1 / 86100%
Autoregressive Processes of Order 1
Formal Definition of (𝐵)−1
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Substitute 𝐵 for 𝑧 to formally define (𝐵)−1
Let 𝜖𝑖= 0 for 𝑖 𝑠
Key equation: 𝑋 = (𝐵)−1𝜖, or more explicitly:
𝑋𝑛= 𝑟−𝑠
|𝑠|=𝑟𝑘≥0 𝜖𝑛−𝑘
Convergence of 𝑋𝑛
When all roots 𝑟𝑖 are outside the unit circle:
|𝑟−𝑠|
|𝑠|=𝑘 (1+𝜂)−𝑘 (𝑘+𝑝1
𝑝1 )(1+𝜂)𝑘 𝑘𝑝
(𝑝1)! as 𝑘
For weak* convergence of 𝑋𝑛, a sufficient condition on 𝜖𝑖 is:
𝑃{|𝜖𝑖|> 𝑡}
𝑡
1𝑑𝑡 <
If 𝜖𝑖 is integrable, 𝑋𝑛 converges in 𝐿1 as well
Behavior with Roots Inside Unit Disk
If 𝑟1 is the unique root with smallest modulus and |𝑟1|< 1:
Distribution of 𝑟1
𝑛𝑋𝑛 converges weakly* to a non-degenerate limit
𝑋𝑛 explodes at exponential rate
If smallest root is not unique, 𝑋𝑛 still explodes, essentially at an exponential rate
Classical Theory vs. Finite Sample Behavior
Classical theory focuses on location of roots of 𝜙 with respect to unit disk
Only considers behavior as time 𝑛
Key insight: This is only part of the overall behavior of these processes
Autoregressive Process of Order 1
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive if |𝑎|< 1
Autoregressive Process of Order 2
Defined as: 𝑋𝑖= 𝑎𝑋𝑖−1 +𝑏𝑋𝑖−2 +𝜖𝑖
Non-explosive conditions:
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 < 0: −𝑏 < 1
If 𝑎2+4𝑏 0: 𝑏+𝑎 < 1
Tail Behavior of Autocovariances (Order 1)
Define matrix 𝐴 such that 𝑋 = 𝐴𝜖
Empirical covariance: 𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)= ⟨𝐴𝑇𝐵𝑘𝐴𝜖,𝜖
Tail behavior depends on value of 𝑎 and parity of 𝑘
Key result: Theorem 11.2.1 gives equivalent expressions for 𝑃{𝑛𝛾𝑛(𝑘)> 𝑡} as 𝑡
Important observation: Odd and even autocovariances exhibit very different
decays when 𝑎 is negative
Students also viewed