HSCO 500 Liberty Poverty as A Social Problem Outline for Research Paper assign.pdf

Is there anything else you׳d like to ask?
Our top-rated tutors can help you.

Click here to post a question
Related Documents
1 / 46100%
Research Paper – Working Outline Instructions
Using current APA format, you will create a Working Outline as the next step towards
your Final Research Paper. This outline will include a title page and references page(s),
making any corrections from the Research Topic Paper and Annotated Bibliography
Paper feedback.
You will outline your proposed Final Paper into various sections. You must include a brief
summary (thesis statement) of the kind of content and scholarly sources you plan to
include, giving a clear direction for your Final Research Paper.
You must cite ALL the sources from your Annotated Bibliography paper into the Working
Outline (carefully review the provided Working Outline Example!). You can add or delete
sources as you build your outline, however, ALL proposed sources (minimum of 10 peer-
reviewed journal articles) must be cited in the outline!
Sources must be referenced as appropriate, following current APA format, and you must
include your references in an APA References page at the end of the Working Outline.
Make sure to review the “Working Outline Example” and follow that format in your
Working Outline paper that you upload for grading!
Please see the attached document for the Research Topic and the annotated
bibliography and grading rubic for the outline. Please make all corrections noted in the
comment sections and all corrections based on feedback in red font color- MAJOR
REQUIREMENT.
Running head: POVERTY IN AMERICA 1
POVERTY IN AMERICA
Introduction to Human Services Counseling – HSCO 500
Student Name
Date
Liberty University
POVERTY IN AMERICA 2
POVERTY IN AMERICA
My research topic will be poverty in America because poverty is a reflection of society
and is not a personal choice. Poverty is primarily a social problem that is affecting many people
in America. Majorly, when a country's economy is static, that country is deemed as poor.
Another factor is the imbalance between a country's population and its natural resources.
Resources are available to assist low or no income families, but not everyone is qualified for
certain benefits; this can lead to poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are
starving. This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
America is also the home to many billionaires and industrialists like Jeff Bezos and Bill
Gates, yet the majority of Americans are unemployed. This is another paradox. Therefore, I have
settled on the topic of "Poverty in America." Data from the United States Census Bureau shows
that the poverty rate in America is at 13. 5 %. In terms of population, this means approximately
43.1 million American citizens are battling the pangs of poverty (Hector, Najera & David, 2019).
One way to define poverty is the state of not having sufficient income to meet the three main
basic needs, such as food, shelter, and clothing. However, there is more to poverty than just not
having sufficient income. Poverty is also associated with not being in a position to afford the
medication needed. Moreover, poverty means not being able to afford quality education or any
education at all (Hector, Najera & David, 2019).
America is one of the world's most developed countries, and many expect not to read or
witness poverty in America. However, this is not true, and poverty is indeed wreaking havoc in
America. Many people are not able to fuel their cars or take their families on vacation because of
the little income they earn. Unemployed Americans living from paycheck to paycheck find it
hard to cope with the demands of life. One of the main reasons why people lack jobs in America
POVERTY IN AMERICA 3
is that larger companies and corporations prefer outsourcing jobs to developing economies. In
developing economies, the human labor force is cheaper compared to an average American
worker. Many chain stores are under receivership in underperforming cities; therefore, they
remain closed (Bradshaw, Chant & Linneker, 2019).
The available jobs in America pay minimum wages that can hardly sustain a family of
five. Compared to other established nations, poverty in America is ranked the highest. Some
American spends a lot of money on drugs and gambling, which is another factor that can lead to
poverty. According to Joseph (2019), 40 % of Americans are homeless due to addiction and
gambling. This number could rise, and the government needs to develop a contingency plan to
end poverty.
