Paper V

profileRaciel1990
  • 2 years ago
  • 20
files (4)

PaperVGradingRubric.docx

GRADING RUBRIC FOR PAPER V

(30 points total)

Met standards

Met most standards

Did not meet most standards

Did not meet standards

1. Abstract

starts on its own page. the word ‘Abstract’ is centered & bolded at the top of the page. clearly identifies problem or research question. thoroughly describes participants. notes experimental method, findings, & conclusion. Is between 150-200 words. includes 5 keywords. is very well written.

starts on its own page. the word ‘Abstract’ is centered & bolded at the top of the page. mostly identifies problem or research question &/or mostly describes participants. may or may not note experimental method. mostly discusses findings & conclusion. is between 150-200 words. includes 3-4 keywords. is well written.

does not start on its own page &/or the word ‘Abstract’ is not centered and/or bolded at the top of the page. loosely identifies problem or research question &/or loosely describes participants. Does not note experimental method. does not discuss findings &/or conclusion. is fewer than 150 words. includes 2-3 keywords. is poorly written.

is incomplete in most criteria as noted in column 1. quality of section is severely lacking or is not present.

2. Discussion

section starts on its own page. the word ‘Discussion’ is centered & bolded. provides brief & thorough summary of most hypotheses and notes whether results supported hypotheses. avoids restating statistics & uses everyday language. includes study limitations. mentions potential follow-up studies. citations are properly formatted. is very well written.

section starts on its own page. the word ‘Discussion’ is centered & bolded. provides mostly thorough & brief summary of most hypotheses & may or may not note whether results supported hypotheses. avoids restating statistics & uses everyday language. may or may not include study limitations &/or potential follow-up studies. citations are properly formatted. is well written.

section does not start on its own page. the word ‘Discussion’ may not be centered and/or bolded. provides brief summary of hypotheses & does not note whether results supported hypotheses. may restate statistics &/or not use everyday language. does not include study limitations &/or potential follow-up studies. citations are improperly formatted. is poorly written.

this section is either missing or severely lacking most criteria as noted on the first column.

3. Title Page APA

page number is flush right. title is 12 words or fewer, centered, bolded, and words with four or more letters start with a capital letter. Ii there is a Running head, it is properly formatted.

the title page has some minor mistakes, as noted in the first column, but is generally correct.

the title page has many fundamental errors in formatting of the title, as noted in the first column.

title page consistently does not follow the formatting instructions provided.