CROSS-BORDER VENTURE CAPITAL AND PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTMENTS
1. Introduction to Cross-border Investments
Understanding Venture Capital (VC) and Private Equity (PE)
Appreciating the workings of Venture Capital VC and Private Equity PE is crucial to comprehend the
dynamics of cross-border investment. This form of funding pushes young innovative firms with great
growth opportunities by investors in search of high returns (Cumming & Johan, 2016). It is conventional
for such a type of investment because it entails high risks but high returns to the investors in case of
success (Lerner & Hardymon, 2012). Private equity in contrast refers to the investment in more stable
and developed businesses to reorganize, rebrand or even grow them in order to increase their value
(Aagedal, 2013 Wright & Robbie, 2016). VC and PE are both important modalities of providing
development capital that aids in the creation of new jobs and the growth of economies (Bernstein et al.,
2019). Venture capitalists engage themselves to some extent in the management of portfolio companies
through offering valuable advice, contacts and assistance (thus, have a more significant role than PE
investors) (Cumming & Johan, 2016). On the other hand, PE firms are more active management
investors who initiate changes in operations and governance structures to generate alpha (Lerner and
Hardymon, 2012). To effectively invest in either VC or PE, then it is important that the investor
determines their risk tolerance as well as the return expectation they have (Wright & Robbie, 2016, p.
318). As the two types of investment are primarily geared to optimize the returns, they must be placed
in terms of risk/return characteristics and investment time span (Bernstein et al., 2019). Venture capital
funding involves relatively greater risks than the ordinary equity financing modes but yields much higher
returns especially in technologies booked industries (Cumming & Johan, 2016). While private equity
investments provide relatively less risk than LBOs, they also offer a lower rate of return in longer
investment period (Lerner and Hardymon, 2012), altogether, cross-border venture capital and private
equity are potentially essential for investors to comprehend the global market
characteristics. Understanding the nature and features of VC and PE, and possible risks and ways to
invest in them, is crucial for global investors to enable them to effectively operate on high risk, high
return ventures such as VC and PE investments to achieve optimality in the various portfolio elements.
Overview of Cross-border Investment Landscape
Another significant aspect of cross-border investment is the cross-border investment environment
which defines a complex process influenced by different factors including the economic conditions, legal
requirements, and geopolitical issues. The VCC cycle is expounded by Gompers and Lerner (2004) as a
presentation of how cross-border investments affect the phases of fundraising, deal sourcing, portfolio
management, and exit. In their paper Wright and Robbie (2012) have ventured further into the concept
of private equity focusing on internationalization and the prospects as well as the risks involved in the
expansion of investment in international markets, in his work, Casella and his colleagues explore how
private equity firms look for good investment opportunities, what challenges they face in the process,
particularly with regards to the regulatory aspects, and how they manage cross border deals.
Appelbaum and Batt (2014) provide literature review on new forms of work system in U. S that goes
beyond this scope, focusing on the dynamism of labor markets, organizations and employment relations
more than any of the aforementioned frameworks, though not specifically related to cross-border
investments, their recommendations put their work in a context that is pertinent to comprehending the
forces that govern the flow of investments within the growing global economy, Phalippou and
Gottschalg (2009) enrich the discussion by presenting an analysis of private equity funds to provide
various insights into the risk-adjusted performance and the value of leveraging on P-E Funds, their work
is significant and significant in shedding light on what distinguishes the performances of various funds
and the possible impacts that these findings may have on the cross-border investments. Combined,
these works give a frame and a context on cross-border investment providing views from both VC as
well as PE field along with macro-economic factors and even ratios and statistical figures, investors that
seek to access opportunities in other countries should be mindful of the challenges and patterns present
in cross-border investments, so as to address the difficulties in international markets and create value in
the global markets and diversify their portfolios.
Importance of Cross-border Investments in Global Economy
Important function within the global economy is international investments including the flow of capital
supporting the formation of economic growth, and international cooperation. According to Ljungqvist,
Richardson and Wolfenzon (2007), Firms in private equity invest cross border in order to expand their
investment frontier, have less correlation with local markets and invest to capitalize on opportunities. In
their turn, Kaplan and Stromberg (2009) are more concerned with the effects of LBOs and PE
transactions on economics and highlight the importance of OIC investments as the agents for reviving
troubled firms. Metrick and Yasuda (2010) continue with the discussion by offering a vast useful
overview of venture capital and private equity investments that underpin innovation and stimulate
entrepreneurship and employment in different locales. Gompers (1996) also expands on the issue of
grandstanding within the context of the VC industry showing how factors of competition, self-interest
fuel cross-border investment choices, Lerner (2009) also explores the issues facing public initiatives
driving entrepreneurship and venture, these studies point out the role of cross-border investments as a
means of stimulating economic development and encouraging entrepreneurship around the world.
Thus, cross-border investment helps with the spread of the best business practices, stimulation of new
business opportunities and the connection of certain economy to the international economy through
capital, knowledge and technology flows across the border of the investing country, the expansion of
cross-border investments should be seen as a critical element of the political and economic evolution of
the entire world and thus as an area calling for increased efforts to helping facilitate international
investments and cooperation.
