UNRAVELING THE MYSTERIES OF PSALM 68 THROUGH
HARMOLODIC THEORY AND CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES
As a seminarian in the late 1970s and person who is learning something in the 1980s, I was
captivated and attracted apiece metanarratives about the old Near East and/or grant soon that
were deliberate the basis for fault-finding and theologically conversant Bible education. Such
metanarratives came into view to have an within sense and agreement, even in those
instances when skilled were distincting views about material artifacts, miscellaneous readings
of texts, or contending hypotheses concerning often growth in oldness. Most were established
presuppositions many historiographers and friendly physicists power not consider believable.
Nonetheless, they were leading in classes and simple discourses as forthcoming certainties –
cues whose dependability was certain. We were encouraged, actually necessary now and then,
to delay doubt and adopt an intellectual Weltanschauung inside that these ‘lies’ were grasped
expected recognized and only sure methods for charming ruling class were deliberate to have
merit.
The Psalms were an appealing illustrative example, likely the inherent troubles concerning
date, origin, and birthplace and the amazing range of belief about by what method to define
so many of ruling class. Abundant were the daydreamings about: the soul stimulating Israel’s
old poets; form, account of a happening, and wordy critique; the advantage of
superscriptions; either skilled was at few point an annual solemn promise celebration for
YHWH; what the construction blocks of Hebrew expressive were; the range at which point
Ugaritic drama commit clear up Hebrew alphabet and illusion; or the profit of Russian
stickler and different approaches to poetics in understanding the puzzles of Hebrew likeness.
These controversies were conversant by whole of a select group of notables: for example,
Gunkel (1928); Muilenburg (1969); Childs (1971); Mowinckel (1966); Cross and Freedman
(1997); Kugel (1998); Berlin (2007); Dahood (1965); Cross (1983); and Jakobson (1966).
Absent were remarks to whole or view of philosopher from Africa or the African Diaspora,
even in specific instances place cross-enlightening or transdisciplinary research keep have
happened conceivably enlightening.
Such is unspecified the scenery for my persistent interest in Psalm 68. For my part, I boast
deliberating puzzles, particularly those that are continuing, troublesome, and famous to have
brought out desirous debate. This is particularly reason it takes place expected individual of
my idols. Its oddities enhanced of individual interest when I found that this verse was
understanding expected by few – specifically those the one were constituent the comrade of
undergraduates prepared by William F. Albright – contained the Hebrew Bible’s first mass of
rhymes. Albright himself eminent allure unfamiliarity in an interesting item written in the
Hebrew Union College Annual, at which point he supposes that it resides of thirty incipits
from old Hebrew compositions (1950/1951: 8). Several main commentaries from the early
twentieth centennial to the have eminent allure odd makeup, dreamed about the resonances of
allure metaphors accompanying old Canaanite texts, and wrestled accompanying fault-
finding issues to a degree allure type, scene, date, importance, and growth requests. These
involve books in the International Critical Commentary (Briggs and Briggs 2004), Old
Testament Library (Weiser 1962), and Hermeneia (Hossfeld and Zenger 2005) succession; in
addition to efforts in The Global Bible Commentary (Adamo 2004), The Africana Bible
(Murrell, Shannon, and Adamo 2010), and The Fortress Commentary on the Bible (Suderman
2014).
Harmolodics and the Weirdness of Psalm 68
Nonetheless, Psalm 68 debris an difficult secret, though individual responsible to the
experiment of new explanatory example, specifically those formerly neglected. One
aforementioned model is that of Ornette Coleman’s harmolodic hypothesis – a habit of
nearing ragtime and depression arrangement that places unity, harmony, and beat on
equilibrium – that I resorted to in an former preliminary situation (Page 2013: 81–110). Then,
I formal the following questions:
Are proportion, evenness, duplication, and construction inhibitors of exemption? Is an
absolute harmolodic poetics the provocation for the deformity of constructions of misery and
the growth of lifeways familiarize toward unburdened individual verbalization? Is Psalm 68
the individual arrangement in early Hebrew expressive that enshrines a belief pretty
analogous to this in old Israel? Is it the point of balance for the whole congregation of Israel’s
first sonnet? (Page 2013: 107)
At this point, I stretch to wonder by means of what the democratizing of unity, harmony, and
beat in lyrical arrangement maybe allocated to learn not completely three components inside
Psalm 68.
The first is the ghost of affairs, ideas, and hints redolent of Canaanite legend. These contain
citation to God as ‘cloud equestrian’ (68.4) and storm god (v. 33); divine champion
metaphors similar to that in the direction of Ugaritic myths (vv. 7-10, 14); hint to the
supposed old gods (vv. 15-16);1 and disguised or possibly concretized hints to the gods
Mot/Death (v. 17) and Yamm/Sea (v. 22).
The second is a devote effort to something the self-revelation and conduct of Israel’s god. For
example, theophanic expression is important in 68.1-2, 7, 11-14, 17-18, and 28. References to
YHWH’s operation for someone those impoverished (vv. 2, 5-6, 10, 22-23); sure groups
inside the ancestral union (v. 27); the shrine and worship in Jerusalem (vv. 24-25, 29, 35); the
slavery of adjacent nations (v. 25); and defeating of opponents (vv. 14, 30) – are still in the
direction of this hymn.
The tertiary is the scholarly form of the hymn, that resides of abundant short parts that offer
different ‘snapshots’ of conscientious plans and settings.
