The_bb two_bb factors_bb that_bb I_bb would_bb consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb
argument_bb would_bb be_bb clarity_bb and_bb credibility._bb If_bb you_bb do_bb not_bb
have_bb clarity_bb as_bb to_bb what_bb the_bb argument_bb is_bb regarding_bb then_bb
it_bb makes_bb it_bb difficult_bb to_bb understand_bb exactly_bb what_bb the_bb issue_bb
is_bb and_ whether_bb or_bb not_bb I_bb should_bb agree,_bb disagree_bb or_bb be_bb
neutral_bb on_bb the_bb subject._bb The_bb other_bb factor_bb being_bb credibility,_bb
this_bb is_bb important_ to_bb take_bb into_bb consideration_bb as_b you_bb evaluate_bb
an_bb argument_bb so_bb as_bb not_bb to_bb take_bb someone's_bb opinion_bb as_bb
factual_bb information._bb We_bb also_bb want_bb to_bb make_bb sure_bb that_bb the_bb
person_bb has_bb provided_bb evidence_bb to_bb back_bb up_bb their_bb argument.In_bb
deductive_bb arguments_bb one_bb takes_bb the_bb evidence_bb given_bb and_bb makes_bb
assumptions_bb with_bb the_bb evidence_bb provided_bb to_bb make_bb a_bb conclusion._bb
However,_bb in_bb an_bb inductive_bb argument_bb the_bb information_bb is_bb taken_bb
and_bb it_bb looks_b for_bb the_bb stronger_bb and_bb consistent_ evidence_bb before_bb
making_bb a_bb conclusion.Reflecting_bb on_bb this_bb weeks_bb lesson_bb regarding_bb
deductive_bb and_bb inductive_bb arguments_bb was_bb interesting_bb to_bb me_bb
because_bb we_bb use_bb these_bb methods_bb everyday,_bb however_bb we_bb should_bb
not_bb be_bb so_bb quick_bb to_bb come_bb to_bb conclusions_bb without_bb really_bb
looking_bb into_bb the_bb evidence_bb available_bb before_bb making_bb a_bb conclusion._bb
Two_bb factors_bb that_bb we_bb should_bb consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb
argument_bb would_bb be_bb credibility_bb and_bb relevance._bb Is_bb the_bb presenter_bb
only_bb bringing_ facts_bb to_bb the_bb argument_bb that_bb have_b something_bb to_bb
do_bb with_bb the_bb issue_bb at_bb hand_bb or_bb are_bb they_bb bringing_bb in_bb
extra_bb stuff_bb that_bb really_bb is_bb not_bb pertinent_bb to_bb this_bb topic_bb to_bb
maybe_bb cloud_ your_bb judgement_bb or_ sway_bb you_bb into_bb another_bb topic_bb
all_bb together?_bb Is_bb the_bb presenter_bb a_bb credible_bb and_bb reliable_bb source?_bb
What_bb is_bb his_bb or_bb her_bb background?_bb Is_bb their_bb stance_bb on_bb the_bb
topic_bb at_bb hand_bb based_bb on_bb facts_bb or_bb opinions?_bb All_bb of_bb this_bb
matters_bb when_bb attempting_bb to_bb make_bb an_bb intelligent_bb decision_bb on_bb
a_bb specific_bb topic.
Inductive_bb arguments_bb only_bb present_bb some_bb of_bb the_ information,_bb just_bb
enough_bb to_bb make_ you_bb believe_bb that_bb there_bb is_bb no_bb way_bb the_bb
other_bb argument_bb could_bb possibly_bb be_bb true._bb Deductive_bb arguments_bb
would_bb be_bb presenting_bb enough_bb logical_bb information_bb to_bb make_bb a_bb
more_bb sound_bb judgement,_bb for_bb instance_bb A_ is_bb greater_bb than_bb B_bb
and_bb B_bb is_bb greater_bb than_bb C,_bb therefore_bb A_bb must_bb be_bb greater_bb
than_bb C.
I_bb actually_bb really_bb enjoyed_bb the_bb pro_bb and_bb con_bb articles_bb this_bb
week._bb I_bb enjoyed_bb the_bb topic_bb at_bb hand_bb because_bb it_bb really_bb is_bb
a_bb real_bb world_bb issue,_bb always_bb has_bb been_bb and_bb I_bb believe_bb it_bb
always_bb will_bb be._bb It_bb can_bb be_bb hard_bb to_bb remember_bb anything_bb
when_bb I_bb am_bb in_bb the_bb middle_bb of_bb an_bb argument_bb but_bb it_bb would_bb
be_bb very_bb helpful_bb to_bb keep_bb my_bb surrounding_bb as_bb well_bb as_bb the_bb
other_bb person's_bb feelings_bb in_bb mind._bb I_bb have_bb learned_bb this_bb week_bb
that_bb you_bb must_bb keep_bb the_b other's_bb persons_bb point_bb of_bb view_bb in_bb
mind_bb in_bb order_bb to_bb successfully_bb get_bb your_bb point_bb across._bb When_bb
evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb there_bb are_bb two_bb factors_bb that_bb come_bb into_bb
the_bb equation_bb and_ those_bb are_bb "clarity_bb and_bb credibility."_bb As_bb a_bb
person_bb is_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb one_bb of_b the_bb most_bb important_bb
aspects_bb to_bb be_bb sure_bb they_bb understand_bb the_bb argument_bb in_bb its_bb
entirety._bb We_bb should_bb all_bb ask_bb for_bb clarification_bb so_bb that_bb we_bb
can_bb better_bb support_bb the_bb argument._bb If_bb you_bb don't_bb fully_bb
understand_bb an_bb argument_bb then_bb you_bb aren't_bb truly_bb evaluating_bb the_bb
argument._bb Which_bb is_bb also_bb why_bb the_bb other_bb factor_bb of_bb evaluating_bb
an_bb argument_bb comes_bb in_bb -_bb credibility._bb In_bb order_bb to_bb truly_bb
evaluate_bb any_b argument_bb you_bb have_bb to_bb consider_bb the_bb source_bb and_bb
information._bb Is_bb it_bb from_bb a_bb reliable_bb and_bb creditable_b source?_bb If_bb
you_bb don't_bb examine_bb the_bb credibility_b or_bb gain_bb clarity_ a_bb person_bb
won't_bb be_bb able_bb to_bb support_bb the_bb argument._bb For_bb me_bb personally_bb
I_bb have_bb to_ work_bb on_bb "assuming"_bb too_bb much_bb or_bb not_bb digging_bb
deeper_bb to_bb find_bb the_bb credibility._bb This_bb chapter_bb has_bb helped_bb me_bb
to_bb take_bb my_ time_bb to_bb evaluate_bb the_bb argument_bb and_bb it's_bb entirety_bb
before_bb I_bb start_bb to_bb speak_bb on_bb it.
