
adolescent males will be provided with the latest evidence-based findings on HPV
vaccinations. The latest research will ensure an informed decision (Spruce & Sanford,
2012). As previously stated, the educational toolkit will be used in conjunction with
11
face-to-face, scripted interactions between the health care provider, the patient, and the
parents (Lobban et al., 2011). The toolkit is not intended to replace face-to-face
interactions with the health care provider.
Implications for Social Change in Practice
When analyzing this social problem, it was important to understand the needs of
the community and its citizens before attempting to identify a solution. A community
should be viewed as a living, breathing organism that has its own needs and its own
desires. It is necessary to connect with members of the community when addressing
public health issues. Health care providers must remain open and nonjudgmental when
discussing STIs such as HPV (Blackwell, 2014). A public health problem is one that
focuses on the needs of a community or group (Kettner, Moroney, & Martin, 2013). The
public health problem of low numbers of adolescent males who are receiving the HPV
vaccine series requires an understanding of the health care processes at work, which
processes do not work, and what can be done to improve the current process. I developed
an educational toolkit to inform parents about the benefits of HPV vaccination.
Currently, there are only HPV toolkits for females and health care providers (Society of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 2013). This DNP project filled this gap by
developing a toolkit specifically for parents of adolescent males.
In order to increase the numbers of adolescent males receiving the HPV vaccine,
there must be an understanding of parents’ beliefs and perceptions regarding the vaccine.
Any questions or concerns regarding the vaccine should be addressed as soon as possible
to avoid any misconceptions or misunderstandings. The number of adolescent males
12
impacted by this public health problem must be collected and compared to previous years
to understand the reduction in numbers within the rural clinic.
Definition of Terms
For the purpose of this project, an educational toolkit is an intervention designed
to provide patients and families with the most current evidence-based information in
clinical practice (Hopkins, DeCristofaro, & Elliott, 2010). The educational toolkit was
designed to address health concerns for the male population regarding HPV and the HPV
vaccine, and it will be available on the health care facility’s website. An evidence-based
fact sheet is an informational handout designed specifically for parents of adolescent
males to provide direction to resources and information found on the educational toolkit.
Parents will receive this informational handout so that they can view the toolkit (on the
facility’s website) before the next scheduled visit. Adolescent males referred to male
patients between the ages of 11 to 17 years. HPV4 vaccine referred to the quadrivalent
vaccine designed to protect against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Parents of adolescent
males are any individual or individuals who have custody of and are responsible for the
health care of the adolescent male.
Assumptions, Delimitations and Limitations
As with any scholarly project, this project contained assumptions and limitations
that I acknowledged. Assumptions were that the parents of both male and female
children are more likely to understand the benefits of the vaccine as compared to those
who only have male children. A second assumption for this scholarly project was that
mothers were more likely to consent to the HPV vaccine administration since mothers
13
were most often the parent present with children at clinic visits. Finally, based on the
press release issued by the CDC, it was assumed that the public health problem of poor
HPV vaccination rates among adolescent males is the same public health problem faced
in other primary health care clinics across the United States.
I identified one delimitation and several limitations with this scholarly project.
The delimitation was the fact that this toolkit was specific to parents of adolescent males
between the ages 11 to 17 years. One limitation of this DNP project was that social
media campaigns have promoted HPV vaccinations for females and not males as
evidenced by current television commercials and print advertisements. Other limitations
pertained to parents having the ability to read, read in English, and have little visual
impairment. The website version of the toolkit is only available to those parents with
Internet access by computer, tablet, or smart phone. The evidence-based fact sheet and
educational toolkit were written in English. Parents must be able to read English.
Parents must have no visual impairments that will prevent reading.
Resolution of limitations provides an opportunity to advance additional
scholarship through creativity and inquiry (Zaccagnini & White, 2011). The
development of this educational toolkit was an attempt to address the public health issue
of a lack of HPV vaccine promotion for adolescent males. If parents do not have access
to a computer, a tablet, or smart phone, they can access the Internet through the public
library or a friend’s device. If the public library or friend is not an option, then the parent
talk with a staff member at the clinic and arrange to view the toolkit. Screen readers are
available for the severely visually impaired that will allow for a reading of information
14
presented on a computer screen. This technology can also be used for those who cannot
read. The evidence-based fact sheet and the educational toolkit were written in English.
Both tools can be translated in other languages in order to meet the needs of the
community.
Summary
Improving HPV vaccination rates among adolescent males is a social problem
that must be addressed. The protection offered by this vaccine can protect patients as
well as partners. An educational toolkit for parents of adolescent males provided
information that will benefit the adolescent male population. This educational toolkit
began to fill the gap of providing specific information to parents, which is lacking for
males about HPV vaccination, since all media campaigns have been targeting females.
The following chapter will provide a review of literature to reinforce the significance and
need of this scholarly project while adding to the current body of knowledge.
15
Section 2: Review of Literature and Theoretical Framework
Introduction
The purpose of this literature review is to increase knowledge and to support the
identified public health problem of a low rate of HPV vaccinations among adolescent
males by developing an HPV educational toolkit for parents. When creating an
educational toolkit, it is important to understand barriers that have been identified
regarding the HPV vaccine. The scholarly literature supports the importance of disease
prevention and health promotion. Vaccine administration is one of the greatest methods
that can be implemented to prevent disease. This section will review scholarly literature
to gain a better understanding of the general knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine as
well as of parents’ and sons’ beliefs and decisions regarding HPV vaccinations.
