A Letter to Dr. Martin Luther on the Epistle of James 2:14-26
Christine Y. Baker
NBST 845: General Epistles/Revelation
November 9, 2025
Grace and peace to you, Dr. Luther, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Few voices
have echoed through church history as powerfully as yours. Your conviction that we are justified
by faith alone has reignited the core of the gospel for generations to come. Because of your
faithfulness, countless believers now rest securely in the assurance that salvation depends not on
human effort, but on Christ’s finished work. For this, I am truly grateful.
It is with the same spirit of gratitude—and genuine respect—that I write regarding a letter
you found troubling: the Epistle of James. You once described it as lacking the substance of the
gospel and questioned its place among the New Testament writings. I understand why. The
language of James 2:14–26, with its emphasis that “faith without works is dead,” can seem to
challenge the very truth you worked so hard to defend. Yet I believe this passage, when read
carefully in its proper context, does not undermine sola fide—the doctrine that sinners are
declared righteous before God solely through faith in Christ, apart from any merit of their own—
but rather strengthens it.
James was not opposing faith; he was defending it. His goal was not to replace grace with
effort, but to demonstrate that true faith—faith that saves—cannot remain silent or inactive. It
moves, acts, and loves. His words do not contradict Paul’s gospel, but complement it, ensuring
believers do not twist grace into complacency.
My purpose in this letter is simple: to demonstrate that James 2:14–26, far from
contradicting justification by faith, aligns perfectly with the rest of the New Testament. When
properly understood, James’s teaching reflects the same living faith you proclaimed—a faith that
receives salvation as a gift and then produces fruit through obedience. It is this living faith,
rooted in grace and demonstrated by love, that unites both James and Paul under the same gospel
message.
Clarifying the Apparent Tension Between James and Paul
Dr. Luther, your resistance to the Epistle of James did not stem from a disregard for
Scripture but from your desire to defend the purity of the gospel. After rediscovering the
liberating truth that sinners are justified solely by faith in Christ, you naturally became cautious
of anything that could threaten that grace-based message. In opposing the legalism of
latemedieval theology, James’s words about faith and works sounded like they reflected the very
system you aimed to reform.
When you read James’s statement that “a person is justified by works and not by faith
alone” (2:24), it probably sounded alarmingly similar to the idea that human merit contributes to
salvation. Your concern was that such teaching could obscure the glory of Christ’s finished work
and mislead believers into trusting their own actions. Paul, however, had made it clear that “by
works of the law no human being will be justified in His sight” (Rom. 3:20) and that “we hold
that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law” (Rom. 3:28).
However, the apparent conflict between James and Paul stems more from context than
from contradiction. Each writer targets a different error in the life of faith. Paul’s argument
opposes legalism—the attempt to earn God’s favor through the law—while James contends with
antinomianism—the presumption that belief without obedience suffices for salvation.
Moo explains that James is not contradicting Paul’s doctrine of justification by faith but
clarifying what true faith involves: a faith that naturally produces righteous deeds.1 Therefore,
their emphases differ, but their theology remains consistent—faith saves, yet the faith that saves
is never passive.
Furthermore, the Greek verb dikaioō (“justify” or “declare righteous”) has a nuance that
illuminates their harmony. Paul employs it in a forensic sense—God’s declaration of
righteousness by faith alone—whereas James uses it demonstratively, describing faith’s visible
vindication through works.2 In this light, Abraham’s obedience in offering Isaac (2:21) does not
earn justification, but rather reveals the living faith already credited to him (Gen. 15:6).
Even your own words confirm this truth. You once wrote that “faith is a living, busy,
active, mighty thing” that “cannot help doing good works incessantly.”3 Such faith, as both you
and James affirm, cannot stay unproductive. The two apostles, therefore, are not opponents but
allies—one defending the foundation of salvation, the other its fruit. Together, they present a
unified gospel of grace that both redeems and transforms, showing faith not as a static belief but
1 Douglas J. Moo, The Letter of James, Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,
2000), 125.
2 Luke Timothy Johnson, The Letter of James, Anchor Bible 37A (New York: Doubleday, 1995), 241–42.
3 Martin Luther, Preface to the Epistle to the Romans (1522), in Luther’s Works, vol. 35, ed. E. Theodore
Bachmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1960), 370.
as a living power that acts. It is within this framework that James’s reasoning in 2:14–26
deserves closer attention, for there he outlines what such living faith looks like in action.
Exposition of James 2:14–26
Dr. Luther, the argument James presents in 2:14–26 cannot be understood without
considering what comes before and after. The previous section (2:1–13) warns against favoritism
within the community of faith, highlighting the inconsistency of honoring the wealthy while
ignoring the poor. James emphasizes that such behavior breaks the “royal law” of love (2:8) and
is judged by the “law of liberty” (2:12). His concern in these verses is that favoritism shows a
fractured faith—a faith that claims mercy but practices discrimination. This moral inconsistency
underpins the subsequent argument: faith that does not produce merciful actions is lifeless.