Regulatory and Legal Considerations in Cross-border Investments
The legal and politico–legal factors play a crucial role in influencing cross-border investments directing
and orienting the investment processes across borders. Who are the authors of this piece of work on
regulatory impact on private equity and financial vulnerability in crises Published in the Review of
Financial Economics in 2019? Companies’ International Investment, this paper was also authored by
Cumming Johan and Zhang (2014) and adds to literature by providing a theoretical concept of
international investment by enterprises with specific emphasis on the regulatory environment impacting
the decision to invest in the foreign markets. Similarly, Bernstein et al, (2017) also examined the effect
of the regulation on new generation buyout and industry performance, and noted that certainty and
consistency in regulation are the key to market robustness and investors’ confidence. It is only by
studying the features of venture capital backed SME financing, that we get insights into financial
intermediaries and the ownership structures in the choice between relational and arm’s length forms of
financing that Cumming, Fleming & Schwienbacher (2014a) offer empirical evidence on the regulatory
mechanisms that promote or hinder entrepreneurial access to financing, however, Lerner and Schoar
(2005) examine the roles of legal enforcement regarding financial exchanges, focusing on PE
investments in particular. Theirstudy emphasizes that to protect investors ‘ rights, to support proper
legal enforcement of contracts as well as effective conflict solving in international deals sound legal
framework is crucial, altogether, these studies elucidate the importance of regulation and legislation in
CBI afield of all the need for integrative approaches among the policymakers, investors, and other
regulators in order to establish clear, stable, and favorable environment for cross-border investment in
the international markets.
2. Risk Assessment in Cross-border Investments
Evaluating Political Risks in Cross-border Investments
Important factors in assessing the political risks in cross-border investments is evaluating how politics
influences and formulate the probability of occurrence or threats that may affect investment results and
consolidation techniques. Da Rin, Nicodano, and Sembenelli (2006), for instance, analyzed public policy
contribution toward development of active venture capital markets where they noted that venture
capital markets policies, reforms, and political stability contributed to the productivity of such
markets. Investors can use politics to measure the political risk, look at the country risk, and even
predict future changes, in terms of laws, policies and regulations. Comparatively, Cumming and Walz
(2010) also help to improve the understanding with regards to the returns of private equity and the level
of disclosure around the globe, their study also highlights the need for political stability and compliance
to ensure regulator disclosure to encourage private equity investment and build investor trust. Volatility
such as instability in the political environment or changes in legislation and policies may reduce the flow
of FDI and establish jeopardy premium hence affecting investment returns and market liquidity. From
the work of Bernstein & Giroud (2019), the authors examine investments made by mutual funds acting
as venture capitalists observing political factors’ influence on venture capital investments in high-growth
startups or ‘unicorns, based on their study, they were able to identify the effects of political plays in the
VC business spectra with such considerations as a shift in taxes or regulations that affect investment
strategies of the business ventures. Further, Cumming and MacIntosh (2003) carry out comparative
study of venture capital exits, where the roles played by political systems and institutions on exit
measures and investment results are also discussed. Governing issues such as political risks, legal
reforms, governments interferences can cause divergent outcomes of exit strategies and unfavorable
progress of investment realization; therefore cross- border investments require extensive political risk
analysis. Concluding political risk analysis should be practiced to fit the fluid and volatile international
investment environment to advantage the international investors, political factors have an influence on
investment, and assessing the distribution and intensity of these factors is central to developing a good
risk management strategy and creating opportunities for portfolio that will yield good results in the
future.
Analyzing Currency Risks and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Assessing Market Risks in Foreign Markets
Identification of future risks in a foreign operating environment is one of the critical steps before foreign
investment to determine the prospects of operating in new markets with various forms of risk. The
cumulative work of armstrong & liz by Cummimgs & Johan (2016) on “Oxford Handbook of Venture
Capital” offers generalized ways and means of managing and measuring business risk while investing in
vc in foreign countries, it is important to conduct a thorough market analysis to ascertain the general
market conditions, competition and regulation in the foreign markets in order to reduce the likelihood
of firms facing severe losses due to risks associated with foreign markets. In "Venture Capital and Private
Equity: Several management cases have been presented in “A Casebook” by Lerner and Hardymon
(2012) that gives real life example of how to determine market risks in differing foreign markets. The
casebook as described brings out the concept of market research, risk analysis, and risk management,
with emphasis put on the precautionary measures that are put in place to mitigate risk in case they
occur. Wright and Robbie's "Venture Capital and Private Equity: One of the recent sources, “A
Practitioner’s Manual” (2016), provides specific information and realistic advice on the market risk
assessment in foreign private equity investments, this manual also provides approaches on how to
conduct market research, identify competition in the market and predict possible changes that can take
place in the market in relation to investment plans. Ref. : Bernstein, Lerner & Mezzanotti, 2019 These
authors have sought to establish the impact of private equity on industries with the focus on industry
performance having identified the associated market risks with specific sector and location investments,
it is an important reminder to investors in industries affected by the dynamics that they have to
appreciate the competition and market forces so as be in a position to manage them well, furthermore,
to the discussion of the venture capital cycle as a framework for analyzing the potential risks of certain
global markets, Gompers and Lerner (2004) offer further insight, venture capital cycle of investments &
risks: This means that by identifying with the various stages of the venture capital cycle, investors can be
in a position to fore see most of the market risks that may be associated with a particular type of
investment and thus enable them formulate workable plans on how to adequately respond to such risks
as a way of optimizing for the best outcomes. Concluding it is important to outline that the evaluating of
risks inherent in a particular market in foreign countries should be based on profound assessment of its
peculiarities and outstanding features, including legal and competitive conditions of the specific market,
this paper argues that knowledge on high-risk international markets can be gathered from scholarly
publications and recommended sources to assist investors in global ventures with managing risks.
