Miracle and Resurrection Paper
xxxxxxx
APOL220_C05_202520
March 19, 2025
1
In today's world, many people face challenges when considering the supernatural claims
of Christianity, especially regarding miracles and the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This
skepticism often arises from a belief in philosophical naturalism, which holds that only the
natural world exists and that all phenomena can be explained through it. To engage thoughtfully
with secular friends or skeptics, it is essential to acknowledge their doubts and start
conversations at their level, creating a bridge for understanding. Using the Inside-Out method as
outlined by Chatraw and Allen, this paper will address common objections related to miracles,
the reliability of the Bible, and the historicity of the resurrection. By combining scholarly
insights with historical evidence, a strong case will be made for the possibility of supernatural
events, culminating with the resurrection of Jesus as a significant historical event that has
profound implications for believers and non-believers alike.
The cultural context of Late Modernism often dismisses the possibility of the
supernatural, leaning heavily into empiricism and skepticism regarding anything that lies beyond
the tangible. In this setting, many skeptics view miracles as mere myths or legends. This
perspective has been significantly influenced by philosophers like David Hume, who claimed
that miracles contradict both natural laws and human experience, rendering them implausible.1
To address this skepticism effectively, one should adopt the Inside-Out method. This approach
validates the doubts and concerns that skeptics hold while presenting evidence that supports the
possibility of supernatural occurrences, creating a dialogue rather than a confrontation.
Philosophical naturalism suggests that everything can be explained through natural
causes and laws. This worldview is challenged when faced with questions that reveal its
1 David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Paul Millican (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2007), 66.
2
inadequacy. For example, questions about the origins of the universe and human consciousness
continue to perplex even the most ardent naturalists. These two foundational issues illustrate that
naturalistic explanations often fall short in addressing the complexity of existence. William Lane
Craig has noted that “Naturalism cannot provide a sufficient account of the origin of the
universe, as it cannot adequately explain the onset of existence".2 Engaging skeptics with
inquiries into these profound mysteries may prompt them to reconsider their stance on the
supernatural, nudging them to explore values and beliefs that they might not have contemplated
previously.
A miracle, as defined within the context of Christianity, is an extraordinary event that
transcends natural laws and is typically considered an act of divine intervention. While skeptics
may argue that miracles cannot be empirically validated, it is essential to frame these occurrences
within a historical context. By analyzing miracles as historical claims, one can approach them
with the same scrutiny applied to any documented historical event.
The New Testament presents numerous accounts of Jesus's miracles and the resurrection,
all written within a specific historical context. Historians often recognize the significance of
eyewitness testimony when evaluating these events. As scholar Craig Keener asserts, “The
literary and social context of the New Testament provides an important framework for
understanding the nature of the miraculous”.3 The accounts in the New Testament reflect genuine
experiences of those who witnessed Jesus perform miracles, lending credibility to their claims
and enhancing the texts' value as historical documents.
2 William Lane Craig, On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision (Colorado Springs, CO:
David C. Cook, 2008), 36.
3 Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker
Academic, 2011), 53.
3
To counter skepticism surrounding miracles, a thorough evaluation of the eyewitness
testimonies recorded in the Gospels is essential. The authors of the New Testament documented
various miraculous activities attributed to Jesus, including healings and transformations of
nature, all indicating his divine authority. The consistency and clarity of these accounts reinforce
their credibility as historical narratives. In the words of Mike Licona, “The early Christian
community placed significant emphasis on the testimony of those who had witnessed Jesus's
miracles firsthand”.4 By examining these testimonies in detail, it becomes possible to highlight
their significance within the context of first-century Judea, where such events were not only
remarkable but also transformative for those who experienced them directly.
Dr. Gary Habermas advocates for the "Minimal Facts" approach to defending the
resurrection, which posits a set of widely accepted historical facts that provide a framework for
discussing these issues with skeptics.5 Essential elements of this argument include Jesus's
crucifixion, the empty tomb, and his post-resurrection appearances to various individuals and
groups. By focusing on these critical points, one can create a logical and compelling case for the
resurrection.
One noteworthy aspect of the empty tomb is that the discovery was made by women,
who, in the cultural context of the time, were marginalized witnesses. This detail points to the
story's authenticity, as the authors would likely not fabricate a narrative that undermines the
credibility of their claims. Licona suggests that “the fact that women are the first witnesses to the
empty tomb would be a detail unlikely to be invented by the early church".6 This
4 Michael Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2010),
127.
