Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 1
Research Proposal
Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles: Balancing Viability and Market Integration
in Sustainable Transportation
Zackary Hallett
School of Business, Liberty University
Executive Summary
In a fossil fuel world driven by oil and pollutants, global warming and the looming future
of the planet are forcing large vehicle manufacturers to reevaluate where their company sits
with tomorrow's long-term production of combustion engines. Because of the rising focus on a
greener future, companies have turned towards an electric tomorrow as the future of
sustainability. However, issues arise as companies move forward with scoping beyond the range
of the electric vehicles and the network buildup of the charging stations required to support it.
As a modern company executive within the automotive industry, the problem arises: Does the
future of sustainability look at short-range, hour-plus charging time vehicles as the standard for
creating what the world deems a greener tomorrow? While electric vehicles have brought the
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 2
industry closer to a sustainable future, their vicinity remains within local regions, servicing or
allowing no more than a couple hundred miles from a charging point. Alternatively, because of
these issues, a significant focus has been driven to research the viability of alternative fuel-cell
electric vehicles (FCEV), specifically hydrogen-powered. This research proposal focuses on
whether FCEVs have the potential to find a market alongside the current massive infrastructure
gains of electric vehicles. Given the sharp ascent in research, development, and infrastructure
expenses, will the need for FCEVs surpass the high cost of the infrastructure and R&D needed to
bring them to market?
Introduction
The 19th century marked a significant milestone in the progression of technological
innovation with the creation of the combustion engine (Bellis, 2019). Successful adoption of this
technology progressed society into an industrial revolution, setting the sights of the world for
new heights. As the globe struggles with the effects of climate change, the automotive industry
finds itself at a turning point in its innovation, looking for ways to strike a balance between
environmental responsibility and commercial viability. The need to switch from conventional
combustion engines to sustainable alternatives is becoming increasingly urgent for industry
executives and politicians considering the constantly changing global transportation scene. Amid
these challenges, electric vehicles have emerged as cleaner alternatives over the last decade,
offering a way for those willing to face the mounting issues. The inherent challenges of limited
range and extended charging times have raised critical questions about the feasibility of an
allencompassing electric vehicle ecosystem. Due to the spatial confines of the current electric
vehicle infrastructure, this research proposal explores the upcoming challenger to an EV
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 3
ecosystem, the fuel-cell electric vehicle (FCEV). The research focuses on how FCEV has a place
alongside the current ecosystem gain of the EV market. Recent research shows a promising
future in that the FCEVs boast a more extended range and significantly reduce fueling times
compared to their counterparts. By examining FCEVs' technological, economic, and
environmental facts, this proposal will determine whether the necessity for a diverse and
sustainable automotive future justifies the substantial investment required to bring
hydrogenpowered vehicles to the front of the market. As the automotive industry stands at the
height of transformation, this research aims to provide insights to inform strategic decision-
making for manufacturers, policymakers, and stakeholders in the sustainable mobility industry.
Problem Statement
Over the past decade, the increased efficiency of EVs has revolutionized transportation,
significantly reducing CO2 emissions and the overall carbon footprint. Despite these
advancements, studies indicate that EVs may only be a practical means of long-distance travel
exceeding 300-400 miles with the emergence of innovative battery technologies. Recent
investigations highlight hydrogen fuel cells as a promising alternative; however, the substantial
rise in research, development, and infrastructure expenses raises questions about the long-term
sustainability of FCEVs. This research aims to evaluate the potential of FCEVs as a viable and
enduring mode of transportation.
Literature Review
The drive for sustainable transportation has enveloped a significant push for research on
various future options, from solar and nuclear cars to current industries' EVs. Additionally, this
research scope encompasses considerable political lobbying to power production, support
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 4
battery research, and many more microscopic connections that drive the world further for a
better tomorrow. This review will focus on 1) the development of EVs in today's market,
including environmental impact, infrastructure, charging, and range; 2) fuel cell electric vehicles,
hydrogen production, and infrastructure; and 3) the future of these sustainable vehicles
compared to each other.
