1
Graham v. Connor
Christopher Middleton
Southern New Hampshire University
CJ-500
January 18, 2025
2
Facts
Graham v. Connor (1989) centers on an incident involving Dethorne Graham, a man with
diabetes who experienced a hypoglycemic episode. During this medical emergency, Graham
entered a store to purchase orange juice to alleviate his condition. Police officers, seeing his
behavior as suspicious, approached him, handcuffed him, and used excessive force in restraining
him, resulting in injuries. Graham filed a lawsuit, alleging that the officers violated his Fourth
Amendment rights by using excessive force in making the arrest, which led to the case going to
trial.
Issue
The primary issue in this case was whether the use of force by the police officers was excessive
and whether their actions violated Graham’s Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable
Case Brief: Graham v. Connor
searches and seizures. The case explored the standards under which police use of force is
considered reasonable.
Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of force in law enforcement should be evaluated
under the “objective reasonableness” standard. This means that the reasonableness of the force
used should be assessed based on what a reasonable officer would do under the same
circumstances, without the benefit of hindsight. The Court concluded that the officers’ use of
3
force in this case did not violate Graham’s constitutional rights, given the information available
to the officers at the time.
Analysis
a) Standard for Reasonableness
In Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court established the “objective reasonableness” standard for
evaluating the use of force by law enforcement officers. This standard requires that officers’
actions be judged based on the facts and circumstances as they appeared to a reasonable officer
at the scene, without considering what might be reasonable after the fact. The Court emphasized
that factors such as the severity of the crime, the threat posed by the suspect, and whether the
suspect is resisting or attempting to flee should all be considered when determining the
appropriateness of force.
b) Perspective of the Court
The Court adopted the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene when determining
whether the officer acted appropriately in using force. It explicitly rejected the use of hindsight in
evaluating the actions of the officers. The Court acknowledged that police officers often make
split-second decisions in situations that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving, which made
hindsight-based judgment inappropriate for this case.
c) Strategies to Ensure Correct Force Application
4
To ensure that officers are applying the correct amount of force, it is essential to implement
comprehensive training programs focusing on de-escalation techniques, the proper use of force,
and the recognition of medical conditions that might be mistaken for suspicious behavior.
Departments should also emphasize the use of body cameras to provide accountability and
transparency. Clear guidelines, continuous officer evaluations, and public oversight can help
ensure that force is applied appropriately. Furthermore, fostering stronger community
relationships and improving communication between law enforcement and citizens can
contribute to reducing the need for force in certain situations.
d) Criminological Theory
The issue of excessive use of force by police officers is closely related to social control theory,
which posits that societal norms and rules are maintained by the institutions responsible for
social order, such as law enforcement. When police officers misuse their authority and use
excessive force, it undermines the social contract, leading to distrust and tension between law
enforcement and the community. By maintaining proper use of force protocols and fostering
positive relationships with the community, police can reinforce the legitimacy of their role in
social control.
The Graham v. Connor case was pivotal in shaping the legal framework for evaluating the use of
force by law enforcement officers. The ruling established the objective reasonableness standard
and emphasized the importance of considering the context and perspective of the officer at the
time of the incident. It also underscored the need for proper training and clear policies to ensure
5
that force is used appropriately in law enforcement. The application of criminological theories,
such as social control theory, can provide further insight into how these issues affect the
relationship between law enforcement and the community.
References
U.S. Supreme Court. (1989). Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1988/87-6571