From_bb the_bb reading_bb in_ Chapter_bb 7_bb &_bb 8_bb I_bb understand_bb the_bb
difference_bb between_bb deductive_bb and_bb inductive_bb arguments_bb is_bb that_bb
inductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb as_bb solid_bb or_bb strong_bb and_bb could_bb come_bb
from_bb a_bb probability_bb and_bb not_bb a_ definite._bb Deductive_bb arguments_bb
can_bb be_bb fact_bb or_bb fiction.
After_bb completing_bb this_bb weeks'_bb assignments_bb and_bb recapping_bb what_bb
I_bb learned_bb the_bb realization_bb of_bb what_bb I_bb stated_bb in_bb the_bb first_bb
paragraph_bb is_bb that_bb I_bb need_bb to_bb evaluate_bb the_bb argument_bb and_bb
really_bb gain_bb clarity_bb and_bb credibility_bb before_bb I_bb respond._bb It's_bb very_bb
easy_bb for_bb me_bb to_bb assume_bb the_bb information_bb is_bb credible_bb and/or_bb
assume_bb I_bb understand_bb the_bb argument_bb instead_bb of_bb asking_bb for_bb
clarity._bb We_bb all_bb have_bb things_bb to_bb work_bb on_bb but_bb this_bb week's_bb
reading_bb help_bb me_ understand_bb myself_bb a_bb little_bb more._bb Be_bb quick_bb
to_bb clarify_bb not_bb quick_bb to_bb respond._bb The_bb two_bb factors_bb you_bb
need_bb to_bb consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb are_bb clarity_bb
and_bb credibility._bb These_bb two_bb things_bb are_bb important_bb because_bb without_bb
them_bb you_bb can_bb have_bb a_bb constructive_bb argument_bb and_bb will_bb just_bb
have_bb meaningless_bb banter._bb You_ have_bb to_bb be_ able_bb to_bb understand_bb
what_bb the_bb argument_bb is_bb about_bb and_bb make_bb sure_bb the_bb points_bb
are_bb all_bb credible._bb Being_bb able_bb to_bb put_bb these_bb two_bb things_bb
together_bb make_bb the_bb main_bb ingredients_bb to_ a_bb good_bb argument.
The_bb reading_bb in_bb these_bb chapters_bb tell_bb us_bb what_bb inductive_bb and_bb
deductive_bb arguments_bb are._bb These_bb give_bb us_bb the_bb book_bb definition_bb
of_bb these,_bb but_bb I_bb believe_bb the_bb most_bb basic_ meaning_bb of_bb these_bb
are_bb that_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb based_bb on_bb facts_bb but_bb don't_bb
really_bb give_bb a_bb full_bb definition_ of_b that_bb fact._bb Meaning_bb that_bb it_bb
will_bb almost_bb lead_bb you_bb to_ believe_bb that_bb what_bb is_bb being_bb argued_bb
is_bb the_bb point_bb and_bb not_bb the_bb facts._bb As_bb for_bb inductive_bb will_bb
give_bb the_bb facts_bb and_bb stick_bb to_bb them_bb and_bb give_bb you_bb a_bb
reasonable_bb meaning_bb for_b the_bb point_bb of_bb the_bb argument,_bb it_bb won't_
lead_bb you_bb to_bb believe_bb the_bb truth_bb is_bb there_bb because_bb the_bb facts_bb
"should_bb show_bb you_bb them"
The_bb most_bb interesting_bb activity_bb this_bb week_bb was_bb reading_bb two_bb
articles_bb and_bb seeing_bb how_bb one_bb topic_bb has_bb opposite_bb views._bb But_bb
them_bb a_bb lot_bb of_ topics_bb have_bb two_bb sides_ to_bb them,_bb but_bb this_bb
one_bb definitely_bb had_bb two_bb strong_bb arguments_bb for_bb both_bb sides._bb
After_bb reading_bb Chapter_bb 6_bb evaluating_bb arguments,_bb two_bb factors_bb I_bb
consider_bb when_b evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb is_bb clarity_bb and_bb credibility._bb
I_bb picked_bb clarity_bb because_bb if_bb a_bb person_bb is_bb not_bb clear_bb and_bb
do_bb not_bb have_bb a_bb good_bb understanding_bb what_bb person_bb is_bb saying_bb
it_bb could_bb cause_bb an_bb argument_bb among_bb people._bb It_bb is_bb always_bb
better_bb to_bb be_bb clear,_bb explain_bb and_bb give_bb an_bb explanation_bb to_bb
what_bb it_bb is_bb you_bb are_bb stating_bb when_bb having_bb a_bb argument._bb
Another_bb factor_bb I_ consider_bb was_bb Credibility._bb I_bb picked_bb credibility_bb
because_bb it_bb is_bb important_bb to_bb have_bb true_bb information_bb that_bb you_bb
can_bb prove_bb to_bb be_bb true_bb than_bb to_bb make_bb assumptions_bb based_bb
off_bb of_bb what_bb you_bb think_bb or_bb how_bb you_bb think_bb it_bb should_bb be.
Inductive_bb Arguments_bb can_bb be_bb stronger_bb or_bb weaker_bb and_bb not_bb true_bb
or_bb false._bb To_bb me_bb meaning_bb that_bb you_bb can_bb have_bb a_bb good_bb
or_bb bad_bb argument_bb but_bb what_ you_bb are_bb saying_bb is_bb neither_bb true_bb
or_bb false._bb Deductive_bb Argument_bb is_bb when_bb the_b argument_bb is_bb true_bb
and_bb all_bb the_bb facts_bb are_bb valid._bb The_bb most_bb interesting_bb concept_bb
I_bb found_bb interesting_bb was_bb the_bb factors_bb of_bb evaluating_bb Arguments._bb
I_bb found_bb this_bb interested_bb because_bb it_bb gave_bb different_bb factors_bb on_bb
ways_bb how_bb to_bb break_bb down_bb different_bb ways_bb to_bb evaluate_bb
arguments._bb Clarity_bb and_bb Credibility_bb are_bb the_bb most_bb important_bb
factors_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_b argument._bb Most_bb speeches_bb or_bb debates_bb
would_bb not_bb be_bb credible_bb if_b the_bb speaker_bb does_bb not_bb have_bb their_bb
speaking_bb points_bb correct_bb or_bb in_bb order._bb These_bb examples_bb are_bb
mostly_bb seen_bb in_bb a_bb Presidential_bb Debate_bb or_bb even_bb a_bb high_bb
school_bb speech_bb class._bb Even_bb though_bb clarity_bb and_bb credibility_bb are_bb
very_bb important_bb most_bb people_bb can_bb be_bb persuaded_bb by_bb only_bb partial_bb
truths.