POVERTY IN AMERICA 4
Reference
Héctor E. Nájera Catalán & David Gordon (2019) The Importance of Reliability and Construct
Validity in Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: An Illustration Using the
Multidimensional Poverty Index for Latin America (MPI-LA), The Journal of
Development Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1663176
Rigaud Joseph (2019) Poverty, Welfare, and Self-Sufficiency: Implications for the Social Work
Profession, Journal of Poverty, 23:6, 505-520, DOI: 10.1080/10875549.2019.1616037
Sarah Bradshaw, Sylvia Chant & Brian Linneker (2019) Challenges and Changes in Gendered
Poverty: The Feminization, De-Feminization, and Re-Feminization of Poverty in Latin
America, Feminist Economics, 25:1, 119-144, DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1529417
Feedback: Poverty is an excellent topic and there is a wealth of information. All sources should
be based upon US populations and you will need to thoroughly cover statistics (incidence,
prevalence, demographics), causes/contributing factors, effects/outcomes, and interventions.
Please keep this is mind as you begin to prepare the Annotated Bibliography. All assertions and
conclusions must be literature supported and it is imported to make sure that information is
interpreted and presented correctly. Parenthetical citations look good. All references are
incorrect, and the US Census Bureau should be listed in the references. Please refer to the APA
manual and sample papers for formatting. Please contact me with questions.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1
Annotated Bibliography
Introduction to Human Services Counseling – HSCO 500
Student Name
Professor’s name
Liberty University
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2
Poverty in America - Annotated Bibliography
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the Causes of Poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
The author discusses the various frameworks for theories of poverty. The author argues
that the cause of poverty can be categorized into three broad theories. The first theory is
the behavioral theory, which discusses how individual behaviors could lead to increased
poverty conditions. The second is structural theories, which look into how demographics
and the labor market can influence poverty. The third theory is the political theories, which
argue that political power and institutions can implement certain policies that may
contribute to increased poverty. This article is crucial to my research as it tries to explain
some of the causes and factors leading to poverty.
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family
poverty on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care.
Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120.
The authors researched various ways available to mitigate the effects of poverty on early
child development. According to the authors, socioeconomic disparities that exist in child
development and school readiness significantly affect the child’s educational
performance. Poverty can adversely affect the childhood development of children from
poor backgrounds. However, interventions such as improved pediatric primary care, in a
bid to prevent behavioral and developmental problems can significantly aid in improving
the child’s developmental conditions. The authors also highlight promoting positive
parenting can significantly improve the child’s developmental outcomes, which translates
to better education and improved chances for a better life.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 3
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
In this journal, the authors study how various social workers perceive issues of poverty in
the United States. Social work requires the individual to adhere to social justice principles,
and help poor and marginal groups to achieve a better social status. In such work, the
negative perception of people living in poor conditions can significantly affect the quality
of work of the social worker. The authors, therefore, argue that social work educators
should devise teaching techniques that will ensure social empathy is embraced. The authors
also highlight the benefits of social work and welfare programs in helping alleviate poverty
from American residents.
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H. (2017).
Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
In this article, the authors investigate the effect of poverty on alcohol abuse, suicide rates,
unemployment, and foreclosures. The authors use national data to evaluate the effects of
poverty from 16 states. Their study reported significant evidence on the relationship
between poverty rates and increased alcohol consumption and suicide rates among adults
in the United States. Also, poverty rates were found to play a crucial role in the
unemployment rates of persons living in poverty levels. This article is crucial to the
research as it addresses the effect of poverty rates on unemployment, suicide rates, and
alcohol abuse.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 4
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-
population health, 2, 123-129.
According to the authors, a higher mortality rate in minority communities such as Blacks
compared to Whites has been proven and investigated widely. However, the authors
argue that the high mortality rate seen in the Black communities can also be significantly
influenced by poverty. The authors investigated the relationship between high poverty
levels and increased mortality rates. Their study revealed that poverty significantly
contributes to social and health inequalities, which mostly leads to mortality disparities
seen today. With high poverty levels, individuals living in the poverty level are unable to
access quality health. Therefore, they end up suffering and dying from various diseases.
This study will help to highlight the effects of poverty on mortality rate.
Kneebone, E., & Holmes, N. (2016). Concentrated poverty in the wake of the Great Recession.
Brookings. Available at: https://www. brookings. edu/research/us-concentrated-poverty-
in-thewake-of-the-great-recession.