Literature Search Strategy
I conducted a comprehensive review of the literature in order to identify scholarly
articles published between 2009 and 2013. The narrow date range is because the HPV
vaccine was only approved for use in the male population in 2009. Prior to 2009, the
literature focused on the female population only and the barriers and benefits of the
vaccine in preventing cervical cancer. I used the following online databases for the
literature search: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL),
Medline, Proquest, and Ovid Nursing Journals. I searched these databases using a
Boolean search strings composed of the following key terms: human papillomavirus,
HPV, human papillomavirus vaccine, HPV vaccine, and males. Using these key terms
resulted in 753 articles.
16
I reviewed the abstracts of articles to determine the relevance and inclusion for
this literature review. I excluded articles for the review if they were conducted prior to
2009, if the study was completed outside the United States, if the article was published in
a language other than English, and if the articles were not specific to the male gender. I
also excluded mortality and morbidity reports, commentaries, and expert opinion pieces
from this review. Once I identified articles for inclusion, I carefully reviewed each
publication carefully and analyzed it for the study’s purpose, design, population sample,
findings, and limitations. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria.
Males’ Knowledge of HPV and HPV Vaccine
Krawczyk et al. (2013) conducted a quantitative study to measure knowledge
about HPV among adult males as well as the intent to receive the HPV vaccine.
Participants included 128 males who were attending college full time. Each participant
completed a questionnaire that assessed demographics, health, objective knowledge of
HPV and the HPV vaccine, and perceived knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine. The
average age of the participants was 20.8 years. Eighty-three percent reported having had
sexual intercourse at the time the survey. The average age of the participants at the onset
of sexual activity was 17 years. The average number of sexual partners was four. When
questioned about having been tested for STIs, 48% had been tested, and approximately
6% had tested positive for an STI during their lifetime. Majority of the participants
reported knowing about HPV (83%) and the HPV vaccine (73%). Less than one half of
the participants (41%) indicated that they intended to receive the vaccine. Heterosexual
men revealed that they had less intention of receiving the HPV vaccine. Men who
17
intended to receive the vaccine were also more likely to use condoms during sexual
intercourse. The findings showed a strong correlation between perceived knowledge and
actual HPV knowledge. Perceived knowledge was defined as a person’s belief system,
which serves as motivation for action, and actual knowledge was defined as a general
awareness to promote informed decision-making. A limitation of the study is that the
findings could not be generalized beyond the small sample size of 128 college males.
This study reinforced the fact that men should be educated on the HPV vaccine as well as
the disease itself.
Nandwani (2010) conducted a systematic review of literature on 14 articles that
examined men’s knowledge of the HPV vaccine as well as factors that would influence
vaccination rates. Findings indicated that there was limited knowledge among men about
HPV and the HPV vaccine in Malaysia, Holland, Sweden, Australia, the United
Kingdom, and United States. High school and college students learned about HPV in
health class, from friends, media sources, and parents. There were numerous factors
identified that influenced the acceptance of the HPV vaccine among males. Influential
factors were perceived susceptibility of HPV, lack of knowledge regarding HPV and the
HPV vaccine, the vaccine not being recommended by a physician, vaccine availability,
cost, and safety and efficacy. The vast majority of patient education for the HPV vaccine
has focused on the prevention of cervical cancer. This systematic review of the literature
reinforced the need to improve patient education for HPV and the HPV vaccine for males
(Nandwani, 2010).
18
Parents’ and Sons’ Beliefs and Decisions Regarding HPV Vaccinations
Perkins et al. (2013) conducted a qualitative study to examine the attitudes of 120
low-income and minority parents of adolescent males (11 to 17 years of age) toward the
HPV vaccine. Participants for the study were of mixed ethnicity with 68 being African
American, 24 being Caucasian, and 28 being Latino. The mean age of the sons was 14
years, and the mean age of the parents was 43.5 years. Perkins et al. identified and
compared common themes among the ethnic groups that participated in the study.
Findings revealed that only 50% of the parents had heard of the HPV vaccine. If
recommended by a physician, 75% of the parents would accept the vaccine for the
children. Overall, there were no differences noted between the ethnic groups regarding
attitudes and beliefs about vaccinating their male children. African American and Latino
parents were more likely to support a school mandate for the HPV vaccine as compared
to Caucasian parents. All ethnic groups agreed that there was less information available
for the use of the vaccine in males as well as a lack of knowledge regarding the safety
and efficacy of the vaccine. Some parents were afraid that the vaccine would promote
promiscuity and unsafe sexual activity. Parents wished to see more information that was
specific to males. The limitations of the study were that the findings could not be
generalized beyond the small sample size of 120 parent participants, and the study was
conducted in a state that required all citizens to have insurance coverage, limiting the
impact of inadequate accessibility (Perkins et al., 2013).
Alexander et al. (2012) conducted a qualitative study that analyzed parents’ and
sons’ decision-making process regarding acceptance of the HPV vaccine. There were 23
19
parent-and-son dyads chosen as participants for the study. The parent group consisted of
17 females and six males. Participants of the study comprised mixed ethnicities (African
American, Hispanic, and Caucasian). The parents ranged in age from 31 to 53 years with
a mean age of 38.9 years. Over half of the parents (n = 12) identified as single parents
and less than half (n = 11) had at least a high school diploma. The son group consisted of
14 African Americans, five Hispanics, and two Caucasians. The average age of the sons
was 13 to 17 years with a mean age of 14 years. Alexander et al. collected data via
semistructured interviews. The interviews for the parents and the sons included topics on
HPV knowledge, information provided by physicians, and the decision-making process.