The influential force behind many new transportation developments focuses on
sustainability and reduced carbon emissions. Ala et al. (2020) produced research in Italy focused
on the infrastructure and development of electric vehicles (EVs), emphasizing the challenges
hindering the widespread adoption of EVs but emphasizing the need because of the significant
and growing concerns related to COS emissions. The primary concern is the environmental
impact of conventional road transportation, which contributes significantly to carbon dioxide
emissions. According to a European Union study, transportation has been responsible for almost
20% of emissions (Sanguesa et al., 2021). Because of the drive for these concerns, a significant
ramp-up in the EV market has led to a massive push to drive CO2 emissions reduction by 2025
to 2030. Ala et al. (2020) explain that based on studies, research shows that between the years
2010 and 2050, the transportation market should grow by roughly 50% between both passenger
and heavy duty. However, using electric vehicles reduces carbon emissions by nearly 60% in
some countries. Some of the more focused concerns in the EU and other places worldwide are
socio-political aspects of adopting and transitioning to new transportation. While the passenger
industry is primarily driven by user choice to convert, freight conversion to sustainable
transportation focuses mainly on the financial incentive for businesses to move from diesel to
electric (Patel & Roscia, 2023). Research done by Patel and Roscia in 2023 shows a good
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 5
breakdown of societal factors by interviewing 108 participants and asking various questions
related to freight electric vehicles. The study results showed participants' concerns regarding
laws, political accountability, and support for new business development (Patel & Roscia, 2023).
Unfortunately, personal and enterprise concerns arise amid a positive reduction in
emissions and significant growth in socio-economic cooperation to drive more robust
infrastructure around EVs. Charging and range drive economic movement in electric
sustainability, and, as a result, these are some of the most debated issues around this
technology. Patil (2019) discusses the challenges that stem from the development of EV
technology. The overarching issue related to charging comes from the need for more
standardization around the charging stations and ports for the large variety of EV
manufacturers. Patil states it best: "Without a common standard, manufacturers are forced to
develop proprietary technologies, which can lead to fragmentation in the market and limit
interoperability” (Patil, 2019, p. 5). Fossil fuel vehicles struggle in various areas. However, the
fuel loading speed, what type of port should be used, and how long you can travel were never
significant political/enterprise issues because the process was not complex. When taken to
commercial viability, the issue increases in complexity because EV commercial manufacturing
appeals to businesses. This means that for heavy and medium-duty vehicles, the wattage
needed to support the infrastructure increases drastically; charging a consumer car is no longer
a port on the garage wall but a line of charging stations in a lot (Al-Hanahi et al., 2021). As for
most consumers, range and long charging times have caused many to question their feasibility
in recent years. Ultimately, the major drawback to the future of EVs focuses on the research
around charging time, weight, range, and cost (Sanguesa et al., 2021).
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 6
While EVs are the driver in sustainable transportation due to an already established
electrical grid, the challenges above have shed light on the potential concept of alternative
forms of sustainable transportation that may not rely on the electrical grid. Fuel cell electric
vehicles (FCEV) are a concept introduced previously; these challenges have driven further
research into the viability of this form of transportation. Aminudin et al. (2023) explain that fuel
cell technology envelops the concept of converting an onboard fuel, commonly hydrogen, into
electricity, turning an electric motor like an electric vehicle. This newer form of research into
fuel cells shows many advantages they bring to the market. FCEVs run on hydrogen, resulting in
only water as the waste, and they have a more extensive range and minor operating power,
giving them a significant advantage in the upcoming drive toward sustainability (Aminudin et al.,
2023). Because hydrogen is the most common element in the universe, the production of it is
less a matter of whether there is enough, but rather how to produce it. Because of this, the
variety of available production methods, such as water, glycerol, biomass, and many other
sources, is relatively significant (Singla et al., 2021). A considerable challenge around FCEV is
infrastructure build-up. Park et al. (2022) focus on expanding FCEV in South Korea, where since
2019, the government has focused on developing research and infrastructure around hydrogen
fuel cell vehicles (HFCV). South Korea has enough hydrogen production to sustain a fleshed-out
transportation market. However, the problem arises when the movement to clean hydrogen
cannot be supported under the already tight cost of expanding an entirely new system (Park et
al., 2022). Other challenges can also be attributed to the development of practical hydrogen
storage systems for vehicles and fueling stations/stationary buildings and the buildup of a
national transportation delivery network for the new fuel (Singla et al., 2021).
