Health Information Technology - Evaluation Plan Project - Evaluation Focus

2/24/22, 12:48 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920716_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Conduct research on how system implementations similar to the one you select have been previously evaluated. After exploring similar system implementations, select one research goal and viewpoint to use in the evaluation.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

Three appropriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed clearly with speci�c detail regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

Three appropriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed with some detail regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

Three appropriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed with details regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model that are vague, inaccurate, or omitted.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) Less than three articles are researched, and/or articles are inappropriate. Research goals, viewpoints, or details regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected are vague, incomplete, or missing.

In a 3- to 4-page paper:

Identify which of the cases from the text you will be evaluating in this project, summarize the case, and explain why you selected the system featured in the case.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail summarizes the selected case study and clearly justi�es the selection.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response accurately summarizes the selected case study and justi�es the selection.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response summarizes the selected case study with a few vague and/or inaccurate details, and/or justi�es the selection with vague and/or inaccurate details.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response summarizes the selected case study with many vague and/or inaccurate details, and/or justi�es the selection with vague, inaccurate, or missing details.

Name: NURS_6541_Week5_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

2/24/22, 12:48 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920716_1 2/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Critique the HIT implementations in your research: Identify successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations. Explain the reasons for the successful elements. Identify areas for improvement and explain why or how they could be improved.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly and with speci�c detail critiques the HIT implementations by clearly identifying successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations researched, explaining in detail the reasons for the successful elements, and clearly identifying areas for improvement with explanations of why or how they could be improved.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response clearly critiques the HIT implementations by identifying successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations researched, explaining the reasons for the successful elements, and identifying areas for improvement with explanations of why or how they could be improved.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response critiques the HIT implementations with a few vague and/or incomplete details regarding successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations researched, reasons for the successful elements, and areas for improvement with explanations of why or how they could be improved.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response critiques the HIT implementations with several vague, incomplete, and/or missing details regarding successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations researched, reasons for the successful elements, and areas for improvement with explanations of why or how they could be improved.

Create an evaluation goal and identify the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide your own evaluation plan. Provide your rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The respone clearly and with speci�c detail describes an evaluation goal and identi�es the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide the evaluation plan, providing rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) The respone describes an evaluation goal and identi�es the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide the evaluation plan, providing rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%) The respone describes an evaluation goal with a few vague and/or incomplete details regarding identi�cation of the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide the evaluation plan and rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%) The respone describes an evaluation goal with several vague, incomplete, and/or missing details regarding identi�cation of the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide the evaluation plan and rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

2/24/22, 12:48 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920716_1 3/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

2/24/22, 12:48 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920716_1 4/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6541_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT