1
THEORETICAL MODELS
Theoretical Models and Approaches
Hyemin Park
Liberty University
COUC698_A23
2
THEORETICAL MODELS
The etiology of addiction has been studied by many researchers, and there are various
models developed to explain the causal attributions to addiction. No sole model can define
the causation of addiction explicitly, but an eclectic and multifaceted approach is required to
understand its complex phenomena. Among the eight categories of models described in the
textbook, Foundations of addictions counseling (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020), the moral model,
biological models, disease model, and psychological model will be reviewed in this paper.
The moral model lies on the assumption that people who struggle with addiction will
have moral issues attributed by their personal characteristics that lack responsibility, self-
regulation or self-care, and impulsive tendency (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). Addiction is
considered to be a moral failure while it underestimates biological or medical contributions to
addiction. This model emphasizes the moral choice defining addiction as a voluntary
behavior of engaging in substance abuse (Rogeberg, 2013).
Based on this assumption, the treatment intervention for addiction comes down to
correcting morally wrong behavior or increasing moral sense or moral responsibility on one’s
behavior (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). Accepting this perspective of the moral model will lead
to the conclusion that the effective intervention to treat addiction is to change morally wrong
behavior. The use of “punishment” as an intervention to treat addiction is an example of this
model; legal systems or religious groups who accepts this view on addiction as a morally
right or wrong behavior emphasize the personality traits or sinful nature that needs to be
disciplined and regulated by punishment (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020).
The moral model cannot be a comprehensive explanation of the etiology of addiction
but still points out some important aspects that can be the initiating factor that leads to
addiction to the chosen drugs. Moral characteristics of impulsivity, irresponsibility,
immaturity that one being not able to involve himself with appropriate self-care can be the
3
THEORETICAL MODELS
factor that increases the possibility of becoming addicted. The moral model stresses the idea
that transition to addiction was one’s voluntary behavior at the beginning.
While the moral model points out the initial attributing factor as a moral choice that
becomes a transition to addiction from voluntary behavior (Rogeberg, 2013), biological
models stress the genetic factors that increase the possibilities of a person being addicted to
such substance. This genetic model indicates there are individuals who are more vulnerable to
substance abuse or any other forms of addiction compared to those who do not have that
genetic factor. The neurobiological model is another explanation as a part of the biological
model; it is more focusing on the neurological process of becoming addicted to such
substance rather than suggesting the initial attribution of involving in the abusive behavior
(Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020).
There are various genetic research that discovered some genetic marks that predispose
a person toward addictions (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). For example, inheritance of genetic
traits that could not produce enough enzyme within the body was found to be a plausible
factor that could increase craving for alcohol and tendency to become addicted when the
craving meets the need (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). Especially with alcoholism, it is found to
be more than 50% of variance is genetic factors; so-called “alcohol-specific genes” are
discovered that characterize an individual’s risk to develop alcoholism (Goldman, 2008).
The biological model of addiction is an important aspect to consider when it comes to
drug addiction treatment. Even though there are psychological and environmental aspects that
could be intervened to help people with substance abuse, neurobiological aspects that hinder
clients from being changed should be considered within counseling and psychotherapy.
Already formed neurotransmitter pathways prior to the substance as the target could be
reversed by the introduction of other drugs (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020), which should be
4
THEORETICAL MODELS
highly considered to implement with clients who have an ongoing family history of substance
abuse because they might have the strong neurobiological attribution to the substance
addiction.
Aligning with the biological model, the disease model also addresses addiction as an
inherited disease that “chemically alters the body in such as way that the individual is
permanently ill at a genetic level” (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020, p.11) rather than of moral
failure or personality deficits. When the etiology of addiction is explained in terms of disease
and illness, there is no perfect cure for substance abuse (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020), but it is
considered as part of themselves that requires continuous care and management on the use of
drugs. Based on this model, it denies cognitive-behavioral aspects of reinforcement because
addiction is a chronic disease “hallmarked by a state of compulsive drug seeking that persists
despite negative consequences (Joffe, Grueter & Grueter, 2014)”.
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is an example of taking this disease model as an
etiology of addiction; the term “recovery” was first used for addiction within this model
according to the perception that addiction is a disease rather than a moral failure or
psychological reinforcement (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). The Disease model detaches
addiction from immoral behavior or weak character that decreases demanding feelings of
responsibility or guilt of being addicted (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020).
Even though this disease model cannot be a sole explanation for addiction, the disease
model provides a good explanation of addiction when it comes to helping people who
struggle with addiction without judging the person or their behaviors. The AA uses these
effects of defining addiction as a disease to help alcoholics; the disease model could promote
powerless feelings over disease, but admitting one is powerless over alcohol and that his or
5
THEORETICAL MODELS
her life had become unmanageable (Kurtz, 2010) could be the first step toward the recovering
process so that one can be helped.
The psychological model provides an explanation of addiction in the context of
attachment, behaviors, cognitions, learning processes, or psychic drives (Capuzzi & Stauffer,
2020). The cognitive-behavioral model brings up pleasure-seeking tendency and behavioral
reinforcement to be the motivation and maintenance of maladaptive behavior that leads to
addiction (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020). The learning model also agrees with a cognitive-
behavioral model that substance abuse is learned as a negative coping skill within a
motivation to seek pleasure while withdrawing unpleasant symptoms (Capuzzi & Stauffer,
2020). The psychodynamic model also addresses addiction as an outcome of deeper
psychological deficiency, while the personality theory model links personality traits and
substance abuse or other types of addiction (Wanigaratne, 2006).
An example of taking account of psychological factors as an addiction etiology is the
relapse prevention (Brunswig & ODonohue, 2002) which is an addiction treatment approach
based on the psychological model. The relapse prevention is an evidence-based addiction
treatment using components of the cognitive-behavioral model to approach addiction; it aims
to increase awareness of relapse by examining the previous relapse pattern and developing
positive coping strategies as well as taking account of personality traits (Wanigaratne, 2006)
that could help or hinder one from addiction recovery.
The psychological model provides good explanations on the reasons why people
engage in abusive behavior and the maintenance of the behavior that results in addiction.
Addiction is perceived as a psychological phenomenon because of psychopathology or
unhealthy cognitive-behavioral pattern encoded in the brain due to the repeated misuse of
addiction. Underlying psychopathology, defense mechanism, and tendency to handle
6
THEORETICAL MODELS
unpleasant with pleasant effect are all reasonable theories that many research supports
regarding the etiology of addiction. Research findings on the high comorbidity rate of
substance abuse between other mental health problems support this psychological model that
there are underlying psychological issues within addiction.
7
THEORETICAL MODELS
References
Brunswig, K. A., & ODonohue, W. (2002). Relapse prevention. Empirically supported
techniques of cognitive-behavioral treatment: A step-by-step guide for clinicians. New
York: Wiley.
Capuzzi, D., & Stauffer, M. D. (2020). Foundations of addictions counseling (4th ed.). New
York, NY: Pearson. ISBN: 9780135166932.
Goldman, D. (2008). Genetic approaches to addiction: genes and alcohol. Addiction., 103(9),
1414–1428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02203.x
Joffe, M. E., Grueter, C. A., & Grueter, B. A. (2014). Biological substrates of addiction.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(2), 151-171.
Kurtz, E. (2010). Not god: A history of Alcoholics Anonymous. Simon and Schuster.
Rogeberg, O. J. (2013). Addiction: Choice or Compulsion? Frontiers in Psychiatry., 4.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00077
Wanigaratne, S. (2006). Psychology of addiction. Psychiatry, 5(12), 455–460.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.mppsy.2006.09.007