1 / 6100%
MODELS AND APPROACHES 1
Theoretical Models and Approaches
Charity Morton
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
Theoretical Models and Approaches
Addiction is complex, and treating it is not a universal approach. Research shows
different models that display what contributes to substance use. Because different models
explain the cause of substance use disorders, counselors need to be aware of the different
models and utilize a multimodal perspective to understand better and provide the best care
possible for clients, because each client is unique with a different story. This paper explores the
disease, biological, social learning, and public health model with insights from the Bible, and
provides a biblical perspective incorporating hope, truth, and restoration.
MODELS AND APPROACHES 2
Disease Model
The disease model of addiction provides an alternative perspective on addiction and has
some criticism due to it often allowing the individual to avoid responsibility for their substance
use (Dumont, 2025). Relating it to diabetes or asthma, the disease model of addiction views
addiction as a chronic brain disease with a change in brain structure that leads the individual to
engage in continuous substance use even though there may be negative consequences, rather
than viewing it as a lack of self-control or willpower (Heilig et al., 2021). With more research
done in neuroscience, drugs affect the brain and alter certain areas such as the basal ganglia,
amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex. This research showed how substances affect the reward
system, motivation, and executive function. Additionally, trauma, family history of use, and
stressful environments can affect an individual's likelihood of having an addiction.
Looking at the disease model with a biblical framework, due to the Fall, sin entered the
world, and everyone has sinned. Humans are broken, and the only source of hope is through
Jesus. In Romans 7:15-25, Paul shares the struggle with doing what they do not want to do and
having to fight their flesh, which is what the addiction cycle is like (English Standard Version
Bible, 2001/2016). Through Christ, there is hope and restoration. Dumont (2025) shares that
restoration and healing from addiction is not merely through a physical aspect but also spiritual
and requires the individual to understand who they are through God's eyes and as an individual
made in His image, which addiction often destroys.
This model provides an explanation of addiction that reduces shame and stigma in
individuals. Instead of viewing it as a moral failure, others view it as a medical condition, similar
to diabetes, and in doing so, individuals are encouraged to seek the help they need and deserve
without judgment or shame. This model also explains how continuous use affects the brain's
reward system and leads to compulsive drug use due to cravings and withdrawal, despite
negative consequences, and affects the brain's ability to manage anxieties and make decisions
(Heilig et al., 2021). This model also provides an understanding that treatment in the form of
MODELS AND APPROACHES 3
medication-assisted therapy, relapse prevention interventions, and harm reduction is possible
and provides an empathetic approach to helping individuals recover.
Biological Model
The biological model of addiction views how physical and neurological factors, such as a
deficit in dopamine, play a role in the chances of an individual having a substance use issue
(Dumont, 2025). Because of this, by utilizing substances such as cocaine, they have a bigger
dose of dopamine in their brain when they do use illicit substances. Another view that is part of
the biological model is that some individuals have a lower physical response to a regular dose of
alcohol, which increases their chance of developing an alcohol use disorder due to their
increased drinking, due to perceived higher tolerance. Additionally, genetics plays a role in
addiction (Hatoum et al., 2021). This model differs from the genetic model because it includes
all biological factors, not just genetics. This broader model includes adolescent vulnerability due
to adolescents' developing brain regions that leave them more susceptible to substance use.
Looking at the biological model from a biblical perspective, because of the first sin, sin
marred the perfect world God created, leaving the irreparable pattern of sin, brokenness, and
separation from God. This model highlights that sin affected both the spiritual aspect and
separation from God. 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 shares how bodies are temples and should be
honored (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). With that, Psalm 139:13 highlights that
God made each individual different and provides readers with hope that, despite the biological
differences and predispositions that others may have, an individual finds their identity through
Christ. Restoration through Him is possible through spiritual and physical aspects.
This model provides a good explanation of addiction because it highlights the biological
reasons for addiction and further explains why some individuals can use substances but not
become addicted (Hatoum et al., 2021). It understands the differences in individuals and that
certain genetic and environmental factors affect everyone. Additionally, instead of labeling
MODELS AND APPROACHES 4
individuals as weak, it provides an empathetic understanding that addiction is complex and is
not just weak willpower, but instead, has its roots in the brain and body.