Mitigating Risks through Diversification and Hedging Strategies
Hedging forms an important aspect of managing investment in the market through risk diversification
and management. In their work, Bernstein and Giroud (2019) consider the role of mutual funds as
venture capitalists and also gain an understanding of investments risks, which can assist the
diversification strategies of investors towards venture capital funds. Diversification simply means using
several activities, all of which work to lessen the impacts of risk in every particular venture, Cumming
and MacIntosh (2003) also study the comparative analysis of venture capital exits to understand the
virtue of diversification for moderating exit risks. To so say, their research reveals the opportunities for
investors to reduce such risks as country risks and risks associated with certain sectors as well as to
promote portfolio stability and high performance in the long run by expanding their portfolios abroad
and across industries. Gompers and Lerner (2000), in their work, highlight effects of fund inflow in the
context of private equity valuation and cover the hazards related to fluctuation, geared reduction
through hedging. Through options, they can be able to control for directional risks in assets or exchange
rates and thereby capitalize on downside risks and contain erosion of portfolio in unfavorable
conditions. Moreover, in the context of exploring factors determining the investment behavior of
buyout funds, Ljungqvist, Richardson, and Wolfenzon (2008) pointed out that hedging activities played
the crucial role in mitigating risks concerning leveraged buyouts, using specific ways of hedging against
rates fluctuations, exchange risks, and other macro drivers, buyout funds are, therefore, ready to reduce
the impact of the downside risks and as well maximize the upside potential of their returns, the study
reveals that the concepts of diversification and hedging are important tools for managing risks in
venture capital and private equity investments. Diversification in an investment portfolio, and then
guarding against losses through hedging ensures the investor’s portfolio has the greatest chance of
being resilient in uncertain and volatile market situations while maximizing the portfolio returns for the
amount of risk taken.
3. Structuring Cross-border Deals
Deal Structuring for Venture Capital Investments
Venture capital deals: Centering on structuring of the contracts that enhance and coordinate between
the investor and entrepreneur goals and eliminate imperatives that may downgrade the investment
return. Bernstein et al. (2017) speak about deal structuring in private equity industries and the effect of
this approaches on overall performance of the field; the authors stress the role of appropriate incentive
design and firm governance in improving deal performance. In their work, Cumming and Spiess, Fleming
and Schwienbacher (2014) look at how financial intermediaries and ownership impact line of Venture
Capital financing to the SMEs, the deal structures crucial for achieving capital for new and
entrepreneurial firms, they also argue that significant evidence exists on how to negotiate deal
structures, with the goal of developing effective mechanisms custom-made for SMEs. Lerner and Schoar
(2005) seek to identify how legal enforcement facilitates financial transactions on private equity,
focusing on contractual features of deals, their study stresses the need to have sound legal systems and
VCMs that can enforce contracts so as to manage agency costs hence enhancing the achievement of
venture capital investments. Also, Da Rin, Nicodano, and Sembenelli (2006) discusses on the access
mechanisms to venture capital that stresses on the policy changes in the technology sector where the
government involvement in creating active venture capital markets is of paramount importance to
examine the impact of public policy on the deal structures and investment opportunities, close attention
to the existing systems and taking advantage of the policies today is critical to helping investors to
properly structure their deals and solve issues related to regulations. Inter alia, Cumming and Walz
(2010) discuss private equity returns and disclosure regime on international level, shedding light on deal
structure in various legal jurisdictions, their research suggests that there is need for connection and
information release to the investors so as to improve on the levels of information certainty in deal
making, defining legal, regulatory, and governance issues of structure for venture capital deals means
the creation of win-win solutions for all participants by focusing on value-added outcomes and risk
profiling for corporations, investors, and VC firms. First, by aligning incentives, it means that investors
will be able to structure deals in such a way that will benefit them in the long-run and the
entrepreneurial ventures they fund second, through the establishment of clear and effective governance
mechanisms that will encourage participation and motivate further innovation and growth by the
entrepreneurial ventures lastly, through the use of regulatory incentives, deal structuring will be
fashioned in order to benefit both the investors and the entrepreneurial ventures.
