1
EXPLORING WORLDVIEW CLASHES AND MEDIATION STRATEGIES IN
RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT: INSIGHTS FROM THE MOVIE MARRIAGE STORY
Introduction
Two-separated gives the audience a glimpse of how a couple’s relationship is during the
process of divorce, the major aspects that are addressed and the complications that both parties
go through physically and emotionally in order to come up with a divorce. This story is based on
Charlie, a theater director and Nicole, an actress after they separate and share the custody of their
children; relationship dynamics and professional and personal traits. Looking at the content
which Baumbach is famous for, Marriage Story also offers a beautiful view at the depiction of
the internal life. Stiglegger (2024) pointed out that conflict and love are sexualized in the film,
ethical concerns are intertwined with the sexual aspects of a happy relationship in both personal
and workplace settings. There is also a great example of divorce and how two individuals with
different perceptive can try to live under the same roof and break down emotionally. According
to Treuthart (2020), legal proceedings add a layer of complexity where not only legal rules are
weapons of separation, but also weapons of affect that strengthen the divide between the two
partners. In other words, the main idea of the conflict in the film is not only the disappointment
of the couple, but also the disappointment of the heroines with their freedom, social roles, and
legal requirements.
The primary issue of Marriage Story is the collision of goal and strategies of the main
characters and thus; it is a depiction of some of the most important issues of contemporary
society and its focus on individualism and marriage. The conflict is centered on the rival claim to
2
the child, Henry, and, thus, exposes both characters to a great degree of emotional vulnerability
and offers each of them two very different ways of living. In a review of Marriage Story
presented as two parallel narratives, Crampton (2024) pays attention to how this conflict seems
to fit more neatly into prior representations of divorce on film especially in light of the
similarities to other films including Kramer vs. Kramer where custody battles stand in for
emotional separation and where gendered expectations are also highlighted. It is not only two
people who want to kill each other but their work which they should do, families they should
take care of and the laws they should follow. Paquelet and Brown (2023) noted that behaviors
observed in those high conflict divorces, including PA has been found to be the parties’ acting
out the child’s emotional experience. The film depicts these external forces alongside individual
problems, and therefore the environment that everybody is confined to is quite volatile, which
makes negotiation without a third party intervention invalid; thus, the film depicts the impact of
such intimate conflict on the community. In the context of the show Marriage Story, Brummans
et al. (2022) explain that conflict mediation demonstrates the different ways that language can be
used and misused in a relation in order to work towards a solution.
The Film’s Overview
Conflicts portrayed in the Film
In Marriage Story, there are several types of conflict depicted mainly relationship, family
and legal conflict. The kind of conflict which can be seen in the movie is the kind of conflict; this
is the relationship conflict, which concerns the breakdown of marriage between Charlie and
Nicole. Their emotional barrier is set up as their professions and aspirations act as barriers
between them; Charlie being more concerned with his career as a theater director than with
Nicole’s desire for a complete and joyful life, and career choice. This leads to high levels of
3
feelings of frustration and alienation because, in the marriage, Nicole has little to no power and is
in fact subordinate to her husband Charlie. It gets even worse when Nicole decide to go solo and
move to Los Angeles for her job and also to escape from a marriage that no longer make her
happy. Therefore, the film is a good example of the relational-conflict model that states that it is
essential to have different approaches to the major facets of life and individual growth in a
marriage (Stiglegger, 2024). This kind of relational conflict therefore forms the basis for other,
more severe forms of conflict between family and legal systems.
The family conflict is most evident when Charlie and Nicole are no longer husband and
wife, and both of them try to define child custody. Henry’s two characters are both anxious for
the son and both have the son’s best interest in mind, though they differ in idea of what is best
for him. That is why Nicole is sure that Henry’s environment will become better in Los Angeles,
but Charlie is afraid of changing something in his life and career in New York. Introducing the
legal fight to the acrimony of the two parents takes the child’s future from being a part of the
private feud between the two parents to being a part of a much more public and official feud.
According to Treuthart; In custody cases as have been noted by Treuthart (2020), the courts are
rather emotional and therefore the reassertion of parental anger is only tolerable to advocate for
bitterness. As in Marriage Story, one could realize that the family conflict was both a fight for
material things and the right to raise the children after the divorce, so the viewers see how
unhappy this couple is. Custody is also a part and parcel of the two-fold concern of divorce and
the concern for autonomy and agency in personal relationships and in legal and familial domains.