In this article, the author provides graphical data indicating the prevalence of poverty in
the United States. According to the article, the authors highlight that over the last 40 years,
the number of US population that lived below the federal poverty line was between 11 to
15 percent. Also, the authors highlight that between the years 2000 and 2014, the number
of residents living below the poverty line rose from 22 million to 47 million. This article
will provide great insights into the research, as it shows the rate of poverty in the United
States.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 5
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B.
(2016). Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift
children out of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
The authors discuss the various policies and interventions that can be implemented to
alleviate child poverty in the United States. According to the authors, intergenerational
poverty is primarily linked to the present unequal distribution of resources and
opportunities. The authors suggest interventions such as improving the opportunities
structure within the neighborhoods and community economic initiatives can significantly
in improving child health, development, and improve the socioeconomic status of the
families. This article is useful in the research as it highlights various measures and tools
that can be implemented to improve the socioeconomic conditions of neighborhoods.
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). Income and poverty in the United States:
2016. Current Population Reports, (P60-259).
The authors researched the income and poverty levels in the United States or the year 2018.
In this article, the authors analyze the median household income for 2018 across all
demographics. In the same way, the authors also analyzed the poverty levels of US
residents in 2018 across all demographics. This research presents crucial information for
the research study, as it analyzes both household income of Americans and the poverty
levels in the US, which will help in highlighting the current state of most US residents in
terms of their standards of living, according to their demographics.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 6
In this article, the authors seek to compare various measures and policies taken by other
rich nations and compares them with those in the United States. The authors note that
poverty levels in the United States are considerably high compared to other high-income
countries. Household composition and labor market are the major drivers to child poverty.
One of the interventions suggested includes investing in children, supporting parental
employment, and incomes. By doing so, the families will be able to ensure the children get
a better education, better healthcare, and improved living conditions.
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about the
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485.
With the number of people living in poverty steadily increasing in the US, getting a
perception of how other members of society view these poor people is essential. The
authors discuss how other individuals view people who are living in poverty and are
dependent on the government’s assistance. The role of social empathy and attitudes
towards the people living in poverty plays a significant role in the attitudes directed towards
poor people. Wealthy Americans may not understand the challenges that poor people are
facing or even factors that can contribute to an individual becoming poor. The article will
help in highlighting the social empathy and attitudes of people living in the poverty
threshold.
Feedback: You have done a good job identifying peer reviewed articles, however, more will be needed to
thoroughly address the topic. Articles that focus on theory and beliefs, as opposed to the practical
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 7
evaluation of poverty and its impact on society should be used in the Introduction. Selected articles do not
address how/why Poverty is a social issue. Who is impacted (statistics on incidence, prevalence, and
demographics)? What are the literal causes and contributing factors (unemployment, mental health issues,
substance abuse, lack of education, generational cycles)? What are the effects/outcomes (mental health
issues, exposure to violence, developmental delays in children, health disparities, food insecurity)? What
are the available interventions and governmental programs to address the noted effects? Articles that
answer these type of practical questions are needed.
To successfully complete the Outline and final paper, supporting literature will need to address basic
content areas: Introduction and Overview, Statistics, Causes/Contributing Factors, Effects/Outcomes, and
Possible Solutions. Please modify the focus of your search to find appropriate articles.
For the Outline, the Roman numerals are comparable to Level 1 headings (major areas); i.e., I. Intro, II.
Statistics, etc. The outline may be organized as you see fit to accommodate content. Many of the articles
selected above may be used for introductory information. In a 10-12-page paper, Level 1 and Level 2
headings should be sufficient, to avoid a choppy (too many paragraphs) paper. Although 10 sources is the
minimum, the best and most thorough papers typically have more than the minimum. It is important to
pay attention to length specifications; detailed, yet concise, writing will be necessary to not exceed 12
pages in the final paper (a little extra is acceptable).
Working Outline
A working outline is crafted after all of your preliminary research is done. It is a solid
tool to organize all of the concepts you will address in your research paper and can easily be
converted into a final draft of your actual paper.