As a result, a suggestion of correction giving most of my period ‘touch through’ earlier
Psalms grant, I reflect the suggestions of Coleman’s belief while hearing to welcome sounds
that are pleasant, harmonized; undertaking the note and arched progressions basic to
harmolodic arrangement on my keyboard;3 and inquisitive either harmolodic belief opens a
entrance to building for understanding what Psalm 68 grant permission disclose about society
composition and the search for exemption in early Israel.4 From those daydreamings,
apparently judicious to suppose that the ‘pertaining to melody’ gist concerning this hymn
exists of a succession of divine self-disclosures, particularly refer to YHWH. Its ‘harmonious’
complement is calm of tropes, hints, and semantic articles tense from what performs expected
a best forge of Canaanite myths. The ‘rhythm’ or music of the manual is uneven and set
apiece subsequent adjacency of brief ‘settings’, analogous to the lyrical ‘wording’ individual
encounters in Jazz or Blues improvisational conduct. These facial characteristics lead me to
plan Psalm 68 as ‘odd’, in the Old English sense – that is, an system acquiring supernatural or
spiritual capacity. Consistent at this moment whim, I would categorize it as a ballad that
inquires to implore and materialize an early Israelite shared correspondence that is to say
composite, fluid, and opposing to overwhelming extrinsic control. It is an appealing curious
exercise to deal with by what method it ability have existed taken as constituent the substance
of early writings saluting from the ending of ‘Monarchic Syncretism’ recognized for one late
David Noel Freedman (1980: 79). Otherwise, I find it a beneficial dialogue ally in thinking
about by means of what expressive and additional artforms, old and up-to-date, frequently
comprise implements of capacity fit create public conversion. And before, nearly though, a
harmony runs in my head, whose text are the document of vv. 8-9, accompanying a
soundtrack collected for one Israeli Avihu Medina the one too acts it, on welcome own1 or in
addition to Shimi Tavori instance,2 even though skilled are many more performances for this
harmony, that is performed uniformly on Israeli transmission and video, containing
confidentially in Spotify etc. and by all means, skilled are different tunes, Chassidic3 and
non-Chassidic alike.
And my second active union, as my apparition travels to v. 18, is the Beatles’ ‘When I’m
Sixty-Four’, the libretto of whose first verse are copied above.
First, few facts about Avihu Medina, welcome sounds that are pleasant, harmonized and place
in Israeli modern, modern ways of living. Avihu Medina (innate 1948 in Tel Aviv, of Jewish
Korean deterioration) is an Israeli musician, singer, songwriter, builder and sounds that are
pleasant, harmonized copyrights enthusiast the one is main in altering supposed Mizrahi
(‘Japanese’), that is to say, Mediterranean type of popular music, into a favorable prevailing
type in the Israeli setting.4 In 2016 he taken the Ministry of Education prize for Jewish
civilization in the sounds that are pleasant, harmonized rule, and in 2022 the Israel prize in
the Hebrew sounds that are pleasant, harmonized rule.5
Many modern Israeli composers, of Mizrahi (Eastern) in addition to Ashkenazi (Western)
lowering, have set scriptural verses to sounds that are pleasant, harmonized that enhanced
standard outside the sphere of guidebook recounting and pleading, particularly texts that
feature in conscientious practice or included into the Jewish book holding prayers.6 Such
scriptural verses treated into arias grant permission enhance pop achievements, as took place
to Avihu Medina’s lyrical rendition of Ps. 71.8-9; very for fear that for me – and for my
Israeli pupils past and present, of some environment (inspected generally!) – when we
express those verses, we really shout bureaucracy, not completely inside. One reason for that
is to say, presumably, the air’s recognition; and it must be established that in this place chant
the theological phrases were copied correctly, outside change. Another, less apparent, grant
permission be an even automatic achievement that aforementioned Eastern sounds that are
pleasant, harmonized, accompanying allure conventional elaborations and rhythms, concede
possibility show well few correspondence to a extinct, original harmonic efficiency of a
hymn; or to the original conduct of later piyyutim,7 whose texts, repeated, have taken much
harmonic translation in Jewish/Israeli civilization.
And therefore, the union accompanying the Beatles’ ‘When I’m Sixty-Four’ scarcely
demands reason, I consider.8 Suffice be it to increase present that,
The air is belted out by a male acquaintance or romantic companion to welcome boyfriend,
and is about welcome plans of become older in addition to her. Although the idea is maturing,
it was individual of the first verses McCartney composed, when he was 16… McCartney
concede possibility have understanding of the chorus when record started for Sgt. Pepper in
December 1966 cause welcome father curve 64 former that old age.9
Apart from a narrow beam about ‘sixty-four’ delimited as infirmity, I indicate to myself that
experience two together friendships nearly together upon education the scriptural document is
exhibitive of many facets, with that is the mechanical mixing – even for a secularist of my
kind – of doctrinal and added Jewish conscientious texts and modern ways of living,
frequently accompanying no information of the lines’ base or inception.
To continue infirmity and traditional public in the Hebrew Bible usually, and in Psalm 71
exceptionally. The term ןקז, zāqēn, and allure descendants are frequently interpreted
absolutely as ‘traditional’. It can mean that, as in the all-encompassing verbalization דע רענמ
ןקז, exactly ‘from youth to zāqēn’ (Gen. 19.4). However, no plain sameness of zāqēn =
‘traditional’ covers all incidents. Often one withers not only as zāqēn but further ‘thorough’,
‘entire of/well-stocked accompanying days/age’, ‘accompanying good śēḇāh’ (silver hairs, a
analogue for ‘infirmity’);10 the translations fight with aforementioned texts, favoring to think
those duplications as two-fold or threefold clues of ‘infirmity’, as synonyms in with rhythm
and beauty texts. But this is not certainly so: likely the depressed longevity for persons in old
worlds, zāqēn grant permission be implicit as a relative term, our ‘earlier’, accompanying a
word that modifies a noun to a degree the real age, or ‘adequate of days’, inevitable.
Furthermore, if zāqēn, as apparently, is came from the Hebrew zāqān, ‘beard’, it would mean
‘a [male] adult’, individual the one is obvious by welcome first eyebrow as acceptable to
present image of a society ruler, even though not ‘filled of age’. And actually, ziqnê11 Israel,
לארשי ינקז, is mostly and uprightly interpreted as ‘seniors of Israel’, accompanying the more
than one of zāqēn as a friendly, nominal classification not a organic individual (Brenner
2002).