One dominant theme was the lack of physician recommendations regarding
administration of the vaccine. Findings indicated that the decision-making process was
not a dialogue solely between the parents and sons, but that also included the physician.
Parents and sons agreed that the prevention of genital warts was the main reason to be
vaccinated, followed by the prevention of cancer. Parents wanted to protect sons, and
sons wanted to maintain long-term health. There was a misconception on behalf of some
parents that the vaccine would protect children against other STIs. One limitation of the
study was that it only included sons between the ages of 13 and 17 years, when the
vaccine has been approved for males 9 to 26 years (Alexander et al., 2012).
Cates et al. (2012) triangulated data in order to determine what factors motivated
a sample of 29 African American parents to vaccinate their sons (11 to 12 years of age)
against HPV. African American parents (n = 29) were chosen because they are known to
be less aware of HPV and the HPV vaccine and are at a higher risk for STIs and HPV-
20
related cancers. Participants were recruited through churches and a middle school, which
the children attended, and through a university-based clinic. Cates et al. conducted five
focus groups. They used chi square tests to assess differences in parents’ gender, age,
race, age of sons, and the likelihood of vaccination. Participants expressed a low
awareness of HPV and the HPV vaccine. All parents agreed that their sons were at risk
for STIs. Overall, parents were confident about the vaccine preventing infection.
Identified barriers for vaccinating their sons included cost of the vaccine and the
perceived side effects, along with the lack of knowledge about the long-term efficiency of
the vaccine. One limitation of the study was that the sample represented only one
ethnic/racial group; therefore, the findings cannot be generalized to other racial groups
(Cates et al., 2012).
Walhart (2012) conducted a review of literature to identify parental beliefs,
attitudes, and barriers to the HPV vaccine with sons. The publications included in the
review were limited to 5 years (2006 to 2011). This review of literature identified gaps in
knowledge relevant to fathers, urban participants, low socioeconomic status, and ethnic
minorities. Beliefs and attitudes of the HPV vaccine included religious convictions with
Christians more likely to vaccinate their sons when compared to those who do not
practice Christianity. Attitudes and beliefs varied among ethnic groups regarding the
vaccine. African Americans were more suspicious of the vaccine while Latina mothers
were more likely to vaccinate their sons against HPV when compared to other ethnicities.
Barriers to vaccination included fear that if vaccinations were administered before the age
of 12, promiscuity would be increased and that some parents felt that their sons would not
21
accept other forms of prophylaxis, such as condoms if vaccinated. Fathers were found to
be less likely to vaccinate sons when compared to mothers. Lastly, the cost of the
vaccine was the final barrier identified. Parents were more likely to vaccinate sons if the
vaccine was offered free of charge (Walhart, 2012).
Joseph et al. (2013) conducted a mixed methodology study to identify ethnic
differences regarding perceived benefits and barriers of the HPV vaccine. However,
quantitative data were not reported in this publication. Participants for this study
consisted of 89 males (18 to 22 years of age): 31 were African American, 26 were of
Haitian descent, 18 were Latino, and 14 were Caucasian. Participants were chosen by
convenience sample from a health care clinic. All participants participated in a survey
and semistructured interviews. Interviews were recorded and coded by two independent
investigators. Benefits of the HPV vaccine were identified as the prevention of oral and
anal cancer and protection against an STI. Barriers to HPV vaccinations varied according
to ethnicity. Caucasians reported not knowing side effects of the vaccine, African
Americans voiced concerns regarding liver damage and insanity, and Haitian participants
were concerned about allergies and autism. Latinos were less likely to receive the
vaccine unless recommended by a physician rather than a physician assistant, nurse
practitioner, or nurse. Findings from this study suggested that cultural sensitivity should
be taken into consideration when discussing HPV vaccinations. Education initiatives can
promote awareness while dispelling myths. One limitation of the study was the small
number of racially/ethnic participants.
22
Reiter et al. (2013) conducted a longitudinal study to examine HPV vaccine
uptake and vaccine predictors among adolescent males. The national sample consisted of
327 parents and 228 sons (11 to 17 years of age) who participated with the parents.
Participants for this study were from 46 states as well as the District of Columbia and
completed a baseline survey and a follow-up survey 3 months after the baseline. Surveys
were administered online. The majority of the parents were less than 45 years of age
(56%), non-Hispanic (68%), married (80%), and resided in urban areas (84%).
Significant predictors for not vaccinating their sons against HPV were related to a lack of
information regarding the vaccine (23%), not receiving a physician’s recommendation for
the vaccine (17%), concerns that the vaccine was unsafe (10%), and the fact that the
vaccine was new to the market for administration to males (5%). One significant finding
was that a physician’s recommendation for parents might be the most promising strategy
for increasing HPV vaccination rates among males (Reiter et al., 2013).
Educational Toolkit Development and the Theory of Reasoned Action
The theoretical framework chosen to guide this DNP project was Ajzen and
Fishbein’s (1980) theory of reasoned action. The theory of reasoned action originated in
the field of social psychology in the late 1960s, is considered a predictor of human
behavior, and explains behavioral intentions, whether positive or negative, as compared
to social standards. Essentially, people make decisions based on the information that is
either available or provided (McEwen & Wills, 2011). This theory can be used in
multiple areas of professional nursing practice when developing interventions designed to
modify patient behaviors (Goldenberg & Laschinger, 1991). Applications of this theory
23
can be ideal for parents of adolescent males, who are at high risk for STIs (Roberto,
Krieger, Katz, Goei, & Jain, 2011). This theory states that an individual will engage in
certain behaviors based on the attitude of the person and a social norm. Social norms are
behaviors in response to socially desirable attitudes and beliefs based on the attitude of
the individual (Ortega, Huang, & Prado, 2012).