Use standard outlining format (see below), with your thesis statement above the first
Roman numeral entry; it will become the foundation for your introductory paragraph (which in
APA style is never preceded by a heading titled “introduction”):
Thesis statement
All of your primary issues will be enumerated as Roman numerals (I, II, III). These
should be left-justified, in standard outline format. They will later become your Level 1
headings (see page 62 of your APA manual). Include some bullets or phrases to support
each, with citations in proper APA format for the resources in your reference list.
Complete sentences are not necessary in an outline.
The supporting (secondary) issues for each primary issue will be labeled with capital
letters (A, B, C). These should be indented ½”, in standard outline format. They will later
become your Level 2 headings.
Any tertiary issues that support your secondary issues will be labeled with Arabic
numbers (1, 2, 3). These should be indented 1”, in standard outline format. They will
become your Level 3 headings.
Subheadings under the tertiary issues would be labeled with lowercase letters (a, b, c).
These would be indented 1-1/2”, in standard outline format. They would become your
Level 4 headings.
The last possible level would be issues supporting the Level 4 headings, which would
be labeled with lowercase Roman numerals (i, ii, iii). These would be indented 2”. They
would become Level 5 headings.
Conclusion.
As with all outlines and papers, there must be at least two divisions for each level used, if
any. Outlines cannot have a “I” without a “II” or an “A” without a “B,” for example. Likewise,
APA papers cannot have just one Level 2 heading under a Level 1 heading; there must be at least
two Level 2 headings under that Level 1 heading, or no Level 2 headings there at all. In other
words, if you don’t plan to divide the larger section into two or more smaller sections, do not
divide it at all. Each new larger section starts anew. It is possible to have five Roman numerals,
with capital letters under just the fourth one; others may have capital letter divisions under every
Roman numeral.
Also note that the information included under each section should NOT be in complete
sentences. Phrases should be short and direct. A standard title page and reference page are also
required, as required in all APA assignments. Sample working outline follows on the next page.
SAMPLE WORKING OUTLINE 1
Sample Working Outline
Student Name
Liberty University
SAMPLE WORKING OUTLINE 2
Sample Working Outline
Thesis: God designed and created man with an internal yearning to have close interpersonal
relationships and attachment to Him and others, thus behavioral issues resulting from attachment
disorders have spiritual implications.
I. The Core Causations of Reactive Attachment Disorder:
A. Attachment Theory and Development of Attachment Styles
1. John Bowlby; Jane Ainsworth.
2. Anxious/ambivalent, avoidant, or secure (Besharat, 2011, p. 475).
a. 16% = anxious/ ambivalent;
b. 21% = avoidant;
c. 63% = secure (Levy et al., 2011, p. 193).
3. Childhood attachment styles develop into lifelong patterns.
B. Pathways to Depravity:
1. RAD develops during the first three years of a child’s life;
2. Due to lack of adequate and appropriate caretaker;
3. RAD = lack of empathy; research = confirmed link between compromised
levels of empathy and antisocial behaviors (Thompson & Gullone, 2008, p. 123).
C. Statistics:
1. United States:
a. 38-40% of foster children;
b. 195,000.
2. International:
a. 1% of all children worldwide;
b. 22,000,000 (Hall & Geher, 2003, p. 149).
SAMPLE WORKING OUTLINE 3
II. Correlations Between One’s Attachment to Others and Corresponding Attachment to God
A. Attachment to Others:
1. People = flesh-and-bone correlation of God’s design.
2. By definition = children with RAD shun true intimacy with everyone/God.
B. God Image and Attachment:
1. Scriptural correlations:
a. “Man is designed to relate to God and the human brain is [in fact]
‘wired for God’” (Fayard et al., 2009, p. 167).
b. Jesus Christ = “living water” (John 4:10, 13).
c. Bible = replete with imagery of God as a compassionate, caring,
involved, devoted and doting father to His children
d. God’s own example = emotional intimacy, bonding, secure attachment
2. Impact of personal religiosity on attachment:
a. Parents with higher levels of personal religiosity = “stronger
authoritative parenting skills … and report less parent-child conflict”
(Pickering & Vazsonyi, 2010, p. 98).
b. Children with a genuine relationship with God = stronger resilience in
navigating the adolescent years (Pickering & Vazsonyi, 2010, p. 111-
112).