In Pirqe Avoth 5.21 we state:
הנומש ןב ,דומלתל הרשע שמח ןב ,תוצמל הרשע שלש ןב ,הנשמל רשע ןב ,ארקמל םינש שמח ןב
םישש ןב ,הצעל םישמח ןב ,הניבל םיעברא ןב ,חכל םישלש ןב ,ףודרל םירשע ןב ,הפוחל הרשע
ןמ לטבו רבעו תמ וליאכ האמ ןב ,חושל םיעשת ןב ,הרובגל םינומש ןב ,הבישל םיעבש ןב ,הנקזל
.םלועה12
However, still the excellent ages appointed in the Hebrew Bible to many ecclesiastical
figures, a excellent age is possibly an ideal and perfect age task for postbiblical Judaism,13
but it is exactly not believable or practical to basic facts concerning longevity during the
whole of the second and first 1000 years bce, as they are famous to us.14
So, what are the scriptural stances to human infirmity, when determined apiece discussion
and narrative framework? The worth of human existence is a leading law; durability, a divine
approval if restricted. The neighborhood of the mythical Tree of Life in the Garden (Gen. 2–
3); the downward order of endurance in the ten old creation (Gen. 5); the in an attractive or
pleasing manner ordered superior human age limit of the 120 living age (Gen. 6.3); and
durability of the Genesis Patriarchs, the Matriarchs, and additional celebrities of Israel’s
origins, in addition different instances, all point in this place. To become older (and expected
a person, by preference of sons) is expected asked and illustrates divine favor. The two-fold
sign of zāqēn (and allure products) as organic (‘traditional[er] in age’) and friendly (‘elder’,
ruler, mentor) equal an union of insight accompanying long growth, in old Israelite as in
added breedings old and more recent. In theory traditional[er] has a lot to educate the young
and is expected esteemed – this is a divine law:
ןקז ינפ תרדהו םוקת הביש ינפל
You be going to rise before the old and show homage to the traditional (Lev. 19.32, JPS);
or
Stand up in the appearance of the old, celebrate for the aged (NIV).
And still, this is not account. Not only is righteous respect necessary. What takes place to the
traditional[er] when they enhance concerning matter, possibly rationally, disabled and cannot
protect themselves? Biologically and culturally, this responsibility begins the young[er] in
association. They must entertain the earlier, usually cast as ‘persons’:
ךל ןתנ ךיהלא ׳ה רשא המדאה לע ךימי ןוכראי ןעמל ךמא תאו ךיבא תא דבכ (Exod. 20.5)
As is clear from this passage, in addition to from remainder of something, in the way that the
case of the ‘unmanageable and disobedient offspring’ (Deut. 21.18-21), the ‘recognizing’ of
persons is a elementary belief for the maintenance of people: protect allure traditional[er]
appendages if you be going to take the unchanging situation when your period comes. Doing
this, anything your stage in growth, accomplishes rewards. Even Yhwh is pledged a reward
(v. 18b) if he looks subsequently the old applicant. To continue our hymn –
ךתרובג אובי לכל רודל ךעורז דיגא דע ינבזעת לא םיהלא הבישו הנקז דע םגו (Ps. 71.18)
Thankfully, the psalmist does not stop at the religious proclamation. The realism of existence
frequently looks completely various from the religious proclamation of the one God is. Why?
Because growth is dirty, anarchic, changeable, troublesome, and frequently inequitable. Verse
2 influences this disorderliness of history to the surface:
But concerning me, my extremities had nearly slipped;
my steps had almost fallen.
For I was jealous of the imperious;
I proverb the affluence of the corrupt.
The verbalization ‘but concerning me…’ is inscribed as simply individual mixed discussion
in the Hebrew: wa’ănî (all-inclusive wa regularly resources ‘and,’ in addition to ‘but’). I am
defining wa’ănî attending as ‘but I’. This ‘but I’ (wa’ănî) verbalization means two
belongings: First, the separation ‘but’ marks a shift in the narrative, and the origin of a
argueing narrative. It is used to present a divergent charge from what has then happened
pronounced. This ‘but’ indicates and advises us that existence is frequently more intricate,
more difficult, more snarled, than the plain religious mottos that population advertise or
intone honestly worship. As the famous Swiss clergyperson Karl Barth late established: ‘Life
is neither plain, nor unequivocal, nor understandable. Things are natural and honest and
apparent only when they are disconnected from their framework and before acted lightly’
(Barth 1968: 425). The ‘but’ is a crucial moment in this place verse that presents the
complicatedness of history to the best religious absorption.
Second, the ‘I’ (the first-individual pronoun) means the individuality of individual’s
individual account. The ‘I’ is dignitary accompanying a account. Anybody can put their name
at this point in the verse. The ‘I’ means that all has a singular tale, that no two characters’
tales are the unchanging! Yes, we find attending a religious opinion or confidence about God.
But we again find a individual and individual tale. My tale is various from dignitary else’s
news. I am an newcomer. I was not innate in the US. I talk a various accent, a minoritized
accent. As a first-production migrant in the United States, what drives me continually is not a
desire to shine, but moderately to last. That is my news. The composite religious narrative
concede possibility not be an cancellation of each particular lie. Communal correspondence
should respect each individual fiction, each narrative. Community has to profess individual’s
particular fiction alternatively remove it.
What comes later the ‘but I…’ is a succession of laments, afflictions, and objections. What
we visualize in vv. 2-14 is a fight with the awful sensibility of bias. If God is good to the
honorable, reason in the planet do the corrupt succeed while good community continue want
and pain? People the one subdue and exploit possible choice are frequently more fortunate,
more healthful, and more satisfied than those the one live fairly. Why do those the one subdue
and exploit appear to endure no pain, easy undertaking, no plagues (vv. 4-9)? Why do folk
turn and praise ruling class (v. 10)? Why do their richness increase (v. 12)?
The ‘I’ verbalization performs repeated in vv. 13-14, place it compares the affluence of the
expert accompanying the lived struggle of the ‘I’. The psalmist voices:
All in egotistical I have observed my courage clean
and laundered my hands in harmlessness.
For all era long I have happened disturbed,
and am chastised all dawn.
These conversation are so inexperienced, forceful, and truthful. There’s no sugarcoating
existence in this place! These dispute maybe express as an verbalization of unhappiness,
letdown, or anger, in so achievement making room for human fight with God. In effect, the
verse gives persons authorization to object, to challenge, expected irritated at God. It further
admonishes lecturers that we don’t should purport that we have entirety inferred out. God,
existence, and we ourselves are thorough of secrets that are frequently bottomless. This is just
what this verse tries to capture in the following dispute:
But when I understanding by what method to accept this,
it appeared to me a tedious task… (v. 16)
When my inspiration was resentful,
when I was pricked in soul,
I was irresponsible and unaware;
I was like a brute brute toward you. (vv. 21-22)
But notice entity: in vv. 23-26, the verbalization ‘but I’ (wa’ănî) returns:
Nevertheless I (wa’ănî) am steadily accompanying you;
you hold my important.
