Running head: ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
1
Rothaermel Exercise 2
Liberty University
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
2
Rothaermel Exercise 2
Module/Week 2 – Individual Assurance of Learning Exercises (AOL 2)
Chapter 6 Rothaermel Text
Discussion Question 6.1
Generic business strategy can be categorized as two different strategies:
differentiation and cost leadership. A differentiation strategy strives to create the highest
value for the customers rather than the competitors. It does so by generating products and
services with unique features, while stabilizing costs and charging customers higher
prices. Cost leadership, on the other hand, offers the same value for customers but allows
firms to offer customers lower prices. A business strategy is most likely to create a
competitive advantage if other firms perform similar activities differently or different
activities, which creates more value, offers the same products, and reduces the cost of
services (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 179). Additionally, utilizing cost leadership and its low
prices can create a disadvantage for a firm because it lessens customer loyalty. When the
price of a product or service is too low, it generates a negative attitude towards the
quality, which could deter customers from buying those products and services. The risk
associated with cost differentiation is the limitation by competitors and a change in the
customer’s taste, which could eliminate a firm’s competitive advantage and reduce sales.
Discussion Question 6.3
One example of a value chain firm that uses a cost-leadership strategy is the
manufacturing company BIC, which produces disposable pens and cigarette lighters at a
low cost to customers. A differentiation strategy is one utilized by the manufacturing
companies like Montblanc, which produces high quality pens with much higher value and
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
3
cost. An example of a value innovation business-level strategy is one utilized by IKEA,
who uses value innovation to eliminate-reduce-raise-create a framework to eliminate its
own blue ocean and to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
Chapter 7 Rothaermel Text
Discussion Question 7.1
In the cell phone application industry, Apple is one of the biggest and most
profitable app companies with its introduction of the Apple App Store. Originally
launched in 2008, the apps store quickly became a popular location for iPhone users to
buy apps and for developers to create them. “Arguably, the explosive growth of the
iPhone is due to the fact that the Apple App Store offers the largest selection of apps to its
users” (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 219). Because users have a better experience when apps
take advantage of the iPhone’s tight hardware and software integrations. But launching a
new innovative industry requires the core competency of R&D in order to create a
product category that would attract customers. This also requires time and investment as
the initial market size is small but will eventually grow in time. After the initial
development and market acceptance, demand increases and people rush to enter the
market. In the case of Apple and its apps store, the success of the iPhone and the needs
for users to have more apps increased.
Apps developing companies entered the industry to create attractive apps that
utilize different aspects of the phone. Once the industry cannot expand any further, the
rate of growth declines and companies start competing against each other to attract
customers and gain a competitive advantage. “As competitive intensity increases, the
weaker firms are forced out of the industry” (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 223). In the app store
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
4
this can be seen when developers create similar games or photo editing apps, then
compete against each other through promotions or extra features to attract more
customers. After competing against each other, only a few companies remain in the
industry morphing the structure into an oligopoly, moving into a maturity stage. At this
point, most of the demand for apps is satisfied and demand now shifts to in-app purchases
like additional features or expansion packs. Lastly, demand falls and the decline in sales
creates a strong pressure on prices. At this final point of the industry life cycle,
“managers generally have four strategic options: exit, harvest, maintain, or consolidate”
(Rothaermel, 2017, p. 224). App companies are forced to increase the prices of their apps
and in-app purchases in order to remain competitive and in the market.
Discussion Question 7.2
Gillette is a highly innovative firm that has dominated the razor industry for years,
holding 80 percent of the razor and blade market at a global scale. Although Gillette
currently continues to dominate the market, it has never stopped taking risks and creating
new innovative ways to design a razor. They continue to do this by adding extra blades or
hinges that will make it easier and more effective to shave. Gillette is a great example of
radical innovation and incremental innovation. Being that the company is one of the first
to ever begin selling razors with disposable blades, it utilized radical innovation to gain
success. Additionally, through incremental innovation the company continues to provide
new versions of it razor through an innovative strategy that has proven to create a
successful competitive advantage.
