Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Student Name
Course:
Instructor:
Strayer University
CRJ 310 - Law Enforcement Operations and Management
Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that in+criminal+cases,
prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant. This includes information
that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses, including+law+enforcement
officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have documented histories of lying in official
matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these histories may render them unable to testify credibly.+
Summarize the main issues that are involved in the following United States Supreme Court cases. You
must have pages, not including your title page.+
Introduction to Missouri v. McNeely
Missouri v. McNeely is a U.S. Supreme Court case from 2013 that addresses the Fourth Amendment
and the constitutionality of warrantless blood tests for suspected drunk drivers. Answer the following
questions:
1. What constitutional issue did Missouri v. McNeely address, and how did the case contribute to
the legal standards surrounding the Fourth Amendment and the constitutionality of warrantless
blood tests for suspected drunk drivers?
2. Discuss the circumstances in Missouri v. McNeely that led to the legal dispute, emphasizing the
nature of the traffic stop and the demand for a blood test.
3. Analyze the Supreme Court's decision in Missouri v. McNeely regarding the reasonableness of
warrantless blood tests and its impact on individual privacy rights.
4. Provide a brief overview of the factual background of Missouri v. McNeely, emphasizing the
circumstances that led to the legal dispute and the Supreme Court's decision.
5. How has Missouri v. McNeely influenced legal practices and the understanding of warrantless
blood tests in cases involving suspected drunk drivers under the Fourth Amendment?
Grading Rubric.
Criteria Points
Possible Points
Earned Instructor’s Comments All key components of the case are explained. 20
Clear, logical flow to paper. 20
Major points are stated clearly. 20
Major points are supported by the following:
1. Lecture material or Scripture;
2. Good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable);
and 3. Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts) 20
