Kanewasinfactaholderinduecoursebecausehemeetallfour
requirements.Hereceivedpaymenthewasowedwiththe
understandingitwasworthwhathewasowed.Hehadnopartinthe
agreementbetweenGeraldandGerald'smotherandtookitasa
goodfaithtransaction.FinallytherewasnosignGerald'smother
gavehimthecheckunderduressorthatitwasfalsified.
ThisisacaseofGerald'smothertryingtogetoutofan
obligationshecommitted.HeractionswerenofaultofKane.Atthe
timeofthetransactionshebelievedshewasgettinghermoneyback
andrealizedshewasn'tafterthefact.IfshehadgivenKanecashshe
wouldn'thavebeenabletosueKaneforhermoneyback.Shepaida
debtanttriedtousealoopholethebankhadtooffertoescapeher
agreement.Whenyouwritesomeoneacheckitshouldbelikecash.
Apersonshouldbeboundtopayachecktheywritefromanethical
perspective.Sheshouldn'tgettochangehermindonapayment
becausehersonfoundhimselfinabind.
DynamicBusinessLawNancieKubasec5thedition