1
Liberty University
Spring 2024 Geography Research Proposal Draft
"Geoscience's Role in Resolving Water Conservation and Rights Management Issues and
Disputes in California's Central Valley"
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Introduction
The I-5 corridor in California reveals a stark contrast between the urban metropolises of
the Bay Area and Los Angeles and California’s rural Central Valley (“The Valley”). The
agriculturally rich valley region, sparsely populated, has a long-running issue: The Valley
residents dispute with state officials over perceived favoritism accorded the much larger, more
densely populated metropolitan clusters, where policy over water conservation and particularly
water allocation apply. Billboards dot the landscape, erected by the activist group Families
Protecting the Valley (FPV), urging residents to voice their concerns to their local representatives
and state officials. A particularly contentious debate rages over official claims that agriculture
consumes 80% of the water allocations, a measure hotly disputed by residents as double the
accurate water distribution for residents, especially the farmers (Pope, 2019).
This scenario underscores the relevance and urgency of water conservation and rights
management research in areas with significant agricultural activity, like the Central Valley.
Water, an indispensable resource, often becomes a point of contention among local and even
global stakeholders vying for its control (Hossen et al., 2023). Water conservation involves
policies, strategies, and activities aimed at the sustainable management of freshwater sources.
In contrast, water rights are legal entitlements permitting water use from a specific source
2
allocated to relevant stakeholders (Pannu, 2012). The research delves into the intersection of
geoscience and water management, focusing on the increasing urgency of climate change (Ray
et al., 2020).
The study examines how geoscience can aid California’s Central Valley, covering 52,000 km²
where over 250 different crops are cultivated, address water demand challenges, and the
conflicts across competing stakeholders (both present and prospective) that often ensue. The
research objective is to expand and validate the recognition of geoscience as a discipline that
can help solve geophysical-based issues that engender mitigating and correlating stakeholder
disputes.
Background of the Problem
Geographic Perspective
California’s Central Valley has long faced stakeholder disputes, present and emerging,
over water conservation and rights management, including resource allocation disputes. The
region’s agricultural productivity thrives due to its hospitable environment, which fosters the
growth of abundant agricultural produce. However, this prosperity brings challenges,
particularly in the context of California’s unique water rights policy. The region grapples with
adopting best practices to reduce the likelihood of ongoing stakeholder disputes over access to
the region’s appealing natural resources. These disputes are otherwise prevalent due to the
region’s inviting natural characteristics (Badham et al., 2019; Giordano, 2014; Lautanen, 2023;
Sugg, 2018; Lautanen, 2023; Nelson & Burchfield, 2017). This region’s high demand for water
resources often competes with environmental needs. However, the advent of climate change is
expected to impact water management strategies significantly, necessitating a shift in approach
(Faunt, 2009; U.S. Geological Survey, n.d.). California has a unique policy hierarchical legal
3
structure for administering surface water rights, recognizing both riparian and appropriative
rights that have amplified confusion and exacerbated conflicts over water allocation in The
Valley (Nelson &
Burchfield, 2017).
Approaches over Time to Resolve Issues
The Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) of 1992 marked a significant shift in
water management, introducing policy packaging leading to changes in water markets, pricing,
and allocation determinations. This Act’s objective was to recalibrate a traditional power
alliance between California’s agricultural and urban sectors, translating into an evolving
approach to water conservation and rights management (Fischhendler & Zilberman, 2005).
Huang and London’s (2012) Cumulative Environmental Vulnerability Assessment (CEVA)
underscores geoscience’s role in providing scientific support for formulating policy mitigating
the long-term effects of stakeholder disputes over water rights in The Valley. The assessment
combines conjoining to contemplate environmental hazards and social vulnerability,
acknowledging the changing landscape of water conservation and rights management disputes
in the Central Valley.
