PUBLIC POLICY INNOVATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PERSPECTIVE
Introduction
Nowadays, various public policies as instruments that synergize the roles of government and
society have not run properly. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of several policies being
canceled or revised by the Government is a sign that there are still overlaps between these
policies. In addition, this phenomenon indicates that there is still a low willingness to
innovate and a lack of ability to innovate. Meanwhile, in the midst of society, the dynamics
of demands for the government to appear to make policy changes that lead to improvements
in the lives of the wider community are emerging.
In addition, in order for the government to run effectively, it requires reliable quality
resources from the apparatus, politicians and bureaucracy in managing the government that
is supported by innovative power in determining policies. This means that without public
policy innovation, it is difficult to realize effective governance. If it is associated with the
implementation of regional autonomy, the objectives of autonomy will be difficult to
achieve. Therefore, a policy innovation step is needed that can substantively be used as an
instrument to support strengthening in solving problems in the community. It is no longer
negotiable, a policy innovation must be carried out immediately so that policies can be
realized that lead to the achievement of Good Public Policy Governance.
Innovation.
The notion of policy innovation by the government is reflected through the implementation
of Law No. IX. 23/2014 on Regional Government. It explains that regional innovation is
needed in order to improve the performance of local government administration. With this
regulation, the Regional Government can innovate in all forms of renewal in the
administration of Regional Government. Innovations made must be supported by strong
commitment and initiative.
The initiative to innovate can come from the regional head, DPRD, state civil apparatus,
Regional Apparatus, and the community. According to Peter Drucker (1986), every
organization needs a core competence, namely innovation. Innovation drives organizational
growth, increases Innovation drives organizational growth, increases future success, and is
the engine that allows organizations to survive vulnerability (viability). To create prosperity,
new capabilities are needed, namely innovation that gives resources strength.
According to Ibrahim (1988 p.131), in Nindry Septya Pranita et al (2008) the sensitivity of
an organization to the emergence of innovation is influenced by the following variables:
Size of the organization. The larger the size of an organization, the more rapid the
acceptance of its innovation.
Characteristics of organizational structure
Individual (leader) characteristics
External characteristics of the organization
Policy
Carl J. Federick as quoted by Leo Agustino (2008: 7) defines policy as a series of
actions/activities proposed by a person, group, or government in a certain environment
where there are obstacles (difficulties) and opportunities to the implementation of the
proposed policy in order to achieve certain goals.
According to Taufiqurakhman (2014) what is meant by policy in Kybernology is the value
system of policies and policies that are born from the wisdom of the actors or institutions
concerned. Furthermore, the policy after going through an in-depth analysis is formulated
appropriately into a policy product.
Policy In general, according to Said Zainal Abidin (Said Zainal Abidin, 2004: 31-33) in
Taufiqurakhman (2014) can be divided into three levels:
General policies, namely policies that serve as guidelines or guidelines for
implementation, both positive and negative, covering the entire area or agency
concerned.
Implementation policies are policies that elaborate general policies. For the central
level, government regulations on the implementation of a law.
Technical policies, operational policies that fall under implementation policies.
Definition of policy according to Carl J. Federick in Leo Agustino (2008: 7), that
policy is a series of actions / activities proposed by a person, group, or government in
a certain environment where there are obstacles (difficulties) and opportunities fo the
implementation of the proposed policy in order to achieve certain goals.
Abdullah Ramdhani, et al (2017). Policy can be defined as a series of program plans,
activities, actions, decisions, attitudes, to act or not to act carried out by the parties (actors),
as a stage for solving the problem at hand. Policy setting is an important factor for
organizations to achieve their goals (Iskandar, 2012).
According to (Thoha, 2012), policy has two aspects, namely:
Policy is a social practice, policy is not a single or isolated event. Thus, policy is
something that is produced by the government. It is formulated based on events that
occur in society. These events grow in the practice of community life, and are not
isolated events that are foreign to the community.
Policy is a response to events that occur, either to create harmony between conflicting
parties, or to create incentives for collective action for parties who are treated
irrationally for their collective efforts.
Thus, policy can be stated as an effort to achieve certain goals, as well as an effort to solve
problems using certain means, and in a certain time stage. Policies are generally basic,
because policies only outline general guidelines as a basis for action in an effort to achieve
predetermined goals.
Public Policy
Thomas R. Dye, (1995) in Dede Mariana (2010). Public policy is what the government
chooses to be done or not done. Then according to Taufiqurakhman (2014: 4) public policy
is a series of policy decisions taken by a person or group of people to realize certain goals in
society.
