1 / 12100%
What makes a true Church
Just as the Apostle Paul was concerned for believers in Colosse, Christ also expresses this same
concern to the church in Thyatira (also in the book of Revelation), where a so-called prophetess,
Jezebel, was allowed to corrupt God’s “servants”. Every defiled church of influential and
notable, but notorious corrupters incurs divine judgment, if they fail to repent. As the Truth
personified, Christ taught the truth of the Word.
Thus, He does not want us to adulterate, modify or mutilate it, because it is the truth that saves,
transforms, sanctifies, empowers, establishes, qualifies and prepares us for heaven. Without the
truth of God taught, believed, obeyed and upheld as central and pre-eminent in the church, such a
gathering is vain and ultimately worthless. The Apostle’s concern is for the church of professing
believers to abide in and uphold the truth.
A true church is not known by its name, but by the attributes of its adherents. Saintliness and
faithfulness characterise believers in a true church. The Scripture calls believers in a Bible-
believing church “saints” not only in name but also in conviction, character, conduct, principle
and practice. They are free from all sins, including fornication, uncleanness or covetousness. As
saints, they do not make jests of or ridicule the doctrine of holiness because Jesus died to make
His followers “unblameable in holiness”.
From the beginning to the very end, believers are supposed to be righteous, holy and saintly. Just
as it is contradictory to have an honest liar, contented thief, sober drunkard, chaste adulteress,
godly idolater, loving oppressor and upright transgressor, it is also impossible to have a ‘sinning
saint’. So, if a person is a saint, he is honest, holy, godly, righteous, chaste, loving and upright.
A real child of God in a true church will also be faithful in business and to the Lord, being
always conscious of His omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence in all his actions and
conversations with others. Possessing a sober comportment, he is “faithful in all things”. This
extends to his employment, where he must not deprive his employer the man-hours for which he
is paid, cut corners, change receipts or collude with fraudsters to dupe his organisation. In the
family, parents and children must faithfully adhere to and practise the Word. Christ is coming for
believers that are faithful in whatever they do, whether in private or in the public space.
Every believer is required to maintain abiding commitment to the body of Christ by upholding
and preserving the doctrines of Christ. Believers in Colosse were commended for being saintly
and faithful and for possessing faith, love and hope. The Thessalonian believers also proved their
membership of the true, triumphant and rapturable church by their “work of faith, and labour of
love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ…” (1 Thessalonians 1:3).
Thus, we need to live by faith, refrain from actions that can “overthrow the faith” of others and
watch over our children to avoid associating with those who will destroy their faith. Christian
leaders must preserve the faith of members of their church from being destroyed. The reason is
that we cannot please God without faith. If our ‘question and answer sessions’ will build faith,
we must not entertain “foolish and unlearned questions” that “engender strife”.
The Colossian Christians also demonstrated love toward “all the saints”. This kind of love is not
tribal, sectional, partial, limited or constrained. We must not love some saints and oppress others;
accept some and reject others; befriend some and be cruel to others. They also had hope of
heaven where Jesus, the Old and New Testament saints have gone. The hope of heaven is the
reason we separate from the world and labour relentlessly to preach all the doctrines of Christ.
To seek or support people who destroy the faith, love, hope and commitment of believers
desiring to get to heaven, is to risk divine judgment. God is calling sinners out of the truth-less,
transgressing, traditional and Christ-rejecting churches. They should come to salvation in Christ.
He is calling converted believers to continue in the truth with godly attributes that qualify them
for heaven.
The Ordinances of the Church
Broadly speaking, Christianity encompasses three major branches: Roman Catholicism, Eastern
Orthodoxy, and Protestantism. In all churches affiliated with these traditions, two common
celebrations stand out: baptism and the Lord’s Supper (Communion; Eucharist). Tragically, what
seemingly unites the three branches actually conceals a division involving the terminology,
number, and nature of these rites.
Terminology: Ordinances or Sacraments
How are we to refer to these two rites? The answer to this question reveals a deep division
among Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant churches. For most, baptism and the Lord’s Supper
are sacraments; for others, they are ordinances.