Experts argue that if this theory can be used in the patient population, then it can
also be used when explaining physician behavior, and in the case of this scholarly project,
parent behaviors (Roberto, Krieger, Katz, Goei, & Jain, 2011). The parental behavior in
this project refers to the decision-making process that will occur after the parents view
the education toolkit. Although a predictor of behavior, this theory reinforces the notion
that certain circumstances, such as those stemming from personality traits, educational
level, socioeconomic status, and personal experiences may not lead to the desired
behavior (Natan, Beyil, & Neta, 2009). The theory of reasoned action has been
effectively used in health behaviors that pertain to contraception, which is similar to this
scholarly project and can be predictive in influencing parents’ decision to vaccinate or
not vaccinate after viewing information from the educational toolkit (Goldenberg &
Laschinger, 1991).
Summary
The literature review resulted in a small number of articles (x = 8) that met the
inclusion criteria. I identified several common themes. Dominant themes were males’
knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine, and parents’ and sons’ beliefs and decisions
regarding HPV vaccinations. The review of the literature supports the need for an
24
educational toolkit to increase HPV vaccination rates among adolescent males. The
educational toolkit will address each theme identified in the literature review.
Addressing each theme will allow the parents of adolescent males to make an informed
decision regarding HPV vaccinations. The following chapter will discuss the project
approach, the target population, and the project evaluation plan.
25
Section 3: Approach
Introduction
The purpose of this DNP project was to develop an educational toolkit to educate
parents so that they can make an informed decision on vaccinating their adolescent sons
(11 to 17 years of age) against HPV. Since the project is developmental, implementation
will occur at a later time at the practicum facility’s discretion. This scholarly project was
designed to contribute to the current body of nursing knowledge about HPV. This
section of the project addressed the development of the educational toolkit, the target
population, as well as an evaluation plan for the scholarly project.
Project Approach
Walden University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) granted approval for this
project (IRB Record Number 10-08-14-0340110). I developed an educational toolkit
using evidence from the literature to educate parents on the importance of vaccinating
their male sons against HPV. It was important to include various methods of learning in
this toolkit in order to capture those parents who have poor reading skills or parents who
have poor health literacy skills. Therefore, the educational toolkit consisted of two
separate parts. The first part of the toolkit was an evidence-based fact sheet (Appendix
A) that provides facts regarding HPV and the HPV vaccine. Additionally, the evidence-
based fact sheet will direct parents to the facility’s website to view the second part of the
toolkit (Appendix B) prior to the next scheduled clinic appointment.
The evidence-based fact sheet consists of four sections: factual information,
vaccine information, websites, and references. The first section (factual information)
26
includes findings outlined from current research and organizations such as the CDC.
Barriers regarding HPV vaccinations are addressed in this section. The second section
includes information regarding the vaccine, including a vaccination schedule for
completing the three shot series. The third section includes website links for parents to
view additional information. The websites with URL links and journal article links will
allow parents to view multiple forms of information. The educational toolkit can be
accessed using a computer, tablet, or smart phone. If there is no access to any
technological device, then the evidence-based fact sheet is the alternative format for
access. The fourth and final section includes the references. I reviewed information for a
reading level of sixth grade or lower as determined by Microsoft Office’s proofing
measures.
The second part of the educational toolkit that will be posted on the facility’s
website contains similar information that was found on the evidence-based fact sheet.
There is factual information provided for HPV and the HPV vaccine, including a
vaccination schedule. Active URL links included in the toolkit will allow parents easier
access to visit the recommended websites. Finally, all references are included. Often,
educational handouts are discarded and not utilized to the maximum potential. The
website version of the educational toolkit will provide the same level of education for
those parents who are more comfortable using various technological devices.
Information gained from the scholarly literature and organizational websites (i.e.,
CDC) was the driving force behind evidence-based resources for the toolkit. Addressing
the barriers to vaccination holds the greatest potential for increasing HPV vaccinations
27
among adolescent males (Walhart, 2012). I developed the implementation plan
(Appendix C) to overcome identified barriers discovered in the review of literature.
Additionally, there was an opportunity to dispel any myths or misconceptions regarding
the vaccine when the parents talk with health care providers at their next scheduled visit.
Target Population
The target population for this scholarly project was parents of adolescent males,
ages 11 to 17 years, who access a rural clinic. I did not collect any demographic data
from parents during this project.
Project Evaluation Plan
Since this project is in development, the tentative evaluation plan (Appendix C) is
included for clinic staff to use when examining if there has been an increase in HPV
vaccination rates. Evaluation of this scholarly project should begin prior to
implementation. After development of the toolkit (evidence-based fact sheet and
website), two content experts knowledgeable about HPV vaccinations for males reviewed
the toolkit for accuracy of the information about HPV, reading level (sixth-grade or
below), and evidence-based resources. Additionally, three different parents of adolescent
males reviewed the toolkit for ease of reading and overall impact of presented
information. The members of the target population included a parent with a high school
diploma and no college attendance, a parent with 2 years of college attendance, and a
parent with 4 years of college attendance. The content experts and parent reviewers
provided feedback, which I incorporated in the final version of the toolkit.