Public policy is generally motivated by strong issues related to policy analysis and is based
on certain considerations. In addition, the scope of discussion of public policy is very broad,
such as: public administration, social, cultural, economic, political, legal, and others. Then
public policy from the aspect of hierarchy, can include national, regional and local.
Likewise, when viewed from the aspect of regulation, it includes: laws, government
regulations, presidential regulations, ministerial regulations, regional / provincial
government regulations, governor decisions, district / city regulations, and regent / mayor
decisions.
In the process of formulating a policy, it is not as easy as turning the palm of the hand. The
contributing factor is that there are various forces that influence the policy-making process.
For example, policymakers sometimes view political issues differently from others.
According to Luankali (2007: 5), in Dede Mariana (2010). that the process of making public
policy includes:
1) Policy making as a political process. Public policy theory explains that public policy
making is not understood narrowly, namely in the process of course conversion, but is a
series of activities that include a series of activities; 2) Policy making as a stage or series of
activities. The process of making public policy as a series of activities includes several
stages such as: a) Agenda setting (problem formulation); b) Policy formulation (forecast); c)
Policy adoption (recommendation); d) Policy implementation - output process (monitoring);
e) Policy assessment - outcome process (evaluation).
Public Administration Paradigm
Historically in the perspective of public administration, it is known that there are several
paradigms, namely: Old Public Administration (OPA), New Public Administration (NPA),
New Public Management (NPM) and New Public Services NPS. Based on these various
administrative paradigms, the New Public Services paradigm is the most appropriate to
apply the principles of innovation.
According to experts, through NPS, the public is seen as a whole and humanist, not reduced
as a customer who is characterized as economistic-egoistic or as an outsider who becomes a
mechanical target of bureaucracy. The NPS paradigm also puts It pays great attention to
innovation and is integral and comprehensive because NPS is an approach that places a high
value on collaboration between parties and improving the performance of every element of
the organization.
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. This condition makes the
government required to be able to run an effective government and make policies that are
pro to the people, and one of them is the government's role as a facilitator and regulator.
The indicator is the birth of innovative public policies from the government and
stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance. However, in fact, almost all policy makers still
dominantly consider short-term and partial interests and have not prioritized a culture of
innovation, resulting in the stagnation of public policy and the performance of governance
has not run optimally.
Research Methods
In this research, the approach used is a qualitative approach. The technique used is to survey
related academic literature in the scientific field of public policy to obtain various concepts
tailored to the study of public policy innovation. Meanwhile, secondary data collection is
carried out through searching various sources, namely: government documents, books and
journals. After the data is collected, it is then processed and described in narrative form
according to data needs. Furthermore, data analysis is carried out based on the theory and
concept of public policy and the data interpretation process is carried out to draw
conclusions from the research results.
Results And Discussion
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
Policy Innovation in the perspective of Public Administration
The public administration paradigm based on the principles of New Public Services (NPS) is
a representation of policy innovation. The NPS principles are:
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow citizens
and not just as customers.
The public interest creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not just focus on productivity
United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs (2006) cited by Ahmad Sururi
(2017). Providing an analysis of innovation as part of the revitalization of public
administration, innovations and experiments in central and local government, especially in
the field of service delivery, are currently taking place around the world as part of the
government's efforts to revitalize public administration. This exchange and sharing of
innovative experiences can create "new knowledge" that can be accessed by countries
around the world.
Prerequisites for Public Policy Innovation
According to Ahmad Sururi (2016), the absolute prerequisite for public policy innovation is
the realization of ideas and ideas from public officials as an entry point for the
implementation of various programs and policies various programs and policies. Ideas and
ideas can be realized if the public sector organization as the locus of policy making is able to
adopt and adapt to developments that occur outside the organization. The mechanism of the
public sector organizational system that involves the organizational environment as input
and organizational processes is an inseparable part of any public policy formulation.
Types of Public Policy Innovation
According to the administrative directory of State Administration Innovation, (2014) there
are several types of public policy innovation, namely the type of process innovation which
consists of standard operating procedures, procedures, systems and procedures. Then the
type of method innovation consists of strategies, ways and new techniques. And the type of
product innovation consists of physical (goods) and non-physical or immaterial (services).
Empirically, policy innovation based on process emphasizes the quality of work processes
both external and internal to make it simpler and more efficient.
Objectives of Public Policy Innovation
According to the United Nations, (2006: 2) in Innovation Discusion Paper, Tri Widodo
Wahyu Utomo, (2016) Innovation aims to revitalize public administration, making it more
pro-active, efficient, accountable and more service-oriented3.
