1
Policy vs. Worldview
Policy vs. Worldview
Brandon Rozzell
MED: Higher Education Leadership, Liberty University
Educ 643: Contemporary Issues in Education Policy
Dr. Thomas Brittain
2
Policy vs. Worldview
Issue Within Contemporary Educational Policy
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act is one of the most sweeping instructional
strategies driven in the United States over the last forty years. This enactment, which was
endorsed by President Bush in January of 2002, significantly extended government impact over
the country's 90,000 state funded schools (Dee & Jacob, 2009). The trademark provisions of this
enactment constrained states to direct yearly student appraisals connected to state guidelines to
distinguish schools neglecting to make "sufficient yearly advancement" (AYP) close to the
expressed objective of having all students accomplish capability in reading and math. Also, the
act had the idea to reward certain schools who achieve successful AYP results (Dee & Jacob,
2009). This act ultimately led to school districts (and specific schools), and educators being
judged by how good students did on standardized issued tests. Schools who yield below standard
test results are often criticized, labeled, and in the worst-case scenario the state takes over and
there is a closure of the school. The No Child Left Behind Act forces sanctions on schools if the
negligible part of any of five racial groups of students showing capability on standardized test
falls under a statewide pass rate (Krieg, 2011). This framework places tension on school
administrators to divert educational resources from groups of students prone to exhibit capability
towards the individuals who are significantly below marginal proficiency.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which was introduced in 2016 eliminated the No
Child Left Behind Act most correctional perspectives. All things considered, it kept up with the
necessity to test students each year in Grades 3 to 8, and once at the high school level.
In the education "world" or "community" instructive change implies making changes to
the framework to guarantee students from all over the nation can measure up to the same
educational requirements. The hypothesis behind standardized testing is that they give true
3
Policy vs. Worldview
results of student performance and assist with guaranteeing that all students become capable in
the given course material. Government (standardized testing) sanctioned testing was intended to
hold state funded schools responsible if they neglected to give viable guidance to all students.
It is debated often that low-income and minority students would get lost because
they do not receive similar quality instruction as their more well-off white partners. Results
presented from the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) shows major gaps
between test results between African-Americans and White American students (Anderson, 2018).
While monetary issues for certain school districts is known, less awareness has been paid to low-
income African American youth's impressions of their academic performances. Low-income
youth clarified in a local survey that scholastic factors create fear, and uncertainty about state
administered test (Anderson, 2018). Given the significance of standardized tests students
encounter huge pressures, which impacts goals for academic success. This generates a negative
stigmatism around adverse testing performance in the African-American educational community.
Considerations and Biblical Worldview
Today, there is a debate and disagreements amongst policymakers, educators, parents, and
administrations about how important standardized testing is for students, and also how the test
results influence educators to adjust their teaching methods in a way that only caters to
producing positive test scores. The strain to create high grades has brought about a teaching
method that encourages test taking skills and results. Furthermore, the fight for policymakers has
been to overemphasize the importance of state sanctioned test outcomes, which don't present a
clear and valid picture of student growth and learning.
A crucial inspiration for change is the idea that publicizing definite data on school-
explicit performances and connecting the "high-stakes" test performances to the possibility of
4
Policy vs. Worldview
significant sanctions can work on the focus and academic productivity of state funded schools
(Dee & Jacob, 2009). Then again, critics have stated that test-based school’s responsibility has
negative results for the intellectual advancement of students at the K-12 level. If educators only
focus on teaching kids’ textbook information that will assist them with passing standardized test,
then it will take away from relationship building, growth in non-testing subjects such as art,
music and physical education, and lastly develop pressure on teachers to generate positive test
results. Campbell's Law suggests, “the more any quantitative social indicator is used for social
decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to
distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor (Krieg, 2011 p.2).”
Galatians 3:28 says, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free
man, there is neither male or female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
This bible verse speaks volumes for the racial inequality and the gap between our low-
income schools and our middle- and upper-class school systems. Low-income areas and students
are often overlooked and have little to no resources to obtain academic success. Educators are
put into tough situations where they must choose between catering to a student’s weakness
intellectually or teaching them how to pass standardized test for the benefit of the school. The
bible reads that we are all equal, but students across our nation are not given equal opportunities
even with government programs such as The No Child Left Behind Act, and Every Student
Succeeds Act.
5
Policy vs. Worldview
References
Anderson, M. B. L. (2018). A SEAT AT THE TABLE: African American Youth's
Perceptions of K-12 Education. The Education Digest, 84, 14-22.
http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fmagazi
nes%2Fseat-at-table-african-american-youths- perceptions%2Fdocview
%2F2133791757%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D12085
Dee, T., & Jacob, B. (2009). The impact of no child left behind on student achievement.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w15531
Krieg, J. M. (2011). Which students are left behind? the racial impacts of the No Child Left
Behind Act. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 654–664.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.02.004