The type of conflict and persons in the conflict and the disagreement
The two main characters in Marriage Story are male including Charlie, a successful
theater director, and female, Nicole, an actress who monitor conflict of interest in personal and
4
career aspirations. Hence in the beginning of the movie, Charlie is portrayed as a good husband
who is fully employed, but again, not husband enough. In the beginning of the marriage, Nicole
is just another character in Charlie’s work environment but when she gets a taste of what she has
lost, she gets her career back and this time outside of marriage. This shift in Nicole’s wants
shows the increasing distance between the two; angry Charlie has no idea how miserable Nicole
is, how much she wants to work. This could be so where one partner pulls the other to the full by
stretching the other to his/her breaking point and the latter cannot stand the marriage any longer
as noted by Paquelet & Brown (2023). The two characters are in conflict with each other because
of the uncertainty they Grove to create in their future life and the emotional mood in the
relations.
During the course of this conflict we see that the primary issue is the child custody. In
this case, Charlie and Nicole both adore their son Henry and they both have the best interest of
their child at heart but the conflict in the approaches to parenting has strained their relationship
further. To this, Nicole is sure that Henry would want to be in Los Angeles, that she plans on
moving to try and build up a career in acting. He doesn’t want to go back to New York because
he has lots of friends there and he doesn’t think that Henry will be of any use in an unknown
city. This disagreement over who knows what’s better for Henry just adds to the conflict between
Charlie and Nicole because the conflicting selflessness affects their parenting. Crampton
described in his 2024 article that this is one of the most common issues that are associated with
divorce, where in order to fight for children, people end up fighting for themselves. It doesn’t
change their emotions they have towards each other and the movie also portrays how they go
back to the topic of Henry’s custody and finding their divorce lawyers makes them feel even
more.
5
The Conflict in the film’s Plot: Its Settings
Conflict is depicted in the movie Marriage Story during a time when a couple seems to
have all that it takes to form a good marriage. It begins on art and theatre since Charlie is a
theatre director and at the start of the story, Nicole is a theatre actress. But as the movie unfolds
the audience gets to know that the movie couple has a troubled marriage because Nicole has
unfulfilled dreams and Charlie is too self-involved to care about his wife’s dreams. According to
Freeman (2015) says this story is shifted through passions, which depict how Mike and Jenna get
frustrated with their marriage. The climax in the series is when Nicole decides to take up her job
in LA and abandon Charlie. Dwyer states, “This is clearly a career change and mark another
major turning point because it reflects Nicole’s need to seek out personal identity apart from
Charlie”. The situation that is observable now is just the first stage of a conflict that is also legal
and is related to family matters.
When added to the conflict the backdrop of legal and emotional warfare also contributes
to the growth of the story. Charlie and Nicole were once two people who completed each other’s
sentences, however, they quickly become adversaries as they try to battle it out through the legal
system in order to come out on top. In the movie Jeff and Frank start a process of divorce and
their individual goals and desires are centered on the need to exercise some control over their
personal lives, careers, and particularly over their son Willy. Not only the theme of custody
depicts the very cause of the conflict between two spouses in their marriage; it also portrays how
the divorce process unveils feelings that the couple might have had for each other. In the work of
Brummans, Higham, and Cooren (2022) it was stated that divorce mediation always brings to
light more issues that are difficult to resolve especially if the two parties concerned are very keen
on the outcome. The film locates the legal struggle for the characters with the broader framework
6
of the legal system; Charlie and Nicole always seem to be in a position of attempting to
distinguish between their emotions and the desire for retribution with the mechanisms of the law
attempting to handle family matters. It is important and more so somewhat bitter and rather true
in the present society that one cannot always bring feelings like love and loyalty into the court,
which are often business like and very professional.