Theoretical/Conceptual Model
The Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) modeling framework forms the
foundation of the research into geoscience’s role in resolving water conservation, allocation,
and rights management issues in California’s Central Valley. The IWRM framework fosters a
synchronized approach toward the development and management of water, land, and related
resources; its goal is to enhance economic and social welfare equitably while maintaining the
sustainability of indispensable ecosystems (Ako et al., 2009, pp. 871-872). IWRM provides a
4
holistic approach in this research, often involving stakeholder contribution to frame, study, and
address water conservation and rights management issues. It recognizes that water
management decisions are not isolated from the broader environmental and socioeconomic
context (Badham et al., 2019).
Critics argue that formalizing the IWRM framework may detract from its original purpose
of practical water management guidelines. At the same time, supporters believe that the
framework effectively shapes research assumptions, methods, and design and too aggressively
influences the selection of study areas, data collection methods, and analysis techniques
(Giordano & Shah, 2014, pp. 363-365). Other methods may be more practical for modeling
(Bertazzon & Martin, 2010). Nonetheless, the IWRM approach has great potential when
implemented in the California Central Valley, where water resources activism intertwines with
agricultural productivity, environmental sustainability, and social equity challenges beset by
sustained drought conditions. A crisis of contentious views across stakeholders must require
due diligence to reconcile (Ruiz et al., 2020).
Limitations and Delimitations of the Study
Limitations
1. Data Availability: The availability and accessibility of relevant data on water conservation
and rights management in the Central Valley could limit the scope of the research.
2. Temporal Scope: The research is confined to a specific period, which may not capture
the full dynamics of water conservation and rights management issues in the Central
Valley.
5
3. Geographical Scope: The focus on the Central Valley may limit the generalizability of the
research findings to other regions with different geographical, climatic, and
socioeconomic conditions.
Delimitations
1. Focus on Geoscience: The research is delimited to exploring the role of geoscience in
resolving water conservation and rights management issues, excluding other potentially
relevant disciplines.
2. Case Study Approach: The research is delimited to the Central Valley of California,
providing in-depth insights into this specific region but limiting the applicability of the
findings to other contexts.
Research Assumptions
1. Role of Geoscience: Geoscience is assumed to have a significant role in addressing water
conservation and rights management issues.
2. Applicability of the IWRM Model: The research assumes that the Integrated Water
Resources Management (IWRM) model is a suitable framework for studying water
management issues in the Central Valley.
3. Data Reliability: The research assumes that the data used in the study, whether primary
or secondary, is reliable and accurate.
4. Stakeholder Engagement: The research assumes that stakeholder engagement is crucial
for sustainable and equitable water management.
5. Climate Change Impact: The research assumes that climate change significantly impacts
water resources in the Central Valley.
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
6
Peer Reviewed Articles
Ako, A. A., Eyong, G. E., & Nkeng, G. E. (2009). Water resources management and integrated
water resources management (IWRM) in Cameroon. Water Resources Management,
24(5), 871-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9476-4
The authors discuss the application of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)
in a rural agricultural area of Cameroon, offering easily transplantable perspectives given
the commonalities of contexts surrounding the management of water resources in
California's Central Valley. The authors assess the institutional structure for IWRM, the
prerequisites for its application, and suggest changes for enhancing IWRM.
Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H., Hamilton, S. H., Hunt, R. J., Jakeman, A. J.,
Pierce, S. A., Snow, V. O., Babbar-Sebens, M., Fu, B., Gober, P., Hill, M. C.,
Iwanaga, T., Loucks, D. P., Merritt, W. S., Peckham, S. D., Richmond, A. K., Zare, F., Ames,
D., … Bammer, G. (2019). Effective modeling for integrated water resource management:
A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities.
Environmental Modelling & Software, 116, 40-56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013
The authors suggest that the success of IWRM modeling largely derives from the quality
of the practices used throughout the process. They provide detailed advice on these
practices and point out important areas for future research.
Fischhendler, I., & Zilberman, D. (2005). Packaging policies to reform the water sector: The case
of the Central Valley project Improvement Act. Water Resources Research, 41(7).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003786
7
The article addresses the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, a policy change to
enhance water sector management. A robust legislative policy bundle could serve as a
tool to bring together interest groups of divergent and often clashing incentives into a
coalition with shared policy agendas. It could also restructure existing and traditional
untenable alliances.
