1 / 10100%
1
Ethical Vignette
Ethical Vignette: To Self-Disclose or Not?
Tyler D. Herring
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
Abstract
This paper analyzes the interaction between a licensed counselor and his client regarding the
dilemma of counselor self-disclosure. The potential issues of self-disclosure included 1)
validation of faulty client assumptions, 2) an inappropriate shift of therapeutic focus, and 3) a
misrepresentation of therapeutic expectations. The goal of this paper is to successfully
implement the ethical decision-making process to determine if and in what way self-disclosure
should be approached. The methodology used began with an analysis of the situation followed
by a wellrounded identification of the problem. This paper then appeals to the ACA Code of
Ethics as well as state legal and ethical guidelines for the counseling. A review of scholarly
literature was conducted to determine evidenced-based practices surrounding the efficacy of
counselor self-disclosure in psychotherapy, and finally, a course of action was established to
2
Ethical Vignette
promote client well-being via a strong therapeutic alliance, immediate and non-immediate
counselor self-disclosure, and client empowerment.
Keywords: self-disclosure, therapeutic alliance, ethical decision-making, ethical
disclosure, non-immediate disclosure, immediate disclosure
Ethical Vignette: To Self-Disclose or Not?
In module four of this week, we were tasked with reviewing two videos and choosing to
analyze one of them. Our analysis was intended to accurately identify the professional dilemma
presented, process the dilemma via the ethical decision-making process, and determine a
course of action that both respects the client and is successful at establishing an effective
therapeutic relationship. The video that I chose to analyze was titled “To Self-Disclose or Not?”
In this video, a counselor faces the challenge of determining whether he should disclose that he
is in addiction recovery to a client that is deciding whether to work with this counselor.
The counselor’s decision to share details about his personal story could have a profound
positive impact on the client; however, it could also have a negative impact if delivered without
proper regard for the client’s well-being. To navigate this dilemma, we will apply an ethical
decision-making model, starting first by examining the issue from multiple perspectives to
accurately determine the nature and scope of the problem. Then, we will appeal to the
American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics, state and federal regulatory laws and
statutes, and professional counseling colleagues to assess if there is precedence in dealing with
selfdisclosure issues. Finally, we will devise a plan with how to proceed in the best interest of
the client’s well-being.
3
Ethical Vignette
Identify the problem
Though this problem may seem elementary, it is multi-faceted, and thus, every
discernable angle must be properly examined before proceeding. The fact of the situation is that
a client has approached a counselor hesitantly, discouraged by past frustrations in therapy. To
mitigate his reservations, the client believes that his counselor needs to be someone who has
experienced the same challenge of drug and alcohol addiction. The counselor identifies that one
potential problem with self-disclosure is that it could shift the focus of the session onto the
counselor’s story rather than the client’s story; but the counselor reassures the client in spite of
this, proceeding to explain that he, too, is in recovery. The video concludes with the counselor
affirming the validity of therapeutic techniques, appealing not to the authority of his personal
experience but to the authority of formal training and education.
There are three primary issues in this scenario: 1) The client assumes only a counselor
with personal experience of addiction can truly understand and help him. He's been hurt by
past counselors, so he’s hesitant and likely guarded, and he needs to feel emotionally safe
before he is vulnerable again. 2) The counselor’s self-disclosure could unintentionally shift the
focus away from the client and create emotional distance. Even with the best intentions, self-
disclosure may negatively impact the client if he feels alienated, offended, or discouraged by the
counselor’s story. 3) The client could over-identify with the counselor or assume that similar
experiences mean the counselor is “the perfect fit.” Shared stories do not guarantee shared
outcomes. The counselor must avoid creating unrealistic expectations.
Each of these issues reflect a clinical and ethical problem rather than a legal or
technological problem. The dilemma is clinical in nature because it involves therapeutic
judgements such as whether self-disclosure is beneficial to the client’s well-being; however, the
4
Ethical Vignette
problem is also ethical in nature because of the challenge to the principles of beneficence,
nonmaleficence, and fidelity. Because of confusion, misrepresentation, or a breach in
professional boundaries, there is a possibility that self-disclosure (or the extent thereof) hinders
the therapeutic process.
Apply the ACA Code of Ethics
Fortunately, there are three standards from the ACA Code of Ethics that apply to this
situation: A.1.a “Primary Responsibility,” A.4.b “Personal Values,” and A.6.a “Advocacy.” A.1.a is
a reminder that the client’s well-being is the primary goal and concern of all the counselor’s
efforts (ACA, 2014). Therefore, it is important to implement a strategy, based on sound research,
that will utilize self-disclosure to promote the client’s well-being. If, however, self-disclosure
confuses the client or appeals to counselor’s own comfort, then it would violate A.1.a (ACA,
2014). Personal values are addressed in statute A.4.b wherein counselors are advised not to
impose their own values on clients (ACA, 2014). By sharing his story, the counselor is essentially
sharing his interpretation of the story – this includes both the intentionally healed parts as well
as the unintentionally unhealed parts. This standard will help guide the counselor in deciding
which parts of his story are relevant to the client and which parts the counselor may want to
share for either validation or impositions sake. A.6.a deals with client advocacy and encourages
the counselor to address the barriers that inhibit the client’s progress (ACA, 2014). One such
barrier is the client’s frustration with previous counselors, and the counselor is correctly trying
to address this issue.