The name sacrament is derived from the Latin word, sacramentum, which was used in Latin
translations of the Bible. The Greek New Testament uses the word μυστήριον (mystērion =
mystery) to refer to matters that God once hid but now has revealed through the gospel (e.g.,
Rom 16:25-26; Eph 3:3-13; Col 1:24-27). The early church applied this term to its administration
of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, considering them to reveal a mystery of divine grace. When
the Greek Bible was translated into Latin, μυστήριον (mystērion) became sacramentum, which
could refer to a rite or an oath of allegiance. By the fifth century, Augustine’s definition of
sacrament as an outward and visible sign of an inward and invisible grace became decisive. The
church considered these two rites as sacred signs designed by God to indicate a divine reality, a
reality that was included in and caused by the signs themselves.
The name ordinance became associated with these two rites when Protestant churches made a
decisive break with the Roman Catholic Church. Included in the protest of some Protestants was
a rejection of the name sacrament; it had too many connotations associated with Catholic
theology and practice of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. In its place these Protestant churches
put the name ordinance, signifying that these rites were ordained, or instituted, by Christ himself.
Today, the Roman Catholic Church, Orthodox churches, and many Protestant churches refer to
these rites as sacraments, while some Protestant churches call them ordinances. Per the title of
this article, the word ordinance will be used, but without prejudice for the term sacrament.
Number of Ordinances
How many ordinances are there? As before, the answer to this question reveals a deep division
among the three traditions of Christendom. The Catholic Church has seven sacraments: Baptism,
Confirmation, the Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.
While embracing these seven “major mysteries,” Orthodox churches do not have a definite
number of sacraments and include other events of blessing, service, prayer, song, procession, and
more that render tangible the presence of God. Protestant churches have two: baptism and the
Lord’s Supper.
In terms of the historical development of this difference in number, Augustine’s idea of a
sacrament as a visible sign and cause of an invisible grace became the standard definition for the
church. Much later (~1150), theologian Peter Lombard enumerated the seven sacraments.
Subsequent comments (e.g., Thomas Aquinas [1225-1274], Council of Florence [1431-1449])
refined Lombard’s treatment but maintained the number. The Council of Trent officially
proclaimed these seven, adding that “if anyone says … any one of these seven is not truly and
properly a sacrament, let him be anathema [cursed]” (7th session [1547], Decree Concerning the
Sacraments). This condemnation, along with others decreed by Trent, underscores that a major
difference introduced by the Reformation had to do with the number—and, to be treated next, the
nature—of sacraments.
Indeed, it was the conviction of Protestant churches that the church should celebrate only two
sacraments. The reason for this reduction in number was that Christ ordained only two rites with
their accompanying tangible signs. Jesus commanded his disciples to “make disciples of all the
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt
28:19). Thus, Christ ordained baptism, with the accompanying sign of water, as a rite that the
church must observe. At his last supper, Jesus instituted the Lord’s Supper: “Now as they were
eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said,
‘Take, eat; this is my body.’ And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to
them, saying, ‘Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out
for many for the forgiveness of sins’” (Matt 26:26–28). Thus, Christ ordained the Lord’s Supper,
with the accompanying signs of bread and wine, as a rite that the church must observe.
Accordingly, a major division plagues the churches affiliated with the three branches of
Christianity in terms of the number of the ordinances. But there is further disagreement still.
Nature of the Ordinances
What is the nature of the ordinances? The answer to this question unveils yet another division
among churches. There are three general answers:
1. The sacraments infuse grace ex opere operato (by their administration) into the people of
God. His grace is transmitted through the sacraments as they are administered, and that
grace effects the transformation of the character of their recipients, whose participation in
the sacraments is necessary for salvation.
2. The sacraments are means of grace by which God confers the benefits of salvation to his
people. Rather than infusing grace, the sacraments, in conjunction with the Word of God,
offer a promise of divine blessing (e.g., sanctification) to their recipients, who appropriate
the promise by faith.
3. The ordinances symbolize the faith and obedience of the people of God. Rather than
transmitting grace or serving as means of grace, the ordinances are opportunities for their
recipients to express their allegiance to Christ.
To fully appreciate the nature of the Protestant ordinances, each one must be considered.
Baptism
In the early church, baptism by immersion was administered to people who grasped the gospel,
repented of their sins, and believed in Jesus Christ for salvation (e.g., Acts 2:37-41). An
important development was the baptism of infants. Some leaders denounced the practice, while
others traced its origin to the apostles. Eventually, the church found a parallel between the
baptism of infants and the Old Testament rite of circumcision. The church also linked infant
baptism to the removal of original sin. By the fifth century, infant baptism became the official
practice of the church.
