I hope to someday be able to become a CFE and continue with this line of work. I feel that
specifically the financial statement analysis will be the most useful and I also found it very
interesting. I work for a 225-employee company that is steadily growing and we recently
purchased a very small company to eventually fold into ours. I have discussed with the CFO
my interest in auditing and analysis and he is very encouraging for me to continue that in our
company. His specialty is analysis so he is very excited that someone else would also like to
work on this aspect of the company. He has me doing a small bit of trend analysis with the
company as I do payroll and assist Accounts receivable and a little of everything else. Since I
see so many aspects of the company, he has me looking for patterns and how to either
improve or stop these from continuing. I understand that there is so much more to all of this
analysis but being able to participate in them currently is very exciting for me. The company I
work for is a privately owned construction company which has its short comings also. I am
keeping my options open to pursue other positions outside of this company also. It never hurts
to see what is out there, while this job is wonderful, there may be one that is even better.
I have really enjoyed this course. I feel like I have learned a lot about a wide variety of topics.
I think the concept that will impact me the most in my future career is the processing of
screening engagements. Having just completed the discussion post regarding oral reporting, I
have realized that this is something I should look for in an engagement. Or even clarify with a
client prior to accepting an engagement. I feel as though the entire concept is too risky to be
relied upon on its own. This is not something I ever would have thought about before this
course. Additionally, the exercise where we had to decide if we would accept or reject an
engagement based on the information provided really made me think. That case was pretty
clear cut, but they won't always be that clear. I learned that I need to look beyond
compensation and scope (is this a case that my skill set is equipt to handle) and consider the
reputation and history of the client as well.
When going into this class, I wasnt sure exactly what to expect. I thought the concept of
forensic accounting was something I had never experienced. However, a lot of the concepts in
this class are ones previously covered in various classes over the course of this and my
undergrad degree. One topic that always stands out is the fraud triangle. The fraud triangle
essentially says "individuals are motivated to commit fraud when three elements come
together: (1) some kind of perceived pressure, (2) some perceived opportunity, and (3) some
way to rationalize the fraud as not being inconsistent with one’s values.” (NWC, n.d.) I liked
applying that theory to the Worldcom fraud scheme. Additionally, I watch a lot of crime
dramas and learning about the fraud triangle helps me better understand the detectives
perspective when trying to determine who is committing the crime (whether it be fraud or any
other crime.) I like being able to take concepts and applying them to different areas of life.
When I initially started college, ethics was a standard lecture topic. Behavior and
professionalism are two areas in which accountants are held to high standards. This training
has significantly shifted my perspective on accounting ethics. Before completing this course,
I had a layperson's perspective on ethics. I saw it as a mechanism to answer questions about
human morality by defining concrete categories for concepts like good, evil, right, wrong,
virtue, and vice. Therefore, the AICPA and the IMA have codified codes of ethics that their
respective members must abide by (Ishaque, 2020). This course has taught me that issues of
public trust are at the heart of accounting ethics and provide the foundation for legal and
regulatory responsibilities in the field.
Attempting to apply theoretical models to ethical questions is too much work. Ethical
decision-making requires even more clarity of values than decision-making generally does.
When we think of leaders, we think of people who act ethically. Most citizens hope their
leaders will provide an example of moral conduct (Fernandhytia & Muslichah, 2020). Ethical
decision assessment and implementation may vary based on the context, as opposed to the
basic principles and processes that may be easily automated for financial, inventory, and
production decisions. Some aspects of a model will work wonderfully, while others will not.
Since then, critical thought and judgment have been required when applying predictive
concepts to ethical dilemmas. When weighing the benefits of applying theoretical models to
ethical circumstances against the stress of doing so, doing so is worthwhile. These benefits
include preserving public trust, avoiding administrative probes and punishments, and
stabilizing stock prices.
The course's most intriguing and helpful takeaway is the importance of ethical behavior in
accounting. This article suggests that accountants should give ethics considerable
consideration to prevent ethical issues by analyzing fraudulent cases and determining the
involvement of accountants in the fraud, whether by willing participation in the crime or
negligence (Shanks, 2020). Due to multiple corporate scandals in the accounting world,
which will call into question the reputation of the Profession, I have learned via this course
that Ethics has become an essential area of concern in the accounting profession. Hence,
accountants risk a wide range of accusations when they act dishonestly. For example, in the
ENRON case, the author Anderson had his license to practice law revoked and his character
smeared. The top brass of Enron was unquestionably unethical. Why leaders might act
unethically to the point of bringing down a huge corporation can be challenging to fathom.