28
I did not use any instrumentation for data collection during development of this
scholarly project, but I recommended that clinic staff collect data during implementation,
using the HPV Survey Tool (Appendix D). When the final version of the educational
toolkit is developed and the project is being implemented, I recommend that demographic
data (patient age and race), HPV vaccination recommendations (provided by the health
care provider), along with information about which part of the toolkit was used
(evidence-based fact sheet or website) are noted in the chart as well as the HPV Survey
Tool. Clinic staff might find this information useful when comparing if vaccination rates
from the previous year increased.
Program evaluation provides direction for program improvements as well as for
future research (Hodges & Videto, 2011). Program evaluation is a social service
technique with a purpose of providing feedback (Kettner, Moroney, & Martin, 2013).
For the purpose of a project designed to increase HPV vaccination rates among
adolescent males, impact program evaluation was the most appropriate. Impact program
evaluation is designed to analyze the cause-and-effect relationship of the identified
problem. There is a distinct relationship between the hypothesis, the intervention, and the
desired results (Kettner et al., 2013). The educational toolkit that was designed for
parents of adolescent males is the intervention. Since the scholarly project was an
educational toolkit designed to improve patient care and nursing practice rather than a
formal research project, there was not an identified hypothesis. However, there was a
project problem statement and a project question noted in Section 1. The desired
outcome was an increase in the number of HPV vaccinations among adolescent males.
29
Once the project is complete, clinic staff will evaluate the toolkit annually for any
updates of information. The clinic will identify someone who will be able to review the
toolkit and provide these recommendations for change. Evaluation of long-term
outcomes of the intervention will not be known for a minimum of 1 year within any given
outpatient clinic, once the educational toolkit is implemented. A recommended
evaluation plan will be provided to the clinic (Appendix C).
Summary
This scholarly project was designed with attention to the purpose, the project
question, the educational toolkit, the target population, and the evaluation plan. It may
take as long as 1 year before clinic staff can examine outcomes from the educational
toolkit. Information from the toolkit should be reviewed annually for updates on the
latest evidence on HPV vaccinations for males. The educational toolkit addressed a
public health problem to improve preventative medicine for adolescent males while
offering a guide for other outpatient clinics that may want to implement a comparable
toolkit. The following section will discuss the project findings, implications for social
change, and analysis of self.
30
Section 4: Findings, Discussion, and Implications
Introduction
Since the project was developmental, there was no data collection, and there are
no statistical findings to report in this section. The purpose of this scholarly project was
to develop an educational toolkit for parents of adolescent males regarding the value of
the HPV vaccine. I developed the evidence-based fact sheet and the educational toolkit
in response to the CDC’s (2013) press release that urged health care providers to work
with state and local health departments in order to improve the utilization of the HPV
vaccine. I designed the educational toolkit to provide patients of adolescent males with
information in order to make an informed decision regarding the acceptance or
declination of the HPV vaccine.
Information presented in the evidence-based fact sheet was written on a sixth-
grade reading level in order to direct parents to the electronic version of the educational
toolkit located on the facility’s website. The website version of the educational toolkit
was designed to provide the same level of education for those parents who are more
comfortable using various technological devices in order to provide current, evidence-
based practice derived from a review of the literature. Hyperlinks have been added to the
toolkit that will allow parents and patients to find information by a click of the mouse.
The educational toolkit addresses each barrier identified in the current literature.
Addressing barriers to the HPV vaccine holds the greatest potential for increasing HPV
vaccination rates (Walhart, 2012).
31
Summary of Findings
Since HPV is one of the highest reported STIs in the United States and has severe
long-term consequences associated with it, it is imperative that parents receive education
regarding the vaccine. The HPV vaccine is known to prevent the four different types of
the virus known to cause various cancers (CDC, n.d.). The vaccine has been thoroughly
studied and has been found to be 89.3% effective if the entire series is completed
(Campos-Outcalt, 2012). The ANA Code of Ethics clearly outlines the expectation of
nurses when providing patient education. Nurses are expected to provide education to
patients that will promote health and wellness in addition to any current conditions or
illnesses (ANA, 2001).
I presented the evidence-based fact sheet and the educational toolkit to my
practicum mentor and staff at the practicum facility. Two content experts reviewed the
information present in each component of the scholarly project. The content experts
included a DNP-prepared nurse practitioner and physician. Each content expert
examined the component for accuracy, ease of understanding, and for its practicality of
use at practicum facility. I revised the evidence-based fact sheet and the educational
toolkit according to the feedback provide by each content expert. The evidence-based
fact sheet is attached as Appendix A, and the educational toolkit is attached as Appendix
B. The evidence-based fact sheet and the educational toolkit contained the following
information:
32
Evidence-based fact sheet:
HPV Facts
Facility Website Address
Consequences of HPV
HPV Vaccine Facts
HPV Vaccine Information
References
Educational toolkit:
Section 1: HPV and HPV Vaccine Facts
o What is HPV?
o Why is the HPV Vaccine Important for My Son?
o What are the Short-term Consequences of an HPV Infection?
o What are the Long-term Consequences of an HPV Infection?
o When Should My Son be vaccinated against HPV?
Section2: HPV Vaccine Information
o How Many Injections are required for the HPV Vaccine?
o Are There any Side Effects of the HPV Vaccine?
o How Much Does the HPV Vaccine Cost and is it covered by
My Insurance?
