1 | P a g e
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS AND POLICIES
1. Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs)
1.1. Definition and purpose
Multilateral Environmental Agreements commonly referred to MEAs, are powerful instruments
that are aimed to help solve the global, cooperative problems of the world. Called the ‘legally
binding treaties between three or more parties,’ MEAs address environmental problems that
cannot be solved on individual nation-state level and include climate change, loss of bio-
diversity and pollutions (Bernauer & Spilker, 2022). The role of MEAS is to develop policies
and procedures in achieving these goals, including programmes, practices, and regulations on
which member states have to agree to conform Due to providing the basis for the cooperation
and multiple, often similar goals and legal requirements, that can be only solved with mutual
endeavours and resources, MEAs provide the framework for the enhanced cooperation to face
the sometimes local, but often international environmental problems (Aggarwal & Evenett,
2019). Thus, the essence of MEAs is in pumping up the action and commitment as well as
resource. They act as a means of sharing information, technology and capital injections from
developed nations to the developing ones, which in most cases lack sufficient financial, human
and natural resource endowment to independently address environmental issues as and when
they occur (Eskelinen, 2022). Facilitating a synergistic relationship between nations assists in
closing the divide between those that have a lot of restraint and capacity as well as those with a
lot of responsibility yet little restraint. In addition, MEAs are used for prescription of standards
in the international environmental arena and the policy instrument in shaping national policies
and advancing sustainable development across the world (Gupta & Pouw, 2017). However,
several factors which have been presented below, hinder the efficiency of MEAS: The MEAs are
negotiated and applied and therefore, reflect several aspects of different nations, their interests,
2 | P a g e
economic priorities, and varying levels of commitment. The principle of CBDR takes these
disparities into account and calls for the equitable allocation of the responsibilities premised on
the volume of an individual country’s contribution to the pollution of the environment in the past
and its current capacity of making contributions towards mitigation measures (Bernauer &
Spilker, 2022). MEAs continues to serve as a crucial instrument to tackle the most pressing
issues affecting our planet earth today and this era.
1.2. Examples (e.g., UNFCCC, CBD)
The UNFCCC and CBD, being MEAs, have played a very defining role in the area of IEG. The
global politics of climate change began in 1992 with the formation of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, whose main objective is to prevent climates
destabilization by the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (Bäckstrand &
Lövbrand, 2019). This agreement provide for other instruments, Instruments like the Kyoto
Protocol and the Paris Agreement where countries have committed themselves to meet specific
targets of greenhouse gases emissions and controll. The UNFCCC is liable for facilitating
international cooperation pursuant to which countries cooperate and develop policy measures for
managing climate change (Clémençon, 2018). As previously mentioned, the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), also signed in 1992, addresses
emissions of greenhouse gases and their impact on natural climate, as well as elaborates
measures for mitigating adverse changes (Carrington & Oberthür, 2022). CBD has contributed
mainly to international actions for development that impacted the environment through the
AGisphere, including the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity
Framework, which seek to address the very problem of diminishing biodiversity. UNFCCC and
CBD also provide examples that MEAs can trigger the global cooperation based on the collective
actions undertaken to solve a particular ecological problem and establish work vectors adequate
3 | P a g e
to the abilities and authorities of member-states (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). The achievements of
MEAs are therefore evident in the level of compliance in the realization of their Brundtland
Goals. For instance, there is internationals acceptance of the Agreement work done under the
UNFCCC where countries are required to provide their NDCs on how the global temperature rise
is to be reduced (Bäckstrand & Lövbrand, 2019). In the same vein, the CBD spurred
considerable improvements in the stewardship of biological diversity, such as the expansion of
protected spaces as well as the assimilation of biological diversity into development laws of the
member countries (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022).
1.3. Negotiation and ratification process
Multilateral Environmental Agreements, or MEAs, may be defined as negotiated accords aimed
at preserving the global environment, signed by a number of nations and ratified in the same
manner. First, there is the identification of an environmental problem that necessitates
intervention and cooperation, and then countries and relevant stakeholders first discuss the
framework of the main objectives and goals of the adoption of the agreement (Karlsson-
Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). It is signed in various international forums and conferences where
specific terms and conditions in relation to the agreement are agreed upon by the participating
countries. The third and most vital stage is the drafting stage in which member countries engage
in dizzying bargain to harmonise their interests and priorities with a view of arriving at a
consensus of the text of the agreement (Mitchell, 2018). After the draft text is approved, the
agreement is signed in a signed conference or meeting- COP under unFCCC. Adoption means
that the countries concerned have approved the draft text as it stands, although it does not mean
that the law is immediately binding. But before the agreement is fully realized, it is important
that it is ratified by the countries that are in it. Ratification is the final step whereby each country
passes the agreement through its respective national legal bodies such as Parliament or Congress
4 | P a g e
through their constitutional legally required processes (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). This
step makes it legal to practice domestically while at the same time making countries to be bound
to honour the provisions of the agreement. The political, economic, as well as social challenges
are there to create complications within the process of negotiation and ratification. A clear
example is where the nations may differ on fundamental<|reserved_special_token_271|> such as
financial obligations, sharing of technology, and timing of the agreements (Moravcsik, 2021).
Also, it may be difficult to seek domestic approval for ratification for the Agreement whereby
there is strong resistance to its terms in some countries. The negotiation and ratification of MEAs
are significant since they offer the international cooperation and group action that are necessary
for addressing environmental challenges. The process highlights diplomacy, compromise, and
what can only be referred to as world statesmen perseverance in coming up with the best ways of
dealing with the ever emerging environmental issues affecting our planet today (Mitchell, 2018).
