1 / 5100%
SOCIAL PROBLEM ON STOREY OFFICE BUILDING ON OCCUPANTS’ SAFETY
Social Problem
Sustainable building which is sometimes referred to as green building has remained a
subject of discussion in many urban management authorities. The built environment has such an
impact on the national economy, and thus higher attention has been placed on resource efficiency
and environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of structures. There is
increased emphasis towards a more sustainable approach to building design and life cycle
performance continues to gain momentum. Sustainable building practice attempts to identify
how the built environment impacts the natural world and subsequently offers a balance of sound
performance with environmental integrity. Furthermore researchers have expressed great concern
over the sprawling suburbs as a major environmental concern because site selection is done
haphazardly.
Most towns in Kenya have put in place mechanism to achieve sustainable building. There
is a building code that is deemed to guide the contractors of all buildings that are developed.
Nevertheless, there are many cases where this code is not adhered to and it is evidenced in the
many cases where building fall and many lives are lost. The fire tragedies that take place cause
many losses as opposed to if the buildings are sustainable through adherence to the building
code. At this point it is clear barriers to sustainable building exist. The barriers are prevalent and
hence the wide spread disorder across the town in Kenya. The barriers range from lack of interest
in or demand for sustainable building from the owners or developers, lack of training and
education in sustainable construction, failure of service fee structures to account for the recovery
of long-term savings, and the higher costs (both real and perceived) of sustainable building
options. Policy makers often wait until something undesirable or catastrophic happens before
they implement controls and policy to resolve issues (Duda 2009). This study was meant to
evaluate factors influencing development of sustainable building in municipalities. It took a case
of Eldoret Municipality since there is evidence of inefficient buildings in the town and in turn
poses negative impacts on social, economic and environmental health of the urban area.
Significance of the Study
It is expected that the study will inform the Management of Eldoret Municipality and others on
factors influencing development of sustainable building in municipalities. The study was
deemed to aid management of Eldoret Municipality to come up with strategies to be able to meet
the challenges of change in the future with the implementation of sustainable building. It is
deemed to further assist other municipalities to manage the challenges of establishing sustainable
buildings. The study is also expected to increase knowledge in the area of research in strategies
of enhancing sustainable building. This was expected to be useful to policy makers on
sustainable building laws and students who will wish to carry out further research.
Basic Assumptions of the Study
The study assumed that there exist barriers to the sustainable building in Eldoret
Municipality. It further assumed that all the sampled respondents had a common understanding
on the issues in the tools of data collection. It was also assumed that the respondents are
acquainted to the building code.
Limitations of the study
One of the limitations of this study was that the findings in Eldoret Municipality may not
be able to be generalized to other urban areas such as Nairobi City and even in other smaller
towns that might need a different approach to the problem under study. Further the study only
addressed strategies to combat the factors that hinder sustainable buildings. The study used
questionnaires, which though appropriate, have their own limitations. Some respondents did not
complete answering the questions, while others failed to provide genuine responses. The
researcher appealed to the respondents individually for their utmost cooperation. The researcher,
however cross-checked the details provided by the respondents with the information got from the
interviews.
Delimitations of the study
The study was limited to the main aim mentioned which was to evaluate the response
strategies adopted by municipalities to cope with barriers achievement of sustainable building.
The study was limited to respondents and buildings within Eldoret Municipality in Uasin Gishu
County Kenya. The study will focus on the builders, designers, clients and the building code
officials all of who are directly involved in the construction industry.
References
CEPMC (2013) Statement from CEPMC on the Product Environmental Footprint Guide, 26
April 2013.
Mora E. 2007. Life cycle, sustainability and the transcendent quality of building materials.
Building and Environment. 2007;42:1329–1334
Dakwale V, Ralegaonkar R, Mandavgane S. Improving environmental performance of building
through increased energy efficiency: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2011;1:211– 218
Gil-Martin M , Gonzalez-Lopez M, Grindlay A, Segura-Naya A, Aschheim M, Hernandez-
Montes E. Toward the production of future heritage structures: Considering durability in build-
ing performance and sustainability – A philosophical and historical overview. International Jour-
nal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2012; 1:269–273
Hooton R, Bickley J. Design for durability: The key to improving concrete sustainability. Con-
struction and Building Materials. 2014; 67:422–430
Fujita K, Takewaki I. Sustainable building design under uncertain structural-parameter environ-
ment in seismic-prone countries. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2011;1:142– 151
Lange D, Devaney S, Usmani A. An application of the PEER performance based earthquake en-
gineering framework to structures in fire Engineering Structures. 2014; 66:100–115
Müller H, Haist M, Vogel M. Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete
structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime. Construction and
Building Materials. 2014; 67:321–337
Cabeza L, Rincóna L, Vilariño V, Péreza G, Castella A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life
cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 29:394–416
Porter K. An Overview of PEER’s Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology
Department of Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
Hoogmartens R, Passel S, Acker K , Dubois M. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA
as sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2014; 48:27–33
76
Pajchrowski G, Noskowiaka A, Lewandowska A, Strykowskia W. Materials composition or en-
ergy characteristic? What is more important in environmental life cycle of buildings? Building
and Environment. 2014; 72:15-27
Azari R. Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes
Energy and Buildings. 2014; 82:156–162
Ramesha T, Prakasha R, Shuklab K. Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. En-
ergy and Buildings. 2010; 42:1592–1600
Stephan A, Crawford R, Myttenaere K. Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis
framework for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2012; 55:592–600
Negro P, Mola E. Performance-Based Engineering Concepts: Past, Present and Future. 2006.
First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
Olmatia P, Petrini F, Gkoumas K. Fragility analysis for the Performance-Based Design of
cladding wall panels subjected to blast load. Engineering Structures. 2014; 78:112–120
Lagaros N, Garavelas A, Papadrakakis M. Innovative seismic design optimization with reliability
constraints. Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Engineering. 2008; 198:28–41
Contini G, Mola E, Negro P. Practical Performance-Based Assessment of an Existing Plan-Wise
Irregular Building. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008,
Beijing, China Re
Students also viewed