I_bb would_bb suggest_bb that_bb the_bb biggest_bb difference_bb between_bb inductive_bb
and_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb is_bb that_bb deductive_b is_bb mostly_bb based_bb
on_bb facts_bb and_bb not_bb thoughts._bb Deductive_bb is_bb mostly_bb driven_bb by_bb
elimination,_bb mathematic_bb and_bb definitions._bb By_ using_bb deductive_bb a_bb
person_bb speaking_bb will_bb most_bb likely_bb drive_bb the_bb points_bb of_bb those_bb
three_bb concepts_bb (elimination,_bb mathematic_bb and_bb definitions)_b and_bb make_bb
valid_bb arguments_bb using_bb facts_bb based_bb on_bb the_bb three_bb types_bb of_bb
arguments._bb Typically_bb inductive_bb arguments_bb will_bb be_bb weaker_bb and_bb
more_bb opinionated._bb I_bb believe_bb that_bb studying_bb the_bb factors_bb of_bb
clarity_bb and_bb credibility_bb are_bb the_bb most_bb interesting_bb concepts_bb that_bb
I_bb learned_bb about_bb during_bb the_bb week._bb I_bb feel_bb that_bb it_bb is_ very_bb
important_bb to_bb use_bb use_bb clarity_bb and_bb credibility_bb in_bb your_bb personal_bb
and_bb professional_bb life._bb Leading_bb by_bb those_bb examples_bb will_bb ensure_bb
that_bb you_bb are_bb a_bb clear_bb and_bb transparent_bb employee_bb or_bb leader.
Five_bb factors_bb should_bb be_bb considered_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument._bb
_bb
• Clarity
• Credibility
• Relevance
• Completeness
• Soundness
Of_bb these_bb five_bb components_bb used_bb to_bb construct_bb and_bb analyze_bb an_bb
argument,_bb I_bb believe_bb that_bb clarity_bb is_bb one_bb of_bb the_bb most_bb
important_bb factors.
Having_bb clarity_bb allows_bb you_bb to_bb identify_bb the_bb issue(s)._bb Being_bb
clear_bb about_bb the_bb issue(s)_bb helps_bb keep_bb the_ argument_bb focused._bb If_bb
the_bb issue(s)_bb is_bb unclear,_bb the_bb argument_bb goes_bb nowhere_bb and_bb can_bb
leave_bb people_bb feeling_bb frustrated_bb and_bb misunderstood._bb A_bb valid_bb
argument_bb clearly_bb presents_bb the_bb issue_bb with_bb good_bb reasons_bb and_b
allows
one_bb to_bb accept_bb or_bb reject_bb a_bb particular_bb position_bb to_bb make_bb up_bb
their_bb own_bb mind_bb about_bb an_bb issue.
Though_bb all_bb five_bb factors_bb are_bb essential_bb to_bb forming_bb a_b great_bb
argument,_bb credibility_bb is_bb the_ second_bb most_b crucial_bb component._bb It_bb
is_bb important_bb to_bb have_bb credible_bb evidence_bb to_bb support_bb claims._bb
Credible_bb evidence_bb should_bb be_bb accurate,_bb unbiased,_bb complete,_bb and_bb
consistent_bb with_bb other_bb relevant_bb evidence._bb The_bb more_bb evidence_bb
there_bb is_ to_bb support_bb the_bb claim,_bb the_bb more_bb reasonable_bb it_bb is_
to_bb accept._bb Having_ impeccable_bb credibility_bb helps_bb form_bb and_bb support_bb
the_bb remaining_bb components_bb of_bb an_bb argument;_bb relevance,_bb
completeness,_bb and_bb soundness._
Inductive_bb arguments_bb contain_bb evidence_bb based_bb on_bb social_bb behavior_bb
and_bb generalization;_bb they_bb are_bb neither_bb true_bb nor_bb false._bb Inductive_bb
arguments_bb can_bb have_bb social_bb error_bb and_bb fallacies_bb because_bb it_bb is_bb
based_bb on_bb generalization_bb (stereotyping)_bb and_bb probability_bb instead_bb of_bb
certainty._bb
Deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb based_bb on_bb mathematical_bb evidence_bb and_bb
certainty._bb A_bb valid_bb deductive_bb argument_bb has_bb true_bb premises_bb and_bb
conclusions._bb Deductive_bb arguments_bb have_bb credible_bb evidence_bb and_bb
logic,_bb making_bb the_bb argument_bb sound._bb To_bb remember_bb the_bb five_bb
factors_bb for_bb the_bb criteria_bb to_bb use_bb to_bb construct_bb and_bb analyze_b
an_bb argument_bb is_ an_bb excellent_bb resource._bb
I_bb am_bb intrigued_bb to_bb begin_bb paying_bb attention_bb to_bb arguments_bb and_bb
practice_bb identifying,_bb breaking_bb down,_bb diagramming,_bb and_bb evaluating_bb
arguments_bb to_bb see_bb how_bb valid_bb and_bb sound_bb they_bb are._bb Two_bb
factors_bb we_bb should_bb consider_bb when_ evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb is_bb
Clarity_bb and_bb Credibility._bb Identify_bb if_bb the_bb terms_bb are_bb clear_bb and_bb
understandable._bb If_bb it's_bb not_bb clear_bb ask_bb for_bb clarification,_bb that_bb is_b
your_bb first_bb step._bb Second_bb factor_bb to_bb consider_bb is_bb credibility._bb
Ensure_bb that_bb the_bb premises_bb are_bb credible_bb and_bb backed_bb with_bb by_bb
evidence.Inductive_bb argument_bb is_bb a_bb collection_bb of_bb evidence_bb of_bb
something_bb specific_bb that_bb is_bb collected_bb and_bb supports_bb a_bb general_bb