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 7
Additional research has shown that businesses are skeptical about entering the hydrogen
industry due to the lack of knowledge and experience related to the sector (Kang & Park, 2011).
This skepticism can be awarded through governmental acceptance and elevation. Kang and Park
(2011) discuss the resistance back in 2011 to entry into hydrogen as a fuel in South Korea. The
uncertainty felt within this industry decreased when the Korean government targeted
promotions and R&D around HFCV. Government involvement is significant in the R&D of a new
technology such as HFCV. Currently, government subsidies help lower the cost of fuel, making
future innovation more alluring to the private sector until further R&D can be completed to
reduce the cost of hydrogen production (Thomas, 2009).
EVs are just heading out of the beginning of practical application in society. Much
research is still needed to understand better battery and charging technology, hoping to appear
to a larger passenger market for local commuter use. Thomas (2009) contrasts EVs with FCEVs,
asserting the superiority of fuel cells due to their lighter weight, smaller spatial footprint,
potential for actual zero emissions, lower overall cost, superior range, and quicker refueling
capabilities. In contrast, EVs are highlighted for their significantly lower fuel costs and minimal
infrastructure requirements. While FCEV does boast a better set of advantages, the limited
research on FCEV shows a lack of understanding of how the cost will genuinely compare,
especially in commercial applications. The struggles lie with the need for more data on how they
compare. Hydrogen fuel cells still need much R&D and a better understanding of how they will
sit alongside each other, with governments and companies investing billions into the FCEV
development.
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 8
Importance/Benefits of the Study
The advantages of this study center on critical and uncertain elements within the
automotive industry's transition to sustainable transportation. Delving into FCEVs enhances
industries' comprehension of the comparative aspects between these transportation forms and
the future implications for the well-established EV infrastructure. In pursuing sustainability, EVs
assumed a leading role due to the extensive electrical network. A decade of EV development
has brought about a landscape where a modest charging network and an emerging market
presence have allowed many to embrace the concept of fully electric transportation.
Regrettably, the heightened demand for sustainable transportation has magnified consumer
frustrations regarding charging duration and range limitations. These challenges have prompted
exploration into alternative transportation forms to address the inherent weaknesses of EVs.
This research seeks to assist companies by providing insights into the costs associated with FCEV
infrastructure, research, and development in combination with the existing EV market. The cost
and resources allocated to these new products align with the development and cost of when
cars and combustion engines were first invented.
By better understanding the value each type of transportation brings, company
executives can asses there overall business objectives and grasp a thorough understanding of
where the company resources are being allocated through informed strategic decision-making.
The ultimate goal is to help organizations weigh the value of each alongside the objective of
sustainability and environmental impact. Many companies want to produce both forms of
transportation, but is that a viable future? Does more research value companies slowing EV
research and putting all into FCEV, or are the roadblocks to FCEV significant enough to continue
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 9
a split push? These questions plague the market and are still majorly unanswered. In a world
where the focus is a push against global climate change and is growing fast, the study's
importance lies in its potential to shape the direction of the automotive industry, address
current challenges, explore alternative solutions, and inform decisions that impact the
environmental landscape.
Research Design
There are four phases to this research design: preliminary analysis planning, surveys and
questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and results and deliverables. This design allows the data to
be gathered from both a quantitative and qualitative approach, giving the overall design of the
research a mixed-methods approach to comprehensively explore the viability and market
potential of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles compared to the established Electric Vehicle market.
Phase One: This stage concentrates on examining the present literature review and any
additional exploration of all available information regarding EVs, FCEVs, infrastructure, prevailing
challenges, and sustainable transportation. The objective is to creatively explore and pinpoint
gaps, challenges, and opportunities, shaping the foundation for developing the research
framework. This phase serves as the bedrock for the subsequent questionnaires, surveys, and
interviews that will unfold in the later stages of the research. Ultimately, the strength of this
phase determines the robustness of the entire research design; a weak foundation here would
inherently weaken the following phases. Lastly, ensuring informed consent, participant
anonymity, and confidentiality is vital in establishing ethical guidelines throughout the research
process. While not always necessary, checking national, regional, or local guidelines for
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 10
necessary approvals from relevant ethics review boards or committees is also essential to
ensure the research is upheld in subsequent peer review processes.
