Health Information Technology - Evaluation Plan Project - Evaluation Focus
Because of the great differences between HIT systems and different goals of an evaluation, there is no one-size-fits-all evaluation plan. Different technologies require different evaluation methods. Consequently, in this part of the Evaluation Plan Project, there is a need to conduct research on how system implementations prevent errors, enhance the quality, and efficiency of health systems. Select one research goal and viewpoint to use in the evaluation.
In a 4-page documentation:
· Identify which of the cases from the text, will be evaluated in this project, summarize the case, and explain why the selected system featured in the case.
· Next, summarize your three research findings on similar HIT implementations. Include the models, evaluation methods, findings, and plans for reevaluation in each article.
· Critique the HIT implementations: Identify successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations. Explain the reasons for the successful elements. Identify areas for improvement and explain why (or how) they could be improved.
· Create an evaluation goal and identify the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide your own evaluation plan. Provide a rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.
Reference
Abbasi-moghaddam, M. A., Zarei, E., Bagherzadeh, R., Dargahi, H., & Farrokhi, P. (2019). Evaluation of service quality from patients’ viewpoint. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi:10.1186/s12913-019-3998-0
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
Brender, J. (2006). Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics. Elsevier Academic Press
Carayon, P., Smith, P., Hundt, A., Kuruchittham, V., & Li, Q. (2009). Implementation of an electronic health records system in a small clinic: the viewpoint of clinic staff. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701628178
Cho, H. Yen, P. Dowding, D., Merril, J., & Schnall, R. (2018, October). A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 86, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012
Hamann, D. J., & Bezboruah, K. C. (2020). Outcomes of health information technology utilization in nursing homes: Do implementation processes matter? Health Informatics Journal, 26(3), 2249–2264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219899556
Huang, Y.-H., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2016). Recommendations for health information technology implementation in rural hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance (09526862), 29(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2015-0115
- Huangetal-Recommendationsforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationinruralhospitals.pdf
- Carayonetal-implentationofanelectronichealthrecordssystem.pdf
- Choetal-Amulti-levelusabilityevaluationofmobilehealthapplications.pdf
- BrenderandJaytte_Chapter-10_Pg_266--269.pdf
- HamannandBezboruah-Outocomesofhealthinformationtechnologyutilizationinnursinghomes.pdf
- Abbasi-moghaddametal-Evaluationofservicequalityfrompatientsviewpoint.pdf
- AssignmentRubric.pdf
- OriginalityReport.pdf
4 years ago
1
Purchase the answer to view it

- HITEvaluationPlanProject.d.pdf
- revisedHITEvaluationPlanProject.docx
- 10 Uniques Apps/Social Sites
- 5-6 page Reflective Paper APA style quality paper
- Need someone who know a great deal of Networking. I need help with my Network Design Proposal.
- ASSIGNMENT
- FIN 571 Week 5 - Individual Assignment - WileyPlus Quiz
- Discussion
- Starvation
- 9x+5=5x-3
- Discussion question 75 to 150 words
- The SCQ Corporation manufactures specialty medical tools ranging from $10,000 to$15,000 per unit. The tools are used in hospitals, clinics, and the home hospitality market. SCQ Corporation has contracted with YOUCPA to assist in creating its cash flow sta