Section 3: Helpful Websites
Section 4: References
Forms
33
I have provided the practicum mentor and the practicum facility with a version of
the toolkit that provides ease of editing when new information and evidence-based
practice becomes available. Additionally, a version of the educational toolkit will be
provided that will prevent website visitors from making any changes. The practicum
mentor will identify a registered nurse to monitor scholarly journals for new information
and evidence-based practice. This nurse will be responsible for ensuring the educational
toolkit is updated as new information becomes available (H. Jeffreys, personal
communication, August 5, 2014).
Discussion of Findings in Context of Literature
After reviewing current literature through multiple databases—CINAHL,
Medline, Proquest, and Ovid Nursing Journals—I identified a need to expand the current
body of knowledge regarding HPV vaccination in adolescent males. In order to improve
the vaccination rates among adolescent males, health care professionals must be willing
to have discussions about HPV and the HPV vaccine with parents. The evidence-based
fact sheet and the educational toolkit provide parents with the necessary information that
will aid in making an informed decision. The educational toolkit is an excellent platform
to disseminate information and current evidence-based practice to parents and patients.
The toolkit allows parents to work through the information at their pace with or without
their children and can be referenced multiple times (Lobban et al., 2011). Lastly, the
toolkit provides an opportunity for active participation in the plan of care (Paterson,
Sock, LeBlanc, & Brewer, 2010).
34
Krawczyk et al. (2013) examined males’ knowledge regarding HPV and the HPV
vaccine. There is a need to provide the same level of HPV and HPV vaccine education to
males as there is for females in order to dispel any myths and misconceptions (Krawczyk
et al., 2013). Numerous barriers have been identified regarding the acceptance of the
HPV vaccine by males. Identified barriers were perceived susceptibility to HPV, lack of
knowledge regarding HPV and the HPV vaccine, the vaccine not being recommended by
a physician, vaccine availability, cost, and safety and efficacy. The vast majority of
patient education for the HPV vaccine has focused on the prevention of cervical cancer,
which does not address the importance for males (Nandwani, 2010).
The current literature supports the need to expand nursing knowledge regarding
HPV and HPV vaccinations among males. It is essential that barriers, misconceptions,
and myths be addressed when providing HPV education, which was evident during
various practicum experiences where I made multiple observations with a variety of
patient populations. The CDC has urged health care providers to work with state and
local health departments to improve HPV vaccination rates. As a result, many states have
labeled the HPV vaccine as a priority. However, there is not an educational toolkit that
specifically addressed the adolescent male population (CDC, 2014a). This scholarly
project addresses that specific need.
Implications for Practice
Addressing the public health issue of poor HPV vaccination rates among
adolescent males will decrease the short-term and long-term consequences of HPV
infection. The vaccine will protect each male as well as each sexual partner encountered
35
(CDC, 2014a). Since HPV is one of the most common STIs, it is one of the most
expensive to treat (CDC, 2013b). In turn, it is expected there will be fewer burdens
placed on the health care system by decreasing the number of genital wart outbreaks and
preventing the various cancers known to be caused by HPV. The educational toolkit has
reinforced the cost-effectiveness of the vaccine as compared to years of genital wart
outbreak treatments and cancer treatments.
Professional nurses must be willing to set aside any biases in order to provide
open and honest education to all patients. Regardless of gender, the expectation of nurses
is to provide the same level of care to all patients (ANA, 2001). Additionally, Health
People 2020 does not make mention of any gender bias in terms of preventing STIs (U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). If this public health issue is not
addressed, the spread of HPV will continue to rise. There will be greater burdens placed
on the health care system since the cost of health care continues to rise year after year
(Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2009). As a result, the cost of treating HPV and HPV-
related illnesses will continue to rise as well. Interventions, such the evidence-based fact
sheet and the educational toolkit, are an attempt to address this growing public health
issue.
The review of literature yielded eight articles that met the inclusion criteria for
this scholarly project. Articles for the specific literature review were excluded if they
were conducted prior to 2009, if the study was completed outside the United States, if the
article was published in a language other than English, and if the articles were not
specific to the male gender. Additional nursing research is needed on this public health
36
issue. Additionally, this scholarly project promotes future research on educational
toolkits and technology since smart phones and tablets are prominent in society.
Implications for Social Change
A press release issued by the CDC urging health care providers to work with state
and local health departments prompted the development of the evidence-based fact sheet
and the educational toolkit. The public health issue of poor HPV vaccination rates
among adolescent males is not isolated to any particular geographic area, but rather
nationwide (CDC, 2013a). Addressing parents of adolescent males as the target
population for this scholarly project helps close a knowledge gap in this area of nursing
research. The generation of new knowledge or the expansion on existing knowledge has
a positive impact on the community, since evidence-based practice is designed to
improve patient outcomes and patient safety.
The development of an educational toolkit is an attempt to address a serious
public health issue. The toolkit increases HPV and HPV vaccine awareness for parents
of adolescent males. Parents can be more active participants in their child’s plan of care.
In addition to general information, the toolkit directs parents and patient to helpful
websites that offer support reassurance. An educational toolkit on a website can offer
health care providers and nurses the opportunity to develop their practice by seeking out
new information (through literature searches and seminars) to add to the toolkit.
Project Strengths, Limitations, and Recommendations
The strengths of the HPV evidence-based fact sheet and the educational toolkit
are the ease of reading and understanding. Both components were written at a sixth-
37
grade level. An educational toolkit is an intervention that is designed to provide patients
and families with the most current information and evidence-based resources in clinical
practice (Hopkins, DeCristofaro, & Elliott, 2010). Each component was provided to the
practicum facility in two different formats (one which is editable and one which is not
editable). The editable format allows the health care provider to update the toolkit as new
information becomes available. The noneditable version is ready to be sent to the
informational technologist for upload to the facility’s website.
