1 / 12100%
Attachment of guarantors by the Rural SACCOs
ACCT 2002 - Managerial Accounting: Introduction to Financial Planning and Analysis
On application for loans by members of Rural SACCOs key security to these loans is the
prescribed number of guarantors. These guarantors must be members of the SACCO and must
have put in savings which when added with the loanees savings should be equal or more than the
loan requested for. The attachment of guarantors will always come as the last resort in case of a
loan default. The SACCO will resort to this after written demand notices have been send to the
loanee and copies given to the guarantors. Rural SACCOs have engaged in recruitment drives
aimed at expanding their client base. Among the Rural SACCOs, members have been
encouraged to purchase shares giving an automatic increase in savings with the growth of
membership. The institutions have also introduced a minimum balance deposited by any client
opening an account. Some groups save money whenever they have group meetings which have
basically helped to improve savings in the community. ‘There is a fee deposited whenever one is
opening an account that is not supposed to be withdrawn’ (SACCO Mbarara). Conditions on
loan application have been put in place such that every borrower has to have at least an
equivalent of 10% of principle loan amount as savings before they qualify for a loan. ‘For one to
borrow should first maintain at least 10% savings for the loan to be borrowed’ (SACCO-Nebbi)
The staff and field officer have sensitized the rural population on the benefits of saving money
with RFIs and discouraged cash savings in the home. ‘Discourage the culture of keeping money
at home’ (Umubuga majjambere , Kisoro)
Effects of guarantors in Rural SACCOs resource mobilization on the incomes of SSDF
A guarantor is a person or company that guarantees that a loan or other type of debt will be paid.
Usually, this person or company agrees to pay another person's debt or perform that person's
duty if he or she should fail to do so himself or herself. The term is most commonly used in
reference to financial assistance. A parent who cosigns a student loan for a child could be
considered a guarantor; if the child defaults on his or her debt, the parent would be held liable for
the remainder of the loan, Ketty, (2011). Generally, loan applicants use guarantors if they believe
that they will be unable to secure a loan on their own. This might be the case for applicants who
have poor credit or no credit history. Individuals and businesses can serve as guarantors or can
have guarantors for their loans. In the case of multiple guarantors, each one usually is liable for
the entire amount of the debt. Some lending institutions require guarantors to be bonded for a
certain amount usually a percentage of the loan so that the institution can be confident that the
money is recoverable (Msemakweli, 2010).
The use of a guarantor on a loan application does not ensure that the loan will be approved,
because the person who guarantees the loan is considered part of the loan application, so the
credit rating of that person or company must be evaluated along with the loan applicant or
applicants. If the SACCOs believe that the guarantor cannot make good on the debt if the
primary applicant defaults on the loan, then the lending institution will not approve the loan.
When seeking a guarantor, someone who needs a loan should keep this in mind, RURAL
SPEED, (2005). Before agreeing to serve as a guarantor, a person should assess the primary
borrower's credit, income and expenses to determine whether he or she is capable of paying back
the loan. The person who guarantees the loan must be prepared to repay the entire amount if
necessary and should not agree to guarantee a loan if he or she is financially unable to do so.
Most people who consider whether to guarantee loans for others obtain copy of the loan contract
and should be sure to read and fully understand it before signing it. After signing the contract,
there is no way for him or her to back out of the agreement, (SPEED 2010).
Membership and savings of SSDF in Rural SACCOs
On application for loans by members of Rural SACCOs key security to these loans is the
prescribed number of guarantors. These guarantors must be members of the SACCO and must
have put in savings which when added with the loanees savings should be equal or more than the
loan requested for. The attachment of guarantor’s savings will always come as the last resort in
case of a loan default. The SACCO will resort to this after written demand notices have been sent
to the loanees and copies given to the guarantors.
As a SACCO’s finances improve, they may be open to canceling the personal guarantee.
However, this is not likely to happen unless the SACCOs have equal or greater security from
elsewhere, Bandiera, O. and I. Rasul (2006). The release of a personal guarantee is done in
writing. The guarantor must always insist that the SACCOs give a written confirmation of the
termination; otherwise, he/she may remain liable for the debt. A guarantor must make sure that
they are comfortable with the amount that they guarantee to the SACCOs. If the company
defaults on the payment of the loan, the SACCOs will demand payment under the guarantee, and
if the guarantor cannot pay the SACCOs can seek a bankruptcy order against the guarantor. The
SACCOs can ultimately force the personal guarantor to sell any of his/her assets in order to pay
the amount owed, (Bandiera, Rasul, 2006).