Utilizing the ACA’s Code of Ethics is supported by Section 2202-I of the Mississippi
Administrative Code. This rule states that counselors are required to adopt and implement into
practice the ACA Code of Ethics. However, the Code of Ethics is not the only resource that we
5
Ethical Vignette
can examine for precedence; Section 2202-A warns counselors against entering a quasi-dual
relationship which is one possible outcome of self-disclosure (MSBPA, n.d.). The client’s reaction
to the counselor’s story could later impair the counselor’s objectivity. Moreover, Section 2202-C
requires counselors to practice due diligence in evaluating techniques that could cause the
client harm or hinder the process (MSBPA, n.d.). In essence, self-disclosure could violate the
spirit of patient rights protection.
Determine the Nature and Dimensions of the Dilemma
The ACA’s principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, fidelity, and veracity are
applicable in this situation; the only ethical principle that does not apply is justice.
Nonmaleficence is the primary ethical concern due to the possibility that self-disclosure could
inhibit therapeutic progress by unintentionally creating distance between the counselor and
client (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016). On the other hand, if the counselor does not establish
good rapport, the client will have more evidence that counselors do not understand him. It is
important for the counselor to handle this situation in such a way as not to enhance the damage
that is already done. Beneficence and fidelity are strong secondary concerns in this dilemma.
The counselor must attempt a therapeutic alliance, and to do so, he must remove the barrier of
mistrust. A concern for fidelity will drive the counselor to protect the integrity of this
relationship from becoming quasi-dual (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016). The counselor should
also respect client autonomy by filtering the disclosure of firsthand interpretive information.
Finally, the client should utilize veracity as a guiding principle to recount his recovery, especially
when employing the ethical decision-making model.
For additional perspective on this situation, the counselor should consult with the
6
Ethical Vignette
American Counseling Association as well as the Mississippi Licensed Professional Counselors
Board of Examiners. Dr. Branden Henry of Red River Counseling and Dr. Michael Stempkovski of
Stillwater Counseling are also respectable resources in the local Jackson, Mississippi area.
Clinicians must familiarize themselves with their state’s licensing board, which sets local clinical
standards. Experienced local colleagues can also offer practical insight based on years of
practice.
Generate Potential Course of Action
As this client’s counselor, I would begin my feedback by validating the client’s feelings of
loneliness and mistrust while empowering him for the journey ahead. I would tell him that he is
not crazy for feeling like the previous counselors did not understand him. Furthermore, I would
empower him by acknowledging the fortitude that he showed in asking about my own recovery.
His apprehension shows that he is highly intelligent and questions things that do not feel right
to him. I want to use this moment to reflect what I see in him which is a man with the capacity
to acknowledge his need for help while simultaneously questioning what does not make sense.
This technique is known as therapist immediate disclosure which is communicating to the client
what I am experiencing in his presence. I would conclude my immediate disclosure by
expressing what an honor and privilege it is to sit with him in this space. This technique appeals
to his desire for relationship and relatability without engaging in full, non-immediate
selfdisclosure. Research suggests that this type of disclosure can lead to improved client
outcomes early in the therapeutic relationship, particularly when the client’s capacity for
emotion regulation is not yet known (Alfi-Yogev et al., 2020).
Next, I would respond to his fears and frustrations regarding the previous counselors. My
desire is to continue empowering him through validation while also inspiring him with hope that
7
Ethical Vignette
his path to recovery is possible – an evidenced-based technique in counseling. (Bartholomew et
al., 2021). Self-disclosure is one way to promote hope. Many counseling graduates begin their
careers with the proper skills, but they lack the necessary gifts that are required for effective
selfdisclosure. Skills are obtained through formal education; gifts, however, are born out of our
wounds. Healed wounds become gifts whilst unhealed wounds become infected and rot the
spirit of the counselor. A skilled and gifted counselor is like a master builder, equipped with the
right tools and inspired by the firsthand beauty of magnificent architecture. This is defined as
counselor self-efficacy (Harris, 2022). Very few clients have the confidence to ask this critical
question to their counselor – what kind of builder are you?