2. Principles and Guiding Concepts
2.1. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities
The nature, axiology and objectives of the international environmental agreements and policies
are essential for formation of fair and efficient standards of the international environmental
governance. Some of the key principles are the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP), and the Common
but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) which recognizes the various capacities and
obligations that nations have to bear for the stewardship of the natural environment. This
principle hinges on the belief that functional countries are responsible for maximizing the impact
of environmental degradation, and thus should be the first to manage these issues and extend
support to emergent nations (Ebner, 2022). The other basic principle is the Polluter Pays
Principle (PPP) which postulates those pollute ought to be responsible for dealing with pollution
so as to avoid negative impact on peoples wellbeing and the surroundings. This principle is to
5 | P a g e
encourage businesses and individuals to take responsibility for environmental impacts because
under this system, businesses and individuals begin to factor in degradation costs as expenses
rather than expecting others, including the government, to bear the burden (Aggarwal & Evenett,
2019). The Precautionary Principle is also central especially in times when there is scientific
controversy. This story actually suggested that if an action or policy has the potential to pose
harm to the public or the environment, and if there is no scientific consensus evidence on the
claim, the proponent ought to present evidence that justifies the action. This principle dictates
that prevention of environmental degradation must be done even if the missing evidence of the
impact is still being sought (Eskelinin, 2022). These principles comprise a united structure that
delivers reasonable, responsible, and precautionous trends to an international policy on the
environment. They can express a fair sharing of global environmental burden with consideration
of historical emissions and current GDP per capita as well as differentiation between 1. 5°C and
2°C temperature goals (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). These guiding concepts hence acts as a check and
balance to confirm that environment polices are not only efficient but social acceptable measures
towards sustainable development with international cooperation and support. Mainstreaming
these principles into the design and structure of international agreements enhances the global
endeavours to combat challenges that stem from environmental concerns and Climate change.
2.2. Polluter Pays Principle
PPP is a core pillar of environmental legislation and policies in which seeks to advocate for
polluters to shift the same cost of pollution that may harm humans or detrimental to the
environment. This principle increases the responsibilities since the emission of pollutants makes
the polluters liable for the costs incurred within the market, thus encouraging businesses and
people to limit pollution (Aggarwal & Evenett, 2019). Becoming noticeable in the 1970s with the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) framework and spreading in
6 | P a g e
the multiple national and international environmental legislation. It provides a basis for the
forecasts of environmental taxation, legal liabilities and other regulatory initiatives so that the
costs for pollution prevention and control will not be shifted on the society, ones responsible for
pollutions (Eskelinen, 2022). The principle is used in diverse solutions included the carbon
pricing including the carbon taxation and cap and trade schemes as well as in the pollution
control policies in industries such as production, transport and disposal of wastes. For example,
in the European Union sector the practices of the Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is a
worthy example of PPP in which companies are obliged to purchase emission permits for
greenhouse gases, thus directly relating the cost of pollution to the polluter (Bernstein &
Hoffmann, 2018). Nonetheless, the use of PPP has its constraints specifically where the adoption
of PPP is being practiced; in the developing nations it may act as a hurdle because of the
presence of synthetic or nascent rules and regulation concerning enforcement. There are debates
whether PPP is fair and efficient to use in some cases for example where the polluters belong to
socially or economically less developed regions, or where pollution crosses border and affects
areas outside the polluter’s geographical area. However, PPP can continue to be an effective
approach for promoting environmental change, encouraging development of greener
technologies, and trending to internalize environmental expenses into economics that impose
those costs on the environment (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). In this way, the PPP ensures that
polluters work to fix the damages, so their self-interest is aligned with the common interest of
sustaining the environment, ensuring that a fair level of justice is followed (Dellmuth et al. ,
2022).
2.3. Precautionary Principle
It is actually an important sustainable development principle for environmental management
which postulates the need to act to prevent harm regardless the existence of scientific ambiguity.
7 | P a g e
This principle stems from the beliefs that it is safer to precede protection even if there are
uncertain links between risks and the effects they produce per scientific research (Karlsson-
Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). The Precautionary Principle was popularised in the international arena
during the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and the principle is stated within the Rio Declaration under
the Principle 15 which is a provision that asserts that the absence of full scientific certainty will
not be used as the basis for inaction with regard to the abandonment of activities that threatens
the environment (Eskelinen, 2022). The Risk of earliest approach has been incorporated in
different global conventions and national practices as a fundamental method of dealing with risks
that relate to the environment and its future such as climate change, loss of bio-diversity, and
chemical pollution among others. For instance, while addressing GMOs and REACH regulation
on chemical substances, the EU has adopted the Precautionary Principle implying severe testing
and risk evaluation processes before substances are allowed to be utilized (Dupont & Oberthür,
2022). This principle obliges the policymakers to act proactively basing their actions on plausible
threats and even though this may entail more costs than efficiency it serves to uphold the life of
human beings and their surroundings above that of capital and technology. But the incidence of
using the Precautionary Principle creates some issues. Skepticism lies in the fact that it may
result in overly protective policies that stand in the way of innovative possibilities in fields where
intrinsic risks are integral (Bernstein & Hoffmann, 2018). Also the following challenges:
defining what is enough to take precautions Additional challenges include: defining what is
enough to take precautions, costs & benefits of precautionary measures. And In light of these
challenges, the Precautionary Principle is still a useful and valuable decision-making tool in
environmental policy-making, as it is based on the precautionary approach and is designed to
address uncertain risks. As a result, preventive action is emphasized, meaning policymakers,
8 | P a g e
when acting, should think about how their decision will affect the future and take into account
the needs of future generations (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al.Eskelinen 2018 and 2022).