A personal guarantee allows a company to borrow money without additional encumbrances on
its business or assets. If the company keeps up its payments, there is no need for the SACCOs to
enforce a personal guarantee. Most SACCOs and reputable financial institutions will insist that
the director and/or shareholder giving the personal guarantee obtain independent legal advice in
respect of the implications of giving such a guarantee, Kaliba, A.R.M., H. Verkuijl and W.
Mwangi (2000). This will ensure that the signatory to a personal guarantee understands the terms
and consequences of giving the guarantee. The burden of a personal guarantee stays with the
director and/or shareholder who gives it. It does not affect the assets of the company. The
SACCOs can therefore demand payment from the person giving the guarantee, rather than from
the company. The guarantee is usually given on a full-indemnity basis, which means that to
initiate an order for payment the SACCOs will only have to prove that the money is owed and
that the loan repayments have not been made. Until the SACCOs recovers the money owed by
the company in full the person giving the personal guarantee remains liable in full, (Bandiera,
Rasul, 2006).
Even though the loan is made for the benefit of the person borrowing the loans, if that debt goes
into arrears, a negative entry may be added to the guarantors. This is usually more of a concern if
you are a usually more of concern to potential guarantors default on the debt can have an
immediate impact on your credit rating. Guaranteeing a loan or other debt obligation where a
second person is given credit often say that personal guarantee, as it could have a major effect on
your personal wealth, (Mwangi, 2000).
Many people would not with to give a personal guarantee without understanding its terms and
fully weighing the consequences of giving. They don’t give the SACCOs written notice to
terminate the guarantee if they are not prepared to pay the SACCOs the outstanding debt. Most
guarantors don’t forget that when a SACCOs agrees to release a personal guarantee it must do so
in writing do not accept anything less than written confirmation from the SACCOs, (Kaliba,
Verkuijl, Mwangi, 2000).
Credit worthiness of SSDF in Rural SACCOs
The financial strength of the guarantor may also be used determinant of the amount of loan to be
submitted to the borrower, for this reason, the rate of loan to be given to the borrower may be
large or small depending on the financial strength of the guarantor. Private savings especially in
the form of financial assets are generally far less restricted by low income than has been assumed
before, both by economists and policy makers. On the contrary there is strong empirical evidence
that, the saving behavior of all private households is highly sensitive towards attractive
incentives to save (Fischer, 2005). He further observes that, higher interest rates can stimulate
financial savings substantially.
Chamwada, (2012) argues that endemic poverty, especially in the rural areas in Kenya is due to
failure of SACCOs to deliver. He is not surprised at the failure of the SACCOs to deliver,
financial SACCOs and other mainstream financial institutions often shun group, as they lack
collateral and, therefore, can’t secure loans. The executive secretary of the Savings and Credit
Cooperative Union League of Tanzania Abdul Mshaweji, (2012) said the problem was serious
and urged the authorities to quickly intervene and redress the situation.
According to (Bliss, 2011), the more one is able to save the more he/she can be able to pay over
a given period of time. He gives an example of an individual who get barely enough to eat over a
given period say one year, and argues that such an individual given a loan may not be able to
repay back as he or she will be straggling to satisfy basic want at the time when they will be
required to pay back the loan. Bliss argues that the more one is able to save the more loans they
should be given. According to Bliss, rich individuals should access more loans to expand their
already mechanized farms, while small scale farmers are better when they remain small, (Bliss,
2011).
Other assets that SSDF may offer the Rural SACCOs as security
In a normal situation, an individual who has ever defaulted repayment of a loan is not likely to be
trusted again to be given loans in future. However, (Keti, 2010) argues that such individuals will
have leant a lesson by the time they come for the second loan and are not as most likely to
default as the newer individuals or simply those individuals who have never defaulted. She
argues that those who have ever defaulted will be careful in investment and management of the
resources given a second opportunity.
A guarantor is a person or company that guarantees that a loan or other type of debt will be paid.