The executives at Enron were motivated by ethical egoism when making moral judgments.
Financial statements of corporations would be accurate, truthful, and reliable if only
accountants followed the rules.
The course titled ‘ACC 646: Intro to Forensic Accounting/Fraud Exam’ has been extremely
informative as it has broadened my insight on forensic accounting and how the learned
concepts can be adopted in the real-life setting. The course helps me learn about
characteristics that can help in the detection of fraud and criminal activities involving
accounting. One of the chief elements of the course that I found most interesting was the use
of information technology in the forensic accounting context. As the course has been
designed in an in-depth manner, I got the opportunity to learn and identify how an individual
might be motivated to engage in fraudulent accounting practices within an organization. As
instances of accounting fraud and malpractices have become extremely common in the
contemporary business landscape, the course can help me to use my learned knowledge and
skills in the practical setting to investigate.
The course helped me to strengthen my skills relating to performing analysis and problem-
solving. I can use these skills in the forensic accounting domain to uncover fraudulent
activities or malpractices. By using these skills, I will be able to design robust and effective
antifraud techniques and control measures in my organizational setting and play a
constructive role in preventing fraudulent activities from taking place. For excelling in the
specific area, I need to make sure that I use my accounting knowledge along with critical-
thinking skills to evaluate issues in a detailed manner. The adoption of ethical principles such
as transparency, honesty and integrity and responsibility is also necessary for professionals in
the domain to promote the adoption of responsible and genuine accounting practices. After
taking up the course, I have realized that I also need to develop appropriate digital skills so
that I can carefully assess financial data and identify manipulations or discrepancies.
This class was interesting especially because I was invited to sit in on my company’s end of
the year audit by the external auditing company. I was able to see first-hand the process
unfold as we were learning about it, this allowed concepts to come to life. This made
concepts such as engagement letters and documentation requirements thought provoking and
provided an insight to actual forensic accounting. Additionally, the engagement letter
presented in the meeting allowed me to identify all the elements of the engagement.
Meanwhile, this class aided me in gathering the required documents for the audit such as bank
statements and journal entries.
Furthermore, the in-depth look at the fraud triangle and the AICPA code of conduct provided
me with resources for the future. These resources will provide the appropriate information for
my personal and professional life. Furthermore, the investigation of the company for the final
project provided real life scenarios to better assist in the decision making in the future.
This has been a very interesting and enjoyable class to take. Before coming into this class, I
had no prior knowledge of Forensic Accounting, but I feel like I have gained a good
understanding of some concepts that may be beneficial in the future. There were so many
concepts, but one of the concepts that I found most interesting is the fraud triangle and how it
helps explain the reasoning behind someone’s decision to commit fraud. We learned that
fraud takes place when three elements are present--pressure, opportunity and rationalization.
We can help prevent fraud by addressing these elements. I have used this information to
educate my co-workers about the ‘opportunity’ element and why we practice things like
separation of duties and documentation. I also find myself thinking of how we could improve
the management structure. Right now, the company has only 2 levels of management and
there is a lot of ambiguity within the company which could be an environment for fraudulent
behavior. Another layer of management may improve communication and oversight.
The skills about analyzing a company’s balance sheet and income statement. Because the
income statement and balance sheet are interconnected, I can look for unusual relationships
that may indicate issues (example: if revenues increased on the income statement, but cash
and receivables decreased on the balance sheet, this may be a red flag). Or financial ratios can
be analyzed, such as return on equity, or debt-to-equity.
I have always met individuals who were either in tax, audit, or general accounting. d I attended
an accounting conference about 15 years ago and sat in a presentation about forensic
accounting. I was so intrigued with the profession. However, I felt that since I have been in
general accounting for a while that it would have been hard to transition into forensic
accounting.
The concept that I enjoyed the most was conducting a fraud investigation. It gave an overview
of the engagement as well as the different phases. It moves on to discuss the reasonableness
of fraud. The concept that will be most useful in my personal life is the chapter on
professional responsibilities. This topic is relevant for all careers and areas of life. As an
accountant there are code of conducts that we must follow in our career. I prepare tax returns
as well. d I must have professional competence and due professional care and keep up with the
tax laws so that I am providing my clients with the best service possible. I also must have
confidently with clients’ information. I have access to individual’s social security number as
well as their dependents and spouses. In addition, I do not provide return information to
client’s families including their spouses if they are filing separately. I leave that up to the
client’s to share their own information if they choose.