Structuring Private Equity Investments in Foreign Markets
Managing private equity investments along the global value chain requires understanding its decision-
making context steeped in the dynamics of investing in markets abroad. In examining the private equity
funds, Phalippou and Gottschalg (2009) argue that examine structures help in enhancing the overall
returns required in foreign markets, the key issues that play an important role in determining the
performance of the international investments and the risks associated with such investments are
essential to understand in order formulating a structure for private equity deals abroad. Among the
investigations that deal with the effects of institutional investors and their strategic decisions,
Ljungqvist, Richardson, and Wolfenzon (2007) focus on private equity fund managers and their
investment behavior to reveal the key factors and actions that affect the structure of direct investment
in foreign countries, they also warn about the need to conduct adequate market research, conduct
background checks on potential target companies, and evaluate risks when arranging lucrative overseas
PEF deals. In their chapter, Kaplan and Stromberg (2009) expound on LBOs and private equity
transactions before providing an insight into the structuring of the deals that facilitate value addition in
foreign markets. The author shall consider how the regulatory system affects the different deal
structures, and how by using financial engineering and forming strategic partner relations, a private
equity investor will maximize the investment yields, Metrick and Yasuda (2010) offer a comprehensive
overview of the venture capital and private equity investments concerning international markets and
the structuring strategies that investors utilize in such environments, they emphasize several key factors
that can support investment decisions in the foreign markets, such as local market knowledge and
cultural sensitivity, as well as an understanding of barriers to entry in the specific country. Moreover,
Gompers (1996) providing insights on grandstanding in the vouchering capital industry, emphasizing on
the need to balance on and off setting of interests in structuring private equity deals and particularly in
cross border setting, interpersonal communications, trust, and relationships are critical to good
communication, negotiations, and structure of Private Equity investment in foreign countries.
Furthermore, within the last innovative task, Lerner (2009) analyses the problematics of public initiatives
aimed at promoting the activities of venture capital and small business and provides recommendations
to the policymakers and investors for structuring the promotion of the entrepreneurship and venture
capital investments in the foreign countries, the process of reorganization of private equity investments
in foreign countries is closely connected with the necessity to take into account the specific conditions
of the certain country and markets, potential barriers, and cultural differences, from academic studies
with social sciences and experienced practicians’ viewpoints, investors can come up with good
structuring strategies that assist him or her in mitigating the challenges of international investment
environment and achieving better investment returns in foreign countries.
Understanding Cross-border M&A Transactions
It is thus necessary to explore the cross-border M&A transactions, the different facades of venture
capital and private equity and multiple intricate economic and organizational environments involved.
Understanding the financing aspects of M&A transactions can be gained from the ‘Oxford Handbook of
Venture Capital’ by Cumming and Johan (2016) where the authors present the work identifying the role
of VC in the development of technological innovation and growth in the target firms. Lerner and
Hardymon's "Venture Capital and Private Equity: Some useful texts are “A Casebook” (2012) that
focuses on the M&A transactions that is useful for presenting and proving an example of strategic
directions, negotiation and actions in structure and function of cross-border acquisitions. Analyzing such
cases can aid investors in identifying strategic approaches to international M&A deals with a view of
achieving improved deals. Similarly, Wright and Robbie's "Venture Capital and Private Equity: A
Practitioner’s Manual” (2016) gives recommendations on M&A planning and implementation,
containing information regarding the evaluation step, valuation methods, and the merger step.
Accordingly, the investors are also capable of increasing their knowledge on the actual cross-border
M&A transactions and thereby, improving the skills and techniques in the deal-making process with the
help of the concepts given in the manual. Bernstein, Lerner, and Mezzanotti (2019) look into the
performance of the merged companies under various industries, and with regards to the empirical
analysis of BADC, they consider the international acquisitions and understand the value creation process
and strategies of the M&A transactions, their work highlights the need to carefully assess M&A
prospects based on industry characteristics and the strategic fit with the firm’s overall goals and
objectives and manage risks inherent to cross-border transactions. Furthermore, Gompers and Lerner
(2004) address the issue of venture capital cycle and its impact on the M&A related operations in the
process of unraveling how cycles and trends in relation to the market affect the flow of deals and
investment patterns. Analyzing the global picture on the M&A enables investors to predict the economic
activity and select prospective cross-border transactions, writing in the journal, International Private
Equity, Wright and Robbie (2012) discuss the finer details of private equity transactions, how the
regulations, culture, and operation of the M&A transactions differ in countries during cross-border
acquisitions, their experience provides a rich background to help managers understand the impacts of
international deal-making and offers insights for creating value within international markets. Last,
Appelbaum & Batt (2014) give some ideas in organizational contextual changes and business change
initiatives in the context of organizational dynamics which is helpful for overall understanding of the
human capital implications and organizational integration risks and opportunities for cross-border
merger and acquisition activity. Based on these factors, the investors would be able to be more
informed and fully understand the organization effects of M&A transaction and the ways by which
values can be recognized after the M&A transaction.
Tax Implications and Structuring Considerations
Legal issues like tax aspects and issues related to company structuring, play an important role in private
equity and venture capital deals and determine the investment solutions and the results of M&A.
Actually, the cyclicality of private equity is described by Bernstein and Lerner (2006), specifically in terms
of tax planning and structuring. Tax effect of optimizing of the structures of the mergers, acquisitions
and leveraged buy outs are among the crucial drivers of the investment returns and tax burdens.