The Clash of Worldviews
The Clash of Worldviews: Comparing Characters
It can be told that the conflict of the ideologies of the two main characters of the
Marriage Story, Charlie and Nicole is one of the main themes of the movie. Differences in job
and childcare objectives, interests, and leisure lead to the spouses’ alienation and, finally, their
divorce. Charlie is a theatre-director, who manages his own theatre, he works in SES which
values power, success, talent and career progression. He identifies with work more than with his
marriage to Nicole, so he considers it a part of his identity. Nicole has got a completely opposite
attitude towards life she wants to run her life, to develop personally, and to have a conventional
family. That is why she feels the need to do something else than just being a wife to John and a
mother to Charlie, that’s why she turns to acting in Los Angeles. In this case, the conflict of the
worlds is in the middle of the conflict because the goals of the characters, and the duties that
Charlie has to fulfill and the liberation that Nicole has to gain creates the emotional and therefore
the philosophical gap between them. According to Sheikh (2022) such a worldview conflict is
always difficult to reconcile since it is as if it is part of one’s identity system. Another typical
husband’s concern is the wife’s lack of respect for his opinion about what life is, which causes
anger and separation between the spouses, and that is the conflict observable in the story.
7
The difference in these believes does not only have emotional impact but also impacts
decision making. It finally points out that the conflict is not only the wars that Pat and Katie
wage for material goods but also the war of the two over the status within the Patterson family.
This is why Charlie has no doubt that his direction and/or oral identification informs his family’s
stability. He wishes he could have gone back to school but he doesn’t think that he has made
wrong sacrifices for his career because he considers his work as his pride. On her part, Nicole
complains that Charlie is selfish since he is busy with career dreams he has crushed her dreams.
This point of view makes her decide to move to Los Angeles thinking that she and her daughter
will be happier and that she will be a better mother in another place. In Zhyvko et al. (2024)
worldview conflict occur when people are unable to comprehend that the other party has a viable
stand, hence communication breakdown. More so, when Nicole moves to Los Angeles, an action
is a paradigm shift in terms of her character development in support of Charlie at the beginning
but then striving to have her own life and therefore, complicating her relation with Charlie.
Intractable Issues: Belief and values of fundamental education and their role
In Marriage Story, all is well because the issues that Charlie and Nicole cannot resolve
are ontological and axiological; issues concerning the being and worth of the self, work, and
child. The root cause of the main conflict is the rights of the spouses to a worthwhile life, the
values that are contradictory. Long said that one’s success at the cost of another is a recurring
theme here, Charlie’s dedication to artistry and career goal hampers the growth of the belief in
family and self-actualization, destroys Nicole’s dreams. These conflicting opinions do not
present the picture of much conflict solvability as they stem from the very essence of the
characters in question. As stated by Ferreira (2023) when identity is salient, threat dictates the
ease with which conflict can escalate and the admitting of fallibility is almost inconceivable. One
8
more crucial factor is Charlie’s work identity; a kind of work identity which for him work is not
just a job but something more like identity. Nicole is right as the mother and her right to have
own a life as well is as basic as it gets. When two people hold opposite beliefs, the feelings the
two individuals have for each other are thrown to the wind and the issues are no longer simple
relationship issues; they become deep-seated, core, and unsolvable.
Their values are also different in terms of child rearing and this subject shows that there
is a complete incompatibility of interests of the couple. New York and the kind of environment
that Charlie has put in place is what he feels is right for Henry growing up under Career. His
paradigm shifts the family that the unit should go with his agenda and consequently, any
derangement of the unit hurts the son. While Nicole is excited about being able to live her life in
Los Angeles on her own and freeing Henry from Banks will free him for a better and happier
future where his mother’s happiness is important. This value conflict in parenting is particularly
dangerous because the conflict is not just over who is right for Henry, but for what Charlie and
Nicole think is right for them and their child. As rightly pointed by Pasricha (2020), and it is
truly difficult to find middle ground when values are involved; this is because it is a belief
system and people always feel that they are correct and need to stand up for what they think is
right.
Custody dispute is the last aspects of such uncontrollable conflicts, where Charlie and
Nicole use their beliefs to decide what is good for Henry. This is not just a technical matter of
negotiation; it is also ideological. They both attempt to blame each other and claim that they are
right and the other is wrong about how the world works, and the possible outcome of the
recognition of are that it is impossible to be a parent and an individual. This conflict is most
often seen in critical state in which basic assumptions or paradigms are in opposition and as
9
pointed out by Morgan (2020) any conflict will morph into a ‘wicked problem’ for which no
solution is entirely good. It becomes truly crazy for Charlie and Nicole to be lost at the legal
level and at the ethical or emotional level of the fight for custody, given that both of these
divorcees are convinced that the right to take the children is a question of their merit, which of
the two is a better parent? Only this kind of conflict can exist unconsciously, because the general
rules of how one should live with a person from another world outlook cannot be applied when
two people have absolutely different outlooks.