There were many concepts and skills Found truly interesting was Cressey’s Fraud theory. d The
theory being that a “violation of trust (fraud) occurs when the position of trust (opportunity) is
viewed by the trusted person as a rational means (solution) to solve a non-shareable problem
(pressure)” (Rufus, 2015, pg. 149). Being able to understand the different sides of the triangle
such as pressure, opportunity, and rationalization is something I will quite literally need to
take with me going into my field. Recently, we have seen a surge of financial statements that
seem dubious and could warrant the need to implement the fraud theory to understand who,
why and how they committed the fraud. The way that the economy is heading, auditors will
be needed more than ever to ensure that companies and institutions follow GAAP standards.
The skill that I find most helpful that I learned from this class is to always be on the lookout
for potential fraud. I think that when you have studied fraud investigations, you carry that
skepticism with you forever. Knowing what could become a potential issue allows you to
identify the signs quicker and makes you a better accountant. It is our job to ensure that
financial statements are reported correctly as we are the last line of defense before the BOD or
executives review it and then includes any fraudulent activity. Know that everyone has the
potential and the opportunity to commit fraud so it is very important that internal controls are
strong and that employees feel comfortable coming forward if they suspect any wrong doings.
These skills included gathering data and transforming data into evidence, which allows one to
provide an interpretation of the evidence so that one gains the understanding necessary to
provide the assurance to the courts or the public interest, depending on the setting. Effective
data gathering as a forensic accountant will require one to exercise professional judgment
when determining the types of data one will analyze and when determining whether the data
gathered was sufficient, relevant, and reliable. “Forensic Accountants as professionals are
trained to be proficient in the use of professional skills, core arithmetic, analytical and
investigative skills, and competencies in the assessment of risk factors that could lead to
material misstatement” (N.U., & Okenwa, 2021, 451). The concepts learned allows us to
understand how to investigate and the steps needed to detect any potential fraud or
misstatements that can affect the relevance and reliability of the data reported on a company’s
financial statement. Given that I work as an Accounting Manager for a nonprofit
organization, I was able to acknowledge the importance of written reports and the need to
document any details that can potentially impact the outcome of a case or investigation. I
have found myself writing up summary reports after every meeting that I have with program
directors, peers, management, and other third parties, as it helps me document any needs or
concerns that the individuals may have expressed during our meeting. I can then always look
back at these reports to serve as guidance when constructing budgets and making revisions
when necessary. “More importantly, the forensic accountant’s objective is to provide a
credible and legally sufficient communication,” as it can, “provide a comprehensive
discussion of the assignment, allowing the reader to develop a greater understanding of the
data, reasoning, and analyses leading to the opinions (conclusions) stated” (Rufus et al., 2015,
380).
When reflecting on the course, the most interesting concepts, in my view, are from real case
experiences and the theories of fraud, mainly white-collar crime and the characteristics of a
fraudster.
The Fraud Diamond theory was introduced with an added condition to the Fraud Triangle:
Capability. The theory didn’t necessarily move me; however, the introduction made me think.
I think capability or incapacity used as an argument by defense attorneys, as described in our
text, is something to consider when collecting evidence or conducting an interview. (Rufus,
Miller, Hahn, 2014) However, my overall thought was it almost doesn’t make sense because
capability and opportunity may be considered the same in some regard or until one enters the
physiological abyss to garnish empathy for a defense. I find this interesting when a “typical
white-collar fraudster lacks feelings of empathy” (Rufus, Miller, Hahn, 2014).
Furthermore, it seems that consideration for incapacity would only truly be present in a sort of
confession by the subject. Also, I would debate if fraud were committed, the subject was
capable whether the subject was caught or not. Overall, I think the fraud triangle is key.
Through personal work experience, every fraudster I have encountered has encompassed
every point of the fraud triangle: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. (Rufus, Miller,
Hahn, 2014)
A new concept learned that positively resonates with me is the Scientific Approach to an
Engagement (Rufus, Miller, Hahn, 2014), encompassing the following five steps: Step 1:
Define the Purpose, Step 2: Form a Hypothesis, Step 3: Gather Evidence, Step 4: Interpret
Data and Refine Hypothesis, Step 5: Draw Conclusions. (Rufus, Miller, Hahn, 2014) I think
the Scientific Approach to an Engagement is a great outline or reference to begin a project
and revisit.