5 Gary R. Habermas, The Risen Jesus and Future Hope (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), 79.
6 Michael Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2010),
121.
4
acknowledgment further strengthens the historicity of the resurrection narrative, as it signifies a
commitment to report events as they occurred, rather than tailoring them for social or political
gain.
The resurrection appearances themselves are pivotal in establishing the event's reality.
According to the accounts, Jesus appeared to various individuals and groups within a span of 40
days following his resurrection. Notable witnesses included Mary Magdalene and the apostles,
among others. The transformation of the disciples—from fearful individuals hiding after Jesus's
crucifixion to bold proclaimers of the resurrection—serves as significant evidence for an
extraordinary occurrence. This dramatic change can be attributed to their genuine experiences of
the risen Christ. Habermas emphasizes this transformation by stating, "The disciples' willingness
to suffer and die for their belief in the risen Jesus speaks volumes about the conviction generated
by their encounters with him".7 Their unwavering commitment indicates that they were not
merely recycling a myth; instead, they were sharing sincere beliefs rooted in profound personal
experiences and encounters that changed their lives forever.
Addressing the reliability of the New Testament as historical documents is crucial in
defending the resurrection. The Gospels were written within a generation of the events they
describe. Furthermore, oral traditions were instrumental in preserving the stories and teachings of
Jesus, ensuring their transmission was accurate and meaningful. Scholars generally date the
Gospels between A.D. 30 and 90, allowing for numerous eyewitnesses to affirm or contest the
accounts. This proximity in time enhances the reliability of the Gospels and solidifies their
position as valuable historical records. Chatraw and Allen argue that “understanding the Gospels
in their historical context allows us to see how they functioned as documents of faith in the early
7 Gary R. Habermas, The Risen Jesus and Future Hope (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), 95.
5
church”.8 This scholarly endorsement strengthens the case for both miracles and the resurrection,
offering skeptics a more nuanced view of these claims.
One prevalent objection to miracles concerns causality and the consistency of natural
laws. Skeptics often argue that remarkable events do not align with a predictable universe
governed by established natural laws. However, this argument presupposes that our
understanding of those laws is exhaustive and incapable of including the possibility of
supernatural intervention. Craig contends that “If God exists and created the universe, his ability
to interact with his creation is not limited by the parameters of normal cause and effect”.9 Thus,
by broadening the scope of what is conceivable, discussions can be initiated that explore the
compatibility of miracles with a rational worldview.
The problem of evil typically arises during conversations about the supernatural. Some
skeptics assert that a loving God would not allow suffering and evil to exist in the world, thereby
casting doubt on the reality of miracles. Addressing this issue invites a deeper exploration of free
will and the purpose of suffering as depicted in Scripture. The biblical narrative presents a God
who engages with humanity amid suffering, offering hope, redemption, and the promise of
resurrection.
Philosopher Alvin Plantinga argues that the existence of evil can be reconciled with the
notion of a loving God, as it allows for the free will of humans.10 The presence of evil does not
negate the possibility of miracles; instead, it highlights the need for divine intervention and
8 Josh Chatraw and Mark D. Allen, Apologetics at the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: HarperCollins, 2018), 84.
9 William Lane Craig, On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision (Colorado Springs, CO:
David C. Cook, 2008), 64.
10 Alvin Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974), 105.
6
guidance to navigate a broken world. By examining these themes, skeptics may start to consider
that the coexistence of evil and miracles is not necessarily contradictory.
Ultimately, the discussion surrounding miracles and resurrection is not merely an
academic exercise—it touches on the heart of the Christian faith. The resurrection of Jesus
represents a victory over death, providing hope and assurance to all believers. As individuals
embark on their faith journeys, many report transformation through experiences that echo the
miraculous. A study conducted by Ladd and Ladd found that 70% of individuals who reported
having a spiritual experience considered it a pivotal moment in their lives.11 These experiences
not only affirm belief but also highlight the transformative nature of faith.
As Chatraw and Allen suggest, sharing personal narratives can be persuasive in
conversations with skeptics, illustrating how belief in the supernatural leads to positive change.12
These stories have the power to reshape perspectives and values by demonstrating the real-life
impact of faith.
