Running head: MY LEARNING THEORY
My Learning Theory
Heather Mays
Liberty University
EDUC 500
MY LEARNING THEORY 2
Introduction
There are several different theories based on learning, and one is not greater than the other. In
my paper I discuss three. My learning theory shows that it takes more than just those three in the
classroom to get your students motivated, interested in learning and to help build their self-
efficacy. It takes a combination of them all. Even though we cannot teach the Bible in the public
school system we can still show our students the love that Christ gives us by promoting the fruit
of the Spirit, by using teachable moments, by being like Christ. I hope and pray that I will always
remember what I have learned in this class.
Learning Theory and Its Importance
According to Slavin & Schunk, (2018, p.3) “learning is an enduring change in behavior, or in
the capacity to behave in a given fashion which results from practice or other forms of
experience.” There are three main learning theories—behavioral, cognitive and constructivist.
Behavioral theory is learning that is observable. B.F. Skinner believed that behaviors and
consequences correlate (Walker, 2018). Pleasurable consequences equal reinforcers, as where
unpleasant consequences equal punishers (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). Reinforcers help with
wanting to continue the behavior, and punishers stop the behavior. A. Bandura believed children
learned their behavior through modeling. They observed and imitated others. A Biblical
perspective of Bandura’s theory on behavior would be the verse “Do not be deceived: Bad
company ruins good morals” (1Corinthians 15:33, English Standard Version). Bandura also
purposed the idea of self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is the ability to believe in oneself to learn
something or complete a specific task (Greene, 2017). Self-efficacy will be discussed later in the
paper.
MY LEARNING THEORY 3
Cognitive theory looks beyond behavior and considers learning as an internal mental process
such as problem-solving, knowledge and thinking (Pagliaro, 2013). Piaget’s theory Cognitive
Development states that a child’s cognitive ability develops through four stages, and that a child
does not skip a stage. His theory proposed children’s patterns of thinking and behavior are called
schemes (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). When learning is taking place a child’s scheme is changing.
Vygotsky’s theory proposed that “learning precedes development” (Slavin & Shunk, 2018, p.
38). He came up with the idea of scaffolding. Scaffolding is providing a student with more
support from their peers or adults. This process can be very helpful in the classroom.
The third theory is constructivism. Constructivism is the idea that student’s must learn new
knowledge off of what they have already learned. They base their knowledge on the culture they
live in and social factors (Durmus, 2016). Students must be active learners in constructivist
theory; which is often called student-centered instruction (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). The theories
of Piaget and Vygotsky have roots in constructivism. Their theories state that new learning
cannot take place without prior knowledge. Constructivism gives students a voice in their own
learning. “Constructivism neglects the fact that there are rights and wrongs rooted in God’s
creation order” (Van Brummelen, 2009, p.70).
Learning theory is important. Teachers need to understand how a student learns, and how
their learning is developed. Without understanding that a teacher cannot ensure students are
remaining on track or staying motivated to learn (Andrade & Heritage, 2018).
Description of an Effective Teacher
An effective teacher is an intentional teacher. According to Slavin & Shunk (2018) an
intentional teacher takes responsibility for class time, activities, and behavior. An effective
MY LEARNING THEORY 4
teacher continues professional development. They attend workshops, seminars, and use mentors
(Eun, 2018). Hindman, Grant & Stronge (2013) defines a teacher mentor as an taking an
inexperienced teacher and placing them with an experienced, master level partner. This allows
the inexperienced teacher to become more confident which improves their self-efficacy. They go
on to say “Effective teachers are effective people….They are warm and caring, they enjoy life,
and they are enthusiastic about helping other people grow and develop. For students, respect,
fairness, humor, and expectations all fit under the umbrella of caring” (Hindman, Grant &
Stronge, 2013, p. 15). They also suggest some characteristics of quality teachers; good
communication skills, teacher preparation, personal dispositions, personal relationships, class
management, Instructional planning, and goals. If a teacher has good communication skills they
have the ability to listen and value their students. Teacher preparation shows the teacher has
content knowledge and is certified to teach. Personal dispositions fit under having motivation
and enthusiasm. By having personal relationships with their students it builds trust, fairness and
respectfulness. Good class management provides a safe and vibrant learning environment.