Giordano, M., & Shah, T. (2014). From IWRM back to integrated water resources management.
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30(3), 364-376.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.851521
The authors posit that other modeling methods besides IWRM would more effectively
address significant water issues, maintaining the formalized IWRM strategy (proposed as
a primary research exploration framework) having evolved to become more formalized
and stringent (not adequately allowing for uniqueness of contexts), hence less a
practical issue modeling strategy.
Hossen, M., Connor, J., & Ahammed, F. (2023). How to resolve Transboundary river water
sharing disputes. Water, 15(14), 2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142630
The article discusses various strategies to settle disputes over water sharing, a frequently
unfolding scenario in contemplation over water management policy and
implementations. The author proposes that collaboration, mediation, an ideal river
basin organization, an effective monitoring system, information sharing, and sharing of
benefits are essential for resolving water conflicts.
Huang, G., & London, J. K. (2012). Cumulative environmental vulnerability and environmental
justice in California’s San Joaquin Valley. International Journal of Environmental
8
Research and Public Health, 9(5), 1593-1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9051593
The author suggests a Cumulative Environmental Vulnerability Assessment (CEVA) to
pinpoint areas with high environmental risks and limited social, economic, and political
resources that plague California's San Joaquin Valley. The author recommends giving
these areas special attention in different water management actions.
Kummu, M., Ward, P. J., De Moel, H., & Varis, O. (2010). Is physical water scarcity a new
phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia.
Environmental Research Letters, 5(3), 034006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-
9326/5/3/034006
The article outlines a timeline of the historical development of physical population-
driven water scarcity, beginning 0 AD through 2005 AD, where disputing burgeoning
positions arguing climate change's perceived impact, where instead it is populations that
have a more significant impact on water shortage than changes in water availability
correlated to long-term climatic change.
Li, F., Yan, W., Zhao, Y., & Jiang, R. (2021). The regulation and management of water resources in
groundwater over-extraction area based on ET. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,
146(1-2), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03713-x
Discusses the regulation and management of water resources in areas of groundwater
over-extraction, where drought exacerbates conditions of groundwater over-extraction,
amplifying the volume and making more volatile the amplitude of water allocation
disputes geoscientists increasingly encounter, particularly in the California Central
Valley.
Liboiron, M. (2021). Decolonizing geoscience requires more than equity and inclusion. Nature
9
Geoscience, 14(12), 876-877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00861-7
Advocates for decolonization within social contexts relevant to disputes over water
rights, where local voices should be accorded equal consideration in geoscientific
explorations of the broader topic of water resource management as it involves
understanding and managing natural resources.
Lunn, J. (2023). Geoscientists Make a Difference. Eos, 104.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EO235007
The author advocates that the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals "special report"
agenda illuminates that geoscientists' expertise, abilities, and competencies can be
leveraged to promote each of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Matchett, E. L., & Fleskes, J. P. (2017). Projected impacts of climate, urbanization, water
management, and wetland restoration on Waterbird habitat in California’s Central Valley.
PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169780
Articulates the impacts of various factors on Waterbird habitat in the Central Valley,
which is related to water resource management as it involves managing natural
habitats, arguing the "new" entrant among stakeholders reflects how ongoing water
and land conservation and allocation policy formulation must be in constant flux.
Nelson, K. S., & Burchfield, E. K. (2017). Effects of the structure of water rights on agricultural
production during drought: A spatiotemporal analysis of California's Central Valley.
Water Resources Research, 53(10), 8293-8309. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020666
The authors discuss the impact of the water rights system on agricultural output through
the perspective of drought, which is anticipated to remain a sustained, inevitable, and
10
increasingly more pervasive external influence in California's Central Valley water
management situation.
Ray, P., Wi, S., Schwarz, A., Correa, M., He, M., & Brown, C. (2020). Vulnerability and risk:
Climate change and water supply from California’s Central Valley water system.