conclusion._bb It_bb will_bb give_bb information_bb that_bb provides_bb the_bb basis_bb
and_bb necessary_bb grounds_bb for_bb a_bb deduction_bb and_bb valid_bb reasoning._bb
Deductive_bb argument_bb will_bb begin_bb with_bb a_bb factual_bb premise,_bb pretty_bb
much_bb means_bb that_bb the_bb conclusion_bb you_bb want_bb to_bb reach_bb must_bb
be_bb true._bb They_bb contain_bb enough_bb information_bb for_bb a_bb conclusion_bb
to_bb be_bb given_bb on_bb any_bb topic._bb This_bb type_bb of_bb argument_bb begins_b
with_bb a_bb statement_bb that_bb is_bb always_bb believed_bb to_bb be_bb true.The_bb
most_bb interesting_bb part_bb of_bb this_bb week_bb was_bb getting_bb the_b
opportunity_bb to_bb learn_bb how_bb to_bb recognize_bb and_bb evaluate_bb casual_bb
arguments._bb Also_bb on_bb how_bb we_bb tend_bb to_bb generalize_bb when_bb getting_bb
to_bb a_bb conclusion._bb The_bb example_bb given_bb about_bb the_bb cat_bb was_bb
perfect_bb and_bb a_bb relatable_bb explanation._bb In_bb my_bb opinion_bb the_bb two_bb
factors_bb you_bb should_bb consider_bb when_ evaluating_bb and_bb argument_bb is_bb
clarity_bb and_bb credibility._bb When_bb it_bb comes_bb to_bb any_bb argument_bb that_bb
is_bb given_ you_b always_bb need_bb to_bb understand_bb what_bb the_bb argument_bb
is_bb referring_bb to_bb because_bb if_b neither_bb party_bb understands_bb what_bb is_bb
going_bb then_bb the_bb argument_bb will_bb never_bb come_bb to_bb a_bb proper_bb
conclusion._bb Credibility_bb plays_bb a_bb huge_bb roll_bb as_bb well_b because_bb in_bb
order_bb to_bb have_bb a_bb good_bb stand_bb in_bb any_bb argument_b you_bb need_bb
to_bb have_bb facts_bb and_bb sources_bb to_bb back_bb up_bb the_bb facts_bb which_bb
will_bb give_bb you_bb a_bb strong_bb stand_ in_bb the_bb argument.In_bb my_bb own_bb
words_bb the_bb difference_bb between_bb an_bb inductive_bb and_bb deductive_bb
argument_bb is_bb that_bb deductive_bb you_bb come_bb up_bb with_bb an_bb idea,_bb
then_bb an_bb observation_bb and_bb finally_bb a_bb conclusion_bb for_bb example_bb
women_bb do_bb not_bb like_bb going_bb shooting_bb ,_bb Sam_bb is_bb a_bb woman_bb
therefore_bb she_bb does_bb not_bb like_bb shooting._bb Inductive_bb is_bb when_b you_bb
observe_bb something_bb ,_bb then_bb analyze_bb it_bb then_bb come_bb up_bb with_bb
a_bb theory_bb for_bb example_bb my_bb face_bb breaks_bb out_bb when_bb I_bb eat_bb
chocolate,_bb signs_bb of_bb allergic_bb reaction_bb therefore_bb I_bb am_bb allergic_bb
to_bb chocolate.This_bb week_bb I_bb really_bb enjoyed_bb watching_bb the_bb video_bb
help_bb break_bb down_bb the_bb types_bb of_bb arguments_bb and_bb everything_bb that_bb
goes_bb along_bb with_bb it._bb Another_bb thing_bb I_bb really_bb enjoyed_bb was_bb
the_bb reading_bb which_bb went_bb more_bb in_bb depth_bb about_bb inductive_bb and_bb
deductive_bb arguments._bb Overall_bb the_bb activities_bb were_bb a_bb great_bb
breakdown_bb of_bb everything_bb covered_bb this_bb week._bb Clarity_bb and_b
completeness_bb are_bb two_bb important_bb factors_bb in_bb an_bb argument_bb that_bb
go_bb hand_bb in_bb hand._bb The_bb clarity_bb of_bb an_bb argument_bb needs_bb to_bb
be_bb clear_bb without_bb bias._bb The_bb wording_bb in_bb the_bb arguments_bb is_bb
defined_bb and_ understandable_bb without_bb having_bb mixed_bb definitions._ So,_bb
the_bb argument_bb can_bb not_bb be_bb misconstrued._bb The_bb premises_bb used_bb
are_bb complete_bb and_bb support_b your_bb argument._bb If_bb there_bb are_bb missing_bb
premises_bb than_bb the_bb argument_bb is_bb not_bb sound_bb and_bb will_bb be_bb
able_bb to_bb be_bb picked_bb apart._bb Inductive_bb arguments_bb use_bb the_bb
probability_bb factor_bb of_bb situation._bb For_bb instance,_bb if_bb the_bb premises_bb
could_bb mostly_bb be_bb true,_bb then_bb the_bb conclusion_bb would_bb be_bb true._bb
Deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb based_bb on_b eliminations_bb of_bb false_bb
premises_bb to_bb come_bb to_bb the_ correct_bb conclusion_bb of_bb an_bb argument._bb
The_bb premises_bb are_bb true_bb than_bb the_b argument_bb is_bb true._bb Deductive_bb
arguments_bb are_bb the_bb most_bb interesting_bb concepts_bb I_bb learned_bb this_bb
week._bb I_bb find_bb myself_bb using_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb in_bb life_bb than_bb
inductive._bb I_bb do_bb not_bb like_bb to_ have_bb issues_bb resolved_bb by_bb chance._bb
Vein_bb diagramming_bb of_bb arguments_bb was_bb confusing_bb to_bb me._bb I_bb
would_bb have_bb to_bb practice_bb it_bb more_bb to_bb understand_bb the_bb concept._bb
Reading_bb about_bb how_bb to_bb diagram_bb will_bb not_bb help_ me_bb remember_bb
the_bb skill._bb It_bb is_bb important_bb to_bb be_bb able_bb to_bb analyze_bb an_bb