3. International Environmental Governance Institutions
3.1. United Nations Environment Programme
UNEP along with other bodies sustainably organize and lead the global efforts on environment
protection and announce the environmental priorities and strategies. UNEP was formed in 1972
after the Stockholm conference on the Human Environment and its major responsibilities are to
coordinate the development of sound environmental policies that will lead to sustainable
development throughout the world (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). UNEP works as the main advocate
for environmental issues within United Nations, promoting environmental agenda and
environmental awareness, engagement and action by providing leadership and integrating the
spirit of partnership in meeting the environmental challenges to enhance the well-being of every
person (Eskelinen, 2022). One of its critical mandates is to assess the condition of the
environment on a global level and offer guidance in terms of the formulation of environmental
policies, as well as technical support and training to its member countries. It also performs
systematic evaluations on any environmental problem that is of interest contemporary issues like
Global Environment Outlook that help the policy makers and society at large to know the status
of the environment and what may be expected in the future (Bernauer & Spilker, 2022). It has a
great deal to do with charting and formulation of International environmental agreements also. It
has been very useful in the formulation of different MEAs such as the Convention on Biological
Diversity, the Minamata convention on Mercury among others as will be shown below. More
specifically, UNEP collaborates with countries in lobbying and advocating for the negotiations
of these agreements, offering a forum for discussion and delivering technical and financial help
with regards to the enforcement of these agreements (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). Also, UNEP is
9 | P a g e
involved in enforcing environmental parameters into each development agenda or policy and
=decision making within various sectors and levels of government. By participating in the United
Nations Environmental Programme Finance Initiative as well as supporting the Sustainable
Development Goals framework, it dialogue with governments, business and civil societies for
sustainable economic development, as the earth’s natural resources are preserved (Eskelinen,
2022). Nevertheless, they have stated their concerns about UNEP, which include inadequate
funding, and most importantly inadequate political backing from the member states.
3.2. Global Environment Facility
The Global Environment Facility (GEF) is a financial mechanism that ensures financial support
for projects, the projects which can lead to improved environmental quality. This is
through helping to combat worldwide environmental concerns. Created in 1991, the GEF is an
international governing organization made up of 183 member countries, IGOs, NGOs and private
companies which aims to fund and coordinate global efforts to tackle some of the world’s most
significant environmental issues including loss of biological diversity, climate change, land
degradation and degradation of international waters (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). In the case of the
GEF, it offers grants and concessional financing to developing countries and countries with
economies in transition for the implementation of measures that provide global environmental
benefits at a cost that is increment to those countries but is very significant for the global
community (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). Mapping therefore highlights one of the GEF’s key
assets-independence and capacity for bringing together co-financing from governments,
international organisations and the private sector. Such leveraging effect greatly enhances the
notion of funding and makes it very possible to fund more projects with an environmental focus.
As it has been mentioned before, the GEF is still underway and it funds a wide range of projects
including those that affect target communities, smaller projects that target specific areas, large
10 | P a g e
scale projects in a target country and even large scale projects in a region (GEF, 2022).
Significantly it is an implementing agreement of several significant interrelated global
environmental treaties that are the CBD, the UNFCCC and the Stockholm Convention on
Persistent Organic Pollutants. This role establishes it at the center of the world environment
financing structure and aids in fulfilling the country obligations in the realization of these
conventions utilizing finance and capacity-building derivation (Bernauer & Spilker, 2022). The
GEF Working can be said to be coordinated by the replenishment cycles when donor countries
promise to contribute the funds. These cycles enable the GEF to plan for its future activities and
funding for an extended period; under three years, it concentrates on programs that are relevant
to the vision of its governing council. Nonetheless, the GEF is faced by complexities like the
challenge of funding and resources, competing demands in relation to stakeholders as well as the
methods of evaluating GEF’s interventions in the long-term.
3.3. World Bank
As one of the largest international organization, the World Bank he has the duty to contribute
and participate to the international environmental governance by working environmental aspects
harmonized into economic rate and poverty reduction. The financial entity World Bank is
another important global actor which supports developmental projects in countries in transition
in the social, economic and environmental spheres for the purpose of improving their economic
outlook and people’s well-being with a focus on large-scale activities in the sphere of
environment (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). The environmental policy of the World Bank Group
consist of integrating environmental concerns in its development work and shaping a sustainable
development for the globe with concern towards environmental problems including global
warming, resource management, and pollution. This is done through funding interventions,
policy consultations, and analytical works aimed at supporting countries in instituting sustainable
11 | P a g e
environmental programs and standards (Eskelinen, 2022). The Civil society groups have claimed
that one of the most important tools of the World Bank in this area is its pledge to fund and
sponsor climate change. The programs whereby assistance has been provided in meeting these
objectives include the provision of substantial resources in the form of financial assistance by the
World Bank Group to aid countries in their quest to embrace climate change mitigation and
adaptation measures as supported by action plans and policies on renewable energy, energy
efficiency, and financing climate-resilient infrastructure. Similarly, the World Bank has a
massive chunk of work involved in facilitating the business investment in sustainable
development through various avenues such as, International Finance Corporation (IFC), which
offers loans, individual portions, and risk mitigation to strengthen private sector involvement in
environment friendly projects (Bernstein & Hoffmann, 2018). In addition, the World Bank’s
technical assistance activities encompass analytical support which helps to improve countries’
capacity to address the environmental concerns. The information gained through the
environmental policies and assessments, consultations with the country also as among them
whichallows the World Bank to shed light on and facilitate the process of, finding the most
suitable policy for the concerned country and its environment.
