Unlike direct costs, those costs that can be traced directly to a service, product, or
department, indirect costs (overhead) cannot be linked in a direct way (Nowicki, 2022).
Carroll & Lord (2016) as well as our text, describe five cost accounting techniques
to allocate indirect costs to direct costs.
Traditional Costing is a method that allocates overhead to direct costs by using an
easy-to-understand and apply formula involving a pre-determined percentage rate. While
it is a simplistic approach, it has been criticized for producing unrealistic and incorrect
depictions of a service or product’s true cost (Carroll & Lord, 2016).
Activity-Based Costing uses cost drivers or activity measures to allocate indirect
costs to products (Nowicki, 2022). This method takes a more rational approach to product
and service costing (Carroll & Lord, 2016).
This method of allocating indirect costs can quickly become outdated if cost driver
assumptions, which are subjective and sometimes related to manager preference, are not
updated to reflect changes in the organization (Carroll & Lord, 2016).
Job Order Costing is a method of determining product costs by taking a sampling
of the product's direct costs and creating a relative value unit (RVU) which is a measure of
what resources are used by each product. Total indirect and direct costs are then assigned
to the product based on the relationship set by RVU (Nowicki, 2022).
Interestingly, I use RVUs when determining which surgical procedure is the
primary (more complex) procedure in the surgical data abstraction work that I do. There is
an RVU calculator found online that I use as a tool.
Ratio of cost to charges (RCC) explained by Carroll & Lord (2016) is a method of
costing that is specific to the healthcare industry and uses traditional costing methods to
allocate indirect costs to clinical departments in the creation of a cost report. This report
allows hospitals to estimate the total cost of each revenue-producing department. The
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require hospitals to file Medicare
Cost Reports annually (Carroll & Lord, 2016).
Nowicki (2022) further explains that this method involves “determining product
cost by relating its cost to its charge” by dividing the total operating expenses of an
organization by gross patient revenue (p. 202). This percentage is then applied to any
organization’s product charge to get the product cost (Nowicki, 2022).
Nowicki (2022) points out a serious flaw with this method and that is that it
assumes a non-changing relationship between cost and charge, and this is simply not
correct.
Process Costing determines the product cost during a given accounting period.
This method divides the full costs of a department or organization divided by the number
of services or products produced or provided during that period and is not appropriate for
all situations (Nowicki, 2022).
Utilization rates as they relate to volume and revenue
According to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, utilization
rates can be calculated by taking the total number of new patient consultations or
healthcare visits of all healthcare sites of a population in a given time period and dividing
it by the total population. This figure is then multiplied by what is referred to as a
correction figure, say 12 as in 12 months to get the utilization rate (London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, n.d.).
The resulting figure lets financial managers know what portion of the population is
seeking medical care and perhaps how accessible healthcare is and how they may increase
volume. If the population of an urban city is 100,000 people, but only 3,000 sought
healthcare consultations in a 12-month period, then with a utilization rate of 0.36,
financial managers might need to ask themselves what barriers to healthcare exist in this
area (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, n.d.)? Why is the volume of new
consultations not greater? How can we reduce barriers to healthcare and increase volume
as well as increase revenue?
According to a study by The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine (NASEM) in 2018, the availability of healthcare services does not necessarily
mean that they are equally accessible to all people within a population. Healthcare
utilization is determined by not only the need for care but also whether that care can be
accessed (NASEM, 2018).
Health status and the need for ongoing healthcare services to maintain or improve
health are significant determinants of healthcare utilization (NASEM, 2018). This means
if a population of an area has relatively equal access to healthcare but this population of
people has more co-morbidities, say in a predominant minority community, then the
utilization rate will be higher than that of a community where access to healthy food and
exercise are prevalent (Risa et al, 2021). In order to increase volume in some areas, then
improve access to healthcare services. By increasing volume, gains in revenue will
necessarily follow (all things being equal).
Thanks for reading,
Jane
References
Carroll, N., & Lord, J. C. (2016). The growing importance of cost accounting for
hospitals. Journal of Health Care Finance, 43(2), 172–185.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. (n.d.). Health service utilization.
http://conflict.lshtm.ac.uk/page_145.htm#:~:text=Health%20service%20utilization
%20can%20be,to%20calculate%20the%20annual%20number.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine
Division; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Health Care Utilization
and Adults with Disabilities. (2018). Factors that affect health-care utilization.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500097/
Nowicki, M. (2022). Cost accounting. In Nowicki. (Ed.), Inroduction to the Financial
Management of Healthcare Organizations (8th ed. pp. 193, 203-204, 210).
Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Risa, J., Lavizzo-Mourey, M.D., Besser, R.E. & Williams, D.R. (2021). Understanding
and Mitigating Health Inequities — Past, Current, and Future Directions. DOI:
10.1056/NEJMp2008628