Climatic Change, 161(1), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02655-z
The authors introduce a systematic stress test for climate change that uses a hydrologic
model based on physical principles. This model represents the infrastructure, operations,
and policy limitations of the interconnected system of natural river channels and
artificial facilities threatened by the vulnerability and risk of climate change that
comprise the Central Valley Water System.
Ruiz, D. M., Tallis, H., Tershy, B. R., & Croll, D. A. (2020). Turning off the tap: Common domestic
water conservation actions insufficient to alleviate drought in the United States of
America. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0229798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229798
The authors posit that present-day household water conservation measures are not
enough to mitigate drought in the United States, suggesting that the largest possible
reductions in use from these residential consumer actions may only relieve water stress
in 6% (174) of U.S. counties.
Sorkhabi, R. (2021). Big questions in geoscience and challenges for the geoscience community.
Current Science, 120(9), 1426. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v120/i9/1426-1432
Maintains geoscience contends with "The Big Questions" while negotiating big questions
internally engendered in the geoscience discipline to assess salient information on
geography from differing vantage points to assemble a body of knowledge that directly
benefits society.
11
Sugg, Z. (2018). An equity autopsy: Exploring the role of water rights in water allocations and
impacts for the Central Valley project during the 2012–2016 California drought.
Resources, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7010012
The author examines how California's water rights priority system and its
implementation through Central Valley Project contracts have contributed to uneven
water allocations and the resulting significant impacts during the persistent drought.
(Despite rainfall
during a recently relative outlier season, the drought crisis is still widely perceived as
unresolved.)
Non Peer Reviewed Articles
Faunt, C. C. (2009). Groundwater availability of the Central Valley aquifer, California. U.S.
Geological Survey Publications Warehouse. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/pp1766
The article addresses groundwater availability in the Central Valley aquifer in California,
an essential part of water management in that area. It thoroughly evaluates
groundwater availability in the aquifer system, covering its current state, changes over
time, and methods to evaluate the system's reactions to future human usage and
climate changes.
Lautanen, E. (2023, March 10). The Hodge approach is the best solution to California’s water
disputes. SCOCAblog. https://scocablog.com/the-hodge-approach-is-the-best-solution-
to californias-water-disputes/
The author argues that because the Hodge approach embraces situation-specific
physical solutions, it provides the necessary investigative and policy-making framework
to account for unique contexts that embody the evolution of California water laws.
12
Pannu, C. (2012). Drinking Water and Exclusion: A Case Study from California’s Central Valley.
California Law Review, 100(1), 223–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41346406 This
paper discusses drinking water exclusion in California's Central Valley, a significant issue
in water resource management there, given the considerable proportion of lowincome,
rural families vying with typically better funded and better politically connected urban
stakeholders, with an increasingly higher wealth disparity by comparison. The argument
is raised that local district boards be granted greater authority and influence
where water rights policies are addressed, an aspect of the water allocation strategies
geoscientists would factor in when making policy recommendations.
Pope, S. (2019, May 19). Who is behind those water signs on I-5? KQED | News, Radio,
Podcasts, TV | Public Media for Northern California.
https://www.kqed.org/bayareabites/96228/who-is-behind-those-water-signs-on-the-i-5
Pope's article offers an eyewitness account of a billboard campaign by the activist group
Families Protecting the Valley (FPV) along California's I-5 corridor and a deeper look into
the sociopolitical aspects of water conservation and rights in the Central Valley. For
instance, the article illustrates the dissenting views on official positions regarding current
water allocation manifestations. The billboards encourage locals to express their
concerns about water conservation and allocation policies to local and state officials.
FPV criticizes policies like the San Joaquin River Restoration Program, fearing it could
limit farmers' access to surface water.
U.S. Geological Survey. (n.d.). California's Central Valley. California Water Science Center.
https://ca.water.usgs.gov/projects/central-valley/about-central-valley.html
13
This is an agency information bulletin about California's Central Valley, a region known
for its agricultural productivity and significant water resource management challenges.
The content is focused mainly on climate change's impact on the region.
U.S. Geological Survey. (n.d.). Water use and climate change in California’s Central Valley.