4. Implementation and Compliance Mechanisms
4.1. Monitoring and reporting requirements
Consistency indicators are central to compliance, and therefore countries signed onto
international environmental agreements must establish monitoring and reporting standards on
policies formulated and executed. These mechanisms include polls conducted periodically to
compile and disseminate statistics concerning environmental stewardship and treaty compliance
(Bernauer and Spilker, 2022). For instance, under the Paris Agreement, countries have to provide
INDCs and repeatedly report their achievements through BURs and NHGIS. Due to the nature of
12 | P a g e
such stringent reporting standards, it is possible to monitor progress in achieving the global
climate targets, identify where improvements are required, and for comparative analysis and
evaluation with other nations (Dellmuth et al . , 2022). Supervisory tools may include the use of
technologically enhanced features such as remote monitoring, satellite imaging, and data
processing to enhance the reporting of status on various environmental variables. These
technologies allow in maintaining a constant watch on variations in the environment and
analyzing trends, radical fluctuations or problems in the RealTime. Sheltered by the GEF and the
UNEP, the Council aids countries in establishing sound monitoring and reporting frameworks by
offering technical assistance, coaching, and aid (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). It requires the
setting-up institutional frameworks at both national and international level to provide
coordination in the activities related to collection, analysis and reporting of the data also. They
help in ensuring that data collected is credible, agreeable and easy to compare to make informed
decisions in policy making and to assess on compliances also. However, the problems remain
actual especially in the developing countries because of the lack of funds and experience in the
establishment of the efficient monitoring systems needed for solving the given
problem. The Global surveillance, coordination, and strengthening of human and organizational
capacities are some of the critical areas requiring international support and assistance. Thus,
strong practice of monitoring and reporting is apparently crucial in the context of Ign infAE.
They give the required openness and justify enhancement to execute the commitments or
apperceive countries’ advancement levels and favorable frontiers. These mechanisms entail, for
instance, the application of modern technologies and cooperation between countries and
regionally and therefore play a crucial role in global environmental governance and sustainable
development goals (Bernauer & Spilker, 2022; Dellmuth et al. 2022).
13 | P a g e
4.2. Financial assistance and technology transfer
Another implementation strategy in the case of IEAs is the provision of financial resources and
technology transfer is vital, especially for the developing countries that are in a better situation to
address environmental problems that result from limited resource endowment. Aid for
environment entails the offering of funds that are in form of grants funding or loans to facilitate
implementation of environmental obligations as well as augment financing of sustainable
development initiatives in recipient nations (Bernauer & Spilker, 2022). The GEF as well as
GCF play significant roles in financing and channeling of resources for international
environmental projects. These institutions assist in filling the gaps by funding endeavour that
seeks to; combat climate change, adapt to climate change, and safeguard biodiversity and prevent
pollution (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). Technology transfer, as one of the process that relates to
the exchange of technology and information between the developed and the developing nations
for the purpose of building up their ability to mitigate environmental issues. This entails;
availability of sophisticated machinery such as solar powered electricity, waste disposal and
management, purification of drinking water and ability of structures to stand the test of natural
disasters such as floods occurrence. Technology transfer promotes the utilization of
environmentally friendly invention through facilitating green technological application, thus
eliminating environmental vices and heralding sustainable economic development (Karlsson-
Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). UNFCCC also states that technology transfer and financial assistance
is essential world’s climate goals state that developed nations need to extend their technological
and financial support to the developing nations. These mechanisms are significant to make it
possible for the whole world with away developed and developing countries to play their part in
offering solution to global environmental aims. Nevertheless, financial assistance and the
technology transfer has some problems such as limited funding, lack of an efficient bureaucratic
14 | P a g e
framework for financial disbursement and protection of intellectual property rights. Successful
and timely disbursement scheme and proper transmission of fits technologies demand solid
international coordination. However, most of these technologies require tremendous support in
enhancing and mainstreaming whenever results are expected in the long run, or capacities to be
built at local level to facilitate the exploitation of the new technologies. capacity building in the
form of financial aid and technology transfers are important elements in the plea for fair
cooperation on international environmental agreements.
4.3. Dispute resolution and non-compliance procedures
The support in terms of financial resources and technology transfer is also a crucial factor when
it comes to IEAs, especially for the developing nations which are more capable to respond to
environmental challenges that arise from low stock of resources. Environmental support
financing is the extension of credit or grant funding for the purpose of meeting environmental
commitments and to supplement development financing that is available in recipient countries
(Bernauer & Spilker, 2022). International environmental projects in terms of financing and
resources mobilization are natured by the GEF and also the GCF. These institutions aid in
helping fill these gaps by supporting endeavour that aims at; mitigation of climate change,
adaptation to climate change, and protection of biodiversity and decrease pollution (Dupont &
Oberthür, 2022). It is the process that defines the relationship between the developed and the
developing nations regarding the flow of technology and information through which the later is
built up of their capacity to address environmental concerns. This requires; provision of well
developed technological infrastructure such as; Generation of electrical energy through solar
power, proper disposal and management of wastes, supply of safe drinking water, and design and
construction of structures that will be able to withstand occurrences of floods. Technology
transfer supports the application of environmentally sustainable invention through promoting
15 | P a g e
application of green technology hence eradicating environmental evils and signifying the
beginning of a sustainable economic transformation (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018).