argument_bb and_bb break_bb it_bb down,_bb two_bb main_bb factors_bb I_bb believe_bb
you_bb should_bb look_bb for_bb in_bb a_bb good_bb argument_bb is_bb relevance_bb
and_bb completeness._bb while_bb the_bb information_bb does_bb need_bb credible_bb
sources,_bb the_bb premises_bb need_bb to_b be_bb relevant_bb to_bb the_bb argument's_bb
conclusion_bb can_bb be_bb false._bb the_bb argument_bb also_bb needs_bb to_bb be_bb
complete,_bb it_bb needs_bb to_bb consider_bb all_bb sides_bb before_bb coming_bb to_bb
a_bb conclusion._bb Without_bb checking_bb the_bb other_bb perspective,_bb the_bb
conclusion_bb can_bb become_bb biased_bb or_ invalid.An_bb inductive_bb argument_bb
is_bb an_bb assumption,_bb A_bb theory_bb that_bb starts_bb with_bb an_bb observation_bb
and_bb concluded_bb without_bb much_bb evidence_bb to_bb back_bb it_bb up._bb this_bb
is_bb something_bb that_bb you_bb cannot_bb necessarily_bb prove_bb and_bb can_bb be_b
easily_bb disproved_bb with_bb newfound_bb evidence._bb an_bb example_bb is:_bb the_bb
last_bb 3_bb tests_bb were_bb easy,_bb therefore_bb the_bb next_bb test_bb will_bb be_bb
easy."_bb A_bb deductive_bb argument_bb is_bb the_bb opposite,_bb It_bb starts_bb with_bb
a_bb theory_bb that_bb can_bb be_bb proven_bb or_bb disproven_bb and_bb the_bb
conclusion_bb is_bb always_bb correct_bb with_bb the_bb right_bb evidence._bb with_bb
deductive_bb reasoning,_bb you_bb can_bb formulate_bb a_bb theory_bb and_bb test_bb
that_bb theory_bb by_bb collecting_bb data_bb and_bb analyzing_bb it_bb until_bb you_bb
can_bb prove_bb or_bb disprove_bb the_bb conclusion_bb of_ the_bb argument.The_bb
textbook_bb has_bb provided_bb a_bb lot_bb of_ examples_bb and_bb exercises_bb that_bb
helped_bb further_bb my_bb understanding_bb of_bb the_bb chapters_bb we_bb are_bb
studying._bb my_bb personal_bb favorite_bb was_bb in_bb chapter_bb 6,_bb breaking_bb
down_bb an_bb argument_bb by_bb identifying_bb the_bb premises_bb and_bb the_bb
conclusion._bb the_bb exercise_bb that_bb I_bb applied_bb was_bb the_bb end_bb of_bb
the_bb chapter_bb practice_bb where_bb Kennedy_bb was_bb arguing_bb for_bb the_bb
rights_bb of_bb Gay_bb marriage_bb using_bb facts_bb and_ breaking_bb down_bb the_bb
legitimacy_bb of_bb why_bb it_bb should_bb be_bb legal._bb He_bb used_bb proper_bb
premises_bb both_bb dependent_bb and_bb independent_bb to_ support_bb his_bb
conclusions.one_bb thing_bb that_bb I_bb had_bb to_bb struggle_bb with_bb and_bb do_bb
extra_bb research_bb on_bb was_bb the_bb difference_bb between_bb Independent_bb and_bb
dependent_bb Premises._bb While_bb the_bb definition_ of_bb both_bb was_bb clear,_bb
I_bb couldn't_bb seem_bb to_bb get_bb a_bb grasp_bb of_bb how_bb to_bb use_ them_bb
in_bb the_bb example._bb Both_bb premises_bb seemed_bb they_bb could_bb be_ used_bb
on_bb their_bb own_bb or_bb conjoined_bb if_bb they_bb wanted_bb to._ While_bb there_bb
are_bb many_bb factors_ that_bb should_bb be_bb considered_bb while_bb evaluating_bb
an_bb argument,_bb I_bb think_bb Credibility_bb and_bb Completeness_bb are_bb the_bb
two_bb most_bb important._bb They're_bb the_bb opposites_bb of_bb two_bb parts_bb of_bb
bad_bb arguments,_bb namely_bb Misinformation_bb and_bb Withholding_bb the_ Truth._bb
If_bb we_bb fail_b to_bb pay_ attention_bb to_bb the_bb credibility_bb of_bb premises_bb
in_bb an_bb argument,_b then_b our_bb understanding_bb of_bb the_bb argument_bb is_bb
limited_bb to_bb whatever_bb information_bb the_bb arguing_bb party_bb gives_bb us._bb
Chapter_bb 6_ had_bb an_bb excellent_bb example_bb of_bb a_bb young_bb girl_bb that_
presented_bb the_bb argument_bb 1)_bb I_bb am_bb a_bb girl,_bb 2)_bb girls_bb become_bb
nurses,_bb boys_bb become_bb doctors,_bb therefore_bb 3)_bb I_bb cannot_bb become_bb
a_bb doctor._bb The_bb second_bb premise_bb of_bb this_bb argument_b is_bb clearly_bb
false_bb if_bb examined_bb through_bb the_bb lens_bb of_bb critical_bb thinking,_bb but_bb
if_bb we_bb don't_bb apply_bb our_bb critical_bb thinking_bb skills_bb to_bb the_bb
credibility_bb of_bb premises_bb such_bb as_bb these_bb then_bb we_bb can_bb have_bb
a_bb misguided_bb understanding_bb of_bb the_ argument._bb Completeness_bb is_ a_bb
bit_bb trickier_bb to_bb understand,_bb but_bb the_bb omission_bb of_bb relevant_bb
premises_bb can_bb make_bb an_bb argument_bb seem_bb true_bb when_bb it_bb really_bb
isn't._bb The_bb following_bb argument_bb is_bb related_bb to_bb an_bb example_bb I_bb
used_bb in_bb an_bb earlier_bb discussion_bb post,_bb but_bb it's_bb relevant_bb here_bb
too._bb 1)_bb seatbelts_bb are_bb now_bb required_bb in_bb cars,_bb 2)_bb emergency_bb