C. Spiritual Implications:
1. RAD = spiritual implications because it necessarily interferes with the person’s
ability to relate to God;
2. It interferes with a person’s ability to relate to others.
III. Conclusion
SAMPLE WORKING OUTLINE 4
References
Besharat, M. (2011). Development and validation of adult attachment inventory. Procedia –
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 475–479.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.093
Fayard, C., Pereau, M., & Ciovica, A. (2009). ‘Love the Lord with all your mind’: Explorations
on a possible neurobiology of the experience of god and some implications for the
practice of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 28(2), 167-181.
Hall, S., & Geher, G. (2003). Behavioral and personality characteristics of children with reactive
attachment disorder. The Journal of Psychology, 137(2), 145-162.
Levy, K., Ellison, W., Scott, L. & Bernecker, S. (2011). Attachment style. Journal of Clinical
Psychology: In Session, 67(2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20756
Pickering, L., & Vazsonyi, A. (2010). Does family process mediate the effect of religiosity on
adolescent deviance?: Revisiting the notion of spuriousness. Criminal Justice and
Behavior, 37, 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809347813
Thompson, K., & Gullone, E. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescents: An
investigation into associations with attachment and empathy. Anthrozoos, 21(2), 123-137.
https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708X305774
SAMPLE WORKING OUTLINE 5
HSCO 500
Page 1 of 1
RESEARCH PAPER WORKING OUTLINE RUBRIC TEMPLATE (BASED ON 100 POINT TOTAL)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Proficient (B- to B+) :
Satisfies Criteria
Developing (C- to C+):
Satisfies most criteria
Below Expectations (F
to D+):
Does not satisfy criteria
Not Present
Points
Earned
Content 70% (70 pts.)
Content
65 - 70 pts.
The outline is clear and
well-focused. Content
displays a clear direction
for the final research paper.
59 - 64 pts.
The outline is clear but
needs focus. Content
displays adequate direction
for the final research paper.
53 - 58 pts.
The outline is vague and
lacks some clarity and focus.
Content displays some
direction for the final
research paper.
1 - 52 pts.
The outline is unclear
and unfocused. Content
displays little to no clear
direction for the final
research paper.
0 points
Structure 30% (30 pts.)
Style
15 pts.
The paper properly uses
current APA style. The
paper reflects a graduate
level voice and vocabulary.
There are very few spelling
and grammar errors.
13 - 14 pts.
The paper consistently uses
current APA style with few
or no exceptions. The paper
reflects a graduate level
voice and vocabulary. There
are few spelling and
grammar errors.
12 pts.
The paper inconsistently
uses APA style. The paper
does not consistently reflect
a graduate level voice and
vocabulary. There are
spelling and grammar errors.
1 - 11 pts.
The paper erroneously
uses or does not use
APA style. The paper
does not reflect a
graduate level voice and
vocabulary. There are
spelling and grammar
errors.
0 points
Sources
15 pts.
The Reference page meets
or exceeds the required
number of sources. All
sources are referenced
throughout the outline.
13 - 14 pts.
The Reference page meets
the required number of
sources. Most sources are
referenced throughout the
outline.
12 pts.
The Reference page does not
meet the required number of
sources. Not all sources are
referenced throughout the
outline.
1 - 11 pts.
The Reference page is
not present or contains
few sources. Not enough
sources are referenced
throughout the outline, or
none are referenced.
0 points
Total
1
A Working Outline
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
2
A Working Outline
Thesis: People who do not have material possession or have insufficient income in the united states
are termed to be living in poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are starving.