UNFCCC also speaks that technology and financial help are important for the accomplishment
of world’s climate objectives and these state that developed nations has to share their
technological as well as financial support to the developing nations. These mechanisms are
crucial to enable the whole world and with away developed and developing nations be capable of
contributing towards solution of global environmental goals. However, the problem of financial
and technological support is as follows: The question of funding is still really urgent; there is no
proper legislation in many countries to enable an effective bureaucracy for grant and subsidized
disbursement; the issue of protection of IPR remains a big concern in many countries. Efficient
and timely disbursement scheme, and proper transfer of fits technologies require sound
international cooperation.
5. Challenges and Criticisms
5.1. Negotiation and consensus-building difficulties
Main issues involving negotiation and reaching consensus in international environmental
agreements include resistance due to the differences of indivisible interests among the
participating countries. Since the dynamics of the environmental issue are complicated, climate
change, and losing diversity, asserting environmental solutions require cooperation from all
countries, including developed and developing ones, and the capacities and responsibilities of
each country are different. The countries of the developed world take meticulous measures of
environmental protection and ambitious emission goals because they have higher potential for
the effective implementation and financing of such activities. On the other hand, the developing
countries stressed more on the economic development and poverty eradication, questioning the
CMCs strict stand on environmental policies which are considered as a threat to their economic
16 | P a g e
growth. This leads to the conflict of interestand of which makes it difficult for countries of the
world to come to a agreeing standing on environmental policies. This is where the principle of
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) seeks to meet these needs; inform that all
countries have the same responsibilities for the protection of the environment, but developed
countries have a greater bearing or a greater capacity because of their role in environmental
depletion (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). However, the process of applying this principle in
negotiations is often debatable due to the multimethod approach, which focuses on the
assessment of fair offers, reasonable fees, and other financial obligations. Moreover, the
international climate negotiations are time taking as they involve numerous countries’
representatives who do not work with the same level of enthausiasm and intensity. It is yet to be
realized that the desire for consensus or near consensus hampers all efforts and results in the
destruction of sound and substantial environmental agreements. For example, the protracted
discussions that culminated in the Paris climate agreement demonstrate that indeterminacy’s
challenge is a matter of how to ensure that the agreement is demanding enough without making it
inflexible in its implementation, and this culminates in Paris Agreement leaning heavily on
voluntary national contributions instead of mandatory legal obligations (Moravcsik, 2021).
Moreover, practical conflicts and conflicts of power in the given global regions can contribute to
the negotiation process, where certain states possess more power than others to insist on certain
propositions.It is important to remember that actors other than the government are involved in
the discussions as well, including NGOs and representatives of the private sector, which makes
the situation even more intricate.The strategies of consensual bargaining in international
environmental agreements face many difficulties due to the conflicting national interests, the
17 | P a g e
deficiencies in economic development, and the tendency of the environmental problems to
induce controversies.
5.2. Lack of enforcement and binding commitments
One of the major flaws in international environmental agreements is that they rarely have teeth
behind them, or in other words, very often they remain only consensus-based frameworks. As
with other voluntary international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, the compliance
mechanisms of the agreement are fairly watered down and not stringent, as they do not involve
legally binding commitments and have weak enforcement measures (Hovic & Andresen, 2022).
They are often not legally binding, and that is why many countries set lower goals and do not
fulfill their outlined commitment without severe repercussions. Lack of specific obligations may
result in the failure in cooperation mechanism due to the so called “free-rider” effect when
certain members gain from the actions of others while contributing little to the collective cause.
That undermines collective action and may result in the vicious cycle of non-compliance:
countries are likely to refrain from making significant moves if they think that others are not
planning to do the same (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). Moreover, there is no strong compliance
system to ensure that countries perform specific obligations and duties and that there are no
consequences even if they do not. Unlike other international regimes that include but not limited
to, WTO trade law that provide clear structures of settling disputes and enforcing compliance,
environmental agreements lack this muscle to punish indoctrination of agreements. In an attempt
to balance the lack of enforcement measures in the previous treaty, the Kyoto Protocol put in
place a compliance mechanism that could potentially punish non-compliant countries – by
assigning them higher emission reduction targets in the future. Nevertheless, owing to the
political backlash and lack of compliance from key member states, the effectiveness of
combating evasion was low – an implication of the challenges arising from multilateralism,
18 | P a g e
where ensuring stringent implementation proves complicated (Eskelinen, 2022). Further,
enforcement of those measures is still very compromised by issues of self-reporting and the
inconsistent surveillance and reporting systems of various countries. Although there are
organizations like the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
that offer recommendations and cooperation in terms of monitoring and reporting, the
shortcoming in equity and accountability can perpetuate flaws in assessment and reporting.