Today, the ordinance of baptism is administered to infants (paedobaptism; Greek paidea = child)
and to believing adults (credobaptism; Greek credo = belief). These two views of the recipients
of baptism express different views of its nature.
Infant Baptism
Discussion of the nature of paedobaptism falls under two categories. The first category is
exemplified by Roman Catholicism. As the first of the seven sacraments, baptism cleanses its
recipients from original sin, regenerates then, and incorporates them into the Catholic Church.
Effective ex opere operato (by administering the sacrament), baptism infuses grace and thereby
begins the lifelong process of transforming the character of the Catholic faithful. Cooperating
with this grace, Catholics become progressively more and more justified and, engaging in good
works, are enabled to merit eternal life. Importantly, baptismal regeneration means that baptized
infants are saved; indeed, this sacrament is necessary for salvation.
The second category of infant baptism is exemplified by (historical) Reformed Protestantism.
Baptism is a means of grace by which God offers a promise to its recipients: they will thereby
become partakers of the salvation of which baptism is the divinely appointed sign and seal. By
being baptized, infants are not saved. Rather, they are incorporated into the covenant community
in which they will hear the gospel and, as heirs of the covenant promise, will embrace the grace
of God by faith for salvation. Moreover, the sacrament is not effective ex opere operato but
depends on the Word and the Spirit for its validity.
Believer’s Baptism
According to credobaptism, baptism is an ordinance instituted by Christ for people who offer a
credible profession of faith in him and who, in obedience to his command, are baptized. In most
cases, the mode of baptism is immersion: people are completely lowered under the water and
brought up out of the water. Discussion of the nature of credobaptism falls under two categories.
The first category is exemplified by Southern Baptists. Baptism “is an act of obedience
symbolizing the believer’s faith in a crucified, buried, and risen Savior, the believer’s death to
sin, the burial of the old life, and the resurrection to walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus”
(Baptist Faith and Message 2000). Accordingly, the nature of baptism is a human act by which
faith in God’s provision of salvation is expressed. It is not salvific but testifies to salvation
already experienced.
The second category builds on this common view of the nature of baptism by expanding on its
meanings, as indicated in the New Testament. First, on the basis of Jesus’s command to baptize
“in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt 28:19), baptism
associates new believers with the triune God. Second, as noted above, immersing baptism vividly
portrays new believers’ identification with the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ (Rom 6:3-
5; Gal 3:26-28). A third meaning of baptism is cleansing from sin, in accordance with Peter’s
Pentecost message: “Repent and be baptized every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins” (Acts 2:38; cf. Act 22:16; Ezek 36:25).
Escape from divine judgment is a fourth meaning of baptism. Just as Noah and his family
escaped God’s judgment of the flood (the antitype), so also Christians escape from divine
judgment via baptism—the plunging under water as a type of death (1Pet 3:20-21). As a fifth
meaning, baptism symbolizes incorporation into the church. It is the initiatory rite, signaling new
believers’ intention to follow obediently and faithfully the mediator of the new covenant, Jesus
Christ, in new covenant community.
Lord’s Supper
The second ordinance to be discussed in terms of its nature is the Lord’s Supper, also referred to
as (Holy) Communion (1Cor 10:16-17), the Eucharist (Greek eucharistia = thanksgiving), the
breaking of bread (Matt 26:26; 1Cor 11:24), and other names. Scripture addresses this rite in
only two places: Jesus’s institution at his last supper (Matt 26:26-29 and parallels) and Paul’s
instructions in 1 Corinthians (10:14-22; 11:17-34). In the early church, only baptized believers in
proper relationship to Christ could participate in this ordinance, which was celebrated weekly.
In terms of the meaning of the Lord’s Supper, the early church held several views. Some saw it
as a sacrifice, linked to the prophecy of Malachi (1:10-11). As to the nature of this sacrifice,
some believed that the sacrifices are the bread and wine as fruits of divine creation, while others
held that the sacrifices are the actual body and blood of Christ. Others focused on the Lord’s
Supper as an act of commemoration. Still others considered it in strongly symbolic terms. The
early church also underscored several benefits of participation in the Lord’s Supper, including
release from death, nourishment, and sanctification.