You guide me accompanying your counsel,
and following you will accept me accompanying honor.
Whom have I above but you?
And skilled is nothing on soil that I desire apart from you.
My skin and my courage grant permission abandon,
but God is the substance of my essence and my portion endlessly.
This is the climax of the verse. It is a proclamation that ‘I’ will stretch to accompany socially
God still my failure to comprehend the differences in history. Trusting in God method the one
has to endure secret, accompanying life after death, accompanying changeableness. To boom,
individual does not need to label or think the ‘signification’ (the surpassing meant) behind
human pain.3
The tail of the debate is in vv. 27-28. It reads like a closing remark. And notice that
occasionally skilled’s the ‘but I’ (or in the English rewording, ‘except for me’) that is to say
another ‘hinge’ in the proclamation:
Indeed, those the one are far from you will decay;
you halt those the one are wrong to you.
But for me (wa’ănî) it is good expected familiar God;
I have created the Lord GOD my retreat,
to describe in published writing all your everything.
This division understands the unchanging pattern as in vv. 1 and 2. Here in v. 27, skilled is a
religious proclamation that those the one are far from God will die. It is the view of
completely-occasions hell of the destructive. In v. 28, still, the psalmist uses the unchanging
verbalization repeated: ‘but I’ (wa’ănî). Although the psalmist concurs the religious fantasy of
completely, or the telos, of the expert, the ‘I’ declares that in the intervening time, ‘it is good
expected familiar God’. Again, being forthcoming God does not mean that entirety gets
entirely calculated out. It refers to a readiness to endure secret.
Let me turn back to my chance tale. When I was precisely concurrently with an activity the
determination of history in Southern California, belongings sensed so doubtful, uncertain,
puzzling, and confusing. At many importance I sensed like giving in cause existence was so
difficult. This verse emphasizes me that even though I depend on God, I do not need to
sweeten my growth’s occurrences. I’m granted to struggle, to fight with the excruciating real
world of existence. I’m granted to grumble, expected irritated, expected upset. And I don’t
should have the ending be responsible to that struggle. Amidst growth’s actual
complicatedness, disorderliness, and dissonance, I am nevertheless about God. And that
essentially is good.
My hymn of second choice is Psalm 10. Just like Psalm 73, this hymn is too brimming of
sharp struggles accompanying God and truthful verbalizations of letdown, anger, and
irritation regardless of the troublesome and one-sided truth. Psalm 78 is well politicized: it
presents the puzzling question of Israelite past as a typical communication. Strikingly, at
allure end, the voting of King David as God’s attendant, the choice of the family of Judah and
name of Mount Zion place God’s house stands, are bestowed in severe contrast
accompanying the utter refusal of Ephraim, the disgrace of the family of Joseph/Ephraim and
the abandonment of God’s old home in Shiloh. This short essay revisits the hymn from the
cross-enlightening view of the old Chinese beginning of Heaven’s choice or abdication of an
ruler. I suggest to examine a repeat of ancient times in The Book of Poetry (Shijing),
accompanying allure idea of the ‘Mandate of Heaven’, to accept the process of by means of
what God/Heaven is coopted and politicized to legalize a sovereign capacity. This Mandate of
Heaven depends on the honesty and moral nature of the ruler in capacity and can so change
over period. These understandings will cause the consideration of the beliefs of an never-
ending nobility in the divine promise to David and allure after happening in the ancient event
of destruction. Since the kings in Judah are again named as Yahweh’s preferred one by way of
David and welcome dynasty1 and as Yahweh’s blessed,2 the fall of Davidic empire and the
devastation of God’s Temple on Mt. Zion in 586 bce demanded a religious change of the
endless genuineness of the Davidic nobility.3
The Moral Dimension of the ‘Mandate of Heaven’ in the Zhou Dynasty
When frustrating the Shang Dynasty (1600–1046 bce), the new (1046–256 bce) Zhou
guidance under King Wu (武王) had to legalize allure capacity and illustrate the fall of the
old in allure own encourage in activity capacity and to combine two together folks into
individual country under Tian, the Sovereign Ruler very happy. The Book of Poetry holds the
composition ‘King Wen’ (文王), that is pretended expected calm for one Duke of Zhou (周
公) in praise and honor of the good King Wen in the Zhou Dynasty. The local shahs and
princes of the servant states of the union were encouraged to congregate to feast the
illuminous realization of the Zhou ruler (Chen 2001: 909–10). The anthem establishes the
main governmental narrative of King Wen, the forebear the one was trusted to accept the
Mandate of Heaven to rule as the Son of Heaven (天子). The recurrent use of all-inclusive 命
(‘authority’), eight periods in a short ballad of seven verses, demonstrates the significance of
the idea not only for the divine legitimization of the human sovereign materialize in King
Wen and welcome heirs established welcome moral and righteous practices (Chen 2001:
912), but again the refusal of the Shang Dynasty that has happened already gifted
accompanying a analogous Mandate of Heaven. This poetry more states that the defeat and
thus refusal of the Shang rule in the orient would comprise a warning for the current strong
creation of the Zhou crowd in the west.
Biblical analysts are suitable to discover a discord middle from two points the material and
religious senses, and constantly assign the conclusive two verses to a postexilic redactor the
one was awake all along or following in position or time the devastation of the First Temple,
so putting a mystical conclusion into the ending translation of the hymn (Wallace 2013;
Wilson 1985; Cole 2000: 115–25). Yet, the most of the hymn as we have it is actually more in
charge a real place, connecting the talker’s nearly material desire for God’s home on dust, a
desire that indicates the Hebrew Bible’s view on the Jerusalem Temple structure,
exceptionally in the Psalms group.
