1
Supply Chain Resilience in the Australian Healthcare Industry: Strategies for
Maintaining Essential Supplies During Disruptions
Student Name
Institution
Course
Date
2
Executive Summary
Company FJ is one of the leading automotive parts manufacturer companies globally; the
company has experienced significant hurdles in managing and operating its supply chain,
especially in global volatility. It affected Indonesia and Taiwan the most, where critical
contributors to FJ’s essential raw material and spare parts were sourced, and their plants were left
devastated, stopping production for the foreseeable future. FJ could also not obtain the raw
materials it used in its production lines because the suppliers it used were located in other nations
and provided substandard materials at higher costs as compared to local suppliers, different of
which affected the operational costs, delivery of products to customers, and its reputation in the
global market. This paper discusses the work done in the study of supply chain resilience. It
recommends that FJ improve its supply chain to increase its robustness and response to
disruptions.
3
Introduction
The globalization of the business environment and its ever-higher dependence on the
supply chain means that supply chains are highly susceptible to risks and disruptions, which can
stem from natural disasters, geopolitical issues, cyber threats, and sudden shifts in demand. The
consequences of such disruptions can range from harmful to catastrophic, involving plant and
equipment shutdown, cost escalation, and loss of sales and market share. As shown in the case of
BP, supply chains in the automotive industry are especially vulnerable to such disruptions
because they involve several suppliers across the value chain in many countries. For instance,
Company FJ, a well-known automobile parts maker, recently learned about the arbitrate shock of
this disaster through a major earthquake in Indonesia and Taiwan, home to some of the supplier
firms. Once again, suppliers’ assets were unattended, and production ceased momentarily due to
the damages. Due to these constraints, FJ had to source its production line materials from other
and more expensive sources in different countries, which led to other adverse impacts such as
high operational costs and delays in delivery, affecting the customers negatively and also causing
reputational damage to the global market. Overall, this paper offers appropriate advice to FJ on
improving supply chain reliability in light of disruptions that may hinder the company's
operation. This paper focuses on measures that can be applied in the automotive parts
manufacturing industry through a literature review and considering the best practices within the
industry.
Literature Review
Supply Chain Resilience: Supply chain resilience thus may be described as the extent to
which the members of a supply chain are ready to tackle challenges that may arise, cope with any
4
calamities, and minimize downtime when disruptions happen (Ponomarov & Holcomb, 2009).
Researchers have identified several critical dimensions of supply chain resilience, including:
1. Readiness: The ability to be proactive in risk matters, which encompasses risk
identification, risk planning, and risk response resource readiness (Ambulkar et al., 2015).
2. Response: The capabilities of identifying threats and opportunities expeditiously,
exercising resourcefulness, executing backup plans, executing control measures, and making
sound decisions (Ponomarov & Holcomb, 2009).
3. Recovery: The ability to return the business processes to a normal state, examine
lessons, and correct the signs that led to the interruption to better prepare for future occurrences.
Strategies for Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Several strategies can be employed to
enhance supply chain resilience in the automotive parts manufacturing industry:
1. Supply Base Diversification: The weakness of depending on a single source or region
is severe disruptions. To reduce the risks of a disruption being centralized within a single
supplier firm or geographic area, the reliance on multiple suppliers and locations should be
pursued (Tomar & Bauner, 2021).
2. Supplier Risk Assessment and Monitoring: This can only mean that the risk assessment
process should involve rigorous analysis of the suppliers. At the same time, a more ongoing
evaluation can be done on performance, financial solvency, and the possibility of specific
disruptions (Tomar & Bauner, 2021).
3. Flexible and Agile Operations: Long-term implementation of flexible manufacturing
systems, modular product designs, and rapid reconfiguration abilities can sustain the company’s
preparedness for revolutions and immediate changes in the environment, supply chain, and
5
economic conditions and instantly respond to new opportunities that shift the production or
sourcing vectors (Ivanov et al., 2019).
4. Supply Chain Visibility and Collaboration: IoT, big data, and the next generation of
supply chain technologies, including blockchain, can increase visibility to ensure the integrity of
information and decision-making. Engaging stakeholders like suppliers, customers, and others
can help in information exchange and an extensive reaction mechanism towards disruptions
(Dolgui et al., 2020).
5. Contingency Planning and Crisis Management: When managing operational
disruptions, the availability of proper contingency plans and integrated crisis management plans
assists a company in reacting appropriately, activating resources, and reducing the consequences
on operations (Ponomarov & Holcomb, 2009).
6. Strategic Inventory Management: Proper management of safety stocks and optimizing
the proportion of items in both inventory types can minimize the effects of disruptions on supply
systems and guarantee operations’ sustained operation (Ambulkar et al., 2015).
