1 / 10100%
Research Project: Final Draft Assignment
Joseph Marks
RLGN 301: Research and Writing for Religious Disciplines
September 30, 2024
1
It is generally accepted that the Gospel of John proclaims Jesus as Lord and God, One
with the Father. There are, however, those who challenge this view. Recently, Peter Nagel
(2019) pointed out that, “Jesus is not regarded as Theos in the Gospel of John”. He refutes the
classical understanding of the texts that Jesus is One with God. He does not regard both the
Logos of John 1:1-2 as references to Jesus. Theological views of Jesus in John are often
understood as that he is One with God.1 Early in the twentieth century, scholars such as Wilhelm
Bousset marginalized such a high confession of Jesus as “Lord and God” with the argument that
such confessions were made in the latter part of the first century among Gentile Christians who
had been polytheists confessing many gods and many lords before confessing Jesus as Lord and
God. Larry Hurtado, among other scholars in the latter part of the twentieth century, dismantled
this argument because the author of John is clearly a Jew writing to monotheistic Jewish
Christians for whom there is only one Lord and God, namely, Yahweh.2 Jesus's "I am"
statements identify Him as God and connect to Old Testament themes.
An appropriate starting point for this study is the major confession in John by Thomas in
John 20:28 noted above: Άκου, Ισραήλ, ο Κύριος ο Θεός μας, ο Κύριος είναι έ (“my Lord and
my God”). Two things are striking in this confession. First, it is a distinct confession of Jesus’
divine identity from the more typical confession found in the Synoptic Gospels where Jesus is
confessed to be “the Christ” by Jews like Peter (Matt 16:16; Mark 8:29; Luke 9:20) and “the Son
of God” by Gentiles like the centurion (Matt 27:54; Mark 15:39). The evangelist John is familiar
with this more traditional confession and includes both “Christ” and “Son of God” in his
narrative: in the list of messianic titles spoken by John the Baptist, Andrew, and Nathanael after
they have encountered Jesus (John 1:34, 41, 49); in Martha’s confession before the raising of
1 Pieter Verster, “The Divinity of Christ in the Gospel of John,” Pharos Journal of Theology, no. 104(5)
(November 2023), doi:10.46222/pharosjot.104.58.
2 Charles A Gieschen, “The YHWH Christology of the Gospel of John,” Concordia Theological Quarterly,
85 No 1 Jan 2021, p 3-22, January 1, 2021.
2
Lazarus (John 11:27); and also in the summary of the purpose of his Gospel (John 31). This
confession—especially Jesus as “the Son of God”—which is featured so prominently in the
Synoptic Gospels, however, plays a relatively minor role in John’s Gospel. The climactic
confessions in this Gospel are by Peter (“You are the Holy One of God” in John 6:69) and
Thomas (“my Lord and my God” in John 20:28). In the Gospel of John, Jesus is primarily “the
Son,” which means he is also “Lord and God” just as the Father is also “Lord and God.”3
The second striking feature of this confession Is that it echoes the Shema’ confessed daily
by pious Jews Άκου, Ισραήλ, ο Κύριος ο Θεός μας, ο Κύριος είναι ένας Hear, O Israel, the
LORD our God, the LORD is one,” Deut. 6:4). For the Scripture states, “Listen, O Israel!
The^Lord^is our God, the^Lord^alone” (Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Deut. 6:4). It must
be emphasized that the Divine Name Hin? (Yahweh) is used twice here in the Hebrew text, along
with the title For a Jew to use the language: Άκου, Ισραήλ, ο Κύριος ο Θεός μας, ο Κύριος είναι
ένα for Jesus is typically to confess Jesus as Yahweh.4
The Fourth Gospel shows the stark contrast of response between true belief and rejection
of truth, between the kingdoms of light and darkness. In John’s Gospel, knowing this “Word”
that “became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14) is more than mental assent—rather, it is a
knowing trust that leads to greater life in and with God.5 For the Scripture states, “So the Word
became human and made his home among us. He was full of unfailing love and faithfulness. And
we have seen his glory, the glory of the Father’s one and only Son” (Holy Bible, New Living
Translation, John 1:14). Differences, however, exist among those who emphasize that an early
high Christology is being reflected in the Gospel of John. For example, Richard Bauckham
3 “Charles A Gieschen, “The YHWH Christology of the Gospel of John,” Concordia Theological
Quarterly, 85 No 1 Jan 2021, p 3-22, January 1, 2021.