This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
I. Introduction
A. Poverty as a social problem (Frank & Rice, 2017).
B. Theories and beliefs (Brady, 2019).
1. Behavioral theory
2. Structural theories
3. Political theories
4. Economic theories
a. Classical and neoclassical
b. Neoliberal/keynsian
c. Radical/ Marxian
d. Social capital and social exclusion
II. United States Poverty statistics (US Census Bureau, 2019)
III. Poverty causes in America
A. Overpopulation (Semega et al., 2017).
B. Epidemic diseases
C. Lack of education
D. Unemployment
E. Climate change
F. Food access
3
G. Health
IV. Effects of poverty (Amarante & Brun, 2018).
A. Food insecurity
B. Homelessness
C. Lack of access to health care (Kimmel et al., 2016).
D. Poor child care (Sandel et al., 2016).
E. Increase in crime
V. Possible interventions (Berger et al., 2018)
A. Programs
1. Low-income Home Energy Assistance (Wagaman et al., 2018)
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
3. National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016).
4. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
(Cates et al., 2016).
5. Community Services Block Grant (Kearney & Harris, 2014).
B. Increase employment opportunities
C. Raise America’s wages
D. Invest in education
E. Invest in health systems
VI. Conclusion
4
References
Amarante, V., & Brun, M. (2018). Cash transfers in Latin America: effects on poverty and
redistribution. Economía, 19(1), 1-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90025861
Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Magnuson, K. (2018). Anti-poverty policy innovations: New
proposals for addressing poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.01
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the causes of poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family poverty
on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic
pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1287261
Kearney, M., & Harris, B. (Eds.). (2014). Policies to address poverty in America. Brookings
Institution Press.
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-population
health, 2, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.003
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B. (2016).
Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift children out
of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.013
5
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). US Census Bureau, current population
reports, P60-259, income and poverty in the United States: 2016. US Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC, 10-11.
Shannon, P. (2014). Reading poverty in America. Routledge.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.011
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2018.1460740
1
A Working Outline
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
2
A Working Outline
Thesis: People who do not have material possession or have insufficient income in the united states
are termed to be living in poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are starving.
This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
I. Introduction
A. Poverty as a social problem (Frank & Rice, 2017).
B. Theories and beliefs (Brady, 2019).
1. Behavioral theory
2. Structural theories
3. Political theories
4. Economic theories
a. Classical and neoclassical
b. Neoliberal/keynsian
c. Radical/ Marxian
d. Social capital and social exclusion
II. United States Poverty statistics (US Census Bureau, 2019)
III. Poverty causes in America
A. Overpopulation (Semega et al., 2017).
B. Epidemic diseases
C. Lack of education
D. Unemployment
E. Climate change
F. Food access
3
G. Health
IV. Effects of poverty (Amarante & Brun, 2018).
A. Food insecurity
B. Homelessness
C. Lack of access to health care (Kimmel et al., 2016).
D. Poor child care (Sandel et al., 2016).
E. Increase in crime
V. Possible interventions (Berger et al., 2018)
A. Programs
1. Low-income Home Energy Assistance (Wagaman et al., 2018)
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
3. National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016).
4. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
(Cates et al., 2016).
5. Community Services Block Grant (Ravallion, 2016).
B. Increase employment opportunities
C. Raise America’s wages
D. Invest in education
E. Invest in health systems
VI. Conclusion
4
References
Amarante, V., & Brun, M. (2018). Cash transfers in Latin America: effects on poverty and
redistribution. Economía, 19(1), 1-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90025861
Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Magnuson, K. (2018). Anti-poverty policy innovations: New
proposals for addressing poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.01
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the causes of poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family poverty
on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic
pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1287261
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-population
health, 2, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.003
Ravallion, M. (2016). The Economics of Poverty. (1st Edition). Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B. (2016).
Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift children out
of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.013
5
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). US Census Bureau, current population
reports, P60-259, income and poverty in the United States: 2016. US Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC, 10-11.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.011
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2018.1460740
I think you sent back the same unedited document. Also need running head and page
numbers....APA seventh edition formatting. I can see that you removed the source dated
2014...
This source is on the annotated bibliography but is missing from the outline
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H.
(2017). Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
Outline DOs:
Read instructions very carefully.
Include all appropriate sources from the Annotated Bibliography; 10 is the
minimum and sources should be recent, within 5 years, peer reviewed
journal articles based on US populations. All foundational sources must
meet these basic criteria. Additional sources may be used to complement
the foundational 10. There is not a maximum and all proposed sources
should be included.
Identify and include additional sources if you were advised to do so.