Instructional planning involves delivery and ongoing student assessment, and effective
instruction. Clearly focused goals and high expectations to promote student achievement.
Research has shown good teacher qualities have higher student achievement, better relationships
with students and fewer discipline issues (Hindman, Grant & Stronge, 2013).
An effective teacher strives to create a positive classroom environment and are conscientious
of the clothing they wear. Pagliaro (2013) reports that a teacher’s clothing affects their attitude,
discipline and work of the students. She goes on to say that the way you dress has four main
effects: respect, credibility, acceptance and authority. An effective teacher displays the fruit of
the Spirit. “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness,
MY LEARNING THEORY 5
faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. Against such things is no law. Those who belong to
Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passion and desires” (Galatians, 5:22-24, New
International Version). A teacher should promote self-control. “Control over one’s life is
something that everyone wants and needs. When we don’t get it, we go after control over others.
Because many of our discipline problems in school either start or end with a power struggle, it is
a good idea to look at the idea of sharing control with students” (Pagliaro, 2013, p.9). This also
relates back to Bandura’s theory on modeling. We have to model the appropriate behavior we
want our students to display.
Description of an Effective Learning Environment
“Only by wrestling with the conditions of the problem at hand, seeking and finding his own
solutions (not in isolation but in correspondence with the teacher and other pupils) does one
learn’ John Dewey” (Durmus, 2016). I thought this quote was good for this section. Every one
of us is still learning. If we work together we can learn so much more. As teachers if we listen
to our students we can learn from them.
Slavin & Shunk (2018) define classroom management as strategies for using class time well,
helping to prevent and respond to misbehavior, engaging student’s minds and imaginations
making them interested in learning. They go on to state that effective instruction is the most
effective approach to maintaining a classroom. If students are participating, motivated and
challenged they rarely pose problems (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). One way to manage the
classroom is in how a teacher sets it up. According to Van Brummelen (2009) classrooms should
have enough space for individual work, small group work and large group work. Students should
be able to see the teacher, the board or any other instructional presentations. Involving your
student’s in arranging the classroom teaches them responsibility, “cooperation and principles of
MY LEARNING THEORY 6
aesthetic displays” (Van Brummelen, 2009, p. 199). Green (2017) describes classrooms as social
environments, and arrangements of that environment can provide support for positive self-
efficacy. If students are involved with the responsibilities of the classroom they become
contributing members in their learning environment. A positive learning environment increases
student engagement, decreases disruptive behavior, improves student achievement and has better
use of instructional time (Hindman, Grant, & Stronge, 2010). Pagliaro (2013) describes a
successful classroom as having an atmosphere of trust where students feel free to participate.
“When trusting, respectful, caring relationships exist between students and teachers, the students
will become engaged learners” (Pagliaro, 2013, Ch.2, p.3). She goes on to report that having
students help set the rules in the classroom at the beginning of the year, helps the students to
understand the rules and why they are important. Research has shown that communication
between the teacher and students made students feel connected and willing to participate, which
enhances cognitive and affective learning (Pagliaro, 2013). If students feel their questions are
welcomed, the atmosphere is nonjudgmental, that it is alright to make mistakes, which they are
given time to think and are being challenged—then you have a supportive classroom. “We are in
this together. When one of us succeeds, we all succeed. When one of us fails, we all fail. It is
critically important to me personally that all of us do well” (Pagliaro, 2013, Ch. 2 p. 4). That
statement would be a wonderful class motto.