Leaving the term and course, I have learned a lot, new tools, and more to offer my clients.
Also, with the current high-profile fraud cases in the media, I understand what everyone is
talking about and can even fill in the blanks! Overall, I still aspire to take on investigative
projects and divorce cases.
This was good, for although I do not want to become a fraud investigator, I now have a better
understanding behind what goes on during an investigation. I feel the fraud triangle was
probably where I came to this realization as it helps in assessing what is lacking in the
controls. Usually, I approach an audit thinking that something was misrepresented due to
human error but I have become a bit more suspicious in my work. d Hopefully I do not find an
administrator who is mismanaging retiree funds, but I feel more aware none the less.
The concepts that we have studied in the course will be very useful in my career, and
currently they already are. In my department at my job, we have our external auditors that
conduct an audit exam every year. This is mainly to prepare us for our FDIC exam. They ask
us specific questions to understand our job functions, and if there are new processes that have
been implemented, they want to know. They are essentially gathering evidence to determine
our final grade for the exam. It was also interesting to learn about the different theories of
crime causation and what drives a criminal to commit a crime, better known as the fraud
theory. I could use the red flags talked about in the text to analyze if I believe a co-worker, or
even a manager, is committing fraudulent acts. Lastly, I must abide by the professional
responsibilities of the accounting profession, which are “to employ the degree of knowledge,
skill, and judgment ordinarily possessed by members of the profession, to follow the highest
standards of conduct prescribed by each of the organizations to which the professional (or
firm) belongs, and to adhere to the provisions of any regulatory or licensing authority”
(Rufus, Miller, & Hahn, 2014, p. 292).
This has been an interesting class to take. I have always loved mysteries and trying to solve
them. This class was about finding out which companies have committed fraud, how they
committed the fraud, and why. I want to go into auditing which the skills I learned in this class
will prepare me for. Skills such as examining and gathering data will be relevant for ensuring
companies are acting in compliance and if not, how the financials have been affected. We also
had an activity where we learned about the factors to consider when deciding to accept or
reject an assignment. This skill will also be useful as an auditor because in some cases you
would need to decide whether to accept or reject a new client and looking at factors such as
why they need a new auditor or they consistently need a new auditor every couple years can
signal that this would be a risky engagement or should be rejected.
This has been one of my most interesting classes. I love the hunt of looking up companies and
seeing what fraud they committed, why they committed it, and what eventually happened to
the company. I have loved looking up Enron and seeing how greedy the upper management
team was and how that eventually caused the company to have to file for bankruptcy and to
close down. The concepts and/or skills learned in this class that I find most interesting and
will be most useful to my professional or personal life is the fraud triangle that was developed
by Dr. Donald Cressey. The fraud triangle is made of 3 categories: opportunity,
rationalization, and financial pressures, and it explains why so many people commit fraud.
This was very interesting to me because now after further researching, I totally agree with the
findings. Having knowledge of this will allow me to make sure that I don't think like this and
allows me to help my friends and family if I feel like they might be leaning towards making
up and excuse to do something illegal.
References
Rufus, R., Miller, L., & Hahn, W. (2014, p. 292). Forensic Accounting. Pearson Education.
Rufus, R., Miller, L., & Hahn, W. (2014). Forensic accounting. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education.
J., N. U., & Okenwa, O. C. (2021). Effective Deploy of Digital Forensic Techniques and the
Sustenance of Material Misstatement-Free Financial Reporting in Nigeria. Journal of
Academic Research in Economics, 13(3), 442–478
Rufus, R., Miller, L., & Hahn, W. (2015). Forensic Accounting. Pearson Education, Inc.
Rufus, R. J., Miller, L. S., & Hahn, W. (2015). Forensic accounting. Pearson.
Fernandhytia, F., & Muslichah, M. (2020). The effect of internal control, individual morality
and ethical value on accounting fraud tendency. Media Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 35(1), 112-
127. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/fe/article/view/1343
Ishaque, M. (2020, January). Cognitive approach to understand the impact of conflict of
interests on accounting professionals’ decision-making behaviour. In Accounting Forum (Vol.
44, No. 1, pp. 64-98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2019.1583303
Shanks, R. (2020). Is the IESBA Code of Ethics sufficient to help solve ethical dilemmas
facing the accounting profession?. London: Institute of Business Ethics.
https://www.ibe.org.uk/uploads/assets/deb95714-bf4d-4e9a-a6444c2451c3b766/2020-
Winning-Essay-Postgraduate.pdf