Berenice, E. Simon
Department of Psychology, Walden University
PSYC-5245-1
Dr. Wilson
July 2nd , 2023
For instance, you might assume that a man who is irrationally upset while sitting in traffic is just
that way because you watched him repeatedly blast the horn of his automobile. However, with
further consideration, you may realize that anyone would become frustrated and upset under such
external circumstances as being stalled in traffic and blame his behavior for that. By taking the
time to examine the scenario and discover the external variables that likely contributed to the
man's behavior, you have avoided making an attribution error. Another example of confirmation
bias in action can be seen in Tausch and Hewstone's (2010) study which showed that people who
have higher social dominance orientations (SDO) are less likely to change their opinion in the
face of evidence which contradicts their initial beliefs. This implies that first impressions play a
key role in formulating our beliefs and opinions about a person or topic, and these mindsets can
be seen as very influential in how we view and interact with others.
The context in which a person's behavior occurred must be considered to fully understand that
person's actions. As a result, we are less likely to make an incorrect attribution or incorrectly
evaluate the person. It would be simple, for instance, to attribute the man's angry horn honking in
traffic to his personality as being an angry person while, in truth, there are probably extrinsic
variables at play. It's possible that the man's outburst was triggered by a combination of variables
like being stalled in traffic and, say, loud music in the car or an argument amongst passengers.
7
The social setting of an individual's behavior must be considered to arrive at an accurate
explanation for it. Often, external factors, such as context and time, will be more significant than
an individual's temperament. A person's behavior may also change when they are exposed to a
new setting or interact with a new group of people, so it's crucial to keep that in mind. We can
better understand another person's behavior and avoid making attributions based on our own
prejudices or uninformed assumptions if we keep in mind the role that context plays in our day-
to-day encounters. If we take the time to learn about someone else's exterior social
circumstances, we can draw more informed conclusions and avoid making attribution errors or
snap judgments. Consider a time when you saw someone acting in a way that seemed to reflect
something about their nature, but which may have been impacted more by external
circumstances.
7
Recently, I saw someone whose actions seemed to stem solely from their character, but which
were more the result of environmental factors. This individual was perusing the grocery store
aisles but gave off the impression that they were highly preoccupied and even slightly anxious.
At first, I chalked off their antics to their character, writing them off as forgetful and easily
sidetracked individuals. However, after giving it some thought, I realized that the circumstances
may have had a role in their actions.
7
On that day, the grocery store's aisles were packed with shoppers. My friend was also out
shopping with a little child who was becoming increasingly disruptive. After giving it some
thought, I realized that my friend's behavior wasn't so much a reflection of their personality as it
was the environmental and situational pressures of being in a crowded grocery store.
This observation illustrates how important it is to consider the various social contexts that may
affect an individual's actions. This demonstrates the need of considering context if you're trying
to explain someone's actions. Understanding why someone is behaving in a certain way requires
considering not only their personality but also the context in which they are acting. The
attribution error can be avoided, and more accurate assessments of behavior can be made if one
takes the time to consider the various contextual factors that might be at play. When trying to
understand or explain someone's actions, it's important to account for both the person's inherent
characteristics and the context in which they're doing those actions. By doing so, rather than
making hasty conclusions or blindly attributing someone's actions to their personality, the
complete context can be considered, leading to a more nuanced view of the person's motivations.
It is essential to consider the external social conditions and the current environment in which the
behavior is occurring if one is to provide a satisfactory explanation for it.
7
We can be less biased and make better judgments when we consider the context of someone's
behavior and the possible social forces that are at play. Recognizing our assumptions about other
people helps us avoid making snap judgments and have an open mind while evaluating the
information at hand. The key to making better judgments and avoiding attribution errors is to
consider contextual, situational, and temporal aspects while attempting to explain someone's
behavior.
Third, both the circumstances and the prosecutors' motivations must be considered when trying
to understand their actions here. Prosecutors may be seasoned criminal attorneys who, in their
professional lives, have internalized certain biases. Because rape trials can be so emotionally
charged, the prosecution may argue that the young women on the jury will have more sympathy
for the defendant because of their age or gender. Additionally, the overall group dynamic of the
jury and the specific case may also factor into the prosecutors' decisions to dismiss these jurors,
as seasoned attorneys may be able to recognize favorable or unfavorable jurors based on how
they answer questions or interact with the other jurors in the jury pool.
7Personal variables aren't the only ones at play here; the situation certainly has an impact.
Because attorneys have fewer for-cause dismissals available, they may be using their peremptory
challenges to get rid of young women jurors. Therefore, prosecutors may be trying to ensure that
they may dismiss any jurors the defense attorney is unable to for cause by being smarter with
their use of peremptory challenges.
7
In sum, both individual and contextual elements must be considered when attempting to account
for the prosecutors' actions here. As seasoned lawyers, they may be influenced by their
prejudices, but they'll also consider the bigger picture and the number of peremptory challenges
they have. It is feasible to have a more nuanced picture of the prosecutors' decision-making
processes by considering both the individual and contextual factors at play. An error that is easy
to make while analyzing someone's behavior is to draw conclusions that aren't supported by
consideration of any relevant contextual factors. It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that
the prosecutors are dismissing young women from the jury because of bias without knowing the
full details of the case or the number of peremptory challenges the prosecution has. It is feasible
to obtain a better understanding of the prosecutors' judgments and avoid making a misguided
attribution error by giving them some time to reflect on their circumstances and evaluate the
external societal conditions that may be influencing their behavior. To draw more accurate
conclusions and eliminate any potential biases or misjudgments, it is important to consider
contextual, situational, and temporal aspects when analyzing someone's behavior. Learning about
the context in which a person lives can shed light on their actions and provide us insight into
what drives them. It's important to be considerate and fair while making decisions, and this can
be achieved by giving due consideration to both internal and external factors.
7
7
7
7
7
7
Reference:
Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Social dominance orientation attenuates stereotype change
in the face of disconfirming information. Social PsychologyLinks to an external site., 41(3),
169–176. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000024
