WK 10 ASSIGN DATA

profileNursebeauty
WK10ASSIGN.DATAQualityImprovementProject.docx

Quality Improvement Project   

As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).  Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model & guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

· Chapter 6, “Evidence of Appraisal: Research” (pp. 254–260)

Required Reading for Topic: Studies 

· Bangura, F. (2024).  Development and evaluation of a nurse practitioner–directed intentional rounding strategy, and its impact on decreasing falls in a veterans long-term care facilityLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. 30991997) [Doctoral dissertation, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Khoja, A., & Moosa, L. (2023).  Impact of tailored interventions for patient safety (TIPS) to reduce fall ratesLinks to an external site.MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 89–93.

· Tzeng, H.-M., & Yin, C.-Y. (2017).  A multihospital survey on effective interventions to prevent hospital falls in adultsLinks to an external site.Nursing Economics, 35(6), 304–313.

Required Resources for Topic: Quality Improvement Project Assignment Options  

· Frazier, M. C. (2023).  Examining the lived experience of secondary traumatic stress in emergency room nurses: A mixed methods studyLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. 30816304) [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Karamichos, S. (2023).  The professional identity of the nurse practitioner: A mixed methods studyLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. 30634134) [Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma City University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Medina, M. (2024).  Implementing motivational interviewing to improve medication adherence: A staff education projectLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. Order No. 30992260) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/15450

· Rampersad, M. (2023).  Oncology nurses, compassion fatigue and general health: A mixed-methods studyLinks to an external site. . Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819/ 

· Document: Simons, A. (2023).  Executive summary: Quality improvement initiative reducing orthopedic surgical site infections through nasal decolonization  Download Executive summary: Quality improvement initiative reducing orthopedic surgical site infections through nasal decolonization. Walden University. 

Previous

Next

To prepare:

· Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided. 

· Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results. 

· Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project. 

The Assignment 3-4 Pages

Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project. 

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your Assignment by  Day 7 of Week 10.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK10Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment f

 

Rubric

NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project.

34 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly explains the global initiative. The response comprehensively and clearly indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.

29 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response clearly explains the global initiative. The response clearly indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.

27 to >26.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the global initiative. The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.

26 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the global initiative, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not indicate how global initiative impacts the nursing profession, or it is missing.

34 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project.

34 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support.

29 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support.

27 to >26.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support.

26 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing.

34 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project.

34 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.

29 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification.

27 to >26.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification.

26 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing.

34 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the quantitative methods used in a selected DNP project.

34 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.

29 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the description.

27 to >26.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the description.

26 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.

34 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project.

34 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.

29 to >27.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the description.

27 to >26.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the description.

26 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.

34 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 200

Previous

Next