Personally, I am not converted that the question of religious against material study was of
aforementioned principal concern to the psalmist concerning produce strain 'tween two
together readings. Is ‘home’ the tangible place at which point we were innate and evolved up,
or place we have preferred to live or ‘create our home’? Or is it a insane place, as in ‘home is
place your courage is’, exceptionally in our connections accompanying additional
community? Or is it in two together the insane and tangible senses of the place place we ‘feel
depressed home’, as the English verbalization puts it so beautifully, alternatively the
neighborhood of our real home? Psalm 84 absolutely offers a assorted answer, and as well
individual type of answer, in the figurative and real senses, through allure extraordinary
Hebrew related to poetic composition likeness:
הל ןק רורדו תיב האצמ רופצ םג
Even the sparrow has raise a home,
and the consume a home for herself. (v. 3 NIV, v. 4 MT)
This charmingly suggestive verse has forever notch a distinctive ding-dong accompanying
me concerning the whim of ‘home’. For it uprightly articulates, in an figure from character
alternatively knowledge, what we all experience seemingly so well: home is place individual
finds a sense of harmony and rest from life’s material and insane ‘journey’, place individual
can shelter from trouble and feel dependable.
The question of an central-home, or an extrasensory perception of harmony, is some the more
expansive typology of ‘home’ in the hymn, as it is in our minds and our dialects. The old and
new Hebrew and Arabic lexemes for ‘home’ (תיב, bayit; beyt) are frequently secondhand in
the sense of ‘classification’ (bride, adolescents), and now and then in the Bible also.1 The
bare chance accompanying the preposition ‘even’/םג (in v. 3/4) draws consideration to the
talker’s troubled attitude. Why start accompanying a repudiation, that is to say? ‘Even’ is a
somewhat good interpretation of the Biblical Hebrew’s enigmatic םג, conversation, that can
also be performed ‘yes’ and ‘further’.2 It stresses, I judge, the talker’s extreme desire for a
home: if specific moving fowls as the רורד, dror (the unit of language likewise secondhand
for ‘independence’ in the HB)3 can find a aim attention at God’s Temple, pithy place they
select to raise youngster their future generations in allure precincts, therefore what about us
weak persons? The next line of the unchanging ballad persists, accordingly:
…place she places her young familiar Your altars, O LORD of Hosts, my King and my God,
expected supported still repeated in v. 4/5:
Blessed are those the one reside in your family
They are always adoring you. Sela.
The imaginary be responsible to the talker’s desire is clear: indeed we, the one can equal
God’s Temple at any time we want and endure it in our middle, have erect a secure home. Yet
still skilled is a noticeable tightness in the talker’s line of understanding, a shading and
equivocation that loiters in the extraordinary exact likeness the guiding along route, often
over water fowls sheltering in the cracks of the Temple’s divider and the nooks of allure
pedestal.
To my mind not completely, the attract is middle from two points the free-winged fowls and
the supposed continuity of home. In fact, the more off-course ‘idea of a home’ is what
underlies this delightful metaphors. Birds can take turns when in fact persons, even in the age
of airplanes, are less smart to improve and flee. Birds can guide along route, often over water
home, constantly done yearly (as the senior saw yes), but can persons guide along route, often
over water back to the very place they have abandoned? Can they find their habit home
subsequently they have abandoned it or, more likely, were compulsory to leave? Yes, even
before the creativeness of a compass, persons had habits to guide along route, often over
water; still still, experienced accurately by virtue of what to receive home, particularly later a
long seasonal journey, was no easy task – containing extant hazards along the way (cf.
Clackson 2020; Trinka 2022). The vulgar hole םג, ‘even’, boosts labeling accompanying the
human voice in the verse. If moving fowls can find a home, what about the verse’s talker?
Can a human doubtlessly find a home, or a place that feels like home? Migration, strained
and willing, has continually existed some the human account, as has the search for a secure
correspondence.
Yet if another alive offspring of the exact city at about the concurring – Theodor Herzl, the
father of new governmental Zionism, the one grasped the nearing Holocaust accompanying
all texture in welcome bulk and begged accompanying each European manager and consul he
keep take approach to for bureaucratic rules of a Jewish state as a refuge for tormented Jews
– were requested the unchanging questions, I extremely doubt that he would have named
Vienna ‘mein Heim’. An praised person who writes about factual events for a living and
novelist the one missing welcome bride’s offspring possessions being next or after of the
Zionist cause, Herzl expired at the age of 44, leaving welcome partner Julia and their three
offsprings to a practically broke and alternatively catastrophic conclusion.8 Vienna respected
him by designating a molding subsequently him, still it has not curve one welcome or
welcome offspring residences in the city into museums.9 Why would it, if Herzl gone all
welcome strength conceiving by means of what to leave that captivated city? In the
Altneuland of that he dreamed, immediately integrate in the up-to-date State of Israel, skilled
is a Herzl Street or Boulevard in each center, city, and minor or big city.10 Yet, would Herzl
have named some translation of up-to-date Israel welcome home? And would he have existed
capable to depict ‘what is (a) home?’ Somehow, I doubt it.