Because of the inherent risks associated with self-disclosure, I want to tailor my
disclosure to reveal just what is necessary for building rapport and enhancing the therapeutic
alliance (Forrest, 2009). I will opt for progressive revelation as modeled by our Lord throughout
Scripture. For all of eternity, faith has been the only thing required of man, and to inspire faith,
God gave hope through the form of progressive revelation via the covenants of Noah, Abraham,
Moses, David, and the New Covenant. The full story of creation or redemption has never been
revealed, yet this has not hindered salvation. In fact, it has empowered salvation (Robertson,
1981). I will inspire my client with the amount of disclosure necessary to establish hope, trust,
and ultimately faith in the alliance that we are building. Thus, I will ensure my client that I have
completed some work and am still completing other work, thus making me a skilled and gifted
counselor. To inspire hope and trust without setting unrealistic expectations or feeding into the
false assumption that only counselors in recovery can heal him, I will disclose to him about my
past job as a confined space rescue technician. For many years, I rescued people who had been
hurt and were scared and hopeless that there was a way out; but once they called for help, I
8
Ethical Vignette
was someone that would rappel in and get them out of whatever complex situation they were
in. The only thing I required was for them to submit to the process and trust me, regardless of
how scary it was. Together, we were getting out alive.
I am comfortable giving the client this level of disclosure at this time; however, I would
reserve the option to disclose more later. I do not want the client assuming that because we
share a similar story then he will have the same outcome as me. I also do not want my story to
offend or distance the client in any way that will hinder this process such as disclosing unhealed
or interpretive parts of my story to the client. Based on what I have said already, I will then ask
the client confidently if he is willing to trust me and submit to the process. If the answer to that
question is no, then I will respect his decision and autonomy and utilize the rest of the session
to identify and clarify his criteria in finding another counselor.
If the client trusts me and wants to continue the process, then I will begin my
investigation by asking him more about what first prompted him to initiate counseling. My goal
is be more connected and in tune with all parts of him – both the addiction side and the
nonaddiction side. This first session is critical in establishing a therapeutic alliance, and I can
build from his story (including his experience with other counselors) to establish trust.
Conclusion
Self-disclosure may seem like an obvious resource in counseling, but counselors must
approach this topic cautiously. Every counselor’s story is unique as is every client. There is no
guarantee that a client will react positively to story – regardless of whether is healed or
unhealed. The client’s well-being and progress throughout the therapeutic process is the
priority for every counselor, and as such, every question, story, analogy, or technique from the
9
Ethical Vignette
counselor must be used to fulfill that goal. According to the ACA Code of Ethics, counselors
should consider nonmaleficence and benevolence when deciding how to engage with clients,
and based on numerous studies, counselor self-disclosure can be beneficial and/or detrimental
to the process
(Alfi-Yogev et al., 2020)(Forrest, 2009). It can also be a tool that is utilized to build rapport and
prompt further client disclosure. In many studies, the success of counselor disclosure depends
on the individual client, the extent of disclosure, the nature of the disclosure, and the timing of
disclosure (Alfi-Yogev et al. 2020)(Forrest, 2009)(Harris, 2022). Therefore, I will utilize my own
self-disclosure with this client as a technique to build trust, inspire hope, empower the client,
validate his frustrations, manages expectations, and aligns with the ethical principles of the ACA
Code of Ethics.
10
Ethical Vignette
References
Alfi-Yogev, T., Hasson-Ohayon, I., Lazarus, G., Ziv-Beiman, S., & Atzil-Slonim, D. (2020). When to
disclose and to whom? Examining within- and between-client moderators of therapist
self-disclosure–outcome associations in psychodynamic psychotherapy.
Psychotherapy Research, 31(7), 921–931.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1866597
American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics.
https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
Bartholomew, T. T., Joy, E. E., & Gundel, B. E. (2021). Clients’ hope for counseling as a predictor
of outcome in psychotherapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(8), 1126–1146.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000211033255
Forester-Miller, H., & Davis, T. E. (2016). Practitioner’s guide to ethical decision making (Rev.
ed.). American Counseling Association. Retrieved from
http://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/ethics/practioner’s-guide-to-
ethical decision-making.pdf
Forrest, G. G. (2009). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy and recovery. Jason Aronson.
Harris, R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between counseling self-efficacy, emotional
intelligence, and perceived stress in counselors-in-training [Doctoral dissertation, Texas
Tech University]. Texas Tech University Libraries.
https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/90234
Mississippi State Board of Public Accountancy (MSBPA). (n.d.). Mississippi Administrative Code,
Title 30, Part 2202: 2014 American Counseling Association Code of Ethics. Justia.
Retrieved April 13, 2025, from
https://regulations.justia.com/states/mississippi/title-30/part-2202/
Robertson, O. P. (1981). The Christ of the covenants. Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing.
Simmons, S. E., et al. (2024). Introduction to counseling: Integration of faith, professional
identity, and clinical practice (2nd ed.). Kendall Hunt Publishing.
https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9798385117543
Students also viewed