If we teach engaging, interesting lessons, students will more likely pay attention (Slavin &
Shunk, 2018). I like the idea of role play in classes. The teacher could dress up as Abe Lincoln
if teaching a Civil War history class, or George Washington and put the red coats on trial.
Lessons that have students moving, interacting with each other grabs their attention. If the class
is culturally diverse, a history lesson could start out on how the Mayans had calenders thousands
MY LEARNING THEORY 7
of years ago (Slavin & Shunk, 2018) or how on top of a mountain sits a city that was lost for
thousands of years.
Setting challenging tasks can help maintain student’s motivation toward learning. The
example Slavin & Shunk (2018, p.286) says “this is tough but I know you can do it.” If teachers
watch how they communicate it will help keep students interested. Another thing to help keep
students interested and motivated is by mixing up how you present the lesson. If students area
sitting all day long while the teacher does board work, they will soon be bored and falling asleep.
Teachers can use music videos, regular videos, guest speakers, food, and computer games (Slavin
& Shunk, 2018).
Another thing to promote an effective learning environment is to not assume all of your
students are on the same learning level. Get to know your students!
Actively Including and Engaging Learners with Diverse Needs and Exceptionalities
Van Brummelen (2009, p. 209) defines exceptional students as “those needing special
assistance to learn well. The most common exceptionalities, in order, are learning disabilities,
behavioral disorders, autism, and physical disabilities.” All students can learn, no matter their
disability. As teachers we must learn how to teach them in the way they learn. Slavin & Shunk
(2018) provides several ways to help these students learn. One way is by giving frequent
feedback, especially feedback on how they have improved or on their hard work. Another
method to be used is peer work. By working with a fellow classmate, they can feel more
included in the classroom. With some students, like ones with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD) rewording instructions might help them understand what they are to do, as
well as provide shorter lessons that will allow them to move around more, and using computers
MY LEARNING THEORY 8
could help in retaining their attention (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). When a student with learning
disabilities is in your class they usually have an Individual Education Program (IEP). As a
teacher it is your responsibility to work with other teachers to establish the best course of action
to promote that students learning, and work toward those goals set. The one thing to never do is
single them out or act like they are different than any other student. Going back to the quote
from Pagliaro (2013) we are in this together.
Addressing Behavior and Character Development
According to Slavin & Shunk (2018, p.321) “the principle of least intervention means using
the simplest methods that will work” is the best method to dealing with misbehavior. Nonverbal
cues should be used first; giving a talking student a look, or walking by a talking student.
Praising other students who are behaving is another method. If a teacher can figure out the cause
behind the behavior, then he/she can stop it; is it a student seeking the teacher’s attention or are
they seeing their peers attention? (Salvin & Shunk 2018). When a verbal reminder is needed, it
should be given immediately after the student misbehaves (Slavin & Shunk, 2018). Sometimes
calling the parents is required.
“Character education is intended to help students become ethically responsible, self-
disciplined, and community-oriented persons” (Van Brummelen, 2009, p. 235). Character
education is interchangeable with moral education. Looking at Bandura and E. Turiel’s views on
moral development we can see the differences and similarities. Bandura believed children’s
moral development began at an early age by modeling, observing, and imitating adults and peers.
Turiel also believed moral development started at a young age. He observed empathic behavior
in children as young as three years old. He said children knew when someone was hurt and that it
was wrong to hurt someone even if a rule was not in place. Turiel believed that the decisions
MY LEARNING THEORY 9
children make are based on right and wrong were determined on harm, welfare and fairness
towards others. Whereas Bandura believes the modeling behavior will determine what is right
and wrong. Bandura says motivation to act helps with making right and wrong decisions. If a
child is rewarded for good behavior then they will continue to do that behavior. However, if a
child views unhealthy behaviors then they will view this as normal. Both theorist agree that
children know the difference between morality and social convention. If we model our behavior
after Jesus. then we know right from wrong and will know how to be empathic towards others.
The Bible says, “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart
from it” (Proverbs 22:6, English Standard Version).