According to Mirlinda Batalli (2011), the public administration innovation process aims to
modernize administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government.
Innovation also affects the improvement of public management, implementation of public
policies and promoting economic growth. Therefore, the role of the State becomes more of a
"servant" than a "ruler".
The occurrence of a government paradigm shift changes the role of government from
program providers and implementers to facilitators and regulators. The occurrence of this
paradigm shift makes the government required to be able to run an effective government and
make pro-people policies, and one of the indicators is the birth of innovative public policies
from the government and stakeholders.
Policy initiatives have been implemented, but various problems still hinder them. Public
policy as an instrument that functions to unite the government and society has not run
optimally. As revealed by Tri Widodo Utomo (2016) that although innovation in Indonesia
has developed rapidly, it is still done relatively partially, piecemeal and stagnant. Partial
because usually an innovation is not automatically connected to other innovations. It is not
connected to the organization's road map, and does not have a long-term vision. Meanwhile,
the nature of 'piecemeal' (one innovation at a time) means that the innovation has not been
implemented. This is because they lack the collective impact of their innovations. As a
result, innovation "goes nowhere" aka stagnant. In fact, the new five-year development plan
indicates a strategic target program, but has not accommodated the need for innovation in
public organizations that require collaboration and elaboration that is enabling.
Stagnation of Public Policy Innovation
Facts show that many regional regulations are revoked because they do not provide benefits
for the interests of the community. Minister of Home Affairs Tjahjo Kumolo emphasized
that the government will immediately revoke 3,266 local regulations that are considered to
hinder investment. Tjahjo explained that the category of problematic local regulations is
hampering investment, licensing, and unnecessary retribution. For example, people who
want to open a business must be asked for a principle permit, business license, building
construction permit (IMB).
According to Dede Mariana, (2010) in Ahmad Sururi (2016), that the obstacles to public
policy change are caused by many factors, including the low capacity of public officials, a
bureaucratic culture that is antipathetic to public policy change and bureaucratic structures
that tend to be rigid and less flexible. In certain cases, there are many different orientations
of public policy between the government and the public, especially in the policy formulation
process, causing disharmony at the implementation level. The government is oriented
towards how to spend the budget so that it is absorbed and can be accounted for, so that it
often neglects programs that are in direct contact with the public interest. These conditions
force the public to remain compliant with government policies that do not have an impact
and benefit the public interest.
Benefits of Public Policy Innovation
According to Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, (2016), the benefits of innovation can be identified
in several manifestations, including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing
effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into
an integrated one, expanding public choice of public goods, strengthening public
engagement in decision making or public policy, reducing the burden on the public on
government services, as well as other benefit models that continue to develop according to
the dynamic needs of public organizations and their stakeholders.
In addition, according to LAN. (2014). in Ahmad Sururi. (2017). that in line with the
implementation of regional autonomy which gives local governments the authority to
formulate policies, the role of public officials in the regions in innovating public policies
will increase and have a positive impact on the quality of policies or regulations that will be
drafted and have been produced. The quality of local regulations is an important indicator of
the performance of local governance.
Conclusion
Based on some of the above discussions, several conclusions can be drawn regarding public
policy innovation from a public administration perspective, namely:
The phenomenon of several policies being canceled or revised by the Government
is an indication that there are still overlapping policies and low ability to innovate and
willingness to innovate public officials. For this reason, policy innovations are needed that
can substantively provide strengthening in solving problems in the community.
The paradigm of public administration based on the principles of New Public
Services (NPS) represents policy innovation. i.e. :
Emphasizes the concept of a relationship of trust and collaboration with fellow
citizens and not just as customers.
Interests The public creates shared interests and responsibilities.
Value on public service and citizen commitment to make a contribution
Think strategically, act democratically
Accountability is not simple
Directing by helping citizens to articulate and fulfill common interests
Respect people and not only focus on productivity
Innovation administration public administration innovation aims to modernize
administrative capacity and create a more efficient and accountable government. Innovation
also influences the improvement of public management, implementation of public policies
and promotes economic growth.
The benefits of public policy innovation can be identified in several manifestations,
including: accelerating work processes or procedures, increasing effectiveness and
efficiency in the use of resources, integrating several types of services into one, expanding
public choice of public goods, strengthening public engagement in decision making or
public policy, reducing the burden on the public for government services, and other benefit
models that continue to develop according to the dynamic needs of public organizations and
their stakeholders.