In confronting skepticism regarding miracles and resurrection, utilizing the Inside-Out
method allows for thoughtful and empathetic engagement with those who uphold naturalistic
views. By presenting compelling historical evidence, considering the reliability of Gospel
accounts, and inviting discussion of skeptical objections, a strong case can be built for the reality
of supernatural events in Christianity.
The resurrection of Jesus stands as not only a pivotal event in Christianity but also as a
historical claim that merits serious examination. Through respectful dialogue and an
11 George E. Ladd and Mary Ladd, "The Impact of Spiritual Experiences on Personal Change," Journal of
Spirituality and Health 14, no. 3 (2019), 115.
12 Josh Chatraw and Mark D. Allen, Apologetics at the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: HarperCollins, 2018),
108.
7
understanding of the skeptic's perspective, opportunities to foster openness toward the
miraculous can arise, paving the way for potential transformative encounters with the divine.
Ultimately, whether individuals accept the miraculous claims of Christianity or continue
to question them, engaging in these discussions fosters understanding and respect. By merging
compassion with clarity, and employing persuasive arguments backed by historical evidence, the
path to faith can be illuminated for many. This approach invites others to consider experiencing
the life-changing power of belief in Jesus, who was crucified but is also alive, ready and willing
to transform lives today.
Additionally, it is essential to cultivate an environment where respectful dialogue can
thrive. Creating such spaces allows both believers and skeptics to voice their perspectives in
earnest. It invites deeper inquiries into matters of faith and allows for the exploration of
existential questions that may have long been unexplored. By fostering an atmosphere of trust
and openness, individuals are more likely to engage earnestly with ideas that challenge their
preconceived notions.
This dialogue goes beyond mere persuasion; it becomes an invitation for all participants
to reflect on their worldviews, confront their doubts, and potentially discover new paths toward
truth and understanding. Both skeptics and believers can learn from one another, enhancing their
mutual appreciation of differing beliefs while finding common ground. These interactions can
lead to constructive discussions that transcend typical ideological divides and encourage greater
understanding of diverse perspectives.
Moreover, examining miracles and the resurrection within the broader context of human
experience can provide further insights into the significance of these events. Miracles are not just
8
sporadic occurrences; they symbolize hope, renewal, and the possibility of new beginnings. The
resurrection, representing triumph over death and despair, serves as an anchor for faith
communities that seek to make sense of suffering and vulnerability in the human condition.
As individuals reflect on their life experiences, they might find parallels between their
struggles and the transformative narratives witnessed in the New Testament. These reflections
can deepen one's understanding of personal suffering as a catalyst for growth, leading to a
renewed appreciation for the stories of hope and resurrection that are central to Christian faith.
In conclusion, engaging with skepticism regarding the miraculous and the resurrection is
not only about defending a set of beliefs but is, at its core, a journey of exploration into what it
means to believe and hope in a higher power. It involves understanding the profound
implications of the resurrection within the context of both history and personal experience.
As discussions unfold, it is possible to emphasize the core messages of Christianity—
hope, redemption, and transformation. The goal should be to create respectful exchanges that
illuminate the life-changing possibilities that faith offers. By addressing skepticism with clarity,
empathy, and robust historical foundations, it is possible to foster an atmosphere where belief in
the supernatural is seen not as an irrational pursuit but as a deeply human exploration of what it
means to encounter the divine in an often-chaotic world.
In this way, these conversations are vital to nurturing a more expansive view of faith—
one that is open to dialogue, replete with historical evidence, and grounded in profound personal
experiences. Engaging thoughtfully with miracles and the resurrection ultimately paves the way
for a deeper understanding of the Christian faith and its relevance in today's multifaceted cultural
landscape.
10
Bibliography
Chatraw, Josh, and Mark D. Allen. Apologetics at the Cross. Grand Rapids, MI: HarperCollins,
2018.
Craig, William Lane. On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision. Colorado
Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2008.
Habermas, Gary R. The Risen Jesus and Future Hope. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield,
2005.
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Paul Millican. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2007.
Keener, Craig S. Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts. Grand Rapids, MI:
Baker Academic, 2011.
Ladd, George E., and Ladd, Mary. "The Impact of Spiritual Experiences on Personal Change."
Journal of Spirituality and Health, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, pp. 110-121.
Licona, Michael. The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications,
2010.
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974.