Cover basic content areas- Introduction/Overview, review of relevant
Statistics, Causes/Contributing Factors, Effects/Outcomes, Interventions,
and Conclusion.
Include a strong Thesis Statement
Include a Reference page
Follow the Sample for formatting- Of note, the Sample is for basic
formatting. Make your outline fit your content.
1
A Working Outline
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
2
A Working Outline
Thesis: People who do not have material possession or have insufficient income in the united states
are termed to be living in poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are starving.
This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
I. Introduction
A. Poverty as a social problem (Frank & Rice, 2017).
B. Theories and beliefs (Brady, 2019).
1. Behavioral theory
2. Structural theories
3. Political theories
4. Economic theories
a. Classical and neoclassical
b. Neoliberal/keynsian
c. Radical/ Marxian
d. Social capital and social exclusion
II. United States Poverty statistics (US Census Bureau, 2019)
III. Poverty causes in America
A. Overpopulation (Semega et al., 2017).
B. Epidemic diseases
C. Lack of education
D. Unemployment
E. Climate change
F. Food access
3
G. Health
IV. Effects of poverty (Amarante & Brun, 2018).
A. Food insecurity
B. Homelessness
C. Lack of access to health care (Kimmel et al., 2016).
D. Poor child care (Sandel et al., 2016).
E. Increase in crime
V. Possible interventions (Berger et al., 2018)
A. Programs
1. Low-income Home Energy Assistance (Wagaman et al., 2018)
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
3. National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016).
4. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
(Cates et al., 2016).
5. Community Services Block Grant (Ravallion, 2016).
B. Increase employment opportunities
C. Raise America’s wages
D. Invest in education
E. Invest in health systems
VI. Conclusion
4
References
Amarante, V., & Brun, M. (2018). Cash transfers in Latin America: effects on poverty and
redistribution. Economía, 19(1), 1-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90025861
Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Magnuson, K. (2018). Anti-poverty policy innovations: New
proposals for addressing poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.01
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the causes of poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family poverty
on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic
pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1287261
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H. (2017).
Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-population
health, 2, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.003
Ravallion, M. (2016). The Economics of Poverty. (1st Edition). Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B. (2016).
Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift children out
5
of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.013
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). US Census Bureau, current population
reports, P60-259, income and poverty in the United States: 2016. US Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC, 10-11.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.011
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2018.1460740
1
A WORKING OUTLINE
A WORKING OUTLINE
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
2
A WORKING OUTLINE
A Working Outline
Thesis: People who do not have material possession or have insufficient income in the united states
are termed to be living in poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are starving.
This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
I. Introduction
A. Poverty as a social problem (Frank & Rice, 2017).
B. Theories and beliefs (Brady, 2019).
1. Behavioral theory
2. Structural theories
3. Political theories
4. Economic theories
a. Classical and neoclassical
b. Neoliberal/keynsian
c. Radical/ Marxian
d. Social capital and social exclusion
II. United States Poverty statistics (US Census Bureau, 2019)
III. Poverty causes in America
A. Overpopulation (Semega et al., 2017).
B. Epidemic diseases
C. Lack of education
D. Unemployment
E. Climate change
F. Food access
3
A WORKING OUTLINE
G. Health
IV. Effects of poverty (Amarante & Brun, 2018).
A. Food insecurity
B. Homelessness
C. Lack of access to health care (Kimmel et al., 2016).
D. Poor child care (Sandel et al., 2016).
E. Increase in crime
V. Possible interventions (Berger et al., 2018)
A. Programs
1. Low-income Home Energy Assistance (Wagaman et al., 2018)
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
3. National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016).
4. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
(Cates et al., 2016).
5. Community Services Block Grant (Ravallion, 2016).
B. Increase employment opportunities
C. Raise America’s wages
D. Invest in education
E. Invest in health systems
VI. Conclusion
4
A WORKING OUTLINE
References
Amarante, V., & Brun, M. (2018). Cash transfers in Latin America: effects on poverty and
redistribution. Economía, 19(1), 1-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90025861
Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Magnuson, K. (2018). Anti-poverty policy innovations: New
proposals for addressing poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.01
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the causes of poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family poverty
on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic
pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1287261
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H. (2017).
Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-population
health, 2, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.003
Ravallion, M. (2016). The Economics of Poverty. (1st Edition). Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B. (2016).
Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift children out
5
A WORKING OUTLINE
of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.013
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). US Census Bureau, current population
reports, P60-259, income and poverty in the United States: 2016. US Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC, 10-11.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.011
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2018.1460740
I see that this is added to the reference page which is great because it’s apart of the
annotated bibliography...
But it’s not cited anywhere in the outline.... that’s the only correction that’s left...
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H.
(2017). Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
1
A WORKING OUTLINE
A WORKING OUTLINE
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
2
A WORKING OUTLINE
A Working Outline
Thesis: People who do not have material possession or have insufficient income in the united states
are termed to be living in poverty. America is the superpower, yet some of its people are starving.
This is a paradox that needs an explanation.
I. Introduction
A. Poverty as a social problem (Frank & Rice, 2017).
B. Theories and beliefs (Brady, 2019).
1. Behavioral theory
2. Structural theories
3. Political theories
4. Economic theories
a. Classical and neoclassical
b. Neoliberal/keynsian
c. Radical/ Marxian
d. Social capital and social exclusion
II. United States Poverty statistics (US Census Bureau, 2019)
III. Poverty causes in America
A. Overpopulation (Semega et al., 2017).
B. Epidemic diseases
C. Lack of education
D. Unemployment
E. Climate change
F. Food access
3
A WORKING OUTLINE
G. Health
IV. Effects of poverty (Amarante & Brun, 2018).
A. Food insecurity
B. Homelessness (Kerr et al. 2017).
C. Lack of access to health care (Kimmel et al., 2016).
D. Poor child care (Sandel et al., 2016).
E. Increase in crime
V. Possible interventions (Berger et al., 2018)
A. Programs
1. Low-income Home Energy Assistance (Wagaman et al., 2018)
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
3. National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016).
4. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
(Cates et al., 2016).
5. Community Services Block Grant (Ravallion, 2016).
B. Increase employment opportunities
C. Raise America’s wages
D. Invest in education
E. Invest in health systems
VI. Conclusion
4
A WORKING OUTLINE
References
Amarante, V., & Brun, M. (2018). Cash transfers in Latin America: effects on poverty and
redistribution. Economía, 19(1), 1-31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90025861
Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Magnuson, K. (2018). Anti-poverty policy innovations: New
proposals for addressing poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2018.4.3.01
Brady, D. (2019). Theories of the causes of poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155-175.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022550
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the effects of family poverty
on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Academic
pediatrics, 16(3), S112-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015
Frank, J. M., & Rice, K. (2017). Perceptions of poverty in America: Using social empathy to
reframe students’ attitudes. Social Work Education, 36(4), 391-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1287261
Kerr, W. C., Kaplan, M. S., Huguet, N., Caetano, R., Giesbrecht, N., & McFarland, B. H. (2017).
Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty,
foreclosure, and job loss. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 469-475.
Kimmel, P. L., Fwu, C. W., Abbott, K. C., Ratner, J., & Eggers, P. W. (2016). Racial disparities
in poverty account for mortality differences in US medicare beneficiaries. SSM-population
health, 2, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.003
Ravallion, M. (2016). The Economics of Poverty. (1st Edition). Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M., Faugno, E., Mingo, A., Cannon, J., Byrd, K., Garcia, D. A., ... & Jarrett, R. B. (2016).
Neighborhood-level interventions to improve childhood opportunity and lift children out
5
A WORKING OUTLINE
of poverty. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S128-S135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.013
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). US Census Bureau, current population
reports, P60-259, income and poverty in the United States: 2016. US Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC, 10-11.
Smeeding, T., & Thévenot, C. (2016). Addressing child poverty: How does the United States
compare with other nations?. Academic pediatrics, 16(3), S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.011
Wagaman, M. A., Compton, K. S., & Segal, E. A. (2018). Social empathy and attitudes about
dependence of people living in poverty on government assistance programs. Journal of
Poverty, 22(6), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2018.1460740
Students also viewed