Therefore, verses 14–26 deepen the warning in 2:1–13 by showing that true faith cannot exist
alongside spiritual laziness or moral contradiction.
It is within this framework that we observe James’s main point: genuine faith is never
passive but shows its reality through obedience and compassion. He starts with a
thoughtprovoking question: “What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does
not have works? Can that faith save him?” (2:14). In this context, the term pistis (πίστις, “faith”)
means more than just intellectual agreement; it refers to relational trust and loyalty to God.
Conversely, erga (ἔργα, “works”) indicates acts of obedience that demonstrate allegiance to the
covenant. James’s wording intentionally highlights the claim to faith (“if someone says he has
faith”), revealing the emptiness of a verbal confession without action. As Davids notes, James
challenges not the idea of faith itself but the type of faith that does not lead to action.4 For James,
belief that results in no obedience is not saving faith but a lifeless imitation of it.
In verses 15–17, he gives a clear example: a brother or sister lacking food and clothing.
To speak words of blessing without offering practical help, James argues, is as empty as claiming
faith without actions. Just as compassion without action leaves the body unfed, so faith without
obedience leaves the soul unchanged. Moo points out that this analogy emphasizes James’s belief
that “a profession of faith that lacks practical expression is worthless.”5 Here, erga becomes the
necessary outward sign of pistis—not a rival to faith but its external expression.
Faith, therefore, is not just spoken but shown; it must be reflected in concrete acts of love.
The dialogue in verses 18–20 sharpens the argument: “Show me your faith apart from
your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.” The repetition of pistis and erga
throughout this dialogue highlights their inseparable relationship. James insists that authentic
faith (pistis alēthinē) is visible only through faithful deeds (erga agatha). Even demons, he
warns, possess intellectual belief, “you believe that God is one” (2:19), yet their knowledge
produces fear rather than obedience. Faith that remains theoretical may acknowledge truth but
lacks the transformation that marks the redeemed life.
To emphasize his point, James cites two Old Testament figures—Abraham and Rahab
—whose actions demonstrated their trust in God. Abraham’s offering of Isaac (2:21–24)
illustrates how faith is perfected (teleioō, τελειόω, “to bring to completion” or “to perfect”)
through obedience. This act did not earn justification but completed the faith previously credited
to him as righteousness (Gen. 15:6). James clarifies this using the verb dikaioō (δικαιόω, “to
justify” or “to declare righteous”), which in his context means the vindication of authentic faith
4 Peter H. Davids, The Epistle of James: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New International Greek
Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1982), 121. 5 Moo, The Letter of James, 130.
by works. Therefore, Abraham’s obedience revealed the faith already alive within him. As
Johnson notes, Abraham’s actions “brought faith to its intended goal,” showing that faith and
works are not enemies but partners in God’s redemptive plan.5 Rahab, likewise, exemplifies the
vitality of faith by welcoming the Israelite spies and sending them out safely (2:25). Her
obedience, like Abraham’s, stems from trust rather than reliance on herself, proving that faith
(pistis) is expressed through courageous deeds (erga). By comparing the patriarch and the
prostitute, James demonstrates that the principle of active faith applies universally: both were
declared righteous because their deeds proved their belief was genuine.
The conclusion of this chapter features a powerful metaphor from James: “For as the
body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead” (2:26). The image is
simple—a corpse, outwardly whole but inwardly lifeless. In this final statement, James highlights
that faith without works isn't just weak but virtually nonexistent, because it lacks the Spirit’s
essential presence.6 Therefore, his main message in this passage isn’t to add works to faith but to
show the true nature of genuine faith—a faith that acts, loves, and obeys because it is alive.
James’s argument, therefore, does not end with a call for active faith. It naturally
transitions into his next chapter (3:1–12), where he warns that genuine faith must also influence
speech. Just as works demonstrate true faith, words reveal the integrity of the heart. The shift
from faith and deeds to speech and discipline highlights James’s consistent focus on a unified life
—a faith fully expressed through actions, compassion, and confession. This seamless moral and
theological flow within the letter reflects the same coherence seen throughout the New
Testament, which I now turn to.
5 Johnson, Letter of James, 243.
6 Johnson, Letter of James, 245.
Faith and Works in Harmony: The Unified Witness of the New Testament
Dr. Luther, the harmony between faith and works that James emphasizes does not stand
alone but echoes throughout the New Testament. Far from presenting a conflicting gospel,
James’s teaching reflects the message of Jesus and the theology of Paul, Peter, John, and the
writer of Hebrews. When properly understood, the apostolic witness speaks with a unified voice:
genuine faith is shown through obedience and love.
Our Lord Himself first expressed this truth. In the Sermon on the Mount, He declared
that “every healthy tree bears good fruit” (Matt. 7:17) and warned that not everyone who says
“Lord, Lord” will enter the kingdom, but only those who do the will of the Father (Matt. 7:21).
