Literature Review Paper

profileBeaker

The Topic for the assignment is "Criminal Courts" thus the paper should reflect and provide all information on this topic.


No plagiarism


In-text Citations in every paragraph


Use Reference Analysis and Reference Page (attached documents) to complete assignment


12 point, times new roman font, double space


Address all assignment requirements a seen below:


 

Assignment 2: LASA # 1: Literature Review Paper

The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with  the opportunity to select a topic in the particular area in which you  have an occupational or research interest, and to complete a literature  review of the topic, using a minimum of ten scholarly references. This  will allow you to demonstrate mastery of the program outcomes for the  B.S. criminal justice program at Argosy University.

You may want to review the following documents:


For additional resources, conduct an Internet search using these keywords: writing a literature review.


Based on your review of the most recent, relevant  research findings on your chosen topic, submit a final version of your  literature review paper, integrating feedback received from your  instructor. Be sure to include a research/focal question, synthesis of  the literature you reviewed, well-established conclusions, and points of  discussion and/or future research.


Begin the review by defining the objective of the paper. Introduce  the reader to your focal question. What is this question intended to  address? You may state your “question” in the form of a problem if you  like. Describe the topic for your literature review and why you chose  this topic. Explain why you think it is important. It is also useful to  tell the reader how the review is organized in your introduction  section, before you transition into the body of the review.


Organize your literature review paper by themes/theories/concepts,  rather than article by article. If there is one major theme you want to  highlight, state the theme. If there are three major themes or streams  of thought on the topic, briefly name them—and then organize the balance  of your literature review around those three streams. Think of themes,  theories, concepts, lines of thought, and ideas as organizing strategies  for your literature review. Your creativity in this assignment is not  the content or findings but the clarity with which you organize the  review and create a context for understanding the focal question.


When you are done introducing the first line of thought, create a  new paragraph to discuss studies which present another line of thought  or opposing view.


Your literature review should hit the high points of each article.  You should not discuss a single article, one by one, like a grocery  list. Zero in on the main theme or finding and then move on to the next  theme. Remember, this is a synthesis, an integration of all the things  you have learned. You are creating a discussion on paper, which in turn  gives the reader a context for understanding where the scholarship has  been, where it is currently, and where it likely will be heading next.  Provide enough details to help the reader understand the significance of  the studies you cite without “rebuilding Rome.” Be sure to evaluate the  studies and offer critical comments on any shortcomings you’ve observed  or that have been reported by the authors.


Discuss the main findings and their implications. Given the results  of your literature review, what is/are the prevailing argument(s)? What  research question could you ask in order to further develop this area of  study and contribute to the existing body of knowledge? Complete your  review by drawing conclusions about your body of research and  identifying gaps in the research which still remain to be explored,  maybe even by you! Make an argument as to why your research question is  important and relevant to the current work being done on your topic.


Requirements:


Apply current APA standards for editorial style,  expression of ideas, and formatting of the text, headings, citations,  and references. Remember to use your own words to describe and evaluate  the articles. Avoid quoting the material and also cite works when you  are discussing someone else’s ideas. Be sure to integrate any and all  feedback received from your instructor. Your paper should be  double-spaced and in 12 point, Times New Roman font with normal one-inch  margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and  grammatical errors. It should include a title page with a running head,  an abstract, and a reference page. The body of the paper should be no  less than 5–6 pages in length.



Grading Criteria  Maximum Points    


Description  of the focal question or problem is clear and thorough. Explanation of  the relevance of the topic to the field of psychology is clear.  36    points


Analysis  of themes, theories, or concepts is clear and complete. Discussion of  articles clearly relates to those themes, theories, or concepts (instead  of discussing each article individually).  40 points 


Choice of articles is appropriate, both in quality and quantity: they directly address the thesis. Their evaluation is based on their relation to themes, theories, or concepts. Evaluation includes discussion of the methodology, and a discussion of any obvious shortcomings.  40    points


Provides  well-supported conclusions. Suggestions for future research are  appropriate and discuss how future research will contribute to the  field.  40  points  


Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. 12    points


Writing  follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are  infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.  12   points 


Using  APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots  throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat  minor.  16   points


Writing remains in third person throughout writing. Word choice is accurate, clear, and appropriate for the audience.  4 points   


Total:  200 

  • 9 years ago
  • 20
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
  • attachment
    order_74619_181735.doc