SweetStudy (HomeworkMarket.com)

0

WK 10 ASSIGN DATA

Nursebeauty

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

a year ago
26.04.2025
15

files (2)

WK8Rubric.docx
WK10ASSIGN.DATAQualityImprovementProject.docx

WK8Rubric.docx

Close Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Completed Appendix E: Determined if the evidence answered the evidence-based practice question.	20 to >16 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the evidence. 16 to >15 pts Good The response clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response clearly analyzes the evidence. 15 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the evidence. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately determined if the evidence answered the EBP question, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not analyze the evidence, or it is missing.	20 / 20 pts
Completed Appendix E: Select the appropriate appraisal for the selected study: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly analyzed the evidence. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly analyzed the evidence. The response clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence or did not accurately complete the section in the appendix, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Completed Appendix G: Identified the EBP question for one selected article.	5 to >4 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 4 to >3.5 pts Good The response accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article, or it is missing.	0 / 5 pts
Completed Appendix G: Completed all components of the form for the selected article.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly completed all sections of the form. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly completed all sections of the form. The response clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet are only briefly described. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.	0 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

WK8Rubric.docx

Close Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Completed Appendix E: Determined if the evidence answered the evidence-based practice question.	20 to >16 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the evidence. 16 to >15 pts Good The response clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response clearly analyzes the evidence. 15 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the evidence. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately determined if the evidence answered the EBP question, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not analyze the evidence, or it is missing.	20 / 20 pts
Completed Appendix E: Select the appropriate appraisal for the selected study: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly analyzed the evidence. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly analyzed the evidence. The response clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence or did not accurately complete the section in the appendix, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Completed Appendix G: Identified the EBP question for one selected article.	5 to >4 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 4 to >3.5 pts Good The response accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article, or it is missing.	0 / 5 pts
Completed Appendix G: Completed all components of the form for the selected article.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly completed all sections of the form. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly completed all sections of the form. The response clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet are only briefly described. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.	0 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

WK8Rubric.docx

Close Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Completed Appendix E: Determined if the evidence answered the evidence-based practice question.	20 to >16 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the evidence. 16 to >15 pts Good The response clearly determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response clearly analyzes the evidence. 15 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely determined if the evidence answered the EBP question. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the evidence. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately determined if the evidence answered the EBP question, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not analyze the evidence, or it is missing.	20 / 20 pts
Completed Appendix E: Select the appropriate appraisal for the selected study: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly analyzed the evidence. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly analyzed the evidence. The response clearly analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence, or accurately completed the section in the appendix. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzed the evidence, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the effectiveness of evidence or did not accurately complete the section in the appendix, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Completed Appendix G: Identified the EBP question for one selected article.	5 to >4 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 4 to >3.5 pts Good The response accurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article. 3 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately identified the EBP question of the selected article, or it is missing.	0 / 5 pts
Completed Appendix G: Completed all components of the form for the selected article.	55 to >49 pts Excellent The response comprehensively and clearly completed all sections of the form. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 49 to >43 pts Good The response clearly completed all sections of the form. The response clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 43 to >12 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected. 12 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected, or it is missing.	55 / 55 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet are only briefly described. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.	0 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 / 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

other Questions(10)