1 / 2100%
The Taxpayer Collaborative Issue Resolution (TCIR) initiative stands as a valuable program for
taxpayers' advantage. TCIR aims to foster a cooperative approach between taxpayers and the IRS in
promptly addressing significant matters arising in the same taxable year they occur. Opting for TCIR
instead of enduring a lengthy post-audit examination spanning two to three years can safeguard
taxpayers from potential long-term financial implications. Moreover, by actively engaging taxpayers
in issue identification and resolution, the TCIR process streamlines resource utilization for the
department, a crucial aspect given prevailing budget uncertainties. Notably, the IRS, in its August
2020 update, opened its doors to new applicants interested in the TCIR initiative. Demonstrating
the program's paramount importance, the IRS could explore implementing a fee structure, thereby
accentuating both its value and significance to both the department and taxpayers alike.
The Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) program has been implemented since 2005 as a pilot
program then moved to a permanent program in 2011. According to Compliance Assurance
Process (2019), this program “employs real-time issue resolution to improve federal tax
compliance. The IRS and the taxpayers work together to achieve federal tax compliance by
resolving issues prior to the filing of a tax return. Successful conclusion of CAP allows the IRS to
achieve an acceptable level of assurance regarding the accuracy of the taxpayer’s filed tax return
and to substantially shorten the length of the post filing examination.”
I think this is an excellent program for taxpayers who are eligible as it reduces the stress involved
with audits from the IRS and drastically lowers the chance of having to pay a hefty fine if there are
misstatements found. Also, I feel that companies would be able to minimize fraudulent activity by
being in this program as it does put a spotlight on the company with the IRS as they are always
auditing the company and looking for issues. On the same note, if a company is trying to hide
something from the IRS such as revenue or fraudulent activity, they would be wary of entering into
this program.
I have not been able to find any information on if they companies need to pay the IRS a fee for
this program but I think there should be a monthly fee as the IRS is putting resources on
continuously auditing the company and reducing the fines they would typically receive from
inaccurate returns. As most companies involved with CAP love this program and find it extremely
helpful, I strongly feel that if there was a cost, there would be even more companies wanting to
utilize the program. Everyone loves something for free, but when there is a cost it many times
signifies that there is value in the program or service. This would also allow the IRS to expand their
employee base for this program and accept even more companies into it.
The IRS relies on taxpayer’s self-compliance regarding the filing and accuracy of their tax returns.
Often the IRS will audit returns for compliance, and in hopes, the funds will generate revenue for
the department. All returns are reviewed for mathematical or clerical errors and items not
unallowable by law in the preliminary phase. After the initial process, the IRS takes a mythological
approach to selecting the returns it will audit and then will begin the examination process by
correspondence, office, and field examination.
Once the review concludes, the taxpayer receives a report of the proposed adjustments, if any. If
the taxpayer agrees with the statement, i.e., the overstatement or underpayment, they pay the tax
and move on. However, if they disagree with the statement and bill, they have 30 days to protest
the report. The appeals process begins with the Appeals Office, and if the tax issue is not resolved,
the taxpayer can seek resolution in the judicial system. The IRS monetizes the audit process
because it does not wait to resolve a tax issue to collect revenue. After all, penalties and interest
will accumulate until the bill is paid or rescinded. Sometimes the penalties and interest can be 50%
or more of the tax debt.
The Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) is a program that is beneficial to taxpayers; thus, the IRS
should not cut the program. The purpose of CAP is to have the IRS and taxpayer collaboratively
identify and resolve material issues during the taxable year in which the issues arise so that a post-
filing examination, if any, of the tax return for that taxable year may be unnecessary, or if
necessary, may be completed promptly (Opper, 2011). Waiting two or three years in an audit
examination without CAP could cost the taxpayer in the long run. The CAP process is less time-
consuming when the taxpayers collaborate in identifying and resolving issues, which means the
department will use its resources effectively and efficiently, especially with budget uncertainties.
References
Opper, L. M. (2011). Compliance assurance process. Tax Executive, 63(6), 413-415,417-419,421.
Retrieved from
https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftradejournals%2Fcom
pliance-assurance-process%2Fdocview%2F926590772%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D3783
Sawyers, R. B., & Gill, S. L. (2018). Federal tax research (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
(CAP) - (FAQs). (2019, June 14). Retrieved from IRS:
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/compliance-assurance-process-cap-frequently- asked-
questions-faqs
Compliance Assurance Process. (2023). Retrieved from IRS:
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/compliance-assurance-process
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/compliance-assurance-process
Students also viewed