Analyzing the possible forms of VC exits, Cumming, Fleming, and Schwienbacher (2006) underline the
legal and regulatory perspective on exits stressing the crucial role of tax legislation in definitive exits
definition with reference to legal issues and taxation, this paper will argue that it is possible to achieve
optimum exit strategies in regard to divestment by avoiding legal pitfalls and at the same time achieving
the best results in terms of taxation policies. The venture capital revolution is highlighted by Gompers
and Lerner (1999) on how the changes impacted entrepreneurial financing and investment. There are
observations within taxes, including the capital gains tax treatment of the assets and tax benefits
applicable to venturing capital investments. Another paper by Kaplan and Strömberg (2009) focused on
the aspects of LBOs as well as private equity transactions with the help of successful tax strategies, by
availing debt financing and efficient use of tax shelters, PE investors can strike an appropriate capital
structure and manage taxes in a manner that contributes toward enhancing the rate of returns on
investment. Moreover, through a discussion of different empirical evidence, Bernstein, Lerner, and
Schoar (2016) offer an examination of sovereign wealth funds and their investment strategies, including
tax effects and structuring of cross-border investments. Many SWFs encountered multidimensional tax
environment and regulatory system in the host country, thus to attain the utmost investment yield as
well as to mitigate tax costs, efficient tax management and planning is of outmost importance, taxes and
structuring concerns are an essential part of private equity/VC investments, affecting everything from
investment profiles to structures and, consequently, investment returns. Investors can therefore be in a
position to devise ways to reduce their tax burden and legal risks while at the same time enjoy higher
yields from the decision on investment and deal form.
4. Due Diligence in Cross-border Investments
Conducting Financial Due Diligence in International Investments
Effects analysis performing financial due diligence on international investments analysis is much more
complex than on local ones, mainly due to the fact that the former involves cross-border transactions.
Kaplan and Strömberg (2009) have described the role of financial due diligence when acquiring targets
with the help of LBOs and private equity firms insisting that sufficient investigation and measurement of
the financial information disclosed in the target’s books and records combined with appropriate analysis
of tangible and intangible assets, liabilities, and potential future cash flows of the firm should be
conducted by the acquirer. There are always some additional challenges in international investments
these include currency risks, legal system differences and culture differences among others and
therefore tend to involve much more research in trying to avoid such risks, this paper by Bernstein,
Lerner and Schoar (2016) provide insights into the investment activities of the sovereign wealth funds,
with a focus on the due diligence procedures the institutional investors undertake while investing in
foreign markets. SWFs also engage in the measurement of performance of potential investment plans to
analyze the market situation and the feasibility of a given strategy in compliance with the strategic goals
and acceptable level of risk. In their paper on risk management of global investments focusing on FDI
and sovereign wealth funds, Cumming, Johan, and Zhang (2014) underscore the significance of
conducting research owing to high risks and volatility of cross-border investments. Financial due
diligence is used in the examination of the company’s financial records, the investigation of the market
into which the investment will take place and the review of the potential contingencies and
repercussions that may arise as due to international investment. For more details on corporate
governance and its effect on equity prices, Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003) provide a clear
perspective focusing on the aspect of due diligence when assessing various firms’ governance standards
and risk management approaches for global investment. This is because, in cross border acquisitions and
invocations, the mercantile risks and prospects for speculation are established depending on the
corporate governance structures and policies of the target organizations. Furthermore, Kaplan and
Strömberg (2009) revealed the patterns for financial due diligence by identifying the factors for LBOs
and private equity transactions, particularly in understanding the financial position of the target”.
Legal Due Diligence Process and Best Practices
Legal due diligence as a part of transaction legal work refers to one of the most valuable constituents in
private equity and venture capital deals owing to legal risks potentially influencing investment success
greatly. Lerner and Schoar (2005) analyze influence of legal enforcement for financial transactions,
underscoring those solid laws and effectively enforceable contract are crucial to private equity deals.
Another activity of legal investigations known as ‘legal due diligence’, refers to legal audit of potential
target companies, in terms of legal liabilities, including the requirement for compliance with the law,
original contracts and legal cases. Da Rin, Nicodano, and Sembenelli (2006) discussed the impact of
public policies is illustrated in Relation to the evolution of Venture Capital Markets where clarity in
legislation and legal certainty emerged as critical pillars of investment activity. An effective completion
process involves the assessment of legal risks of investing in new targets/Deals and implications of
government frameworks to the investment opportunities and deal structures. In the study of the private
equity return and disclosure across the globe, Cumming and Walz (2010) highlight on the need to have
legal due diligence when looking at prospects of investment risks and returns across international
jurisdictions. Legal due diligence is a legal risk assessment process that entails examination of legal
documents including contracts/ agreements and legal claims /intellectual property rights with the
intention of ascertaining implications to the investment value. In the same regard, Bernstein and Giroud
(2019) opine on how mutual funds also partake in acting as venture capitalists and the legal concerns
arising out of such investments. The legal due diligence in the sphere of mutual funds is useful and
aimed at the compliance with legal demands in the sphere of venture capital transactions and
protection of the investors. In addition, Cumming and MacIntosh (2003) provide cross-sectional analysis
of venture capital exits with reference to a number of countries indicating legal issues regarding various
exit methods. Legal due diligence is a factor that should be given special attention during the exit
transactions in order to uphold sound legal policies that will enhance the ownership change. To sum up,
legal due diligence is a critical procedure that aids the investors to pinpoint legal risks and analyze them
before financing; guarantee that the provisions of the investment will observe the lawful restraints in
the target business; and safeguard the investors’ interests from the time of investment, in legal and
other related regards, the investors should ensure that they have done their homework well in a bid to
avoid coming across some of these legal pitfalls that are likely to crop up in future.