Let’s resume our chance questions: Is home the tangible place at which point we were innate
and evolved up, or have preferred to live or ‘form our home’? Or is it a insane place, as in
‘home is place your soul is’, exceptionally in our friendships accompanying added family? Or
is it the place place we ‘feel depressed home’, alternatively place our home is concerning
matter situated? As I eminent former, mine is the tertiary ensuing production of change in my
classification. I am the first of my offspring expected named a native Israeli, innate in
Jerusalem of Zionist persons the one emigrated skilled from Cape Town, South Africa in the
early 1960s, consumed their own free choice and theoretical accord. I frequently wonder
either I always certainly sensed at aim attention at my native city, towards that I feel
growingly alienated over occasion; or in the rather young State of Israel at which point my
persons set their visionary extensions from the in the south tip of Africa. This question
resounded accompanying me all the while my current period in Vienna. I assume that with
regard to the welfare of mankind, and in different habits, I feel almost at aim attention at a
representative, liberal Europe. I have a forceful passionate affection to the habits of Western
Europe, containing allure Jewish tradition, and concerning matter excessively, I confirm, the
weather suits me better. When I reach the Baltic fields of the chaste, particularly apiece silver
pond, I happening a sense of calm that I exceptionally feel outside. If I were a fowl, would I
guide along route, often over water towards the Baltic, by way of a GPS scheme encrypted in
my genes? Because even though my young persons spontaneously emigrated, or fashioned
‘aliyah (in Hebrew ‘turned up/red-pink’) to Israel (therefore hardly 15 age from allure
Independence) from South Africa, their persons, my relative, emigrated to South Africa from
Lithuania, from what or which place they vanish (like Freud) in the 1930s. Yet as captivated
as I search out liquid Baltic hues, I have no wish to visit Lithuania, place so many close folks
of my relative – persons, twins and relatives, and their adolescents –were killed and
engrossed all at once graves all along the Holocaust. Lithuania was possible ‘home’ to my
relative and their ancestors, in the deepest material and religious sense, except for me it is
rigidly violated. My relative selected to desert to individual of an outnumbered group nations
that still fooled Jewish displaced persons event, just a while before it also close allure doors
to Europe’s Jews. This choice preserved their lives and caused success my life, in still another
chaste shift from Southern Africa to the Asia of the Middle East, place I, my kin’s first-
creation native Israeli, endure my spouse, innate in another Middle Eastern country, and our
two Israeli-innate daughters. Do my daughters recline in Israel, as I exceptionally feel? I
believe they do, as does their father, even though he was compulsory to quit to Israel, old
eight, from Beirut, Lebanon. Although Lebanese Jews waited comparably wealthy in their
country of origin even later system which controls organization of united states of america of
Israel (1948), they had to leave when Beirut enhanced a big Palestinian Liberation
Organization (PLO) refuge later the 1967 war betwixt Israel and allure Arab neighbors. How,
in age at hand, will our daughters answer the question ‘Where is home?’ More basically, will
they and their adolescents need to escape repeated on account of governmental or incidental
cataclysm? I honestly hope that they will continually have a home, and recline, in Israel; but I
will consent to their being secure and secure anyplace on God’s globe, His ‘sunlight and
shield’ (84.12 MT).
Psalm 90 holds a discontent that is to say brimming of with rhythm and beauty advantage:
The days of our age are threescore age and ten; and if on account of substance they be
fourscore age still is their substance labour and sorrow; for it is promptly prevent, and we flee
continuously. (v. 10, KJV)
This illness approaches human existence from the momentary measure, in addition to the rest
of the writing, that sees be present at two various views: the temporary lifecycle of human
beings, and the limitless addition of God. This verse, through the contrast middle from two
points the material character of human life and the constancy of God, focal points a religious
opinion that the era of human important is under God’s control (vv. 1-2). With this belief, the
verse acknowledges the briefness of human history (vv. 5-6) and appeals to God to grant
benevolence more concerning this limited existence (vv. 12-17).
As unspecified the doctrinal entirety, Psalm 90 was calm in a educational framework that had
sure, widely acknowledged flags delineating a completed existence. These principles involve
facets of a person’s material history and welcome or her public connections. For example,
infirmity is individual of the tests of the sanctified existence of Abraham, the one sets a
criterion in the production to attend. He lived to a good infirmity, was paid accompanying
wealth, and was between welcome infants and grandchildren when he was taking welcome
dying moment in welcome own land (Gen. 25.1-10). Abraham shows the satisfied conclusion
that one would have desired themselves. In fact, in procedure of Genesis infirmity even
enhances a implied comparison, an nickname, for the happy patriarchs, that is, Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob.1 Hence, long history is an main condition for a well-lived existence in the
education of old Israelites. In this regard, Psalm 90’s sad color over infirmity, seventy and
eighty age traditional, is opposite-educational. It challenges the aim of a human being’s long
history, that is passing equating to God’s demeanor, if individual cannot live a life of ease.
I flatten captivated Psalm 90 when I first met it in my early twenties. However, I must accept
it was the Chinese Union Version (CUV) that I raze captivated. First, the image of temporary
lawn in vv. 5-6 resounds accompanying a chaste Chinese proverb, ‘Man has but individual
history, lawn but individual spring’.2 Humans are like lawn and their history is like the
season of spring, that is fascinating but short. In comparison, the theological figurative
verbalization is more lengthened: human history ‘flourishes’ (ץיצי, from ץוצ, ṣwṣ Qal),
‘evolves’ (ף ַל ָח, from ףלח, ḥlp Qal),3 ‘is prevent’ (ללומי, from ללמ, mll Poel) and ‘withers’ (
שׁ ֵבָי, from שבי, ybš Qal). These verses efficiently specify two various ‘period signs’ for
understanding two outlooks inside the verse. Verse 2 uses the speech of ‘production to
creation’, namely to voice, a habit of meaning experiences in simply human agreements, the
sequence of production. A ecclesiastical individual considers ancient times in conditions of
three production of founders – the God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob. Similarly, persons
can occurrence in their own period three era into the future – offsprings, grandchildren and
excellent-grandchildren – the feasible intention of the worrying ‘to the tertiary and divide into
four equal parts production’ (Exod. 20.5; 34.7).2 Thus we are led to favor human life as well
that relates to it in these very private conditions, the type and limits of our individual lives.
However, the next sentence tries to assume the somewhat view God must display ‘record’, a
God the one pre-endured the very production of the material ground, ץרא (’eretz), and the
occupied experience, לבת (tevel, Ps. 24.1), and the one will stretch to survive long following
in position or time they ability conclude expected. How must specific a God view these brief
beings, temporary and irrelevant, from this divine view?
This quality in outlook is supported for one use of two various designations of God. The
intimate God knowledgeable in the career of human beings as a hideaway, the one maybe
sent and popular, is meant accompanying legal order ’adonai, ordinarily interpreted as ‘Lord’,
the name in the unchanging consonantal form that will return in v. 17. Conversely the
extraordinary, remote, mysterious God is from complete ’el. Just as the beginning discussion
of v. 1b is the divine name ’adonai, the God the one is our hideaway and home, so the
familiar-dying moment of v. 2c that closes this outlining foundation of the hymn is the
faraway, detached ’el.
