Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Student Name
Course:
Instructor:
Strayer University
CRJ 310 - Law Enforcement Operations and Management
Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that in+criminal+cases,
prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant. This includes information
that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses, including+law+enforcement
officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have documented histories of lying in official
matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these histories may render them unable to testify credibly.+
Summarize the main issues that are involved in the following United States Supreme Court cases. You
must have pages, not including your title page.+
Introduction to Maryland v. Buie :
Maryland v. Buie is a U.S. Supreme Court case from 1990 that addresses the Fourth Amendment and the
scope of protective sweeps during law enforcement searches. Answer the following questions:
1. What constitutional issue did Maryland v. Buie address, and how did the case contribute to the
legal standards surrounding the Fourth Amendment and the scope of protective sweeps during
law enforcement searches?
2. Discuss the circumstances in Maryland v. Buie that led to the legal dispute, emphasizing the law
enforcement actions and the nature of the search.
3. Analyze the Supreme Court's decision in Maryland v. Buie regarding the reasonableness of
protective sweeps and the balancing of law enforcement interests with individual privacy rights.
4. Provide a brief overview of the factual background of Maryland v. Buie, emphasizing the
circumstances that led to the legal dispute and the Supreme Court's decision.
5. How has Maryland v. Buie influenced legal practices and the understanding of protective sweeps
in cases involving law enforcement searches under the Fourth Amendment?
Grading Rubric...
Criteria Points
Possible Points
Earned Instructor’s Comments All key components of the case are explained. 20
Clear, logical flow to paper. 20
Major points are stated clearly. 20
Major points are supported by the following:
1. Lecture material or Scripture;
2. Good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable);