room_bb visits_bb for_bb injuries_bb obtained_bb in_bb car_bb crashes_bb have_bb gone_bb
way_bb up,_bb therefore_bb 3)_bb seatbelts_bb make_bb people_bb more_bb likely_bb to_bb
be_bb injured_bb in_bb a_bb car_bb crash._bb This_bb argument_bb may_ seem_bb valid_bb
at_bb first,_bb but_bb when_bb examined_bb through_bb the_bb lens_bb of_bb critical_bb
thinking_bb we_bb see_ that_bb it's_bb incomplete._bb There_bb should_bb be_bb a_bb
third_bb premise,_bb "deaths_bb from_bb injuries_bb obtained_bb in_bb car_bb crashes_bb
have_bb gone_bb way_bb down"._bb If_bb we_bb don't_bb pay_bb attention_bb to_bb the_bb
completeness_bb of_bb arguments,_bb we_bb may_bb once_bb again_bb have_bb a_bb
misguided_bb understanding_bb of_b the_bb argument.Deductive_bb arguments_bb remind_bb
me_bb of_bb math_bb -_bb the_bb conclusion_ is_bb not_bb just_bb logically,_bb but_bb
inevitably_bb drawn_bb from_bb the_bb premises._bb The_bb Wason_bb card_bb problem_bb
(or_bb the_bb more_bb easily_bb understandable_bb underage_bb drinking_bb problem)_bb
are_bb excellent_bb examples_bb of_bb this._bb A_bb deductive_bb argument_bb may_bb
be_bb complex_bb or_bb otherwise_bb difficult_bb to_bb follow,_bb but_bb in_bb the_bb
end_bb there's_bb only_bb one_bb factually_bb correct_bb conclusion._bb Inductive_bb
arguments_bb are_bb less_bb like_bb math_bb and_bb more_bb like_bb a_ story._bb The_bb
premises_bb will_bb point_bb towards_bb the_bb conclusion,_bb sometimes_bb with_bb
great_bb evidence,_bb but_bb there's_bb no_bb factually_bb correct_bb conclusion.I_bb
really_bb enjoyed_bb looking_bb over_bb the_bb diagraming_bb of_bb arguments_bb in_bb
chapter_bb 6._bb Of_bb course_bb I've_bb used_b arguments_bb for_bb as_bb long_bb as_bb
I've_bb been_bb able_bb to_bb speak_bb and_bb write,_bb but_bb I've_bb never_bb broken_bb
one_bb down_bb in_bb such_bb a_bb way._bb The_bb two_bb areas_bb in_bb evaluating_bb
an_bb argument_bb I_bb believe_bb are_bb credibility,_bb and_bb soundness._bb Credibility_bb
of_bb an_bb argument_bb needs_bb to_bb have_bb strong_bb facts_bb and_bb sources_bb
to_bb be_bb viewed_bb as_bb valid._bb Soundness_bb of_bb an_bb argument_bb is_b also_bb
a_bb primary_bb need._bb If_bb your_bb ideas_bb are_bb not_bb well-thought_bb out_bb
your_bb argument_bb can_bb be_bb flawed_bb and_bb not_bb very_bb sound_bb in_bb
your_bb presentation._bb Inductive_bb arguments_bb usually_bb follow_bb the_bb premises._bb
They_bb are_bb either_bb stronger_bb or_bb weaker_bb in_bb support_bb of_bb the_bb
conclusion_bb rather_bb than_bb being_bb true_bb or_bb false._bb Deductive_bb arguments_bb
necessarily_bb follow_b the_bb premises._bb That_bb is_bb if_bb the_bb premises_bb are_bb
true,_bb and_bb the_bb reasoning_bb process_bb is_bb valid.What_bb we_bb studied_bb
this_bb week_bb was_bb interesting._bb The_ different_bb part_b of_bb an_bb argument_bb
was_bb fascinating,_bb as_bb well_bb as,_bb how_bb to_bb defuse_bb a_bb lot_bb of_bb
arguments._bb I_bb got_bb the_bb gist_bb of_bb what_bb the_bb book_bb was_bb saying,_bb
but_bb I_bb will_bb have_bb to_bb work_bb on_bb how_bb to_bb best_bb evaluate_bb the_bb
process_bb on_bb how_bb to_bb present_bb an_bb argument._bb I_bb am_bb also_bb
wondering_bb how_bb you_bb would_bb want_bb to_bb diagram_bb an_bb argument._bb
Most_bb of_bb the_bb arguments_bb I_bb have_bb had_bb you_bb do_bb not_bb have_bb
the_bb time_bb to_bb do_bb such_bb a_bb thing,_bb unless_bb you_bb are_bb on_bb a_bb
debate_bb team_bb on_bb working_bb as_bb a_bb lawyer,_bb you_bb do_bb not_bb have_bb
the_bb time_bb for_b that._bb Just_bb thinking_bb aloud._bb The_bb videos_bb are_bb the_bb
best_bb teaching_bb tool_bb when_bb it_bb comes_bb to_bb talking_bb about_bb these_b
kinds_bb of_bb things._bb One_bb factor_bb that_bb should_bb be_bb considered_bb when_bb
evaluating_bb critical_bb thinking_bb is_bb clarity._bb To_bb have_bb clarity_bb in_bb an_bb
argument_bb means_bb that_bb you_bb completely_bb understand_bb what_bb the_bb
argument_bb entails_bb and_bb that_bb it_bb is_bb straight_bb forward._bb This_bb is_bb
important_bb because_bb if_bb you_bb do_bb not_bb understand_bb your_bb own_bb
argument_bb and_ the_ premises_bb to_bb it,_bb it_bb has_bb no_bb value._bb Another_bb
very_bb important_bb factor_bb that_bb should_bb be_bb considered_bb when_bb evaluating_bb
critical_bb thinking_bb is_bb credibility._bb Credibility_bb in_bb an_bb argument_bb means_bb
that_bb there_bb is_bb factual_bb evidence_bb and_bb reasoning_bb to_bb back_bb up_bb
your_bb claim._bb This_bb is_bb important_bb because_bb with_bb out_bb credible_bb
sources_bb and_bb evidence_bb your_bb argument_bb is_bb most_bb likely_bb invalid,_bb
and_bb it_bb is_bb dangerous_bb to_bb spread_bb mis-information.