5.3. Balancing environmental and economic interests
The ever-present challenge of reconciling the environment and the economy, inevitably defines
and defines the formulation and implementation of international environmental agreements. It
has been traditionally followed that economic development and sustainability of the earth’s
environment are inversely related; with interest conflict that enhances encumbrance in policy-
making and global diplomacy (Bernauer, 2022). As for the critics to common but differentiated
responsibility, developing countries for instance contend that excessive environmental standards
can retard their growth, thus worsening poverty and more inequality. They continue to call for
funding from developed countries that shall also embrace policies with fiscal and technological
motives to enhance sustainable development strategies without negating their economic dreams
(Dellmuth et al. , 2022). Even the developed countries, for the most part, are better equipped in
terms of adopting high standards of environment compliance and accountability; however, they
also have similar pressures of how to achieve economic growth without compromising
environmental laws. Sectors that have continued to use the traditional fuels and have pollution
proactive measures resent any changes stating that they will lead to job losses and economic
difficulties. Nevertheless, there are interests that can be addressed by the idea of Green Growth
and the transition to a green grow economy as approaches that provide for economic
development cooperating with environmental concerns. There is various opportunity to switch
19 | P a g e
our economy towards green economy by investing in renewable energy power plants, sustainable
agriculture and green technologies this will will creat job opportunities and help in the increase
of economic growth while also reducing the amount of harm done to our environment
(Eskelinen, 2022). But, while much attention has been given to this issue, the requisite balancing
of the supply side and demand side and the attainment of financial surpluses sufficient to
accommodate major capital investments and the development of policies to support and sustain
those investments can be difficult to engineer especially in the developing world. These
challenges are even provides mechanisms within the frame work of the international
environmental agreements including financial assistance, technology transfer and capacity
building. It is important to mention that there are initiatives like the Green Climate Fund (GCF)
and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), which aim at providing funds and technical
assistance to the developing nations in order for them to develop sustainability, which should not
limit their access to growth. The principles of equity and fairness in environmental agreements,
especially the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), are useful in understanding
the different features of countries in as much as they seek to address the unequal capacities, and
past responsibilities are in question.
6. Role of Non-State Actors
6.1. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
Currently, the non-governmental organizations (INGOs) are critical organizations in the
monitoring of international environmental governance through policy change advocacy,
awareness creation and government or corporate accountability. Some of the global NGOs are
Greenpeace organization, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Friends of the Earth among other
organization and all these NGOs possess immense expert knowledge, networks, and resources
that assist them in shaping policy making practices and advancing environmental measures
20 | P a g e
(Bäckstrand & Lövbrand, 2019). A key responsibility communicated with regards to NGOs is
engagement in the supervision of the fulfillment of environment pacts and the reporting of
infringements or violations. They offer vital information, undertake personal analyses, and
prepare reports that promote the pushing of policymakers into undertaking even more drastic
measures on climate change (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). Some are involved in advocating for
policies that protect the environment, some others are involved in writing laws regarding the
environment while others are involved in capacity building especially in the Third World
countries whereby they assist in providing technical support, capacity building as well as other
requirements in formulating as well as enforcing of environmental laws. Due to their extensive
networks of volunteers, they can coordinate mass outcry and enlist communities in
environmental conservation. And ndeed, provides leadership, and coordination and is usually
involved in mediating disputes between governments, the private sector and citizens
organisations. They are invited to attend and observe or serve as consultants, and sometimes they
play an active role in framing CNs and the overall governance of large-scale international
environmental meetings such as the COP under the UNFCCC (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al. ,
2018). However, the implementation of such programs present certain difficulties; for instance,
NGOs are usually poorly funded, meet with political opposition in many cases, and can also face
restrictions on their activities by the government. This finance perspective underscores the
reason why their work and resources must be sustained, their operational space defended and
expanded. and why the international community must appreciate the centrality of the regimes to
global environmental governance. And therefore, in final analysis, it is possible to conclude that
NGOs are vital stakeholders in the IGAE regime.
21 | P a g e
6.2. Private sector and corporate initiatives
Experts and scholars have recently drawn attention on the fact that the private sector and
corporate initiatives play the essential roles to promote as well as to achieve the international
environmental agreements. Businesses mostly large multinationals remain important entities in
driving sustainability. this is through research, development of new technologies, capital
investment and adopting of sustainable solutions in fields that are most sensitive to
environmental degradation like energy production, food production and manufacturing. Today, it
is common for a firm to engage in CSR and report ESG metrics as sustainability has become a
fabric of the organizational strategies. These efforts occasionally extend beyond strict adherence
to legal requirements and focus on reducing carbon footprints, increasing resource utilization,
developing sustainability indicators, and supporting the objectives of global accords such as the
Paris Agreement (Cao & Prakash, 2021). Inter alia, leaders of the most powerful companies in
the world, including Apple, Google, Tesla, have fixed themselves aggressive goals for
transitioning to renewable energy sources, declared alongside large-scale coverage of green
industries as well as outlined serious plans of socializing alterations within their industries for
improving the environmental impact. These roles are not only played by mega corporations but
also sme’s of the private sector by participating in sustainable practices and implementation of
sustainable technologies at their local industries (Falkner, 2019). The creation of corporate
ventures lead to new innovations, where the corporation is the primary innovator in the
advancement of new technologies and process that have the potential to be environmentally
friendly and provide sustainability. There are also other ways through which private sector
supports environmental objectives and one of the most prevalent ways is through public private
partnerships (PPPs). These forms of partnerships between governments and businesses take
advantage of the specific nature of public and private sectors in funding and executing more
22 | P a g e
extensive environmental projects including renewable energy technologies, agriculture
conservation, waste management, among others (Bernstein & Hoffmann, 2018). While private
sector engagement is critical, it is also imperative to get it right to avoid certain drawbacks. This
is associated with the issue of greenwashing, that is, when companies may claim that they are
environmentally friendly and working to fix the issue, but may not be doing as much as they
say. It is important to embrace transparency, non-tolerance to corruption, and adherence to
international best practices, especially scientific methodologies.