Cultural Due Diligence: Understanding Local Business Practices
Cultural due diligence helps to avoid misunderstandings of cross-cultural communication and
understand the basic rules in relations with counterparts in the framework of M&A transactions. There
is a discussion of grandstanding in the venture capital industry by Gompers (1996) The author stress the
necessity to understand and align cultural values when designing and implementing a successful
cooperation strategy between investors and entrepreneurs. Cultural sensitivity entails identifying the
working culture and means of business communication in different markets to create a right working
foundation. Lerner (2009) analyse the problematics of changing cultures of entrepreneurship and
Venture Capital to reveal the difficulties of public efforts to promotion of venture capital and small
business, pointing to the problems with the cultural sensitivity of making changes in organizational
practices. It is important to name that Cultural due diligence assists the investors to study more cultural
factors influencing their potential operations and business, and to adjust their strategies according to
the existing norms and habitual practises, which again contributes to the increased rates of successful
entrepreneurial activity. Bernstein et al (2019) analyzed the connection between private equity and
financial vulnerability in crises; thus, arguing for cultural due diligence in the evaluation of target firms’
coping capacity to adverse economic conditions. Relating risk and resilience with cultural practices is
central to comprehending the investors’ contextual drivers across the globe in order to hedge against
the risks and harness the opportunities in uncertain climate. It is the process of evaluating cultural
similarities or differences, social practices and structures of institutions, in the target countries in order
to make wise investment decisions that will also help avoid cultural blunders. Moreover, in the study by
Bernstein, Lerner, Sorensen, and Strömberg (2017) where the authors explain about private equity,
culture sensitivity as part of due diligence is viewed as critical for industry performance as well as
competitiveness, cultural due diligence can help investors to identify possible areas of endogenous
growth, reveal potential barriers to changes, and adapt provision based on country context, thereby
improving investment results. Furthermore, while analyzing the venture capital investments in Japanese
SMEs, Cumming, Fleming and Schwienbacher (2014) also stress that culture is an important factor that
needs to be taken in account while structuring deals and negotiating with the financial intermediaries,
cultural due diligence assists investors in the following ways by explaining cultural differences, increases
confidence when dealing with the other party, enables the investor to trust the local party, and provides
the means necessary for finally undertaking an investment transaction, in conclusion, the cultural
examination of the target country is highly significant for an investor to be familiar with the ways of
interacting with the local business environment, in a concerted manner, investors can then avoid cross-
cultural pitfalls, develop trust and optimize the chances of success of international business ventures
when they follow the steps enumerated below:
Technological Due Diligence for Cross-border Ventures
Cross border merger and acquisitions literally involve two or more companies coming together to form a
new business entity and technological due diligence is one of the most sensitive areas of assessment in
the current globalized world, continuing with the discussion of work systems, Appelbaum and Batt
(2014) discuss trends in the United States with regard to the nature of change in these work systems, as
well as the nature of technological change in today’s workplaces, it is crucial for investors undertaking
FDI to understand these changes because it helps investor decisions concerning embracing,
implementing and developing new technologies. Phalippou and Gottschalg (2009) examine private
equity fund performance with an eye to the way technological DD can help in the selection of
investments and identify sources of value-add, technological due diligence is the process of evaluating
the state of technological dispositions, assets, and property of the companies that are likely to become a
merger partner or an acquisition target in order to determine their suitability for competing and
sustaining their businesses in global markets. Ljungqvist et al, (2007) examine the tendencies in the
investment strategy of private equity fund managers focusing on technological due diligence as a crucial
factor in possible shifts, new technologies, and opportunities sourcing. Technological due diligence is
very relevant to the fund managers as it keeps them informed on technological advancements, create
value from those innovation and in turn make investors happy. Leveraged buyouts and private equity
transactions are considered by Kaplan and Stromberg (2009), and it notable that technological due
diligence is used to evaluate the targets’ technological resources and competencies, it also entails
assessing the strategic management capability, measurement of risks such as those relating to
technological growth, and cybersecurity issues, as well as formulating a plan to minimize such risks to
investors’ interests. Further, Metrick and Yasuda (2010) examine the survey of venture capital and
private equity investments in which increased efforts are made for technological due diligence to
influence deliberate investment strategies and portfolio management activities. Technological due
diligence concerns the identification of the technology worth of the target businesses, indicating the
defense and growth potential of their technology portfolios and solutions as investment and risk
mitigation tools, in conclusion, this involves the assessment of the state of technology of the
organization apart from the identification of the key opportunities and risk associated with technology
in cross-border ventures, in other words, technologically oriented due diligence plays an important role
in the manner in which target firms’ technologies are assessed, the match between investments and
technologies, strategies of maximizing investors’ returns from cross-border investments are developed.
5. Managing Cross-border Investments
Post-Investment Monitoring and Value Addition
The evaluation phase includes venture capital and private equity investment post-investment
management and value enhancement, which are vital in the achievement of set returns and thus
success on an investment. Post investment monitoring as pointed out by Cumming and Johan (2016),
refers to consistent assessment of the portfolio company to determine its effectiveness and other
possible risks to be managed, this process must involve the investors in making contributions in terms of
giving directions, resources, and referral companies to help the growth of the company. According to
Lerner and Hardymon (2012) some forms of value addition include operational improvements that help
to run the businesses more efficiently, strategic direction that orients the business towards the right
direction and governance mechanisms that manage the businesses. Eusher: Many venture capitalists
and private equity investors utilize their experience and connections in the industry to offer guidance
and support to the firms that are invested in. As pointed out by Wright and Robbie (2016) that, sources
of value-added services involve financial restructuring, recruitment of key human capital, and
practicable strategies in market expansion to bolster on the portfolio companies. Bernstein, Lerner, and
Mezzanotti (2019) argue that effective post investment intervention and value creation can create the
multiplier effect, improve industry performance hence returns for investors and ultimately, economic
growth, Gompers and Lerner (2004) postulated that venture capitalist’s capability to make value
addition to their portfolio firms is essential in analyzing performance on the venture capital cycle, in
conclusion, one of the major findings that can be deduced from this research study is that post-
investment monitoring and value addition are critical steps in the venture capital and private equity
investment. From this perspective, based on the investment made, through interactions with,
supporting, advising, as well as using contacts to build a presence in portfolio businesses, investors are
in a position to optimize the operation and performance of the investments made, ensuring its
profitability is not only an advantage for the investors but underscores the overall development and
progress of the economy.