The_bb differences_bb between_bb inductive_bb and_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb
drastic_bb but_bb very_bb easy_bb to_bb understand._bb While_bb the_bb premises_bb of_bb
inductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb support_bb for_ the_bb conclusion,_bb the_bb premises_bb
of_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb facts._bb I_bb think_bb the_bb major_bb difference_bb
between_bb the_bb two_bb is_bb that_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb 100%_bb
certain_bb or_bb absolute_bb while_bb inductive_bb is_bb very_bb probable_bb and_bb
uncertain.My_bb favourite_bb reading_bb from_bb this_bb week_bb was_bb chapter_bb six_b
with_bb all_bb of_bb the_bb factors_bb to_bb evaluate_bb in_bb an_bb argument._bb I_bb
think_bb this_bb section_bb will_bb truly_bb help_bb me_bb in_bb my_bb day_bb to_bb
day_bb life_bb by_bb having_bb controlled,_bb knowledgeable_bb arguments._bb one_bb
of_bb the_b factors_bb I_bb consider_bb we_bb should_bb evaluate_bb are_bb Argument_bb
from_bb definition,_bb why_bb because_bb it_bb is_bb based_bb on_bb a_bb key_b term_bb
or_bb essential_bb attribute_bb in_bb a_bb defintion,_bb the_bb second_bb one_bb is,_bb
Hypothetical_bb Syllogism,_bb why_bb because_bb it_bb contains_bb two_bb premises_bb
at_bb least_bb one_bb of_bb which_bb is_bb a_bb hypothetical_bb conditional_bb statement._bb
Inductive_bb provides_bb support_bb but_bb not_bb neccessarily_bb proof_bb for_bb the_bb
conclusion,_bb which_bb means_bb like_bb when_bb me_bb and_bb my_bb cousin_ got_bb
to_bb arguing_bb she_bb was_bb saying_bb things_bb but_bb could't_bb state_bb the_bb
fact_bb the_bb whole_bb purpose_bb of_ the_bb argument.Deductive_bb the_bb
conclusion_bb necessarily_bb follows_bb from_bb the_bb premises,_bb which_bb means_bb
she_bb never_bb got_bb to_bb the_bb bottom_bb of_bb why_bb we_bb was_bb arguing,_b
what_bb was_bb the_bb purpose_bb and_bb getting_bb loud_bb and_bb anger_bb if_bb you_bb
can't_bb tell_bb us_bb the_bb reason_bb for_bb this_bb all._bb Reflecting_bb on_bb this_bb
learning_bb activity_bb it's_bb plenty_bb of_bb ideas,_bb topics,_b and_bb concepts,_bb I_bb
have_bb learn_bb and_bb it's_bb so_bb much_bb more_bb I_bb would_bb like_bb to_bb
learn._bb When_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb I_bb believe_bb the_bb two_bb factors_bb
that_bb should_bb garner_bb the_bb most_bb attention_bb are_bb the_bb Premise_bb and_bb
Conclusion_bb of_bb the_bb argument._bb A_bb good_bb premise_bb should_bb be_bb
based_bb in_bb facts,_bb knowledge_bb and_bb experience._bb If_bb a_bb premise_bb is_bb
based_bb in_bb opinions_bb or_bb biases_bb of_bb any_bb sort_bb the_bb argument_bb
could_bb be_bb considered_bb faulty_bb in_bb the_bb educational_bb field_bb and_bb in_bb
terms_bb of_bb critical_bb thinking._bb The_bb conclusion_bb should_bb be_bb in_bb
alignment_bb with_bb the_bb arguments_bb premise_bb and_bb keep_bb everything_bb
cohesive._bb Being_bb able_bb to_bb identify_bb the_bb structure_bb and_bb tone_bb of_bb
the_bb premise_bb and_bb conclusion_bb may_bb also_bb help_bb identify_bb whether_bb
the_bb argument_bb is_b deductive_bb or_bb inductive.Inductive_bb arguments_bb tend_bb
to_bb rely_bb on_bb conjecture_bb or_bb a_ pattern._bb Inductive_bb arguments_bb can_bb
usually_bb be_bb based_bb in_bb probabilities_bb or_bb likelihoods_bb rather_bb than_bb
facts._bb Inductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb not_bb insured_bb and_bb can_bb be_bb viewed_bb
if_bb looking_bb for_bb probability_bb over_bb facts._bb Deductive_bb reasoning_bb is_bb
the_bb search_bb for_bb accuracy_bb and_bb precision._bb The_bb premise_bb in_bb
deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb factual_bb and_bb to_bb the_bb point._bb The_bb end_bb
result_bb of_bb this_bb form_bb of_bb argument_bb is_bb usually_bb a_bb factual_bb
conclusion._bb Learning_bb how_bb to_bb evaluate_bb an_bb argument_bb based_bb on_bb
clarity,_bb credibility,_bb relevance,_bb soundness_bb and_bb completeness_bb was_bb
definitely_bb very_bb helpful_bb for_bb me_bb this_bb week._bb I_bb feel_bb like_bb in_bb
the_bb age_bb of_bb misinformation_bb being_bb able_bb to_bb sort_bb through_bb some_bb
of_bb the_bb chaos_bb is_bb a_bb tool_bb everyone_bb can_bb benefit_bb from._bb Two_bb
of_bb the_bb factors_bb we_bb should_bb consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb
argument_bb are_bb Relevance,_bb which_bb will_bb help_bb to_bb ensure_bb that_bb you_bb
have_bb the_b material_bb provided_ that_bb is_bb factual_bb and_bb supports_bb what_bb
is_bb stated._bb The_bb second_bb factor_bb is_bb Soundness,_bb to_bb help_bb ensure_bb
that_bb there_bb is_bb evidence_bb that_bb supports_bb the_bb facts_bb of_bb the_bb
positive_bb conclusion_bb and_bb ensure_bb it_bb gives_bb specific_bb detail_bb to_bb
make_bb your_bb point_bb and_bb argument_bb strong._bb These_bb two_bb of_bb the_bb
five_bb factors_bb are_bb important_bb to_bb build_bb an_bb argument._bb Having_bb
these_bb factors_bb helps_bb to_bb ensure_bb that_bb you_bb are_bb clear_bb in_ stating_bb
your_bb platform,_bb you_bb have_bb used_bb credible_bb material_bb that_bb is_bb
relevant,_bb you_bb have_bb looked_bb at_bb all_bb sides_bb to_bb ensure_bb you_bb have_bb
not_bb missed_bb an_bb important_bb piece._bb Last_bb but_bb not_bb least_bb is_bb the_bb
soundness_bb that_bb you_bb have_bb supporting_bb evidence.Inductive_bb Arguments_bb
suggests_bb it_bb is_bb factual_bb however_bb using_bb certain_bb words_bb can_bb
change_bb the_bb outcome_bb to_bb likely._bb Inductive_bb does_bb not_bb have_bb all_bb
the_bb proof_bb of_bb investigative_bb facts,_bb therefore_bb they_bb are_bb weak_bb and_bb
do_bb not_bb have_bb any_bb support._bb Deductive_bb arguments_bb are_bb common_bb
sense_bb reasoning_bb from_bb investigating_bb and_bb have_bb facts_bb and_bb
conclusions,_bb they_bb are_bb the_bb truth._bb It_bb will_bb have_bb supporting_bb
evidence.The_bb learning_bb activity_bb that_bb was_bb most_bb interesting_bb this_bb