California Water Science Center.
https://ca.water.usgs.gov/projects/central-valley/climate.html
This is an agency information bulletin about California's Central Valley, a region known
for its agricultural productivity and significant water resource management challenges.
The content is focused mainly on climate change's impact on the region.
Non Peer Reviewed Book (Chapters)
Bertazzon, S., & Martin, Y. (2010). Modeling. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones (Eds.), Research
methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 354-374). John Wiley & Sons.
The chapter delves into various modeling approaches used in geography. Modeling can
include statistical models, mathematical simulations, or computer-based models to
understand and predict geographic phenomena. The authors discuss how models are
constructed, calibrated, and validated and their applications in different geographical
contexts.
Robbins, P. F. (2010). Human-Environment Field Study. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 239255).
John Wiley & Sons.
The Human-Environment Field Study is closely related to understanding the intricate
interactions between people and their surroundings. Geoscientists use this approach to
investigate how human activities impact the environment and vice versa. By observing,
collecting data, and analyzing findings in real-world settings, they gain insights into
14
sustainable practices, resource management, and the effects of climate change. It
bridges the gap between human behavior and the natural world, contributing valuable
knowledge for addressing water management challenges and disputes, especially during
persistent droughts in California's Central Valley.
St Martin, K., & Pavlovskaya, M. (2010). Secondary Data. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., p. 173).
John Wiley & Sons.
A geoscientist can analyze secondary data about California’s Central Valley to delve into
its ongoing water rights management issues, which are further complicated by the
enduring impacts of climate change. This data can offer a historical perspective on water
usage, rainfall, and agricultural yields, facilitate comparative studies with similar data
from other regions or countries, link socioeconomic factors with water conservation and
rights management issues, and scrutinize past policies and legal disputes to deepen the
understanding of present issues and potentially propose solutions.
Chapter 3 – Methodology
Research Design
A mixed-methods approach will combine qualitative and quantitative research methods.
This design has seen a rise in popularity and utility in geographic research as ideal as it allows
for a comprehensive exploration of the role of geoscience in resolving water conservation and
rights management issues in California’s Central Valley (Visser & Jones III, 2010). The qualitative
aspect will provide in-depth insights to characterize even numerical data into the experiences
and perspectives of various stakeholders (Herod & Parker, 2010). In contrast, the quantitative
aspect, historically the preferred geographic research approach, will foster objective analysis of
numerical data related to water usage, distribution, and conservation (Rhoads & Wilson, 2010).
15
In particular, geoscience can synthesize the assessment of information from qualitative and
quantitative sources to formulate the best empirical evidentiary support that will help bridge
gaps between competing perspectives and contribute to a sustainable solution for water
allocation and conservation.
Sample or Population
The population for this study will be the stakeholders involved in water conservation and
rights management in California’s Central Valley, which includes local communities,
policymakers, planners, and farmers. Their experiences and perspectives are self-evidently
relevant and from sufficiently disparate vantage points, making research into the issues utilizing
this cross-section of sampling exhaustively and comprehensively representative of the
population
(Jensen & Shumway, 2010).
Data Collection Procedures
Surveys, interviews, document analysis, and public sources such as billboards and public
campaigns will offer specialized insights into the public sentiment and concerns regarding water
source distribution unique to California’s Central Valley. Surveys will gather quantitative data
through “scripted conversations” on water usage and conservation practices while gathering
supplemental information from interviews, billboards, and public campaigns, which will gain
qualitative insights into the experiences and perspectives of stakeholders (Secor, 2010). Lastly,
secondary data from policy papers, legal documents, and environmental reports addressing this
issue will be analyzed to determine how public campaigns inform how (may) be impacted by
stakeholder perspectives…and vice versa (St Martin & Pavlovskaya, 2010).
16
Data Analysis
Statistical and thematic analysis will comprise the context of assessing collected data.
Statistical analysis, often following normal distribution patterns (Winkler, 2010), assesses
quantitative data collected through surveys, while thematic analysis assesses qualitative data
gathered from interviews and document analysis on more specific topics (Hanna, 2010).