Usually, this person or company agrees to pay another person's debt or perform that person's
duty if he or she should fail to do so himself or herself. The term is most commonly used in
reference to financial assistance, (Keti, 2010). Generally, loan applicants use guarantors if they
believe that they will be unable to secure a loan on their own. This might be the case for
applicants who have poor credit or no credit history. Individuals and businesses can serve as
guarantors or can have guarantors for their loans. In the case of multiple guarantors, each one
usually is liable for the entire amount of the debt. The use of a guarantor on a loan application
does not ensure that the loan will be approved, because the person who guarantees the loan is
considered part of the loan application, so the credit rating of that person or company must be
evaluated along with the loan applicant or applicants, (Keti, 2010).
If the lending institution believes that the guarantor cannot make good on the debt if the primary
applicant defaults on the loan, then the lending institution will not approve the loan. Before
agreeing to serve as a guarantor, a person should assess the primary borrower's credit, income
and expenses to determine whether he or she is capable of paying back the loan. The person who
guarantees the loan must be prepared to repay the entire amount if necessary and should not
agree to guarantee a loan if he or she is financially unable to do so. Anyone who is considering
whether to become a guarantor should obtain a copy of the loan contract and should be sure to
read and fully understand it before signing it. After signing the contract, there is no way for him
or her to back out of the agreement, (Bliss, 2011)
A study by Odongo, (2010) established that the effects of unsecured SACCOs loan on Mombasa
teachers' savings and credit services is reality and the SACCO has already suffered from the
effects as evidenced by some of its members having moved to commercial banks hence affecting
the SACCOs. The major factor contributing to the effects was the SACCOs lack of strong capital
base with sufficient funds to meet the increasing demand of loans from the members due to its
weak cash flows attributed to low monthly savings. This means that by virtue of being a member
of a SACCOs one is not tied to solicit for loans in the same organization for a number of reasons,
(Odongo, 2010).
REFERENCES
Adedayo, (2005). ‘Dairy Sub-sector in Zambia: How can it be productive?’ Times of Zambia
29th July. Accessed on 14th March
Adera, 2005) . Assessing Community Health Programs: Participant's Manual And
Workbook.Uk: Teaching Aids At Low Cost. Journals And Publications
Ajibade, (2002). .A history Of The Uganda Cooperative Movement 1913-1988.Kampala:Uganda
Cooperative Alliance Ltd.
Bandiera, (2006). Integrated Development in Uganda: Kampala: Desk Top Publishing Division
Africa Development Series No.2 Vol .1.
Chambers, (2003) Adoption of innovations and best management practices among dairy farmers
in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey’, Journal of Animal and Veterinary
Advances10(2):
Chamwada, (2012). Kampala: Uganda Institute of Saccosers.Vol.2.Issue 1, March.
Chapoto, (2011) How Joint Farming may solve Contradictions between Technological Level
and Farm structure in Norwegian Dairy Production’
Chrystal, (2005). Apractical Guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. London:
Macmillan Press Ltd.
Coelli, (2005). ‘Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique’, The
Economic Journal 116(514): 869-902.
De Soto, 2009. Central Statistics Office, (2006) Living Conditions Monitoring Survey. Lusaka,
Zambia: CSO.
Dwivedi (2006) Analysis of Variance Interpretation The social construction of analytical
systems: New directions in the analysis and research technology : 83-103.
FAO, (2010). ‘The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the
Sociology and History of Technology’, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Francis, (2010) , New Research methodology techniques Desk Top Publishing Division Africa
Development Series No.2 Vol .1.
Friedman, (2007). .Mobilising Household savings through Rural Financial markets. Ohio state
University: University of Chicago Press.
Haig-Simons, (2013). .Basic Econometrics 4thEdition.NewDelhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
Henry Simons. (2007) .Applying international best practices to South Africa's SACCOs:
Holmes, (2001). ‘An Analysis of Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Adopt Dairy Performance
Recording in Malawi’, Livestock Research for Rural Development 18(5).
IADP, (2007) Human Development through Credit Unions: Guide for Credit Union Promoters.
Nairobi, Kenya. Acosca.
Ijere, (1992). ‘The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations’, Science,
Technology & Human Values 27(1): 28-52.