Phase Two: This phase aims to develop surveys and questionnaires targeting a diverse
sample of individual consumers, businesses, and industry experts. Building quantitative
instrument designs that capture quantitative data can be done through administered online
surveys and questionnaires, ensuring representation across demographics, geographic locations,
and business sectors. The content of the questions needs to focus on preferences, concerns, and
willingness to adopt EVs and FCEVs, as well as factors influencing purchase decisions throughout
the automotive industry. The participants in this study should include individual consumers,
businesses, industry experts, automotive manufacturers, and policymakers who understand and
deal with the many ins and outs of both the growing EV market and the beginning research and
development of the FCEVs. The specific instruments within the phase should include structured
surveys with Likert scales, multiple-choice questions, and demographic inquiries.
Phase Three: This phase includes qualitative data gathering through in-depth interviews.
The interviews are to be conducted with industry experts, automotive manufacturers,
policymakers, and representatives from relevant organizations. This form of data gathering gives
the researcher a direct connection and understanding of the recipient's responses. While
surveys and questionnaires can hit a larger group of participants, the answers are quantitative,
and little can be understood about each individual's personal experiences. Using in-depth
interviews allows the researcher to gather data using a semi-structured format for flexibility and
in-depth exploration of critical themes. The content of the interviews should focus on factors
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 11
influencing strategic decisions, resource allocation, and the perceived value of each
transportation form
while exploring nuanced insights into the challenges, opportunities, and future trends
associated with EVs and FCEVs. The sampling should be to select participants with diverse
expertise and perspectives within the automotive and sustainable transportation sectors.
Ensure a diverse and representative sample to capture a comprehensive range of opinions and
experiences.
Phase Four: This phase represents the gathering and analysis of the data. Depending on
the final size and scope of the survey and questionnaires, the data amount could be pretty
significant and require some time to properly understand and quantify the results into a form
the audience could understand.
Nature and Form of Results
The nature of the results from the research design encompasses numerical and
nonnumerical information from both the qualitative and quantitative data. The non-numerical
data is in the form of text or narratives taken from the interviews. The data within the research
was gathered through two different methods, qualitative and quantitative, and because of this,
how they are presented should be based on this structure. The quantitative findings can be best
displayed using statistical tools, which were pulled through analyzing the patterns and trends
within the surveys and questionnaires. The graphical data is presented with bar graphs and pie
charts, allowing the audience to understand what perceptions were found. Lastly, comparative
analyses of the responses of individual consumers, businesses, industry experts, automotive
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 12
manufacturers, and policymakers will be conducted to identify differences in opinions across
different groups.
The qualitative results are best represented in narrative analysis and quotes and
excerpts. The in-depth interviews will give tremendous personal data, providing great insight
into key themes, insights, challenges, and opportunities of each individual's experiences in the
field, with customers, and in research. All of this can be gathered from the narrative analysis
portion of the results. The quotes and excerpts give the audience a feel of the human element
from the results, allowing them to understand the diverse perspectives within the automotive
and sustainable transportation sectors.
For the audience, the results aim to ensure that the diverse audience, including industry
professionals, such as automobile executives and policymakers, can grasp the intricate dynamics
and implications uncovered by this research. While the primary research aims at higher
leadership within an organization, such results should be built to provide valuable information
for various individuals within the fields. Because of this, the expected audience should be
presented with the data in the following manner: An executive summary, detailed reports (split
between the data findings), and a visual presentation. The executive summary will encapsulate
the findings and give an overview of the trends and recommendations brought by the research.
The detailed reports encompass an in-depth analysis of the study's quantitative and qualitative
sections. Lastly, the visual presentation should be incorporated throughout the report to allow
introspective infographics to convey the complex data in an accessible format.
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 13
Budget
The budget to activate such an extensive form of research will require a large sum of
money spread across various areas. The first set will pertain to the primary research procedures.