One limitation of this project is the fact that this toolkit is specific to parents of
adolescent males between the ages 11 to 17 years. Another limitation of this DNP project
is that social media campaigns have promoted HPV vaccinations for females and not
males. However, the development of this educational toolkit will be an attempt to
address this problem. The toolkit holds great potential to address difficult topics of
discussion, such as HPV and the HPV vaccine. The evidence-based fact sheet and the
educational toolkit received positive responses from the practicum mentor and the
practicum facility. Additionally, if the practicum facility chooses to broaden its scope of
inclusion for the educational toolkit, it is easily modifiable and offers other male age
groups the same information and level of care.
Analysis of Self as a Scholar
The journey of working toward a doctoral degree has been very exciting and some
of the best years of my life. Although exhausting at times, the achievement is one that
few nurses complete. A high school teacher told me that I would amount to nothing.
Instead of using those words to foster hatred and discontent, I used them as motivation. I
38
was intimidated when I enrolled in Walden’s DNP program. I did not feel I was smart
enough to complete this degree. Two years later, I am working on my scholarly project.
This program has allowed me to grow personally and professionally. I have been pushed
to my personal limits at times, and I have been successful in each endeavor.
Professionally, I have gain confidence and competence through the practicum
experiences.
As a scholar, I have learned to rely on current research. I did not fully appreciate
scholarly literature before enrolling in this program. Through weekly discussions, I have
been able to network with peers across the United States. Professional networking
provides research opportunities as well as presentation and speaking opportunities.
Through the trials of the scholarly project, I have identified a research interest, the
educational toolkit. I would not have developed this interest to this level without the
various practicum experiences, my practicum mentor’s guidance, and a review of the
literature. It is a humbling experience to be referred to as a scholar in the most honorable
profession. The lettering I have earned in this program allows me the opportunity to
grow through scholarship. Professional growth and scholarship are expectations of the
DNP-prepared nurse, and I am ready to face those challenges.
Analysis of Self as a Practitioner
It is an honor to practice professional nursing. I have become increasing aware of
this honor throughout the course of the DNP program. I am more confident and
competent in my practice. Confidence and competence are skills that I gained through
my practicum experiences, my clinical practice of nursing, and the scholarly literature.
39
The progression in this terminal degree program has earned the respect of many
colleagues. I am becoming a scholarly peer to those who currently practice with a
terminal degree, which I find to be a humbling experience. However humbling, there is a
higher expectation of scholarship and responsibility to the profession of nursing. The
development of an educational toolkit, which addresses difficult topics such as HPV and
the HPV vaccine, is something I am very proud to accomplish. The educational toolkit
for parents of adolescent males is a new concept that enhances nursing practice and offers
opportunities for additional research.
Analysis of Self as a Project Developer
I have learned to search the professional literature throughout the development of
an educational toolkit. I have become very comfortable searching various databases. As
a project developer, the literature has become my greatest ally. Becoming familiar with
databases and scholarly literature is a skill that is unique to scholars and project
developers. Once I identified a gap in current literature, with the assistance of the
practicum mentor, I was able to schedule my practicum experiences. The literature, the
practicum experiences, and the previous course work guided the development of an
educational toolkit.
The DNP scholarly project process is overwhelming and time-consuming.
However, I have learned more than I ever thought was possible. I learned a great deal of
patience during project development. My stress levels increased once I submitted the
project for review since each committee member had 2 weeks to review the project and
provide feedback. I learned to use the feedback as constructive criticism since each
40
response from the committee members was intended to improve my writing and to ensure
I am producing a scholarly project. The experience of the DNP scholarly project will
guide my future research and my future project developments.
Analysis of Self as a Professional
The development of the DNP scholarly project has increased my personal and
professional growth and development. I have gained confidence and competence in this
program that will guide my career for the rest of my life. I have learned to prioritize
activities in order to meet goals and deadlines. I will use the skills I learned in this
program to improve patient care, develop interventions to improve patient outcomes and
patient safety, and to promote nursing scholarship. As a DNP-prepared nurse, I accept
the professional responsibilities outlined in the DNP Essentials written by the American
Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN).
Summary
HPV is a public health issue that health professions must address. The numbers
of individuals who are infected with HPV continue to grow each year. Scholarly
literature lacks research and interventions directly related to vaccinating adolescent males
against HPV. Currently, there are no educational toolkits designed for adolescent males.
This gap in knowledge has prompted the development of an educational toolkit for
parents of adolescent males in order to improve HPV vaccination rates. I designed an
educational toolkit to be used in the practicum facility, and it can be modified for use in
other facilities across the nation. The following section will discuss project
dissemination, the project summary, and the program evaluation report.
41
Section 5: Scholarly Product
Introduction
Doctoral education reinforces the importance of scholarship. The DNP is no
exception. The AACN has established eight essentials for the DNP-prepared nurse that
outlines the expectations of the practice scholar. The DNP Essential III outlines clinical
scholarship and its integration into professional practice (AACN, 2006). The final
scholarly product was an educational toolkit for parents of adolescent males. I developed
the toolkit in response to a press release issued by the CDC, which indicated the HPV
vaccine is grossly underutilized (CDC, 2013). Additionally, my practicum experiences
reinforced the need to vaccinate adolescent males against HPV. Since adolescents are
unable to provide legal consent for the vaccine, the toolkit targets parents of adolescent
males. In addition to DNP Essential III, this scholarly project addressed DNP Essential
VI, which requires interprofessional collaboration in order to improve patient a d
population health outcomes. The toolkit presents current evidence-based practice and
necessary information that will allow for an informed decision regarding the HPV
vaccine.
