The best option for Carol executing out of the Partnership to retire in my opinion, would be for Bob to
borrow money to pay Carol’s interest in the business. It is often very expensive for a buyout and using
your own funds or financing through business funds can put a financial burden on the remaining
partner and business. To keep financial flexibility and be able to not impact capital to reinvest in the
business, getting a Partner Buyout loan is the best option. This does not deplete business funds and put
a strain on the business and leaves capital free for reinvesting and operating.
Also, it allows the other partner to get their money and move on quickly. In this case Carol being
older and retiring if she died it would make it a little harder to do. So, she would need to make sure a
lawyer drew documents first thing and leave a beneficiary that would assume the partner being bought
out. This is easiest and safest way to ensure Carol or her family shall she pass gets the money. This
will let the company move on with ventures and not leave a continuous waiting game and slowly
depleting shares overtime. In my opinion this is by far quickest, easiest, and most efficient route.
With Carol ready to retire, there are several options that the partnership can consider. One option
would be to borrow the money to pay for Carol’s interest in the business. z This might be most logical
because option 1 sells off the business and the other two partners have not identified that they want to
sell or retire at this juncture, and option 3 may be hard to accomplish because finding a buyer is not
always easy. z Ideally, the partnership agreement created several years ago has a detailed plan for when
a partner buyout occurs.
The value of Carol’s interest in the partnership must be valued. z There are a lot of ways to accomplish
this. One method would be using principals of The Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA).
Essentially, a “partners value is determined by calculating the partnerships property less any
liabilities” on the day that Carol would want to retire (Weidner & Larson, n.d.). z “The tax basis for the
departing partner’s payment is the sum of their initial investment, any additional capital contributions
made during their tenure as a partner, and their share of business income during that time, all reduced
by their percentage of any business losses and distributions” (Oak Street Funding, 2023).
The partners will consider need to 26 U.S. Code § 736 that pertains to retiring or deceased partners.
This will determine if “payments made to liquidate the partnership are considered a capital gain/loss
or ordinary income and whether payments by the remaining partners are deductible” (Oak Street
Funding, 2023). z Because Bob and Amy will want all control of the business when Carol retires, they
will obtain financing to buy her out. z It is sometimes hard for partners to get funding for a debt buyout
instead of taking on a new partner, for example. z Regardless, this will take time to accomplish.
“All payments to the exiting partner in liquidation of his entire interest are treated as either:
1. Section 736(a) payments, which are considered guaranteed payments to the exiting partner. The
partnership is allowed to deduct these payments, which means tax savings for the remaining partners.
However, the exiting partner must treat guaranteed payments as high-taxed ordinary income.
2. Section 736(b) payments, which are considered payments for the exiting partner’s share of the
partnership’s assets. The partnership cannot deduct these payments. In general, the exiting partner
treats the difference between the total Section 736(b) payments received, and his or her tax basis in the
partnership interest, as a capital gain or loss” (2018).
Should Carol, die before the partnership buyout is finalized, payments would be made to her successor
on her behalf (irs.gov, n.d.). If payments are more than her basis, such payments would be subject to
capital gains taxes.
Partnerships are formed by two or more partners. When one of the partners decides to leave the
partnership, the partner’s ownership may be distributed as liquidating distributions or nonliquidating
distributions, as in the case for ABC Partners. Liquidating distributions completely reduce a partner’s
interest through a single or series of distributions (Rupert & Anderson, 10-2). Furthermore, partner
can choose to either receive liquidating distribution or to sell the interest. Option 3 discusses asking
Carol to find an outside buyer for her interest in the business. Under Sec. 751, the sale of partnership
interest creates ordinary income or loss if “consideration received is attributable to the partner’s share
of unrealized receivables and inventory items” (Rupert & Anderson, 10-17). Partner also has to take
into consideration the unrecaptured Sec. 1250 gain.
If Carol dies before the plan is executed, then the “IRS accepts the valuation placed on the retiring
partner’s interest in the partnership property by the partners in an arm’s-length transaction” (Rupert &
Anderson, 10-19). These payments are taxed with liquidating distribution rules. The partnership may
not deduct these payments. Carol’s ownership interest can be sold or others can buy the ownership
interest.
When one of the partners decides or is ready to retire from a partnership formed, there are many
options in liquidation to end the relationship. Each one of these options is based on the tax
consequences for the partner leaving and the ones staying. According to Antico (2013), “When
offering a new equity position or buying out a retiring partner, considerations vary depending on the
structure of the practice, so it is important to note the differences when dealing with a partnership, as
distinguished from a corporation. The appropriate structure of a practice depends on the needs and
desires of the practice owners”. Now having this in hand, the option I will pick and be beneficial for
every partner is Option 1, just because it is considering and giving opportunities equally to everyone. z
We have to remember that Carol is the one retiring and Amy and Bob are not, they would like to
continue with the partnership. z z
In my opinion, in options #2 and #3, you are adding an extra “thought” beside a partner’s retirement. z
Option #2 is considering a new responsibility for the partnership and Option #3, is considering a new
partner, someone that you do not really know, maybe in the future.
The sale of a partnership interest is treated as the sale or exchange of a capital asset, so normal taxes
will be applied to this sale. The gain or loss will be calculated as the difference between the amount
realized in the transaction and the selling partner’s adjusted basis in the partnership interest being sold.
In case of death, the purchaser’s basis is determined under normal tax rules, by cost, and according to
Section 1015. Also, this death of a partner can lead to tax issues involving the close of a partnership's
tax year with respect to the deceased partner, a possible change in the partnership's year-end, post-
death allocation of income, Sec. 754 elections, and Sec. 743 adjustments, among other things.