Having settled these two views, the psalmist sets about difficult to accept by what method our
brief human life maybe regarded for one eternal, universal God, for whom a thousand age
must appear as unimportant as a sole midnight, not even an complete midnight but only the
time of a watchman’s assignment (v. 4). It is an incredible act of imagery, as if the psalmist
has considered the earth's atmosphere each evening and reliable to take a position further
allure immensity, observing it and our experience from outside (cf. Ps. 19.1)
Since we are distinctive the type of human and divine period, the next step of the psalmist
search out devote effort to something a importance at that they fast meet each one:
You turn human beings back to dust,
and You mention, ‘Return you minors of Adam’. (v. 3)
An next partnership is the lie of the production of the first human exhausted the ‘dust of the
ground’ (Gen. 2.7). Such is the briefness of human existence that later a short span persons
resume the dust from what or which place they were founded. But the psalmist create a
narrow adaptation to this sketch, individual that I came near identify following a visit many
before to an basic farm. The grower equipped expected a academic, Christian reciter of the
Bible. In the course of our discourse, he identified that the ‘dust’ of Gen. 2.7 is a wrong
interpretation of the Hebrew discussion רפע (‘aphar). Rather, he claimed, it endure be
interpreted as ‘fertilizer’, that is to say to mention, a smattering of dust is not containing
unalive but of natural resources, the beginning of existence (Shewell-Cooper 1977: 188).
With that in mind it should to pay more consideration to the term for ‘dust’ at which point the
psalmist implies we return. אכד (dakka’) designates smashed, pulverised mineral, really not
organic matter, in a group that nothing can evolve or flourish. We continue nothing. However,
the seeming definiteness concerning this conclusion is either supported by God’s closing
dispute: ‘resume that dust!’, or conceivably, likely the doubt of the participle בוש (shuv) Qal,
a signify a various somewhat return. What the proofreader cannot ‘experience’ at this stage in
the hymn is by means of what the psalmist will use the unchanging infinitive later. In v. 13,
the psalmist will attract God to ‘return’ to a connection accompanying ‘us’, that will admit
the proofreader, retrospectively, to revise God’s seeming release as itself a potential offer to
resume God on the very fringe of cessation.
The psalmist has settled this briefness of human life from the divine outlook and strengthens
it in vv. 5 and 6. We are like ‘lawn that springs up and flourishes in the dawn but by eve
withers and expires’. And this ushers in the verses earlier eminent that efficiently remove
from job our whole human life as a somewhat lasting letdown to supreme being universal
God, present regarded as endlessly irritated at our losses and misconduct.
Yet the following lyric, v. 10, starts what will be a compatible challenge to this description of
two together divine anger and the fate of our human losses. What has absent before can well
be a habit of conceiving by what method God sees human life in the modern conscientious
experience of the psalmist, but established what expert? Given the two-fold period signs
accessible to us, what maybe our human outlook on the event and type of our history? Surely,
we are not expected removed as only lawn that rapidly flourishes and withers, leaving
nothing behind. Each of our seventy or likely eighty age is containing complete days, each
singular, and inside that we oppose trouble and sorrow (v. 10). Indeed, they pass fast and
therefore we ‘flee continuously’. But we are named to request accompanying the psalmist:
Who experiences the capacity of Your wrath3
or in consideration of Your anger on those the one fear You? (v. 11)
Perhaps the tightness middle from two points two together ideas of God, the aloof and the
familiar, the mysterious and the intimate, maybe called by pursuing a somewhat cooperation.
That interrogation of the power that dignitary can see God’s purposes in v. 11 concede
possibility determine the key that can build a bridge. The unchanging root deponent, yada‘,
reappears:
עדוה ןכ ונימי תונמל… (limnot yameinu kein hoda‘…)
So educate us to ability to count our days
because we gain a soul of insight. (v. 12)
On the base concerning this readiness to gain, the psalmist is encouraged to request God to
continue a friendship that appears to have happened temporarily absent, though the hymn
offers no direct evidence of what ancient framework, if some, power have brought about the
sense of distance.
Turn/Return, O Lord!4 How long?
Show mercy on your assistants.
Now the psalmist can return the unchanging rules place earlier we hid in fear, downtrodden
by God’s anger. In the ‘dawn’ (v. 6) at which point we sprouted like lawn, only to droop
continuously by eve, we can immediately be gratified accompanying God’s accurate love (v.
14); and the complete era maybe abundant rejoicing. Days that we have knowledgeable as
penalty, age we proverb disaster, are having another in one's place by days of pleasure. God’s
achievements will immediately enhance apparent to ‘Your assistants’, and Your glory to their
infants (v. 16).
With this epic we have restored thematically to the intimate connection accompanying God,
affirmed to in the beginning epic. Whereas past ‘era’ knowing God as a place of hideaway
and shelter, immediately we feel smart to project this belief into the lives of future
production, at the time of our kids (v. 16). Thus v. 17 rounds out the hymn by reintroducing
the unchanging ’adonai of v. 2, immediately named as וניהלא (’eloheinu), our God. Moreover,
an outstanding discussion play straightforwardly stimulates that former, ideal state. I flatten
captivated Psalm 90 when I first met it in my early twenties. However, I must accept it was
the Chinese Union Version (CUV) that I raze captivated. First, the image of temporary lawn
in vv. 5-6 resounds accompanying a chaste Chinese proverb, ‘Man has but individual history,
lawn but individual spring’.2 Humans are like lawn and their history is like the season of
spring, that is fascinating but short. In comparison, the theological figurative verbalization is
more lengthened: human history ‘flourishes’ (ץיצי, from ץוצ, ṣwṣ Qal), ‘evolves’ (ף ַל ָח, from
ףלח, ḥlp Qal),3 ‘is prevent’ (ללומי, from ללמ, mll Poel) and ‘withers’ (שׁ ֵבָי, from שבי, ybš
Qal). These verses efficiently specify two various ‘period signs’ for understanding two
outlooks inside the verse. Verse 2 uses the speech of ‘production to creation’, namely to
voice, a habit of meaning experiences in simply human agreements, the sequence of
production. A ecclesiastical individual considers ancient times in conditions of three
production of founders – the God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob. Similarly, persons can
occurrence in their own period three era into the future – offsprings, grandchildren and
excellent-grandchildren – the feasible intention of the worrying ‘to the tertiary and divide into
four equal parts production’ (Exod. 20.5; 34.7).2 Thus we are led to favor human life as well
that relates to it in these very private conditions, the type and limits of our individual lives.