Engaging Students in Learning, Building Self-Efficacy and Motivation
Self-efficacy is a person’s ability to believe in themselves to get certain task done (Davidson,
2003). People need to have motivation in order to perform what they have learned. Self-efficacy
“enables people to influence events and to take a hand in shaping what courses their lives take”
(Davidson, 2003). Unless an individual has motivation and believes in their capabilities to
produce desired effects, they will not persevere during failures. I can help my students develop a
stronger sense of self-efficacy by using peer models. By using peer models, the children can see
their classmates working on the problem and solving it, and think that they can do it too. By
giving praise, it will help them see that they can do it too. I can use the different reinforcement:
fixed ratio, variable ratio, fixed interval, and variable interval. By breaking down into smaller
sections what they are learning and reinforcing that behavior, I believe will improve the
children’s self-efficacy.
A student can get anxiety that will lower their self-efficacy. Teachers can give students extra
time to take the test, and try to get them to relax (Slavin & Shunk, 2018, Greene, 2017).
MY LEARNING THEORY 10
Students also need to be aware that they are responsible for their successes. Teachers can
provide feedback quickly that allows students to see how they are improving, and their strengths
(Greene, 2017). Greene suggest another motivating factor is convincing students they can use
their learning outside of the classroom; reading to younger siblings. Scaffolding can help build
self-efficacy by providing assistance from more competent peers (Slavin & Shunk, 2018).
Greene suggest that can be planned in with lessons to make them more fun; giving students hints
can make it seem like they are playing a game.
Person Reflections/Conclusion
In conclusion, I have learned a lot that I plan to use when I become a teacher. I do not believe
one theory is better than any other, even though I lean more towards Bandura’s modeling theory.
I think a teacher needs to know how all of the learning theories come together. I plan to use all
three that I have discussed in this paper in my classroom. I have also learned through my own
son, who has a learning disability, and ADHD, the challenges one faces, and how it takes just
rewording instructions helped him. I plan to use the different teaching techniques in my classes;
role play, videos, worksheets, and group work. By having my TESOL certificate I learned that
making learning fun for students holds their attention longer. The curriculum might be set, but I
am responsible for how I present the material.
Jesus used various methods of teaching the people in the Bible. He did not discriminate, but
he sought out those who were different. He told us the kingdom of God belongs to the children.
I learned a lot from the teachings of Jesus. When I walk in the classroom I need to remember
these teachings.
MY LEARNING THEORY 11
References
Andrade, H., Heritage, M. (2018). Using formative assessment to enhance learning,
achievement, and academic self-regulation. New York: Routledge. https://www-
taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/books/9781317227267
Davidson, F. (Producer). (2003). Bandura’s social cognitive theory. Davidson Films. Retrieved
http://search.alexanderstreet.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/view/work/1780107
Durmus, Y. (2016). Effective learning environment characteristics as a requirement of
contructivist curricula: Teachers’ needs and school principals’ views. International
Journal of Instruction, 9 (2), 183-198. Doi:10.12973/iji.2016.9213a
Eun, B. (2018). Adopting a stance: Bandura and Vygotsky on professional development.
Research in education, 1-10. Doi:10.1177/003452371879343/
Greene, B. A. (2017). Self-efficacy and future goals in education. Retrieved from
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu
Hindman, J., Grant, L., Stronge, J. (2013). The supportive learning environment: Effective
teaching practice. New York: Rutledge. Retrieved from https://www-taylorfrancis-
com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/books/9781317923398
Pagliaro, M. (2013). Academic success: Applying learning theory in the classroom. Maryland:
Rowman & Littlefield Education. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-
com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/lib/liberty/detail.action?docID=1565257
Salvin, R. and Schunk, D. (2018). Learning theories: EDUC 500. New York, NY: Pearson.
Van Brummelen, H. (2009). Walking with God in the classroom. Colorado: Purposeful Design
Publications