Managing Cross-border Portfolio Companies
The evaluation phase includes venture capital and private equity investment post-investment
management and value enhancement, which are vital in the achievement of set returns and thus
success on an investment. Post investment monitoring as pointed out by Cumming and Johan (2016),
refers to consistent assessment of the portfolio company to determine its effectiveness and other
possible risks to be managed, this process must involve the investors in making contributions in terms of
giving directions, resources, and referral companies to help the growth of the company. According to
Lerner and Hardymon (2012) some forms of value addition include operational improvements that help
to run the businesses more efficiently, strategic direction that orients the business towards the right
direction and governance mechanisms that manage the businesses. Eาวusher : Many venture capitalists
and private equity investors utilize their experience and connections in the industry to offer guidance
and support to the firms that are invested in. As pointed out by Wright and Robbie (2016) that, sources
of value-added services involve financial restructuring, recruitment of key human capital, and
practicable strategies in market expansion to bolster on the portfolio companies. Bernstein, Lerner, and
Mezzanotti (2019) argue that effective post investment intervention and value creation can create the
multiplier effect, improve industry performance hence returns for investors and ultimately, economic
growth, Gompers and Lerner (2004) postulated that venture capitalist’s capability to make value
addition to their portfolio firms is essential in analyzing performance on the venture capital cycle, in
conclusion, one of the major findings that can be deduced from this research study is that post-
investment monitoring and value addition are critical steps in the venture capital and private equity
investment. From this perspective, based on the investment made, through interactions with,
supporting, advising, as well as using contacts to build a presence in portfolio businesses, investors are
in a position to optimize the operation and performance of the investments made ensuring its
profitability is not only an advantage for the investors but underscores the overall development and
progress of the economy.
Exit Strategies in Cross-border Ventures
Existence plans and how they affect success of cross border ventures in the field of venture capital and
private equity. As noted by Cumming and Johan, (2016), exits are extremely important since they offer
investors, an opportunity to exit the investment and realize on their investments. When it comes to the
selection of the appropriate exit strategy particularly in the global context, it is imperative to consider
some factors such as the state of the market as well as the specific laws that govern each country as well
as the conditions that prevail in those jurisdictions. Some foreign entry mode exit strategies are: One of
the common modes of exiting cross-border ventures is through an IPO. Lerner and Hardymon (2012)
have specifically written about how IPOs facilitate access to public capital markets, offering liquidity to
investors and enable them to exit some of their stakes. However, controlling multiple IPOs in different
countries increases the chances of facing strict regulations and unfavourable market situations, which
can make operating cross-border ventures a risky but worthwhile strategy for an IPO. Another exit
strategy used frequently to exit cross-border ventures is through Strategic Acquisition. Wright & Robbie
(2016) contributed on how acquisition strategy delivers synergies as well as growth for the bidding firm
and the target firm. Strategic acquisitions are defined as acquisitions in which two or more companies
combine to gain a new market position or new technologies in the case of cross-border venture.
Secondly the presence of other PE firms and other financial institutions serve as an exit strategy the
cross-border ventures. Bernstein et al. , (2019) note that the secondary sales enables investors to realise
their investment while creating another chance for other investors in the venture, in this regard, the
disposal through secondary sales may entail investors in cross-border ventures seeking to transfer or
withdraw their funds for various business strategies, in conclusion, one can state that exit strategies are
some of the most important approaches to cross border ventures in venture capital and private equity.
There are, therefore, certain aspects that one needs to take into consideration when determining the
best exit strategy when in the process of floats, acquisition or secondary sale, to make sure that the
business is going to be profitable.
Dealing with Cross-cultural Management Challenges
Management across cultures is one of the most crucial aspects that need to become navigate when it
comes to international business particularly in the field of venture capital and private equity. Porat also
highlights the need to recognize and manage cultural differences pertinent too when engaging with and
managing portfolio companies across national contexts (Wright and Robbie, 2016). Cultures influence
the way people communicate, think and behave in business both at the interpersonal and organizational
level, hence a vital factor in the success of a management strategy in the international business.