Dissemination of evidence-based practice is essential to the practice of
professional nursing. All current policies, guidelines, and protocols are driven by
evidence-based practice (AACN, 2006). Dissemination of research and scholarly
projects can take many different forms. The most common forms include, but are not
limited to, manuscript publication, poster presentations, professional conference
presentations, and dissemination through independent nurse consultants. A research
42
project or DNP scholarly project is not considered complete unless the results are shared
with other professionals (Oermann & Hays, 2011). Lastly, the sharing of knowledge
provides an opportunity for additional research, which can generate new knowledge or
expand on existing knowledge (Doran et al., 2010).
Project Dissemination
Publication is one of the most common forms of information dissemination. The
first choice of publication for an educational toolkit that addresses the public health issue
of HPV, and the HPV vaccine is the Journal of Public Health. Publishing in this journal
has the greatest potential of reaching far more public health professionals as compared to
other methods of dissemination. This population of health care professionals can, in turn,
further disseminate the information to the target population. I would like to collect and
analyze data, using the developed survey tool (Appendix D) before submitting a
manuscript for publication. I believe data collection and analysis will have a greater
impact on health care professionals. This information will provide evidence that the
intervention, which is the educational toolkit, can improve HPV vaccination rates.
A poster presentation is another acceptable method to disseminate information.
This method of dissemination is the method of choice for the completion of this DNP
scholarly project (Appendix E). This poster presentation provides an opportunity to
exhibit the role of a nurse champion in the field of HPV prevention and the care of the
adolescent male (Ploeg et al., 2010). When the poster is presented to other scholars,
health care professionals, and the public, there is direct access to the research and the
researcher. Direct access encourages personal and professional development as
43
compared to electronic methods of dissemination (Ousley, Swarz, Milliken, & Ellis,
2010). Additionally, the researcher has an opportunity to network with other scholars
and content experts, which allows for additional research and scholarship. Networking
with other scholars can generate research interests that can affect patient care and
professional practice on a national and international level (Forsyth, Wright, Scherb, &
Gaspar, 2010).
Project Summary
In summary, the development of a DNP project that resulted in an educational
toolkit for parents of adolescent males that addressed HPV vaccinations was very
rewarding. I identified a knowledge gap in the current scholarly literature. This
scholarly project was an attempt to close that gap in nursing knowledge. The review of
literature was intense and often overwhelming. However, this project would not have
come to fruition without reviewing the scholarly literature. The educational toolkit is a
resource for parents of adolescent males that is designed to provide enough information
to make an informed decision regarding the HPV vaccine. Ajzen and Fishbein’s (1980)
theory of reasoned action guided this DNP project. This theory states that people make
decisions based on the information that is either available or provided (McEwen & Wills,
2011). Applications of this theory were found to be ideal for parents of adolescent males,
who are at high risk for STIs (Roberto, Krieger, Katz, Goei, & Jain, 2011). My mentor
was very helpful in determining the information that should be included in the final
scholarly product.
44
The educational toolkit addresses a growing problem in the United States, which
is increasing numbers of individuals who are diagnosed with an STI each year. This
project supports the Health People 2020 initiatives, which focused on STI prevention
(U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2010). The educational toolkit was
designed to educate parents on the benefits of vaccinating their adolescent sons against
HPV. This project allows parents to review the information in the privacy of their home
without feeling any external pressures within the clinic. Parents have the choice of how
much information that should be disclosed to their children. Finally, the parent who
primarily escorts the child to the clinic appointment has an opportunity to review the
educational toolkit with the other parent who was not or cannot be present at the clinic
appointment.
Program Evaluation Report
It is essential that program evaluation begin before the project implementation.
The program evaluation should be used to guide the project from inception through
implementation and evaluation. The evaluation plan outlines the overall goal of the
project and serves as an outline of what the intended project should accomplish. This
DNP project was developmental and was not implemented. However, an implementation
and evaluation plan was developed that can be used by any primary health care clinic
across the United States (Appendix C). Since the final product was an electronic and
hard copy provided to the practicum facility, the implementation and evaluation plan has
numerous steps that include a continuous review of the scholarly literature to data
analysis.
45
I reviewed and assessed numerous resources to determine the information that
should be included in the educational toolkit. My project mentor, an additional content
expert with a practice in primary health care, and three members from the target
population reviewed the toolkit. I reviewed and presented all comments to my project
mentor and made multiple revisions to the educational toolkit. The information presented
in the educational toolkit is current and up-to-date. However, continuous literature
surveillance will be required. The evaluation process will not end as long as this toolkit
is in practice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I designed the HPV educational toolkit to provide parents of
adolescent males with the most current evidence-based practice in order to make an
informed decision regarding the HPV vaccine. This project addressed a sensitive subject
regarding STIs and is an attempt to close the knowledge gap regarding the HPV vaccine
and adolescent males. This scholarly project is a perfect example of the expectations of
the DNP-prepared nurse, which is to identify a practice problem and develop a solution
or solutions to improve practice or patient safety (Zaccagnini & White, 2011). I included
a poster presentation (Appendix E) for this project. In the future, I will submit a
manuscript to the Journal of Public Health for publication.