The research team will encompass salaries and wages for research assistants, data analysts, and
project coordinators. The interviewers include compensation for individuals conducting in-depth
interviews with industry experts, automotive manufacturers, policymakers, and relevant
stakeholders. The second portion of the primary budget goes to data collection, participant
incentives, and travel/accommodations. The data collection includes any surveying software and
interview transcription services needed for the in-depth interviews. Fieldwork travel expenses
will need to be related to travel for in-person interviews, on-site data collection, and
accommodation for lodging during fieldwork activities. Given the set budget and scope, some of
the interviews could be done over video, but the in-person experience would be lost in this
method. The secondary portion of the budget represents the support structure that will not be
seen directly within the research findings but is necessary for the completion. Approvals such as
board authorization from the ethical reviews, technological equipment, reports, presentation
design, and communication are some of the secondary budget requirements that are there in
order to support the research process. Additionally, there will be other fees, such as training for
the research team in survey design, interview techniques, or data analysis, insurance for the
research, and finally, a buffer for any miscellaneous expenses that may be incurred.
Schedule
The schedule for the research is planned into distinct phases market with milestones
that will be shown to completion by the primary deliverables. The outline below provides a
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 14
concise overview of the milestones, timelines, and primary deliverables for each phase in
completing the research.
•Phase One: Preliminary Analysis Planning o Timeline:
Approximately 1 month.
oMilestones: Within this phase, milestones can be contributed to reviewing the
current literature and any further analysis needed, forming the research team,
and providing the necessary training and development of the survey,
questionnaires, interview protocols, and process.
oPrimary Deliverables: The primary deliverables for this phase will be the report
on the further literature review and the finalized research team structure and
roles.
•Phase Two: Surveys and Questionnaires o Timeline:
Approximately 2-4 Months, but much depends on the availability
of company individuals, time of year, and various other variables.
oMilestones: These milestones consist of the online surveys and questionnaires
deployed to the groups, the data gathered from the completion, and the start of
initial findings from the gathered data.
oPreliminary Deliverables: From the surveys and questionnaires, the primary
deliverables will be the quantitative data sets and the initial survey analysis
report on the completion of this phase.
•Phase Three: In-depth Interviews o Timeline: Approximately 4-6
months. The in-depth interviews can have a wide schedule
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 15
because of the time and effort needed to ensure each interview
is with the correct participants and is not rushed to gather the
most valuable information.
oMilestones: The milestones of phase three are noted by the completion of the
indepth interviews and the transcriptions from the interviews received.
oPrimary Deliverables: This will be represented by the initial analysis and report
of the qualitative interview transcripts.
•Phase Four: Results and Deliverables o Timeline: Approximately
6-12 months
oMilestone: The final milestones are indicated when the final quantitative and
qualitative findings are integrated, data analysis is completed, and the report and
presentation are compiled.
oPrimary Deliverables: The final deliverables will be noted by completing the
executive summary, the comprehensive research report, and the visual
presentation and infographic for the audience.
Many schedule aspects are not covered here, including training and development,
approvals, and other miscellaneous activities. However, the above represents the primary phase
schedules needed to complete the research.
Ethical Considerations
Research involves asking how, why, when, where, and who. Questions of this nature
often lead to situations and activities that require the careful examination of ethical guidelines
and a firm commitment to ethical principles. This commitment is essential to ensure
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 16
participants' integrity, confidentiality, and well-being, irrespective of the research demands. In
this research, obtaining informed consent is a pivotal aspect, encompassing the administration
of surveys, questionnaires, and interviews.
The research proposal encompasses the possibility of delving into internal company
information about EVs and FCEVs, research methodologies, infrastructure details, and patented
designs. As this information is confidential to the company, providing clear and comprehensive
details about the research objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits to all participants
and organizational leadership is imperative. Participants must comprehend that the research
upholds the highest standards of integrity, and explicit consent is required before participating
in surveys, questionnaires, or interviews. The consent form underscores the voluntary nature of
participation, allowing individuals to withdraw at any point without facing consequences.
Additionally, participants should be assured of the considerations of confidentiality and
anonymity. This involves ensuring the protection of confidentiality by anonymizing data during
analysis, thereby safeguarding individual privacy. These safeguards are crucial to instill trust and
uphold ethical standards throughout the research process.
After the data collection is completed, any outside competitor getting their hands on the
data could result in significant monetary failure if the data goes to the wrong place. Data
security and storage are essential ethical considerations while conducting the research. In an
industry that does not have much groundwork, the data gathered here could be foundational to
development. Access to collected data must be restricted to authorized research team members
to ensure that only the proper team members handle the data. In storing and moving the data,
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 17
the electronic data must be encrypted, and physical records must be stored in locked and secure
locations.