4 Ibid.
5 Cara L. T. Murphy, “John,” in Approaching the New Testament: A Guide for Students (Nashville, TN:
B&H Academic, 2022), 74.
3
argues, “that writers like John are seeking to identify Jesus within the mystery of the one God
Yahweh, so they have a Divine Identity Christology that includes Jesus within the mystery of
Yahweh.”
Unique to John’s Gospel is Jesus’s use of the I AM statements, drawing his audience
toward Old Testament parallels of Yahweh’s self-naming in Ex. 3:14, Jesus aligns himself with
this same divine nature. For the Scripture states, “God replied to Moses, “I am who I am. Say
this to the people of Israel: “I AM”^has sent me to you” (Holy Bible, New Living Translation,
Exodus 3:14).
In John, we see Jesus with “I am,” (4:26; 8:24, 28, 58; 13:13, 19; 18:5–6, 8), and seven
more times he combines this declaration with a predicate-adjective qualifier: “I am the bread of
life” (6:35), “I am the light of the world” (8:12; 9:5), “I am the gate” (10:9), “I am the good
shepherd” (10:11, 14), “I am the resurrection and the life” (11:25), “I am the way, the truth, and
the life” (14:6), and “I am the vine” (15:5). These statements invite the modern reader into a
reflection of how they are walking in discipleship with Jesus, the great I AM, who through his
incarnation has become “flesh and dwelt among us” (1:14).6 Where the synoptic gospels of
Matthew, Mark and Luke are detailed testimonies of the facts surrounding Jesus' ministry,
John concentrates on the theology surrounding those events. This may make it the most
important book ever written. It tells who Jesus is, what He did on the cross, how He can be
known personally, and how a person can receive eternal life through Him.7
Jesus’ claim of being the Way, the Truth, and the Life in John 14:6 point directly to His
deity and has direct correlation to the Old Testament. This statement of fact by Jesus is a
6 Cara L. T. Murphy, “John,” in Approaching the New Testament: A Guide for Students (Nashville, TN:
B&H Academic, 2022), 75.
7 John W Carter, “The Prolegomena of the Fourth Gospel: Jesus, LORD and YAHWEH.,” Journal of
Biblical Theology, no. 6 (January 2023).
4
cumulative proclamation of all seven “I Am” statements in John’s Gospel: Bread of Life, Light
of the World, the Door/Gate, the Good Shepherd, the Resurrection, and the True Vine. There is
no shortage of self-references made by Jesus claiming to be the “I am.”
Before identifying the “I” in all these statements, the significance of “I Am (egô eimi)”
needs to be examined. The use of “egô eimi” by Jesus shows its significance with both the
Jewish scriptures and the Septuagint. It has been identified that, “It is now generally recognized
that egô eimi serves as a form of divine self-identification in several places within the
Septuagint, especially in those sections of Isaiah associated with the Babylonian diaspora.”8 Such
examples include Isaiah 43:10, “…so that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I
am He,” Isaiah 51:12a, “I, even I, am He who comforts you,” and Isaiah 52:6, “…therefore they
shall know in that day that I am He who speaks: ‘behold, it is I.’” Even more indicative is, “the
occasion when Yahweh offers this definitive self-designation to Moses as divine authorization
for his rescue mission: ‘I am who I am [egô eimi ho ôn]’ (Exodus 3:14).”9 It is not by
happenstance Jesus uses the same phrase in the New Testament claiming to be the “I Am” as
Yahweh does in the Old Testament Septuagint. There is deliberate reasoning to the words Jesus
spoke and John captured in his Gospel.
