How to cover a court trial: 6 tips for journalists
Here are six tips for writers who might be new to a courtroom, and what they should do before
and after they get there.
Before you go to court:
1. Make friends with everyone.
Unless you have a law degree, it’s going to be hard to understand some cases by simply reading
the complaints. You don’t want to be confused when you get into the courtroom.
Lawyers will happily fill in the blanks, and they’re not hard to track down. Their contact details
are in court documents, dockets or law firms’ websites. There are also Internet databases that let
you look up emails and phone numbers in California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and
other states.
Many lawyers can’t officially speak for their clients, but they will happily gab about a lawsuit if
they know their names won’t make the news. Ask them the highlights, including the obvious:
Who is suing whom? What do they want? What laws do they claim were violated?
Parties in the case often change at the last minute before trial, so be sure to ask if anyone has
settled or is near settlement.
If the lawyers in the case won’t talk, try the clerk, or — on rare occasion — the judge. The clerk
or judge can mostly talk about what’s happened so far in the case and what’s coming up. If they
decline to talk, many lawyers who aren’t involved in the lawsuit will be happy to explain it to
you if you send them a complaint.
2. Expect the unexpected.
An unpredictable schedule is one of the biggest challenges in trial coverage, according to
Malaika Fraley, who covers California courts for the Contra Costa Times.
Sometimes witnesses get delayed. Opening statements run long. A judge pushes off a date of
testimony.
Other times, Fraley said in a phone interview, “I’m told a trial starts at 9 a.m., and then I get
there and it’s five hours of jury instruction.”
The best and often only way to know what will happen is to be present in court, Fraley said. But
if you can’t go, the easiest solution is to ask someone who was there — and don’t trust just one
person to get it right, she added.
An alternative is checking online calendars, which many courts have. Judges also frequently
keep paper calendars with the day’s schedule outside their courtrooms.
3. Know how you will file.
Internet access isn’t a sure thing if you’re on the road. When I covered the Apple-Samsung trial
in San Jose, for example, several reporters and lawyers couldn’t use the court’s free WiFi
because so many people tried to log on simultaneously. After the day’s testimony ended, I went
to a nearby Starbucks to write on a seven-inch tablet. My battery threatened to die and I lost part
of my article multiple times because the free coffee-shop Internet failed or my tablet froze.
Before a trial starts, look for quiet places to work after a hearing and whether they have Internet.
Many courts have press rooms that reporters will unlock and share. If that fails and there’s no
free WiFi nearby, find out if you can tether your phone’s data plan to a laptop. Your newsroom
might also have a USB Internet dongle or be willing to spring for one.
When you get to court:
4. Arrive early.
If it’s a big trial, get there at least an hour early.
Parking can be a mess, and there will also be a security checkpoint, so leave any weapons at
home.
The biggest problem, though, is finding a seat. Large trials can be like a Friday night at the
movies, with people saving seats for five of their friends by laying down suit jackets or binders
of documents. When that happens, reporters often wind up standing awkwardly for hours in an
aisle or in the back with anyone else who arrived late.
5. Cut the jargon.
Most readers don’t need a play-by-play of what happens at trial. A lot of it is routine and, more
importantly, the average reader won’t know or care about all the legal terms flying back and
forth. But finding those strong, memorable quotes can be a chore. A lot of mileage can be found
in quotes that answer the “why” questions — why did the judge deny a motion? Why are the
plaintiffs so upset in a case?
Reporters often cover only opening and closing statements because the basic, straightforward
facts will be summarized during those hearings. Though that sometimes gets you in trouble.
“Things like juror and judge reaction can be difficult or impossible to gauge unless you’re
physically in the courtroom, even at the really boring moments where jurors, judges and even
lawyers sometimes drift off,” Politico White House and courts reporter Josh Gerstein said via
email.
6. Mind your electronics.
If you bring a computer, don’t waste the whole battery typing notes during court. Bring a
notepad instead. In addition to saving power, everyone will be grateful for not having to hear the
clickity-clack of a keyboard.
The same goes for phones: keep them off or at least put away. Editors sometimes ask reporters to
send text-message updates during trial, but this should be kept to a minimum. Phones can distract
you from finding good quotes, and you also might need one later to call a source or file a story.
REFERENCES
Allen, M. (2013). Textbook on criminal law (12th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Arslan,M. (2018). The right to examination of prosecution witnesses. Zeitschrift für
Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 6(1), 218-228.
Bernard, T. J., Paoline III, E. A., & Pare, P. P. (2005). General systems theory and criminal
justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 203-211.
Bowden, P., Henning, T., & Plater, D. (2014). Balancing fairness to victims, society and
defendants in the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses: An impossible
triangulation? Melbourne University Law Review, 37(2), 539-584.
Cross, N. (2010). Criminal law and criminal justice. Sage.
Cruft, R. (2011). Crime, punishment, and responsibility: The jurisprudence of Antony Duff.
Oxford University Press.
Dignan, J., & Cavadino, M. (2007). The penal system: An introduction (3rd ed.). Sage
Publications.
Duff, R. A. (2007). Answering for crime: Responsibility and liability in the criminal law.
Hart Publishing.
Ferguson, G. (2015). Criminal liability and criminal defenses. In J. D. Wright (Ed.),
International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 219-
226). Springer.
Hall, J. (2008). General principles of criminal law (2nd ed.). The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
Husak, D. N. (1989). Justifications and the criminal liability of accessories. The Journal of
Criminal Law & Criminology, 80(2), 491-520.
Husak, D. N. (1992). The serial view of criminal law defenses. Criminal Law Forum, 3(3),
369-400.
Ibrahim, N., & Nambiar, R. M. K. (2011). There are many ways of skinning a cat, my lord:
Humor in the Malaysian adversarial courtroom. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of
English Language Studies, 17(2), 73-89.
Lanham, D., Wood, D., Bartal, B., & Evans, R. (2006). Criminal laws in Australia. The
Federation Press.
Leverick, F. (2006). Killing in self-defence. Oxford University Press.
Monaghan, N. (2016). Criminal law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Pakes, F. (2010). Comparative criminal justice (2nd ed.). Willian Publishing.
Pham, T. T. N. (2016). Juvenile offenders in Vietnam and the right to defence. Youth
Justice, 16(1), 49-70.
Robinson, P. H. (1982). Criminal law defenses: A systematic analysis. Columbia Law
Review, 82(2), 199-291.
Sistare, C. T. (1989). Responsibility and criminal liability. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