When one of the partners decides or is ready to retire from a partnership formed, there are many
options in liquidation to end the relationship. Each one of these options is based on the tax
consequences for the partner leaving and the ones staying. According to Antico (2013), “When
offering a new equity position or buying out a retiring partner, considerations vary depending on the
structure of the practice, so it is important to note the differences when dealing with a partnership, as
distinguished from a corporation. The appropriate structure of a practice depends on the needs and
desires of the practice owners”. Now having this in hand, the option I will pick and be beneficial for
every partner is Option 1, just because it is considering and giving opportunities equally to everyone. z
We have to remember that Carol is the one retiring and Amy and Bob are not, they would like to
continue with the partnership. z z
In my opinion, in options #2 and #3, you are adding an extra “thought” beside a partner’s retirement. z
Option #2 is considering a new responsibility for the partnership and Option #3, is considering a new
partner, someone that you don’t really know, maybe in the future.
The sale of a partnership interest is treated as the sale or exchange of a capital asset, so normal taxes
will be applied to this sale. The gain or loss will be calculated as the difference between the amount
realized in the transaction and the selling partner’s adjusted basis in the partnership interest being sold.
In case of death, the purchaser’s basis is determined under normal tax rules, by cost, and according to
Section 1015. Also, this death of a partner can lead to tax issues involving the close of a partnership's
tax year with respect to the deceased partner, a possible change in the partnership's year-end, post-
death allocation of income, Sec. 754 elections, and Sec. 743 adjustments, among other things.
The most logical solution should the remaining partners want to continue the marina business would
be option 3, to ask carol to find an outside buyer, or as an organization, solicit another partner to take
Carol’s share. This option is reasonable because the entire team can assess whether the new partner
would be a good fit for the business and to work with the remaining partners and the sale wouldn’t
affect the business. per IRC 708, the partnership can remain so long as 50% of the partnership isn’t
sold (Cornell, 2000). As Carol's stake is only 33% of the business, the sale would be straightforward
and won’t have a tax impact on the remaining partners unless the FMW changes dramatically at the
time of sale. should it be discovered that FMV of assets have changed, a special adjustment can be
made. "An IRC Section 754 election allows a partnership to adjust the basis of the property within a
partnership under IRC Sections 734(b) and 743(b) when one of two triggering events occur: 1) a
distribution of partnership property or 2) certain transfers of a partnership interest" (IRS, 2022)
However, if no special elections need to be made, upon Carol’s retirement, the sale would be
recognized as a capital gain or loss under section 741, as the partnership is a capital asset (Cornell,
1954). If she should pass away prior to finalizing the terms of the sale, her stake would go to the
estate. A lump sum payment could be paid out by the owners, whereby the cash or loan mix would be
recorded in the statement of cash flows, increase in debt, and increase in asset allocation (The Federal
Register, 2022).
References
Antico, S. R. (2013). Understand tax implications of practice buy-ins, buy-outs: structure agreements
carefully to maximize benefits when an owner or partner leaves or is brought on board. Medical
Economics, 90(2).
Simmons, D. L. (2013). The Tax Consequences of Partnership Break-Ups: A Primer on Partnership
Sales and Liquidations. Tax Lawyer, 66(3), 653–731.
The Tax Consequences of Partnership Break-Ups: A Primer on Partnership Sale...: Multi-Search
(snhu.edu)
Legal Information Institute. (2000, January 11). 26 CFR § 1.708-1 - continuation of partnership. Legal
Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.708-1
Legal Information Institute. (1954, April 16). 26 U.S. Code § 741 - recognition and character of gain
or loss on sale or exchange. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/741
Legal Information Institute. (1976, October 4). 26 U.S. Code § 754 - manner of electing optional
adjustment to basis of partnership property. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/754
FAQs for Internal Revenue Code (IRC) sec. 754 election and revocationi. Internal Revenue Service.
(2022, December 2). Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/businesses/partnerships/faqs-for-internal-
revenue-code-irc-sec-754-election-and-
revocation#:~:text=An%20IRC%20Section%20754%20election%20allows%20a%20partnership%20t
o%20adjust,transfers%20of%20a%20partnership%20interest.
The Federal Register. Federal Register :: Request Access. (2022, June 7). Retrieved from
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/05/2022-16271/streamlining-the-section-754-
election-statement
Antico, S. R. (2013). Understand tax implications of practice buy-ins, buy-outs: structure agreements
carefully to maximize benefits when an owner or partner leaves or is brought on board. Medical
Economics, 90(2).
Simmons, D. L. (2013). The Tax Consequences of Partnership Break-Ups: A Primer on Partnership
Sales and Liquidations. Tax Lawyer, 66(3), 653–731.
The Tax Consequences of Partnership Break-Ups: A Primer on Partnership Sale...: Multi-Search
(snhu.edu)
Rupert, T. J., & Anderson, K. E. (2023). Prentice Hall’s Federal Taxation 2023 Corporations,
Partnerships, Estates & Trusts. Pearson Custom.
U.S. Department of Treasury. (n.d.). 26 U.S. Code § 751 -Unrealized receivables and inventory items.
Legal Information Institute. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/751
Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). 26 U.S. Code § 736 - payments to a retiring partner or a deceased
partner's successor in interest. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/736
Oak Street Funding. (2023, February 8). What are the tax implications of a partner buyout?*. Oak
Street Funding. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://www.oakstreetfunding.com/blog/partner-
buyout-tax-implications
Tax planning for payments to buy out an exiting partner. GRF CPAs & Advisors. (2018, August 1).
Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://www.grfcpa.com/resource/tax-planning-for-payments-to-buy-
out-an-exiting-partner/
Weidner, D. J., & Larson, J. W. (n.d.). The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: The reporters' overview.
Scholarship Repository. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/143/
ForaFinancial.com (June 29, 2021): Retrieved from: /blog/working-capital/partner-buyout-financing/