Additionally, Jesus’ baptism, recorded by John, has profound correlation to Yahweh and
the Old Testament scripture in Exodus. Though Jesus’ baptism is not explicitly defined in John’s
Gospel, Wallis states, “it clearly identifies Jesus’ baptism as the definitive moment in his
spiritual transformation with the emergence of a filial consciousness, a sense of sonship, in line
with the Synoptics.”10 It is also highly recognized among scholars and theologians that Jesus’s
baptism marked the beginning of Jesus’ ministry on earth and a transformation in spirit as
8 Ian Wallis, “Difficult Text: John 14.6 – Is Jesus the Only Way?”, Theology 124, no. 5 (September 2021):
358–64, doi:10.1177/0040571x211043174.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
5
mentioned by Wallis. Evidence supporting such a claim is, “found in Yahweh’s indwelling of the
Tabernacle or tent of witness as narrated in the second half of the book of Exodus.”11 First,
understand notice the resemblance from John 1:14. For the Scripture states, “And the
Word^became^flesh and dwelt among us, and^we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only
begotten of the Father,^full of grace and truth” (Holy Bible, New King James Version, John
1:14). Second, notice how Yahweh’s presence does not indwell the Tabernacle until after
construction and the Tabernacle was consecrated. In Exodus 25:8 God calls Moses to begin
building the temple and told Moses, “And let them make me a sanctuary; that I may dwell among
them” (NKJV). However, it is not until Exodus 40:9, when the temple is anointed with oil and
consecrated, that God came to dwell in the temple amongst them. Just as the temple was
consecrated then God dwelt amongst them, so was Jesus baptized (consecrated) and anointed
then the Holy Spirit came down like a dove and rested upon Jesus.
John’s main purpose is stated near the end of his Gospel, rounding out his narrative
pointing out that Jesus is, in fact, the Christ, He is also the Son of God, and those who believe in
Him will have life. Jesus’s divinity is evident and pronounced throughout John’s Gospel, and
“Nowhere is this more evident than in the ‘I AM’ statements of Jesus.”12 In these statements,
Jesus is not simply proclaiming His divinity, rather, He is equating Himself with Yahweh. He is
putting Himself on a level playing field as Elohim, the creator of the universe. These
proclamations by Jesus, “give reference to the names of God given to Moses in the Old
Testament” and “would have been clear statements of divinity to the Jews of Jesus’ day.13 This
deistic, self-proclamation is made evident by John 8:58-59. For the Scripture states, “Jesus said
to them,^“Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was,^I AM.” So^they picked up stones to
11 Ibid.
12 Fr Vasilios Avramidis. “I AM: Jesus’ Claim to be Jehovah the God of the Israelites in the Old
Testament.” Saint Elias School of Orthodox Theology, October 23,2010:2.
13 Ibid,
6
throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple” (Holy Bible, English Standard
Version, John 8:58-59). Which is followed in verse fifty-nine by the crowd of Jews Jesus is
speaking to picking up stones to stone Him. Jesus’ proclamation of being God, the “I AM,” was
clear to the Jews of His day.
However, Jesus’ “I Am” statements are not merely supported on their own. According to
Father Avramidis, “They not only reference the names of God in the Old Testament and ascribe
them to Jesus, but they are often accompanied by some divine revelation, or miracle, as in the
case of the feeding of the five thousand prior to Jesus declaring, “I AM the Bread of Life.”14
Jesus miraculously feeds five thousand people with only two fish and five loaves of bread, giving
“life” through sustenance and food. He then declares that He is the Bread of Life, signifying that
it is through Himself that one finds sustaining life. John’s Gospel narrates the Christology of
Jesus more abundantly than the other Synoptic Gospels. John, “chooses events from Jesus’ life
that best demonstrate that He is God, the Messiah foretold by the prophets, the New Moses that
was prophesied in Deuteronomy chapter eighteen.”15 Clearly, Jesus’ declaration of being the
Bread of Life paired with the miracle of feeding the five thousand wasn’t just for show, rather, it
was solidifying Jesus’ deity as being God and the promised Messiah from Old Testament
Scripture.
Compared to the other three Synoptic Gospels, John begins his account of Jesus from the
very beginning. Where Mark began his Gospel when Jesus was thirty years of age, Matthew
went further to Jesus’ birth and even used genealogy tracing Jesus’ roots back to Abraham. Then,
in Luke’s Gospel, he took it a step further and took Jesus’ title as the Son of Man and used
genealogy to trace His roots back to Adam, to the creation story. However, John introduces Jesus
14 Ibid.
15 David Pawson. Unlocking the Bible: A Unique Overview of the Whole Bible. Rest True Potential
Publishing, Inc., 2007, 552.