Lastly, because of the potential value the collected data could add to a company's
research and development in the FCEV and EV market, transparent reporting with integrity is
essential in ensuring the reported findings are accurate and reflect the collected data without
manipulation. In this, checking and double-checking the data for biased views and
interpretations is important as executives trust the data presented and make company decisions
that could alter the course of the organization's future.
Implications and Considerations
The most significant implication of this research lies in its ability to transform the
industry and strategic decision-making of company executives who understand and listen to this
research. The market for EVs is at a tipping point where consumers are not buying into the local
form of EV transportation only, especially for larger families. As consumers are steping back, the
electric market has been softening. Organizational leadership has to have the data to
understand the implications of this future and make valid decisions. The data gathered in this
research allows these decisions to push forward in EVs and FCEV based on a solid data
foundation rather than just what people's wallets are directing them toward. If FCEVs prove to
be a viable and competitive alternative to EVs, the industry could witness a shift in focus and
investments toward hydrogen-powered vehicles, impacting production, infrastructure, and
marketing strategies around a decade of development.
Another implication lies in the future of the environmental and economic impact the
research would have on a variety of industries. If the research showed that the data for FCEV
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 18
contains a more extensive form of viability long-term over EVs, it could contribute to reducing
carbon emissions and reliance on finite resources. Also, understanding the economic viability
and market potential of FCEVs versus EVs could guide company investments, potentially
fostering economic growth and job creation in the emerging hydrogen-powered vehicle sector.
As great as the potential for the research is, there are limitations within. One limitation is
the generalization the research can have over a massive scope of communities, industries,
demographics, and regions. Not every location has the same advancements and policies, which
could limit the organization's potential to implement the research implications globally.
Additionally, the research could step into the realm of technological advancement that is still
under research and development and not in scope for commercial development anytime soon.
Another limitation lies in this research's heightened security risks to an industry with
billions at stake. An organization's intellectual property is vital to its growth and is directly
related to shareholders' and investors' dividends in larger organizations. Collaboration amongst
companies to participate in surveys and interviews could be a significant challenge. In order to
guarantee the confidentiality of the data, the research needs to carefully address and mitigate
these risks to safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of the collected data.
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 19
References
Al-Hanahi, B., Ahmad, I., Habibi, D., & Masoum, M. A. (2021). Charging infrastructure for
commercial electric vehicles: Challenges and future works. IEEE Access, 9, 121476–
121492. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3108817
Ala, G., Castiglia, V., Di Filippo, G., Miceli, R., Romano, P., & Viola, F. (2020). From electric
mobility to hydrogen mobility: Current state and possible future expansions. 2020 IEEE
20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference ( MELECON).
https://doi.org/10.1109/melecon48756.2020.9140482
Aminudin, M. A., Kamarudin, S. K., Lim, B. H., Majilan, E. H., Masdar, M. S., & Shaari, N. (2023).
An overview: Current progress on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. International
Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(11), 4371–4388.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.156
Bellis, M. (2019, July 6). The evolution of the car dates all the way back to the 1600s.
ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/who-invented-the-car-4059932
Kang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of
hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3465–3475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.045
Park, C., Lim, S., Shin, J., & Lee, C.-Y. (2022). How much hydrogen should be supplied in the
transportation market? focusing on hydrogen fuel cell vehicle demand in South Korea.
Research Proposal: Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles 20
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121750
Patel, A. R., & Roscia, M. (2023). Assessing the impact of sociopolitical factors on the rollout of
freight electric vehicles. 2023 12th International Conference on Renewable Energy
Research and Applications (ICRERA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icrera59003.2023.10269373
Patil, P. (2019). Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Current Status, Challenges, and Future
Developments. International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing, 2(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/https://research.tensorgate.org/index.php/IJIAC/article/view/25
Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021). A
review on electric vehicles: Technologies and challenges. Smart Cities, 4(1), 372–404.
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010022
Singla, M. K., Nijhawan, P., & Oberoi, A. S. (2021). Hydrogen fuel and fuel cell technology for
Cleaner Future: A Review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(13), 15607–
15626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12231-8
Thomas, C. E. (2009). Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared. International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, 34(15), 6005–6020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.003