week_bb was_bb the_bb Video_bb explaining_bb arguments_bb and_bb how_bb it_bb helped_bb
you_bb remember_bb Clarity,_bb Credibility,_bb Relevance,_bb Completeness_bb &_bb
Soundness._bb "CCRCS"._bb Using_bb word_bb association_bb is_bb always_bb helpful_bb
for_bb me._bb The_bb material_bb this_bb week_bb was_bb explained_bb well_bb through_bb
the_bb videos_bb and_bb readings._bb Being_bb able_bb to_bb recognize_bb the_bb issue_bb
in_bb any_bb argument_bb and_bb also_bb keeping_bb an_bb open_bb mind_bb so_bb that_b
your_bb brain_bb can_bb ask_bb the_bb right_bb questions,_bb are_bb two_bb things_bb to_bb
consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument._bb These_bb are_bb two_bb important_bb
parts_bb because_bb if_ we_bb can_bb point_bb out_bb the_bb issue_bb we_bb can_bb
begin_bb to_bb formulate_bb an_ opinion_ or_bb solution_bb to_bb the_bb argument._bb
When_bb my_bb husband_bb and_bb I_bb argue_bb I_bb keep_bb an_bb open_bb mind_bb
about_bb whatever_bb it_bb is_bb he_bb is_bb trying_bb to_bb convey._bb When_bb I_bb
do_bb this_bb it_bb helps_bb him_bb to_bb feel_bb more_bb comfortable_bb to_bb
communicate_bb with_bb me_bb rather_bb than_bb feeling_bb attacked._b Having_bb a_bb
good_bb listening_bb ear_bb before_bb jumping_bb to_b a_bb conclusion_bb is_bb vital_bb
in_bb the_bb communication_bb process._bb My_bb hubby_bb likes_bb to_bb say_bb that_bb
he_bb is_bb the_bb smartest_bb man_bb that_bb I_bb know._bb That_bb statement_bb
indicates_bb an_bb inductive_bb argument_bb i_bb feel._bb I_bb am_bb familiar_bb with_bb
other_bb men_bb but_bb I_bb don't_bb know_bb their_bb levels_bb of_bb intelligence._bb
That_bb doesn't_bb make_bb his_bb statement_bb true_bb per_bb say._bb Maybe_bb If_bb
he_bb rephrases_bb his_bb statement_bb to_bb being_bb the_bb smartest_bb man_bb that_bb
I_bb have_bb ever_bb been_bb married_bb to,_bb then_bb wouldn't_bb that_bb indicate_bb
a_bb deductive_bb argument?_bb Its_bb true_bb and_bb valid_bb that_bb I_bb haven't_bb
dated_bb much_bb and_bb in_bb the_bb past_bb I_bb have_bb not_bb picked_bb the_bb
most_bb intellectual_bb guys.Its_bb also_bb tru_bb that_bb we_bb are_bb married._bb I_bb
think_bb this_bb concept_bb of_bb inductive_bb versus_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb is_bb
the_bb most_b interesting_bb topic_bb this_bb week._bb I_bb am_bb still_bb trying_ to_bb
accurately_bb pin_bb point_bb the_bb differences._bb I_bb think_bb I_bb will_bb further_bb
read_bb up_bb on_bb this_bb because_bb it_bb can_bb be_bb tricky_bb distinguishing_bb
between_bb the_bb two._bb Two_bb important_bb factors_bb that_bb we_bb should_bb
consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb may_bb include_bb premises_bb
and_bb the_bb presence_bb of_bb fallacies._bb The_bb main_bb goal_bb of_bb an_bb
argument_bb is_b to_bb provide_bb a_bb stance_bb in_bb regards_bb to_ a_bb certain_bb
topic,_bb and_bb it_bb is_bb important_bb evaluate_bb the_bb presence_bb of_bb premises._bb
Premises_bb are_bb the_bb reasons,_bb and_b they_bb are_bb sometimes_b not_bb absent_bb
of_bb opinion_bb or_bb non_bb credible_bb facts._bb Fallacies_bb may_bb also_bb take_bb
form_bb in_bb an_bb argument._bb There_bb may_bb be_bb generalizations_bb that_bb will_bb
negate_bb the_bb credibility_bb of_bb the_bb whole_bb argument.In_bb my_bb own_bb
opinion,_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb actually_bb have_bb a_bb conclusion._bb For_bb
example,_bb if_bb someone_bb says_bb that_bb all_bb cats_ are_bb cute,_bb and_bb a_bb
stray_bb cats_bb are_bb cats,_bb then_bb stray_bb cats_bb are_bb cute._bb This_bb is_bb a_bb
deductive_bb argument,_bb but_bb it_bb is_bb invalid._bb Not_bb all_bb deductive_bb
arguments_bb are_bb valid._bb Inductive_bb arguments_bb predict_bb a_bb conclusion._bb
This_bb would_bb be_bb like_bb saying_bb "Sally_bb did_bb not_bb clean_bb her_bb room._bb
She_bb is_bb messy."_bb This_bb statement_bb predicts_bb the_bb conclusion_bb that_bb
she_bb is_bb messy.This_bb week,_bb I_bb enjoyed_bb learning_bb about_bb inductive_bb
and_bb deducting_bb arguments._bb I_bb think_bb that_bb it_bb is_bb important_bb to_bb
be_bb able_bb to_bb evaluate_bb arguments_bb and_bb be_bb able_bb to_bb acknowledge_bb
premises._bb Being_bb able_bb to_bb identify_bb if_bb an_bb argument_bb is_bb valid_bb
or_bb invalid_bb also_bb will_bb contribute_bb to_bb better_bb critical_bb thinking_bb
skills._bb Two_bb factors_bb we_b should_bb consider_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb
argument_bb are_bb Clarity_bb and_bb Relevance._bb Clarity_bb is_bb important_bb
because_bb you_bb want_bb to_bb make_bb sure_bb you_bb clearly_bb and_bb fully_bb
understand_bb exactly_bb what_ the_bb argument_bb is._bb If_bb you_bb evaluate_bb a_bb
argument_bb without_bb clarity_bb of_bb the_bb argument_bb you_bb are_bb more_bb than_bb
likely_bb to_bb have_bb a_b conclusion_bb that_bb doesn’t_bb make_bb sense_bb or_bb
could_bb be_bb totally_bb wrong._bb Relevance_bb is_bb important_bb because_bb you_bb
want_bb to_bb make_bb sure_bb that_bb you_bb have_bb relevant_bb evidence_bb to_bb
support_bb your_bb argument._bb If_bb it_bb is_bb not_bb relevant_bb to_bb the_bb
argument_bb then_bb it_bb cannot_bb support_bb it._bb The_bb difference_bb between_bb
inductive_bb and_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb is_bb that_bb with_bb inductive_b
arguments_bb statements_bb more_bb so_bb offer_bb support_bb to_bb the_bb conclusion_b
and_bb with_bb deductive_bb arguments_bb the_bb statement_bb more_bb so_bb proves_bb
the_bb conclusion_bb or_bb why_bb the_bb conclusion_bb is_bb correct_bb or_bb legit._bb
I_bb don’t_bb have_bb a_bb specific_bb interesting_bb activity,_bb they_bb all_bb were_bb
very_bb much_bb interesting_bb and_bb very_bb knowledgeable._bb Understanding_bb
exactly_bb what_bb an_bb argument_bb is_bb and_bb the_bb breakdown_bb to_bb take_bb
into_bb consideration_bb when_bb evaluating_bb an_bb argument_bb was_bb great_bb
information_bb to_bb obtain.