7
by, “emphasizing that Jesus existed before creation.”16 John starts his Gospel by taking the words
from Genesis 1:1, “as the basis for his opening to the Gospel: ‘In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”17
Now, to understand the significance to the opening line of Johns’ Gospel, one must
understand some of the etymology behind the title John bestowed upon Jesus: The Logos
(Word). They etymology of the word “logos” definitively identifies Jesus’ deity, and the divine
Logos Johns speaks of. The historical backdrop to “logos” helps to understand the root definition
and understanding behind John’s use of it in entitling Jesus as the Logos. Between Heraclitus and
the Septuagint, it is clear why John bestowed “Logos” to Jesus Christ as the “reason why.”
According to David Pawson, about six hundred years before John’s Gospel written in
Ephesus, there lived a man by the name of Heraclitus, who was, “acknowledged as the founder
of science.”18 He believed in inquiring about the science of the natural world, asking why things
were the way they were? He even, “looked for patterns or ‘laws’ to see if he could deduce some
logic behind the operation of the natural world.”19 Heraclitus used logos to stand for, “the
purpose behind what took place.”20 When he would look to life (bios), he would look for the
logos of life; he did the same with weather (meteor).This concept is plainly seen in our world
today in different fields of study such as biology, psychology, meteorology, geology, sociology,
etc.21
16 David Pawson. Unlocking the Bible: A Unique Overview of the Whole Bible. Rest True Potential
Publishing, Inc., 2007, 552.
17 David Pawson. Unlocking the Bible: A Unique Overview of the Whole Bible. Rest True Potential
Publishing, Inc., 2007, 552.
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid.
20 Ibid,
21 Ibid.
8
With this line of thought and understanding of logos, John realized that “Jesus is the
ultimate reason ‘why’ everything happened.”22 With this, John took this idea and entitled Jesus as
the Logos, the Word. John realized Jesus is the “reason why” behind everything. The world was
made for Him. He was the Logos before anything or one existed. John understood Jesus is why
anyone is even here. It will all be summed up in Jesus; He is the “reason why.”
In conclusion, it is very clear how Jesus is proclaimed as Lord and God, One with the
Father. In the Gospel of John, John provides sufficient evidence how Jesus's "I am" statements
identify Him as God and connect to Old Testament themes.
22 Ibid.
9
Bibliography
Anderson, Paul N. “Aspects of Historicity in the Fourth Gospel:” John, Jesus, and History,
Volume 2(2006): 379–386.
Avramidis, Fr Vasilios. “I AM: Jesus’ Claim to be Jehovah the God of the Israelites in the Old
Testament.” Sait Elias School of Orthodox Theology (October 23, 2010).
Carter, John W. “The Prolegomena of the Fourth Gospel: Jesus, LORD and YAHWEH.” Journal
of Biblical Theology, no. 6 (January 2023).
Costa, Tony. “The Use of Πιστεύω in the Gospel of John: Some Considerations on Meaning and
Issues of Consistency and Ambiguity.” Conspectus : The Journal of the South African
Theological Seminary 32, no. 1 (October 2021): 93–109.
doi:10.54725/conspectus.2021.2.5.
Erickson, Millard J., and L. Arnold Hustad. Introducing Christian Doctrine. 3rd ed. Grand
Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.
Gieschen, Charles A. “The YHWH Christology of the Gospel of John - Concordia Theological
Seminary’s Media Hub,” 2021. https://media.ctsfw.edu/Text/ViewDetails/19087.
Keener, Craig S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. 2nd ed. Downers
Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2014.
Macaskill, Grant. “Name Christology, Divine Aseity, and the I Am Sayings in the Fourth
Gospel.” Journal of Theological Interpretation 12, no. 2 (November 2018): 217–41.
doi:10.5325/jtheointe.12.2.0217.
McClendon, Adam, and John Beck Cartwright. Approaching the New Testament: A Guide for
Students. Nashville: B & H Academic, 2022.
Moser, J. David. “The Flesh of the Logos, Instrumentum Divinitatis: Retrieving an Ancient
Christological Doctrine.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 23, no. 3 (July
2021): 313–32. doi:10.1111/ijst.12509.
Wallis, Ian. “Difficult Text: John 14.6 – Is Jesus the Only Way?” Theology 124, no. 5
(September 2021): 358–64. doi:10.1177/0040571x211043174.
Students also viewed