However, the next sentence tries to assume the somewhat view God must display ‘record’, a
God the one pre-endured the very production of the material ground, ץרא (’eretz), and the
occupied experience, לבת (tevel, Ps. 24.1), and the one will stretch to survive long following
in position or time they ability conclude expected. How must specific a God view these brief
beings, temporary and irrelevant, from this divine view?
This quality in outlook is supported for one use of two various designations of God. The
intimate God knowledgeable in the career of human beings as a hideaway, the one maybe
sent and popular, is meant accompanying legal order ’adonai, ordinarily interpreted as ‘Lord’,
the name in the unchanging consonantal form that will return in v. 17. Conversely the
extraordinary, remote, mysterious God is from complete ’el. Just as the beginning discussion
of v. 1b is the divine name ’adonai, the God the one is our hideaway and home, so the
familiar-dying moment of v. 2c that closes this outlining foundation of the hymn is the
faraway, detached ’el.
Having settled these two views, the psalmist sets about difficult to accept by what method our
brief human life maybe regarded for one eternal, universal God, for whom a thousand age
must appear as unimportant as a sole midnight, not even an complete midnight but only the
time of a watchman’s assignment (v. 4). It is an incredible act of imagery, as if the psalmist
has considered the earth's atmosphere each evening and reliable to take a position further
allure immensity, observing it and our experience from outside (cf. Ps. 19.1)
Since we are distinctive the type of human and divine period, the next step of the psalmist
search out devote effort to something a importance at that they fast meet each one:
You turn human beings back to dust,
and You mention, ‘Return you minors of Adam’. (v. 3)
An next partnership is the lie of the production of the first human exhausted the ‘dust of the
ground’ (Gen. 2.7). Such is the briefness of human existence that later a short span persons
resume the dust from what or which place they were founded. But the psalmist create a
narrow adaptation to this sketch, individual that I came near identify following a visit many
before to an basic farm. The grower equipped expected a academic, Christian reciter of the
Bible. In the course of our discourse, he identified that the ‘dust’ of Gen. 2.7 is a wrong
interpretation of the Hebrew discussion רפע (‘aphar). Rather, he claimed, it endure be
interpreted as ‘fertilizer’, that is to say to mention, a smattering of dust is not containing
unalive but of natural resources, the beginning of existence (Shewell-Cooper 1977: 188).
With that in mind it should to pay more consideration to the term for ‘dust’ at which point the
psalmist implies we return. אכד (dakka’) designates smashed, pulverised mineral, really not
organic matter, in a group that nothing can evolve or flourish. We continue nothing. However,
the seeming definiteness concerning this conclusion is either supported by God’s closing
dispute: ‘resume that dust!’, or conceivably, likely the doubt of the participle בוש (shuv) Qal,
a signify a various somewhat return. What the proofreader cannot ‘experience’ at this stage in
the hymn is by means of what the psalmist will use the unchanging infinitive later. In v. 13,
the psalmist will attract God to ‘return’ to a connection accompanying ‘us’, that will admit
the proofreader, retrospectively, to revise God’s seeming release as itself a potential offer to
resume God on the very fringe of cessation.
The psalmist has settled this briefness of human life from the divine outlook and strengthens
it in vv. 5 and 6. We are like ‘lawn that springs up and flourishes in the dawn but by eve
withers and expires’. And this ushers in the verses earlier eminent that efficiently remove
from job our whole human life as a somewhat lasting letdown to supreme being universal
God, present regarded as endlessly irritated at our losses and misconduct.
Yet the following lyric, v. 10, starts what will be a compatible challenge to this description of
two together divine anger and the fate of our human losses. What has absent before can well
be a habit of conceiving by what method God sees human life in the modern conscientious
experience of the psalmist, but established what expert? Given the two-fold period signs
accessible to us, what maybe our human outlook on the event and type of our history? Surely,
we are not expected removed as only lawn that rapidly flourishes and withers, leaving
nothing behind. Each of our seventy or likely eighty age is containing complete days, each
singular, and inside that we oppose trouble and sorrow (v. 10). Indeed, they pass fast and
therefore we ‘flee continuously’. But we are named to request accompanying the psalmist:
Who experiences the capacity of Your wrath3
or in consideration of Your anger on those the one fear You? (v. 11)
Perhaps the tightness middle from two points two together ideas of God, the aloof and the
familiar, the mysterious and the intimate, maybe called by pursuing a somewhat cooperation.
That interrogation of the power that dignitary can see God’s purposes in v. 11 concede
possibility determine the key that can build a bridge. The unchanging root deponent, yada‘,
reappears:
עדוה ןכ ונימי תונמל… (limnot yameinu kein hoda‘…)
So educate us to ability to count our days
because we gain a soul of insight. (v. 12)
On the base concerning this readiness to gain, the psalmist is encouraged to request God to
continue a friendship that appears to have happened temporarily absent, though the hymn
offers no direct evidence of what ancient framework, if some, power have brought about the
sense of distance.
Turn/Return, O Lord!4 How long?
Show mercy on your assistants.
Now the psalmist can return the unchanging rules place earlier we hid in fear, downtrodden
by God’s anger. In the ‘dawn’ (v. 6) at which point we sprouted like lawn, only to droop
continuously by eve, we can immediately be gratified accompanying God’s accurate love (v.
14); and the complete era maybe abundant rejoicing. Days that we have knowledgeable as
penalty, age we proverb disaster, are having another in one's place by days of pleasure. God’s
achievements will immediately enhance apparent to ‘Your assistants’, and Your glory to their
infants (v. 16).
With this epic we have restored thematically to the intimate connection accompanying God,
affirmed to in the beginning epic. Whereas past ‘era’ knowing God as a place of hideaway
and shelter, immediately we feel smart to project this belief into the lives of future
production, at the time of our kids (v. 16). Thus v. 17 rounds out the hymn by reintroducing
the unchanging ’adonai of v. 2, immediately named as וניהלא (’eloheinu), our God. Moreover,
an outstanding discussion play straightforwardly stimulates that former, ideal state.