Theories on Worldview Clashes: Analysis and Examples taken from the Film
There are good theories about worldview clashes, especially in connection with the
article by Sheikh (2022) that describes the relations between Charlie and Nicole in Marriage
Story. Cognitive conflict is likely to be recurrent when the belief systems of people are quite
opposite, and are fundamental to their self-images, and cannot be easily integrated. Therefore,
the main values of the protagonist Charlie, who is entirely oriented on art and is ready to work
hard to succeed both in his career and in his personal life, is opposed to the concept of freedom
that fascinates the protagonist’s girlfriend Nicole. Their values are polar opposites, and as
Ferreira (2023) would put it Montresor and the narrator are value-divergent characters for whom
identity is linked to individual perception of the world and anything that goes against this is seen
as a threat. Here, Nicole’s decision to remain working in Los Angeles is not only personal
decisions but a way of writing herself a new script outside marriage. Charlie on the other hand
looks at it as people going back on their life’s commitment, the promises they made and received
in their lifetime. The conflict between the two therefore represents ideological differences on
identity, power and family as the last is not easy to discuss since it is private.
10
Examples that help the movie to demonstrate that Charlie and Nicole struggle to
understand the nature of the world. A breakthrough is made when Charlie’s wife Nicole says that
she feels as if she is not present in the marriage; this scene represents the Californian
egocentricity. Another way to make sense of the problem is to understand it as an
unacknowledged lack of personal self-actualization on the part of Nicole, which leads her to
resent Charlie’s domination. On the surface, for Charlie his wife’s attempt to leave and go to Los
Angeles to continue her career is a rejection of their relationships and a challenge to his belief
system that success is the only success in the society. And unlike in Woolf’s previous novels,
this clash of worldviews is conducted through emotion and both of the two main characters
become more and more intolerable and impatient with the other as the confrontation between
them grows more intense and specific. As Zhyvko et al. (2024) also pointed out, the enhanced
focus and attitude divergence may lead to polarization if only it is just apparent that each party is
rooted to its own belief and cannot comprehend the thinking of the other party. In Marriage Story
this can be seen by the way that both characters become more and more stuck in their own
positions and perspectives and thus make any possible way of coming back together even worse.
Use of Negotiation and Mediation
Bargaining and settling of disputes in a marriage story
In Marriage Story, both the main characters Charlie and Nicole attempt to bring
compromise and compromise into the conflict though do not succeed fully since they are rigid
due to severe psychological injury and different perception of the world. First, both of them
engage in the bargaining or at least some aspects of it, for example, when they are talking about
children issues, child custody issue to be more precise, as well as main issue of conflict in
marriage. These efforts at mediation are made because they do not want to resort to other more
11
hostile means of conflict resolution such as litigation. For instance, Nicole has a better agreement
on child custody since she wants to be an amicable visitation of Henry and besides, each one of
them has personal business engagements to attend to. However, these efforts are easily broken
down as soon as affective engagement rises, and the conversation becomes more hostile. They
demonstrate that the two basic concerns they both have, Charlie’s career and Nicole’s liberty,
prevent the emergence of a simple knockdown bargain over the casual conversations. This is
indicative of a deeper issue as it is no longer about child custody and divorce, but about the
opposite visions and expectations of the couple. Informal negotiation is not helpful in situations
where the parties allow emotions to play a part and the interest that are associated with the
emotions take precedence over the rational solution finding process as pointed out by Goldberg
et al. (2020).