Bernstein, Lerner, and Mezzanotti (2019) conveys those cultural considerations should be of paramount
importance when PE firms invest in a given country or country cluster given the difference in cultural
understanding between different country clusters, cultural differences have been known to affect
everything ranging from staff attitudes, behavior, perception and expectations. Also, Gompers and
Lerner (2004) highlighted how cultural issues play-out within the very aspects of the venture capital
cycle involving deal sourcing, due diligence and post-investment management. There may be cases of
cultural differences existing between investors and portfolio companies that may act as barriers in the
realization of strategic goals and often value creation processes. Wright and Robbie (2012) attempt to
explain the nature of the international private equity saying that for an American fund to get the
maximum value from an Asian investment, it has to employ CI, as CI helps to manage risks, effective
cross border operations call for effective management skills in responding to cultural differences and
undertaking activities that will foster a good goodwill in relation to stakeholders from different parts of
the world. Speaking of cross-Cultural management, Appelbaum and Batt (2014) underscore that
organizational culture plays an essential role in organizational behavior and could act as the basis for a
diversity management strategy. The cross-cultural management does not only apply to the relationships
between the portfolio companies and the business management teams but also within the human
resources in the portfolio companies which require right strategies on how best to foster cross cultural
working relationships. For a critique and elaboration of methods used to evaluate the efficacy of private
equity, see Phalippou and Gottschalg (2009) where authors claim that the cultural effect significantly
impacts the investment results, cultural competence gives the private equity managers meaningful ways
of identifying and managing on risks of investing across a country’s borders thus being helpful in
portfolio performance complacency as well as overall investor satisfaction, hence, it is crucial to
understand the various types of cross cultural management issues and factors to succeed in
international businesses in venture capital and private equity sector, understanding cultural differences
and accepting the cultural background lead to improving the quality of decisions made, extend
relationships across the investment boundaries, and increase the value added in international
operations.
REFERENCES
Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital. Oxford University
Press.
Lerner, J., & Hardymon, G. F. (2012). Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Casebook (5th ed.). John
Wiley & Sons.
Wright, M., & Robbie, K. (2016). Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Practitioner’s Manual (4th ed.).
Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bernstein, J., Lerner, J., & Mezzanotti, F. (2019). Private Equity and Industry Performance. Journal of
Financial Economics, 132(1), 160-178.
Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2004). The Venture Capital Cycle. MIT Press.
Wright, M., & Robbie, K. (Eds.). (2012). International Private Equity. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Appelbaum, D., & Batt, R. (2014). The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the
United States. ILR Press.
Phalippou, L., & Gottschalg, O. (2009). The Performance of Private Equity Funds. Review of Financial
Studies, 22(4), 1747-1776.
Ljungqvist, A., Richardson, M., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). The Investment Behavior of Private Equity Fund
Managers. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 61-76.
Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2009). Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 23(1), 121-146.
Metrick, A., & Yasuda, A. (2010). Venture Capital and Other Private Equity: A Survey. European Financial
Management, 16(5), 619-654.
Gompers, P. A. (1996). Grandstanding in the Venture Capital Industry. Journal of Financial Economics,
42(1), 133-156.
Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and
Venture Capital Have Failed--And What to Do About It. Princeton University
Press.
Bernstein, S., Lerner, J., & Mezzanotti, F. (2019). Private Equity and Financial Fragility During the Crisis.
Journal of Financial Economics, 133(3), 520-544.
Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Zhang, M. (2014). Venturing Abroad: A Theory of International Investment by
Enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 1013-1037.
Bernstein, S., Lerner, J., Sorensen, M., & Strömberg, P. (2017). Private Equity and Industry Performance:
Reply. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 346-351.
Cumming, D., Fleming, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Financial Intermediaries, Ownership Structure
and the Provision of Venture Capital to SMEs: Evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin
Finance Journal, 27, 20-35.
Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2005). Does Legal Enforcement Affect Financial Transactions? The Contractual
Channel in Private Equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 223-246.
Da Rin, M., Nicodano, G., & Sembenelli, A. (2006). Public Policy and the Creation of Active Venture
Capital Markets. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1699-1723.
Cumming, D., & Walz, U. (2010). Private Equity Returns and Disclosure Around the World. Journal of
International Business Studies, 41(4), 727-754.
Bernstein, S., & Giroud, X. (2019). Mutual Funds as Venture Capitalists? Evidence from Unicorns. Journal
of Financial Economics, 132(2), 491-506.
Cumming, D., & MacIntosh, J. G. (2003). A Cross-Country Comparison of Full and Partial Venture Capital
Exits. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(3), 511-548.
Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2000). Money Chasing Deals? The Impact of Fund Inflows on Private Equity
Valuations. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(2), 281-325.
Ljungqvist, A., Richardson, M., & Wolfenzon, D. (2008). The Investment Behavior of Buyout Funds:
Theory and Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(2), 176-198.
Metrick, A., & Yasuda, A. (2011). Venture Capital and Other Private Equity: A Survey. In B. Espen Eckbo
(Ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (Vol. 2, pp.
835-901). Elsevier.
Bernstein, S., & Lerner, J. (2006). The Private Equity Cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 267-
308.
Cumming, D., Fleming, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2006). Legality and Venture Capital Exits. Journal of
Corporate Finance, 12(2), 214-245.
Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (1999). The Venture Capital Revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
13(2), 145-168.
Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2009). Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity. In B. Espen Eckbo (Ed.),
Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 703-
862). Elsevier.
Bernstein, S., Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2016). The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 129-151.
Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Zhang, M. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment and Sovereign Wealth Funds:
New Horizons in International Finance. Financial Management, 43(3), 517-540.
Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 118(1), 107-155.
Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2009). Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity. In B. Espen Eckbo (Ed.),
Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empi