6.3. Indigenous communities and local participation
Ethnic groups and subnational actors plays very significant roles in international environmental
politics as they offer traditional cultural voices and grounds vital in environmental conservation.
First Nation peoples have traditionally inhabited areas that are sensitive to ecological balance,
and have a natural mode of resource and wildlife management to ensure growth, sustainability,
and protection of the biosphere (Gupta & Pouw, 2017). From the aspect of culture, their
traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is the database of numerous techniques for sustainable
use of resources and adaptation practices accumulated during time. This knowledge has become
widely acknowledged and applied more systematically to international environmental policies
and measures, particularly in the ongoing practices of biological diversity protection, forest
utilisation and climate change mitigation (Dupont & Oberthür, 2022). For instance, one of the
guiding documents on the management and conservation of biological diversity is the convention
on biological diversity (CBD ), which states that consideration should be given to the traditional
knowledge systems of indigenous communities in the process of managing the biological
component of the environment. Due to the social acceptability increases on outcomes, they
recommend that local participation is crucial in facilitating more permanent environmental
projects and policies. CBNRM is an approach that has been adopted, where the rights to the
23 | P a g e
natural resources are devolved to the communities to provide effective management and
protection of the resources with an added extra of lifting the standards of living of the people
(Falkner, 2019). Where CBNRM has been successful, it is possible to look at a few different
areas including the community forest management regime in Nepal and the protection of marine
and coastal environments by the local communities in the Pacific Island Nations. A Development
of relations with communities, especially indigenous people and local populations, is also
effective in addressing the problems of environmental justice, because people, who are affected
by environment-related initiatives and measures, will receive certain benefits, and they will not
be affected by the environment more than they affect it (Dellmuth, et al. , 2022). There are,
however, several obstacles relating to the incorporation of indigenous peoples and local
communities into International Environmental Governance. It includes guaranteeing real and
effective stakeholder representation, eliminating the political and economic exclusion, and
defending Indigenous People’s rights and lands.
7. Regional Environmental Agreements
7.1. European Union environmental policies
The EU is arguably one of the most advanced in the establishment and implementation of
regional environmental policies due to its concern for sustainable development and
environmental conservation. The EU’s current environmental commitments are supported by a
broad policy structure that encompasses all the legislation and agendas targeting various
environmental challenges such as climate change, air and water pollution, waste disposal, and the
destruction of ecosystems (Eskelinen, 2022). One more key aspect of the EU policy is the
European Green Deal introduced in 2019 and targeting to turn the continent into climate-neutral
by 2050.The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)–the largest carbon market globally–is one of
the pillars of this strategy, where emissions are capped and emission allowances can be traded to
24 | P a g e
induce savings (Dellmuth et al. , 2022). Moreover, through policy like the Ambient Air Quality
Directive and the Water Framework Directive, the EU has adopted strict standards on air and
water pollution. Such directives provide clear goals for pollution emissions and outline
procedures for tracking and reporting on progress. The EU also looks at the circular economy
model where it seeks to minimise waste and recycle and remanufacture products. The Circular
Economy Action Plan adopted ambitious targets for product design, recycling, and waste
prevention to enhance resource efficiency and environmental sustainability (Dupont & Oberthür,
2022). Another area of focus is the protection of species and ecosystems, where for example the
EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 targets achieving the protection of 30% of the EU territory
and sea areas and the restoration of ecosystems in the EU. To this end, Natura 2000 is the largest
coordinated network of protected areas in the world that aims at protecting the habitats and
species throughout the member states. The EU has been confronted with some challenges in the
realization of its environmental goals and policies due to member states’ compliance, economic
constraints, and political culture. EU environmental policies need proper enforcement
mechanisms; adequate funding and support needed to be provided to the member states.
7.2. North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation
Sustainable development between Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America is a
tripartite environmental deal known as the NAAEC, which kicked off hand in hand with the
NAFTA with a view of considering environmental impacts spurred by formation of free trade
blocks. The NAAEC’s goals are to assist the three countries to cooperate, establish and
implement policies for sustainable development within these countries and make sure that the
environmental laws put in place are effectively implemented as planned (Bernauer & Spilker,
2022). The cooperation commission which is under the NAAEC helps with cooperation and
public participation in environmental concerns. It works through programs and projects that are
25 | P a g e
aimed at ensuring sound environmental management through provision of adequate conservation
measures in fields such as Biodiversity, Air and Water, Hazardous wastes etc. Its one of the
significant programs is the North American Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR)
which offers a great detail of pollutions that are being released or transferred, with much focus
on giving the public a clear picture about the environmental disclosures that need to be made
(Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen et al. , 2018). Assembled into the NAAEC, there are provisions for
handling the public complaints on enforcement of environmental laws. In the process, concerned
individuals and organizations can report cases that they feel a party is not implementing its
environmental laws as expected. It enhances accountability and fries governments so that they
keep to their word on the environment (Eskelinen, 2022). However, there are several weaknesses
that the NAAEC is faced with in the accomplishment of its objectives. The three countries may
face differences in implementation and enforcement of environmental laws therefore having
various levels of impact and programs hence compromise the activities of cooperation. The
incorporation and the degree of emphasis that is given on environmental policies also depend on
the economic developments or constraints as well as the prevailing political conditions. For
example, the shifts in the political regimes and presidential terms, especially those of America,
have affected the enthusiasm and effort in implementing the NAAEC. Upgrading NAFTA to
USMCA continues the process of environmental change in the region, hard representative is
aimed at improving environmental governance. By centring the commitment to maintain labour
standards on environmental degradation, the USMCA gives significant focus to environmental
aspects of trade relations and tackles the illegal sale of wildlife products and promotes
sustainable forestry and environmental legal reforms (Falkner, 2019).