Neither of the characters in the case wants to compromise over the problems they have
and thus, the only way they can solve it is through the courts as the legal systems. Charlie and
Nicole chose to hire the services of divorce lawyers which is a more intense approach as well as
the turning away from the informal ways of conflict solving, the personal ones. Yet, while with
the help of the therapy the communication between them became less focused on the needs of
each of them, the communication via lawyers is also not primarily focused on the legal matters
but on the child support, property division, etc. The two parties drift further away, Charlie’s
lawyer encouraging him to battle, while Nicole’s lawyer tells Nicole to stand her ground as far as
the custody of the child and child support is concerned. This move to legal mediation is evidence
of the many drawbacks of informal negotiation in crucial and private conflict. As stated by
Müller & Potzel (2024), while face-to-face bargaining can be deadlocked, legal mediations acts
as a formal process, despite being a legal process, it emphasizes feelings of anonymity and given
12
powerlessness in the bargaining process. In Marriage Story, we understood that the process of
trying to address the core psychological and interpersonal problems is extremely difficult when
the legal process is initiated and the main idea is to defeat the other side rather than reach an
agreement on the problem.
Methods of Negotiation and Conflict Solving– Formal and Informal
All the first and the second level of the negotiation and mediation are used in Marriage
Story to try to resolve the conflicts between the main characters Charlie and Nicole, yet all of
them are not without their problems. Casoni, but, wants to communicate with her informally and
with this, Nicole hopes to get a friendlier and more involved shared care of the children as well
as a divorce from the marriage tyranny. These are methods that are not very formal and do
involve conversation between the two interested parties with aim of expressing certain feelings
with a view of arriving at a certain decision in order to avoid other more formal procedures. The
series premiere sees Nicole wanting to keep things civil and as much as possible avoid court
appearance for Henry and try to reach a settlement. But it is crucial to appreciate the fact that,
informal negotiation especially in emotionally charged vital meetings, lacks the desired value
and emotional consideration if the two are not adequately captured. According to Curhan et al.
(2022), when there is no conscious mindset and the main motive of the negotiation is feeling, it
is highly likely to get a negative outcome. In Marriage Story, the decisions are made during
conversations and the tense negotiations are depicted as a power to make decisions, as well as
everything related to personal and very sensitive matters is shown as quite difficult when there
are no outside professionals.
On the other hand, the formal approach to the conflict solution becomes the central issue
of the movie when the two characters, Charlie and Nicole, seek help from legal advisors.
13
According to Müller and Potzel (2024), while legal negotiations provide a mechanism of solving
it, they also contribute to the escalation of polarization of the conflict. The two mediators who
are the two lawyers in this case represent their client interest and in the process they enhance the
emotional distance between Charlie and Nicole. The process of mediation which is best reflected
in the film is the legal mediation, where mediation is a determination of rights or rights in
persona, for example, child custody and visitation, maintenance, and property division but not
rights in rem, as the conflict is grounded in an affective disorder. What happens in this method of
negotiation is that it tends to deal more with process fairness than with affective restoration. As
described by Folberg and Reynolds in 2021, legal negotiations have a structure that works well
for the legal dispute but does not take into account how both partners feel neglected and
unhappy.
Application of Conflict Resolution Theories- Interest Based Approach and Principled
Negotiation
The present study adopted interest-based negotiation theory where the primary focus is
on the needs of the two main characters, Charlie and Nicole, in Marriage Story. Interest based
approach is based on the assumption that the cause of conflict is to be attributed to the self-
interest of each of the parties involved in the conflict. This is not conflict over the children, or
child support or alimony and division of assets and debts which this is conflict between the need
for self-actualization, self-governance, self-determination and self-identification. The same idea
can be seen in the fact that Charlie has no time for anything but work and being a man on a
career; Nicole wants freedom and the chance to be reminded that she exists. If the emphasis had
been placed on what is under the skin, then a better solution could have been reached. The
principled negotiation theory by Fisher and Ury (2011) focused on kernel, separating people
14
from the problem and interim positions away from interests and commitments, radical solutions-
focusing more on the instrument- analysis of interests rather than positions; and collaborative-
building of packages, creating solutions to fit mutual and maximum shared interest. If in
Marriage Story Charlie and Nicole had gone through ethical bargaining, then they would have
probably understood what each of them wanted and since both of them wanted purity then a
solution could have been found that included some of what each of them wanted.
The law and the oppositional character of the official mediation process do not allow this
couple to be closer and to demonstrate the inefficiency of the interest-based negotiation when the
participants are self-interest. Charlie cannot accept that Nicole has growing assertiveness says
that her desire to become a professional and move to Los Angeles is an invasion of his space.