Social Learning Model
The social learning model of addiction looks into how an individual's environment,
personal characteristics, and emotional development play a role in the development of a
substance use disorder (Smith, 2021). This model provides an understanding of addiction based
on Albert Bandura's social learning theory, and that behaviors are learned and influenced by
family and friends, and through the experience of either rewards or punishment (Dumont,
2025). An individual growing up in a household where substance use was common is more likely
to develop a substance use disorder based on how modeling and imitation affect an individual.
With this model, addiction is viewed as a biopsychosocial disorder through various dimensions
to understand what causes the individual to start using (Smith, 2021).
The social learning model of addiction highlights biblical principles, and 1 Corinthians
15:33 shares the importance of being surrounded by individuals who will model Christian
principles (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Individuals will likely use substances if
that is considered normal in their environment and upbringing. By changing environments and
social circles, it becomes easier to resist peer pressure and replace negative patterns in
behavior. The Bible provides many perspectives on the importance of being surrounded by
good, godly friends and having a supportive support system that aids in encouraging recovery.
This model provides an alternative perspective on addiction because it incorporates how
social and environmental aspects affect the start of addiction, and counselors can identify
familial patterns and social pressures that may affect the cycle of addiction (Smith, 2021). This
model provides an empathetic approach and emphasizes harm reduction, the prioritization of a
healthy support network, and an understanding that an individual's upbringing affects their
chances of addiction. This model provides a biopsychosocial outlook on substance use and, by
integrating biblical principles, it addresses how to support this group of people.
MODELS AND APPROACHES 5
Public Health Model
The public health model of addiction prioritizes harm reduction and ensuring the public
is aware of how to prevent addiction (Crépault et al., 2023). Naloxone and syringe exchange are
two common harm reduction interventions that aid individuals who use substances to use safely
(Dumont, 2025). The goal of this model is to provide awareness of substance use that is bigger
than the individual, but instead widens it to the societal level. It highlights the importance of
individuals safely using substances rather than abstaining. Instead of putting all the blame on
the individual, it provides a shared responsibility for preventative efforts.
This model highlights the importance of caring for the community and creating a space
where individuals feel they can thrive. The Bible further explains in Galatians 6:2 the importance
of leaning on others to help them with their troubles (English Standard Version Bible,
2001/2016). In Micah 6:8, the emphasis is to be kind and be merciful, ensuring the community
and environment are at their best. Integrating the public health model with the Bible serves as a
reminder that counselors must advocate for their environment and raise awareness.
This model provides a powerful explanation of addiction because it incorporates the
community into the individual's responsibility of either lowering their substance use or
achieving abstinence. This model utilizes the understanding that the community can play a role
in supporting individuals with substance use (Crépault et al., 2023). By increasing community
education, utilizing harm reduction interventions, and encouraging individuals to use safely, the
public health model helps support individuals who use substances and helps create a
community that fosters recovery and lowers the likelihood of addiction.
Addiction is an intricate issue that many individuals around the world struggle with, and
looking at it through multiple models provides a better understanding of each individual and a
chance to create an individualized treatment plan. The disease model provides an empathetic
understanding that it is a brain disease, the biological model looks at the role of physical and
neurological aspects, the social learning model highlights how environment and relationships
MODELS AND APPROACHES 6
influence addiction, and the public health model incorporates the community and the
importance of awareness. Each of these models provides an empathetic approach to
understanding addiction, and when coupled with the Bible, it gives hope that restoration and
transformation are possible.
References
Crépault, J.-F., Russell, C., Watson, T. M., Strike, C., Bonato, S., & Rehm, J. (2023). What is a
public health approach to substance use? A qualitative systematic review and thematic
synthesis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103958
Dumont, K. (2025). In His image: Addiction counseling through a biblical worldview. Kendall
Hunt. https://online.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9798385176045/epubcfi/
6/8[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Ddedication]!/4[appr01]/4
Hatoum, A. S., Johnson, E. C., Colbert, S. M. C., Polimanti, R., Zhou, H., Walters, R. K., Gelernter,
J., Edenberg, H. J., Bogdan, R., & Agrawal, A. (2021). The addiction risk factor: A unitary
genetic vulnerability characterizes substance use disorders and their associations with
common correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47, 1739–1745.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01209-w
Heilig, M., MacKillop, J., Martinez, D., Rehm, J., Leggio, L., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2021).
Addiction as a brain disease revised: Why it still matters, and the need for consilience.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 46(10), 1715–1723.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-00950-y
Smith, M. A. (2021). Social learning and addiction. Behavioral Brain Research, 398(1).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112954
Students also viewed