[Notable for this research is that precipitation is not a category of data that typically follows
normal distribution patterns (Winkler, 2010).] This combination of data analysis methods will
allow for a comprehensive compilation of data on the research topic.
Research Questions or Hypothesis
1. What role does geoscience play in resolving water conservation and rights management
issues in California’s Central Valley?
2. How can geoscience applications be improved to support addressing these issues?
3. How can geoscience improve current water conservation and rights management
strategies, resulting in improved perceptions of the strategies across stakeholders?
Chapter 4: Representation and Analysis of Findings
Research methods can often be used in combination to complement each other. It is not
that one method is “least beneficial” overall, but rather that different methods may be more or
less advantageous depending on the specific research questions and objectives. It is always
essential to choose the best research methods (Research Methods in Geography: A Critical
Introduction, 2010). Regarding research on “Geoscience’s Role in Resolving Water
Conservation and Rights Management Issues in California’s Central Valley,” Maps and Diagrams,
Descriptive Statistics, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can provide different
perspectives and insights, making research more comprehensive and robust. The application of
17
geoscience has and can contribute to addressing issues, countenancing the implications of
findings equally for various stakeholders, such as local communities, policymakers, planners,
and farmers.
Maps and Diagrams
Maps and diagrams visually represent relationships, processes, structures, or concepts.
They do not typically involve numerical data. Given the geographical nature of the study, maps
will provide a visual representation of the Central Valley’s physical characteristics, water
distribution, and areas of contention; this includes using cartograms and digital elevation
models to represent data proportionally and accurately. The design of these maps will consider
elements such as scale, projection, and symbolization to ensure they accurately represent the
geographical data. On the other hand, diagrams will illustrate concepts, relationships, and water
conservation and rights management processes. They will aid in understanding the complex
interplay between various factors such as geoscience, policy, stakeholder interests, and
environmental conditions. The power of maps and diagrams lies in their ability to convey
complex geographical information in a visually accessible manner. By using these tools, this
research aims to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application,
making the findings more accessible and understandable to a wide range of stakeholders
(Hanna, 2010, pp. 259-278).
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistics will summarize and understand the quantitative data collected
through surveys, including measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and dispersion
(range, variance, standard deviation) to gain insights into water usage patterns, conservation
practices, and stakeholder perceptions. The data’s frequency distribution, including skewness
18
and kurtosis, will be analyzed, and Z-scores will be calculated to understand each data point’s
relative position. Graphical representations like histograms, bar charts, and pie charts will
enhance visual clarity. The relationships between variables will be described using measures of
co-variation (Visser & Jones III, 2010, pp. 280-285).
Geographic Information Systems
A Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tool will capture, store, and analyze spatial data
for spatial analysis of the Central Valley region to provide a comprehensive view, helping identify
patterns related to water conservation and rights management. Statistical biases and spatial
phenomena that can impact results. GIS can help visualize the impact of specific policies on
different areas or the correlation between water usage and agricultural productivity
(Goodchild, 2010, pp. 377-383).
19
References
Goodchild, M. F. (2010). Geographic Information Systems. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 376390).
John Wiley & Sons.
Hanna, S. P. (2010). Maps and Diagrams. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones (Eds.), Research
methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 259-278). John Wiley & Sons.
Herod, A., & Parker, K. (2010). Operational Decisions. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones (Eds.),
Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., p. 67). John Wiley &
Sons.
Jensen, R. R., & Shumway, J. M. (2010). Sampling Our World. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., p. 79).
John Wiley & Sons.
Rhoads, B. L., & Wilson, D. (2010). Observing Our World. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones (Eds.),
Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 30-31).
John Wiley & Sons.
Secor, A. (2010). Social Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., p. 195).
John Wiley & Sons.
Visser, S., & Jones III, J. P. (2010). Descriptive Statistics. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones
(Eds.), Research methods in geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., pp. 279296).
John Wiley & Sons.
Winkler, J. A. (2010). Climates. In B. Gomez & I. John Paul Jones (Eds.), Research methods in
geography: A critical introduction (6th ed., p. 125). John Wiley & Sons.