Nicole has no appreciation of the fact that Charlie needs to be successful in whatever he does and
therefore sees him career as being self-centered and neglecting her needs. In fact, this inability to
reason with the middle ground having been shifted from the common interest that both the
prosecuting and the defendant want means that the conflict escalates where both partners do not
acknowledge or meet the attitudes and needs. Curhan and his team in the year 2022 stated that
negotiation is not an impulse and people are not in the right frame of mind most of the times
especially since most of the events are emotionally influenced. The lack of interest-based
negotiation in Marriage Story contributes to the worsening of the war and leads to the very long
and painful Lawyered battle.
Third Parties in Mediation
Goldberg et al. (2020) posit that various outsiders namely legal representatives,
intermediaries and family members significantly engage in the mediation process of the conflict
within Marriage Story. Last but not the least, in mediation lawyers are most involved as they
15
represent legal and financial interests of the party. The way how divorce lawyers of Charlie and
Nicole contribute in the conflict of the divorce process is depicted in the film. Specifically,
Nicole’s attorney would like her to become more assertive as regards the custody and financial
aspects of the case, while Charlie’s attorney would also like him to take a more assertive
position. This formal legal negotiation made by the lawyers made the enmity between two
characters worse because instead of solving the problem each lawyer was trying to win the case.
The change from an internal approach to bargaining to the structuralization of the negotiating
process and the searching for an independent legal advice shows that while mediation is most
effective when the parties have shared goals, it is not effective when the goals of the various
parties are conflicting. However, as noted by Goldberg et al., (2020), legal professionals offer
systematic reasoning and simultaneously erase the self, and also, remain focused on the legal
dispute rather than conflict between people.
The family members have very minimal interaction with the characters but they seem to
play a big role in the affairs of the characters either by comforting them or even influencing their
actions. For example, when the character named Nicole moves to Los Angeles she has the
backing of her family while Charlie’s family is more concerned with how much he will be
affected in his line of duty and in life in general. It is for such family dynamics that the process
of mediation becomes a rather challenging one because a character has dual responsibilities,
towards the self and the family. Family members may offer advice or push further, but the data
they will give will be influenced by bias and emotions and will only harm the mediation process.
Müller and Potzel (2024) has pointed out that parental mediation and the role of other family
members may even lead to reactance rather than compliance as the third party tries to force the
subject into accepting the best possible solution for the targeted persons. In Marriage Story, what
16
observers bring is the intensification of feelings that has a bearing to their conflict that interferes
with the bargaining and compromise systems of marriage.
Worldviews Clash-Conflict with "The Other"
Worldviews Clash- The relation between conflict and otherness in Love and Death
In fact, in Marriage Story, “the Other” can be seen most clearly in the interactions that
Charlie and Nicole have with the legal system and their lawyers. This can be seen through the
show not forcing Charlie’s rather old fashioned view of the world on Nicole who has left New
York and is now experiencing a completely different working culture in Los Angeles along with
her career and freedom. This is because, when Nicole has to deal with law, she encounters
certain or even tacit cultures and ideologies of the opposition of genders, of careers and families,
etc. Also, the totality of the lawyers, the family, and the legal system, in general, are stigmatized
as the Other, people having their own vision of the world, and their own egocentric interests
which do not always correspond to the beliefs of the main characters, Charlie and Nicole. These
parts reveal that in their divorce proceeding both characters encounter people who cannot
understand their situation and struggles and go back to the conflict between the working,
independent, and self-realized rubrics, and the stable, contractual, and family-oriented rubrics.
Brandt and Crawford (2020) pointed out that the extramural approach to conflict where one party
is seen as ‘the Other’ does not make the process any easier when the conflict needs to be
managed.
The conflict between Charlie and Nicole that is depicted in personal communication can
also be explained by the basic cultural differences when the two are overwhelmed by passion.
Charlie and Nicole fail to understand each other’s reason in the course of their conversation
regarding child, Henry and the future of their family. Charlie was frustrated with his wife for
17
wanting to be on her own at the same time Nicole thought that Charlie was selfish and was only
caring about his job and career. Both of the characters fail to acknowledge the other as having a
point of view, which frustrates them even more. These moments reflect the fundamental clash of
their worldviews which is the life of an artist. In this case, Charlie gives up everything that he
had attained in his line of art for his wife to get her personal identity back instead of becoming a
wife. The lawyers and mediators make it worse by explaining the issue in legal language rather
than feelings. Sheikh (2022) notes that by not accepting the complexity of the "Other", the two
sides cannot even compromise since everyone is holding onto their own views of the issue.