KARI, (2011). ‘Farmers’ Stepwise Adoption of Technological Packages: Evidence from the
Kenyan Cooperatives’, Cooperative Journal of Agricultural Economics: 519-527.
Katwa, (2009) ‘Dynamic Pathways into and out of Poverty: A case of Smallholder Farmers in
Kenya’, FSRP Working Paper No. 56
Ketty, (2011).Supporting Smes Development &The Role Of Micro Finance In Africa
Kothari, (2004) Sample Research Design and method s Research Teaching Aids At Low Cost.
Journals And Publications Nairobi University press 2001
Kupoluyi (2003), ‘Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Maize Seeds and use of Inorganic
Fertilizer for Maize Production in the Intermediate and Lowland Zones of Tanzania’,
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32(1): 35-48.
Kyamulesire, (2008). ‘Milking the Region? South African Capital and Zambia’s Dairy Industry’,
African Sociological Review 12(2): 55-66
Mauri (2008), Micro-Finance Hand Book: An Institutional and Financial Perspective.
Washington D.C, World Saccos.
Mbugua, (2009). ‘Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological
Analysis’, The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the
sociology and history of technology : 83-103.
Msemakweli, L., (2004). ‘Future of Livestock Industries in East and Southern Africa’,
proceedings of the Workshop Held at Soysambu Ranch, Kenya, 20-23 July
1992.International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Kenya
Mshaweji, (2012).Uganda Cooperative Alliance Today. Kampala:Uca/Crfs Unit
Mubi (2013), ‘Smallholder Dairy Systems in the Kenya Highlands: Cattle Population Dynamics
Under Increasing Intensification’, Livestock Production Science 82(2-3): 211-221.
Mugenda and Mugenda, (2003), Research and methodology Kenya Agricultural Research
Institute Accessed 12th April 2004 Kenyatta University Press. Nairobi NBI 122/11
Musinguzi,( 2000). The New Approach To Cooperative Development. Kampala: Uca/Crfs Unit.
Mwangi (2000). Savings habits, Needs and Priorities in Rural Kenya Usa: Usaid.
Mwangi, (2000). The East African Capital Markets Journal April 25, 2005.
Mwankemwa 2004). Cooperatives: Past, Present and Future. Kampala: Uganda Cooperative
Alliance Ltd. References
Mwesigye, R.Mwesigye, F., 2003.Cooperatives Take off in Ntungamo District. The New Vision,
Vol.18 No.50.
Ntungamo District Ngo Forum. , 1997.Directory Of Civil Society Organisation In Ntungamo
District.
Nurkse, 2003),An Introduction To Positive Economics, 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Ofuoku et al., (2009)‘The increasing Importance of Quality Assurance to Smallholder Dairy
Farmers in East and West Africa:
Olatona, (2007) ‘Agricultural Technology Adoption and Poverty reduction: A propensity score
matching analysis for rural Bangladesh’, Food Policy 32 : 372-393, Elsevier
Olawepo, (2003). ‘Adoption of dairy technologies: Lessons learnt from Case Study in Western
Kenya’, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Accessed 12th April 2011
Olayemi, (2001) Personal Finance, USA: Irwin Homewood.
Orodho (2004) Correlation, coding and sample design techniques Increasing Intensification’
analysis and research Science 82(2-3): 211-221.
Patton (2011) research design and their methodology US statistical Research Institute Accessed
12th April 2011 Nevada USA. Published dissertation, South Africa: De Mont fort
University.
Ramesh, (2010) ‘Demythologizing Planned Intervention: An Actor Perspective’, Sociologia
Ruralis 29(3‐4): 226-249.
Shanner, (2012);‘Understanding Technology Pathways among Vegetable Farmers: A Theoretical
Framework and Research Agenda’, The World Vegetable Centre
Speed, (2010). A mannual on Credit and Savings For The Poor of Developing Countries:
Developing Guidelines N0.1.Uk.Oxfam. A Report On Status Of Rural Savings And
Credit Cooperatives In Kenya, 1998. International Cooperative Alliance.
The Micro Finance Saccoser, 2001. Kampala: Uganda Institute of Saccosers.Vol.1.Issue 3,
December.
The Micro Finance Saccoser, 2003. Kampala: Uganda Institute of Saccosers.Vol.3.Issue 1,
March.
Students also viewed