Discussion Question 7.4
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
5
“Innovative advances in IT and logistics facilitated the creation of the overnight
express delivery industry by FedEx and that of big-box retailing by Walmart”
(Rothaermel, 2017, p. 218). One low-technology innovation that has helped people in
undeveloped areas of the world without clean drinking water is the LifeStraw. Millions of
people die every year from diseases contracted from drinking polluted water. LifeStraw
filters the water from polluted sources and converts it into clean water at a low price. The
device is small enough to carry and can be shared with others. Because of the low cost
and necessity to provide a clean source of drinking water to billions of people around the
world, the manufacturing company has innovatively produced a product that is now in
high demand and simultaneously has gained a competitive advantage in its industry.
Chapter 8 Rothaermel Text
Discussion Question 8.1
“Corporate strategy comprises the decisions that senior management makes and
the goal-directed actions it takes in the quest for competitive advantage in several
industries and markets simultaneously” (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 256). It allows top
management to determine where to compete, and the strategy to take within the three
dimensions of vertical integration, diversification, and geographic scope. A business-level
strategy of differentiation aims at creating higher value for customers than the value that
competitors create. It also delivers products or services with unique features, while
making sure costs remain the same or at a similar level, which allows firms to charge
higher prices to its customers (Rothaermel, 2017, p.179). When Walmart decided to add
grocery stores to its locations and create supercenters, they did so by utilizing a corporate
strategy of diversification, which expanded their scope of operations and provided
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
6
customers with a wider variety of goods. Walmart used a business-level strategy to
compete with others and try to gain a competitive advantage.
Chapter 9 Rothaermel Text
Discussion Question 9.1
No-equity alliance is one of the most common governing mechanisms used by
firms either through supply agreements, distribution agreements, or licensing agreements.
Non-equity alliances provide flexibility and are easy to initiate and terminate because of
their contractual nature. “However, because they can be temporary in nature, they also
sometimes produce weak ties between the alliance partners, which can result in a lack of
trust and commitment” (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 305). Equity alliance allows one partner to
take partial ownership in the other partner’s share, and it less common because it requires
a large investment. Equity alliance creates strong ties, greater trust, and offers a window
into new technology. “The downside of equity alliances is the amount of investment that
can be involved, as well as a possible lack of flexibility and speed in putting together and
reaping benefits from the partnership” (Rothaermel, 2017, p. 306). Lastly, joint ventures
create a standalone organization that can be jointly owned by two or more parent
companies. The advantages of joint ventures are that it creates strong ties, trust, and
commitment. Nevertheless, this type of governing mechanism requires long negotiation
and significant investment. If an alliance doesn’t work, undoing a joint venture takes time
and considerable cost.
Chapter 10 Rothaermel Text
Discussion Question 10.3
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
7
“Globalization is a process of closer integration and exchange between different
countries and peoples worldwide, made possible by falling trade and investment barriers,
advances in telecommunications, and reductions in transportation costs” (Rothaermel,
2017, p. 330). Coca-Cola is one of the most well-known firms that operates at an
international level. Originally created in 1886, the company has grown over time making
itself one of the most recognizable brands of all time. Coca-Cola uses a simple global
strategic position of the 3 A’s: acceptability, affordability, and availability, which has
contributed to the success of the company. Additionally, it has been successful in the
market because it follows local strategies and is able to deliver to the needs of people.
Aside from manufacturing sodas, the company owns over 500 additional brands ranging
from Sprite, Nestea, Dasani water, and Powerade. In conclusion, Coca-Cola’s strategy is
effective and efficient internally due to its clear vision and its global strategy.
ROTHAERMEL EXERCISE 2
8
References
Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Strategic management concepts (Custom 3rd ed.) New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.