How the clash of worldviews makes the conflict more complex?
The conflict between Charlie and Nicole’s views on life deepen the Stakes in Marriage
Story by denying both characters a comprehension of the other’s wants and needs. Therefore,
Nicole has the opposite of Charlie’s worldview since she wants to have a job of her choice and to
progress practically in her career. The very difference in aims and values makes people have
emotions that are so opposite that it is impossible to reach a compromise. This is because While
Nicole and Charlie have distinct ideas about what makes for a successful life; with Nicole trying
to escape the roles of wife and mother and Charlie having a vision of marriage whereby both
partners sacrifice everything for the sake of the family; the film is built on miscommunication
and marital estrangement. For instance, Charlie having an understanding that Nicole is going
away to follow her career is quite a different case from the idea that Nicole is settling for a life of
sacrifice so that Charlie can have a successful career. They replace the potentially warmer and
certainly more appreciated male attitude with two extremely critical opinions of the world,
consequently, the two worldviews diverge and push the couple away from each other. According
to Sweetman (2021) when people not only fail to recognize the other as having a right to be right
18
but proceed to state that the other is right condemnably then the conflict escalates as each
becomes a case of the other being the "Other"; unwanted and unheard.
The clear conflict between these two attitudes is worked out in terms of the emotional
stress of various legal confrontations, a state of affairs which corresponds to the basic division
into the winners and the losers. The lawyers who are handling this case have not painted it as a
war or a fight, rather it is a war which has to be fought and then lost. This widens the existing
gulf between Charlie and Nicole, they are pitted against each other and their lawyers are their
mouthpieces. The position of the external intermediaries, the lawyers themselves, and the
mediators appointed by the court; illustrates the dynamics of worldview conflict in
organizational contexts. It is, thus, useful in understanding how and in what ways Charlie and
Nicole, fighting their battle in the postfeminist landscape to win the custody battle becomes
enmeshed in such complexity of postfeminist gender politics and, therefore, culture, law and
society in which they are located. As Morgan (2020) rightly pointed out, in as much as people
are exposed to multiple views of the world, which especially in such adversarial or high-stakes
situations as divorce, the picture is not softened or reconciled, but rather more sharply defined.
Nationalism, Marriage Story and the view of the “The Other”
While Marriage Story does not have themes of patriotism or nationalism it is still possible
to understand division of cultural and national identity between the two main characters,
specifically in how each of them perceives the Other. On every level, the movie represents the
theme of the individual in society and in the light of the whole plot of the main character Nicole
leaving New York to get a job in Los Angeles, this can be easily seen as individualism which is a
typical western culture value. On the other hand, Charlie has connections to New York and his
position within an art community of a certain subculture. This conflict in the perception of what
19
it is to thrive and create a life reflects a larger culture divide between the cultures of collectivism
and individualism. In this way, the characters’ identities and attitudes that one tells two different
cultures, which are associated with success and which define the Other. According to Valk
(2021), the worldview conflicts under consideration are not only personal but can be imposed by
society and culture on individuals and societies resulting in division and confusion.
National and cultural discourses also shape the way in which each of the characters looks
at the other or defines him or her. For instance, Charlie is ready to argue that he has to give up on
personal contacts for his corporate employment by the idea that such a trade-off has purchased
him a successful, traditional male life style; Nicole’s concepts of the possibility of making such a
trade are gone, she is no longer ready to risk her future for a career that may never be there.
These may be seen as a manifestation of national gender ideologies and pathways of women
particularly mothers in relation to the achievement of success and compliance to family
expectations and duties, that Nicole is rebellion and equal to a man in an effort to alter the
nuclear nature of the family. That is why the conflict of Charlie and Nicole becomes a struggle
between two different visions of the society. Tthe first one is the commoner who chooses a
career in Hollywood. It is in this light that conflict between couple seems to be an embodiment
of one or the other ideologies in the society where individual autonomy struggles with
conformism of familial or community norms. Brandt and Crawford (2020) suggest that where
such conflicts occur the potential at play is higher when the topics discussed fall under the
domain of nationalism or cultural values associated with certain lifestyles.