Eventually, four positions on the nature of the Lord’s Supper developed, all of which continue to
be held today.
1. Transubstantiation is the Roman Catholic position, officially proclaimed in 1215. During
the administration of the sacrament of the Eucharist, the bread is transubstantiated—or
changed—into the body of Christ, and the wine into the blood of Christ, by the power of
God. As explained by Thomas Aquinas, transubstantiation is the change (trans) of
substance (that which makes something what it is). However, the accidents (the
characteristics that can be perceived by the senses) remain the same. As the sacrament of
the Eucharist is administered, though the bread still looks, smells, feels, and tastes like
bread, its substance has been changed into the body of Christ. Similarly, though the wine
still looks, smells, and tastes like wine, its substance has been changed into the blood of
Christ. All Protestant churches reject transubstantiation.
2. Consubstantiation, or sacramental union, is the Lutheran view. As developed by Martin
Luther (1483-1546), the Lord’s Supper is a last testament made by Christ as he was about
to die. In this promise he designated an inheritance—the forgiveness of sins—and
appointed its heirs—all those who believe in his promise. Moreover, during the
administration of the sacrament, Christ is truly present in both his deity and humanity,
“in, with, and under” the substance of the bread and wine. Because Christ’s body is
everywhere present, and in accordance with his words of institution (“this is my body”;
Matt 26:26), God brings about the presence of Christ in the Lord’s Supper.
3. Memorial is the view of many non-sacramentalist (e.g., Baptist) churches. As developed
by Huldrych Zwingli (1484-1531), this position is that the Lord’s Supper is a memorial
of Christ’s death. Being located in heaven, Christ’s body (and blood) cannot be present in
the sacrament. Moreover, Christ’s words of institution (“this is my body”; Matt 26:26)—
are figurative and cannot be taken literally. Accordingly, the memorial view stands
against both transubstantiation and consubstantiation. Most importantly, Jesus
commanded, “Do this in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19; 1Cor 11:24); thus, the Lord’s
Supper is a memorial celebration by which the church remembers what Christ did on the
cross to accomplish salvation.
4. Spiritual presence is the view of many Reformed Protestant churches (e.g., Presbyterian;
Christian Reformed). Moving beyond the memorial view, John Calvin (1509-1564)
maintained that the bread and wine are certainly symbols, but they are not empty
symbols: they render what they symbolize. By his spiritual presence, Christ presents
himself and his saving benefits through these means of grace. How Christ can be located
in heaven and spiritually present in the Lord’s Supper is ultimately a mystery. But Calvin
invoked the power of the Holy Spirit to unite Christ in heaven with the church on earth.
The benefits of this sacrament include participation with Christ, church unity, and
nourishment toward sanctification.
Conclusion
Though the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox churches, and Protestant churches
administer baptism and the Lord’s Supper, these common celebrations conceal a great division
among the three branches. They differ widely as to the terminology (sacraments or ordinances),
number (seven, seven plus others, two), and nature (paedobaptism, credobaptism,
transubstantiation, consubstantiation, memorial view, spiritual presence view) of these rites.
Further Reading
John H. Armstrong, ed., Understanding Four Views on Baptism (Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2007)
David F. Wright, ed., Baptism: Three Views (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2009)
Everett Ferguson, Baptism in the Early Church: History, Theology, and Liturgy in the
First Five Centuries (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009)
John H. Armstrong, ed., Understanding Four Views on the Lord’s Supper (Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2007)
Gordon T. Smith, ed., The Lord’s Supper: Five Views (Downers Grove: InterVarsity
Press, 2008)
Howard Marshall, Last Supper and Lord’s Supper (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980)
“Protestantism: Rituals and Worship,” patheos.com
Kevin DeYoung, “A Brief Defense of Infant Baptism,” TGC blog
Sam Storms, “A Brief Defense of Believer’s Baptism,” Enjoying God blogpost
Dustin Crowe, “What Does It Mean to Remember Jesus in the Lord’s Supper?” TGC
(January 6, 2014)
R. C. Sproul, “The Battle for the Table,” Ligonier Ministries (November 1, 2006)
Students also viewed