7. Supply Chain Mapping and Risk Assessments: Supply chain mapping and risk
assessment approaches may also assist in identifying the most significant nodes, dependencies,
and risks that can affect the supply network. This allows for developing appropriate risk
management plans from the extensive supply chain risk management field (Ivanov et al., 2019).
Discussion and Analysis
This case of the Indonesian earthquake and Taiwan's subsequent earthquakes revealed FJ
Company's fundamental problem: the weakness of its supply chain system and, thus, the
importance of improving its supply chain resiliencies. As shown in the literature analysis, it is
6
necessary to put into practice the strategies that would assist FJ in responding to, managing, and
recovering from disruptions to reduce their impacts on operations, customers, and reputation.
Supply Base Diversification: FJ should avoid sourcing its products from one region or a
few suppliers only because this would allow for high price hikes from those suppliers. This can
be done by evaluating potential new suppliers, classifying them in different geographical
locations, and spending a rotating award cycle in those sourcing locations.
Supplier Risk Assessment and Monitoring: FJ needs a good supplier risk assessment and
monitoring program to ensure it detects and quantifies vulnerabilities and risks with suppliers to
mitigate moderate risks. It is possible to assess the overall financial performance of the supplier
and its overall service capabilities, including adequately managing the risks and exposure to
disruptions.
Flexible and Agile Operations: To achieve this state of readiness dependent on future
conditions, FJ must adopt an appropriate strategic architecture characterized by the capabilities
for flexibility at the level of manufacturing systems, products, and organizational responses to
change. This would ensure the company could easily change its strategies, swap around
production, or source various components from another manufacturer if needed.
Supply Chain Visibility and Collaboration: This paper recommended that FJ boost its
visibility across the entire supply chain by utilizing modern technologies like IoT, BigData
analytical tools, and blockchain technology. This would allow for tracking avenues within the
supply chain, identifying threats likely to compromise the chain’s functions, and informed
decision-making. In addition, FJ needs to encourage the interoperability of responses with
suppliers, customers, and other relevant stakeholders to aid in sharing information and
responding to disruptions.
7
Contingency Planning and Crisis Management: One recommendation for FJ is to have
backup strategies and management crisis mechanisms to address issues that may hinder its
operations. Ideally, these plans should identify the different types of disruption that may occur,
where, how, and within what time frame, specific measures should be taken, the necessary
resources provided, the communication channels that should be used, and the decision-making
processes that should be followed.
Strategic Inventory Management: The company should develop worthwhile inventory
management methodologies, including safety stock levels and inventory policy, to buffer against
unfavorable supply disruptions that could affect FJ's operations.
Supply Chain Mapping and Risk Assessments: To minimize disruptions, FJ needs to map
the supply chain and perform frequent risk analyses to determine focus key product nodes,
dependencies, and risks within its supply chain framework. This knowledge can converge into
specific risk reduction measures and contingency measures plans.
Thus, FJ should adopt the abovementioned tactics to strengthen supply chain
management. This will help the company incorporate the relevant strategies to tackle disruptions
and their subsequent effects on the organization and its customers in the globalized automotive
parts manufacturing industry.
Conclusion
Based on the trends and challenges identified above, it is evident that Company FJ needs
to improve its supply chain's ability to cope with future shocks. As outlined in this report, supply
base diversification, supplier risk assessment and monitoring systems, flexible and agile
manufacturing and operations management, supply chain visibility and collaboration, business
continuity, and contingent planning, inventory and supply chain risk management, and supply
8
chain mapping and risk assessment can help address supply chain disruptions and their potential
impact on FJ. The strategies highlighted here need to be embraced as a comprehensive approach
for any change within the organization to happen, and this needs to be supported by a collective
involvement by all the players in the organization, not forgetting other players in the supply
chain, such as the suppliers and the customers. It may also require capital expenditure to acquire
improved technologies, streamline operating methods, and provide employees with relevant
learning and development opportunities. Supply chain adaptability is necessary to prevent
disruptions and losses for FJ and maintain its reputation and buyers' confidence in automobile
spare parts in the global market. The assessment shows that it is essential for FJ to identify and
prevent gaps in the system and enhance the supply chain resiliency to strengthen its partner
position and emerge as a flexible and adaptive supplier capable of delivering good quality
products and services even amidst disruptions. In sum, the various recommendations made in
this report are good strategies and directions that FJ could consider to overcome the uncertainty
inherent in the business world, consequently undergoing sustainability and competitiveness in
car parts manufacturing firms.
9
References
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions:
Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, pp.
33–34, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020). Reconfigurable supply chain: The X-ray of
disruption risks with theoretical, numerical, and viable study in a global context.
International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), 4670-4692.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1756496
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0
on the resilience and vulnerability of supply chains. In A. Dolgui, D. Ivanov, & B.
Sokolov (Eds.), Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain (pp. 167-190). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_8
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain
resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-143.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
Tomar, S., & Bauner, C. (2021). Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review.
International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 388-416.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0304