Likewise, He commanded His disciples to let their light shine before others “so that they may see
your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 5:16). Jesus thus lays
the foundation for James’s argument: faith that is alive must show itself in erga agatha (ἔργα
ἀγαθά, “good works”). These deeds are not the cause of salvation but the natural fruit of
participation in the life of God.
Paul’s writings also affirm this truth. While he insists that justification (dikaiōsis) is by
grace through faith alone, he equally maintains that believers are “created in Christ Jesus for
good works” (Eph. 2:10). His statement that “faith works through love” (Gal. 5:6) echoes
James’s conviction that faith (pistis) and works (erga) are inseparable aspects of the redeemed
life. Paul also reminds believers that “it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before
God, but the doers of the law who will be justified” (Rom. 2:13). Far from opposing James, Paul
complements him by showing that true faith naturally manifests itself in a life guided by
obedience and grace.
The writer of Hebrews likewise presents faith as active trust, showcasing a lineage of
saints who demonstrated their belief through decisive action. “By faith Abraham offered up
Isaac,” and “by faith Rahab welcomed the spies” (Heb. 11:17, 31)—the same examples James
uses to illustrate faith’s maturity. Peter encourages believers to “keep your conduct among the
Gentiles honorable, so that... they may see your good deeds and glorify God” (1 Pet. 2:12), while
John warns that love must not remain in “word or talk but in deed and in truth” (1 John 3:18).
Throughout these witnesses, faith is never a private conviction but a public reality, visible
through a transformed life.
Taken together, these passages reveal that James’s message is not an isolated
theological point but a vital part of the New Testament’s unified message. His declaration that
“faith without works is dead” (2:26) reflects the moral and spiritual vision of the entire apostolic
witness: faith that saves is faith that acts. The gospel preached throughout the New Testament is
one of integrated grace—a salvation that both declares righteousness and produces it. James,
therefore, is not opposed to Paul, but alongside him, emphasizing that authentic faith is never
idle, for it lives through love.
The Canonical and Pastoral Significance of James
Dr. Luther, when the Epistle of James is read within the larger witness of the New
Testament, its lasting value becomes clear. It offers not a competing theology but a corrective
perspective—a necessary counterpart that keeps the gospel from being distorted. Within the
canon, James serves as the Spirit’s reminder that the grace that saves also sanctifies, and that
faith, once justified, must be demonstrated through righteous living. His voice ensures that the
church’s confession of Christ remains connected to the character of Christ.
Canonically, James emphasizes the unity of Scripture by grounding theology in action.
His focus on the visible expression of faith connects the wisdom tradition of the Old Testament
with the moral teachings of the New Testament. The “law of liberty” (1:25; 2:12) echoes the
covenant language of Deuteronomy and is fulfilled in Christ’s command to love God and
neighbor (Matt. 22:37–40). Through this continuity, James links the testaments, showing that
grace does not eliminate obedience but renews it under the new covenant. His epistle thus roots
Christian ethics in the same divine wisdom that underpinned Israel’s faithfulness and now guides
the redeemed community.
Pastorally, James addresses the ongoing danger of nominal faith—believing without
transformation. He speaks to a church tempted by favoritism, worldliness, and careless words,
urging believers toward integrity and mercy. His exhortations remind believers that spiritual
maturity (teleiōtēs, τελειότης) is not just about knowledge but about actions that show divine
compassion. Through James’s perspective, the believer understands that faith is not just an
abstract agreement but a lived relationship—a continuous alignment of the heart and hands with
the Word of God.
For the contemporary church, this message remains essential. In an age focused on
convenience and confession without cost, James’s words reveal the inadequacy of a faith that
simply agrees with truth but fails to act on it. His letter urges God's people to a life of
consistency, where belief and action, mercy and justice, conviction and compassion work
together. It is this integration that safeguards the doctrine of justification by faith from slipping
into moral complacency. Faith that saves must also be faith that serves.
In closing, Dr. Luther, the Epistle of James rightly holds its place within the New
Testament canon. It does not weaken the gospel you so bravely defended; it strengthens it. By
insisting that living faith must act, James ensures that the grace proclaimed by Paul does not
become an excuse for apathy but a call to holiness. In this way, his teaching safeguards the true
meaning of sola fide—faith alone that justifies, yet never remains alone, for it is accompanied by
works born of love. His message is not straw but steel—a refining word that bolsters the
believer’s faith and sharpens the church’s witness. In his wisdom, God has joined James’s voice
to Paul’s, that together they might teach the fullness of the gospel: a faith that justifies,
transforms, and endures.
May this understanding inspire a renewed appreciation for the letter you once questioned.
Its call to sincere obedience contains the same gospel you preach: Christ alone as Savior, grace
alone as the source of life, and faith alone as the means of receiving it.
Yours in the fellowship of Christ and in gratitude for your devotion to His Word,
A fellow servant of the gospel.