26 | P a g e
7.3. African Union Convention on Conservation of Nature
The AU Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a very great policy
instrument for achieving the goal of sustainable development and environmental conservation in
Africa. It was adopted in 1968 and amended in 2003, the Convention seeks to ensure that all the
African countries co-ordinate their programmes, promote conservation of natural resources and
enhance sustainable utilization in Africa, which has a diverse variation of bio- diversity. The
concerns of the Convention, as mentioned in the Preamble, are to adopt the environmental
perspective in socio-economic development strategies. This paradigm addresses the relationships
that exist between environmental sustainability and economic development because, in a world
where people rely on natural resources for survival, productivity, and sustenance, economic
growth and environmental conservation are not mutually exclusive (Falkner, 2019). This is in
line with the fifth of the 10 principles of the Convention where the participation of local
communities in conservation is emphasized. Such a model creates a foundation for acts requiring
a participatory approach since it is a socially appropriate measure that aligns with cultural
practices consequently becoming sustainable. Culturally appropriate traditional knowledge
systems and practices are recognized as important in the sustainable use and management of
natural resources, which supports the protection of biological diversity and promoting ecosystem
recovery (Negrao-Filho et al. , 2022). Through the Convention, there is a recognition of
protected areas at the same time having the need for the rehabilitation of ecosystems that have
been exploited. It supports cross-border conservation efforts, for it realizes that the environment
and wildlife have no regard for national jurisdictions. This therefore shows that cross border
cooperation like the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area have benefits that
enhance their attaining of conservation objectives as well as boosting tourism. Though, the AU
Convention to end and prevent Sor Lucas is still in implementation, there are many barriers as
27 | P a g e
follows. Aggregation of funding sources which is a scarcity of adequate skills, volatile political
climate, and other projects competing for priority can hamper the implementation of
conservation measures. The following are the challenges encountered; However, there are
possible solutions which include; Ensuring adequate funding, capacity building, and political
will are among some of the recommendations which can help overcome the mentioned barriers
(Eskelinen, 2022). Many problems like poor implementation and enforcement of laws regarding
wildlife trade, man-made habitat destruction, and climate change cannot be solved without
cooperation among nations, regional organizations, and the international community as a whole.
28 | P a g e
8. Reference
Adger, W. N., Pulhin, J. M., Barnett, J., Dabelko, G. D., Hovelsrud, G. K., Levy, M., ... & Vogel,
C. H. (2020). Human security. In IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in
a changing climate (pp. 447-546). Cambridge University Press.
Aggarwal, V. K., & Evenett, S. J. (2019). Promoting dialogue among the trade and
environmental regimes. Global Environmental Politics, 19(2), 30-42.
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00503
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2019). The road to Paris: Negotiating a stronger climate
agreement. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 519-532.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1658367
Bernauer, T., & Spilker, G. (2022). International environmental agreements and environmental
quality: Insights and implications. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 341-361.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-114309
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact
of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189-211.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8
Cao, B., & Prakash, A. (2021). The role of non-governmental actors in promoting low-carbon
transitions. Climate Policy, 21(7), 881-896.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1980396
Clémençon, R. (2018). The two sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal failure or historic
success? The Journal of Environment & Development, 27(1), 3-24.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496517722786
29 | P a g e
Dellmuth, L. M., Tallberg, J., Duit, A., & Bakaki, Z. (2022). Institutional sources of legitimacy
in global environmental governance. The Review of International Organizations,
17(2), 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09452-0
Depledge, J. (2018). Striving for no net loss: The other climate change convention. Climate
Policy, 18(3), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1338792
Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2022). Under climate's shadow: Fragmented governance, shifting
power and state capacity for biodiversity. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 821-844.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.2004503
Eskelinen, T. (2022). Changing global environmental governance: Institutional complexity and
power distribution among international organizations. Global Environmental Politics,
22(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00660
Falkner, R. (2019). The role of global environmentalism. In R. Falkner (Ed.), Environmentalism
and Global International Society (pp. 1-26). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667203.001
Graham, N., Carroll, P., & Pinto, D. (2019). Language in the Anthropocene: Transdisciplinary
practices in sustainable environmental governance. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1-
2), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619868904
Gupta, J., & Pouw, N. (2017). Towards a trans-disciplinary conceptualization of inclusive
development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 96-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.03.004
30 | P a g e
Hale, T. (2020). Catalytic cooperation. Global Environmental Politics, 20(4), 73-98.
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00561
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Dahl, A., & Colenbrander, D. (2018). Negotiating international
environmental agreements for the Anthropocene. International Environmental
Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(5), 675-689.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9415-0
Kuyper, J. W., Bäckstrand, K., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Institutional accountability of nonstate
actors in the UNFCCC: Exit, voice, and loyalty. International Environmental
Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(4), 537-556.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9408-z
Meckling, J., & McWhinney, M. (2022). The carbon asymmetry: Institutional inertia and market
incentives in global response to climate change. Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, R. B. (2018). What does environmental governance mean? Insights in Environmental
Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.21552/001c.14.1.1
Moravcsik, A. (2021). Domestic politics as a source of negotiating leverage: Negotiating the
Paris climate agreement. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2035-2063.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997153