Mainstream cinematic techniques of portraying interpersonal relationships. In what extent
can we view the attempts of Charlie and Nicole to live together while they have different visions
of the world as a reflection of major social discourses on freedom, national identity, and
20
belongingness? It does not use patriotism or nationalism as the causes of conflict between the
characters, yet the attitudes to success, family, and the levels of sacrifice stand for the conflict of
American individualism against Asian collectivism. It is also important that Charlie is very proud
of being New Yorker and being a professional, these are the remnants of the traditional ethos,
while Nicole’s enjoyment of creating a life outside of Charlie, her work, friends, trips, is
postmodern. These are both individual and organizational and intensify the clash, and the
characters cannot avoid. As noted by Sweetman (2021) when the conflicts are driven by national
or cultural worldview, the way the “Other” is seen is as completely incompatible and hence the
conflict is going to be even more severe. The conflict of the main characters of Marriage Story,
Charlie and Nicole, is a typical representative of Jewish culture as their personal conflict together
with the ideological one makes divorce and reconciliation almost unthinkable.
Managing Conflict through Nonviolent Communication
Applying Nonviolent Communication (NVC) as a Method of Solving Conflicts
In the movie Marriage Story, non-violent communication- could have been a god sent
tool to try and douse the flames between Charlie and Nicole. NVC based on the model by
Marshall Rosenberg offers them to pay attention only to the messages of feelings, needs,
observations, and requests, but without any judgement of the other party. If Charlie and Nicole
had both been using NVC, Charlie would not have generated those emotionally loaded
interactions which sustain the conflict. For example, when Charlie’s acting aggressively towards
Nicole’s demands, or when Nicole is cold to Charlie, the two characters are opposed. Changing
the relational messages, for example, from blaming to using reports of affective states, could
have provided such a window. As proposed by Arieli and Abboud Armaly (2023), people create
a context in which both are aware of the other’s experiences, or, put simply, an exchange of
21
emotions or both parties. If only Charlie and Nicole had paid attention to such ideas, then they
would most certainly have been in a position to express themselves to each other their real needs
and fear and such could have helped them approach their problems in a much better way.
In the NVC Empathy there is the constructive confrontation that has to be there when
there are conflicts and we could have seen Charlie and Nicole work on the feeling of
vulnerability and an effort to try to understand the other person’s needs. In the film both
characters always speak from a place of frustration and this makes one become defensive and
miss what the other is saying. The non-violent communication empathy is therefore not only the
act of listening but listening with the ear to the feelings. According to Koopman and Seliga
(2021) when one listens to the other party with the intention of understanding the other person,
the other person is also least likely to respond defensively. Had both characters avoided
aggressive scripts, personalized communicated they could have steer away from escalating the
conflict and could have moved towards a healthier conversation about their relationship.
Applying NVC could have perhaps have enabled Charlie and Nicole to get to the bottom of the
issues they believed were pushing them to their resistant position hence reducing the conflict.
The other part of NVC which could have helped in changing the communication intensity
in Marriage Story is the use of respecting dialogue. In this movie, most of them, relational
aggression which include use of abusive language and accusations that widen the gap between
Charlie and Nicole. They could have made use of the ‘I’ statements suggested in the Non-Violent
Communication (NVC) instead of saying things like “You always…” For instance, instead of
acting out such things as betrayal and selfishness to each other they could have expressed
themselves in form of, "I feel like… when…" or "I want…". This language shifts from the blame
cast to a need or feeling assertion and understanding process. According to Lasater and Lasater
22
(2022) good communication is courteous and enables the practitioner and the patient to express
themselves without the fear of being punished in a similar manner or even worse. In Marriage
Story, if such communication had been adopted, Charlie and Nicole could have had better
communication that if encouraged would have decreased the physical fighting and increase the
emotional IQ in the quarrel.
Real Life Examples for and Against the Practice of Nonviolent Communication
In Marriage Story, there are examples of nonviolent communication by Charlie and
Nicole during interactions that are filled with aggressive communication. One example of
success is when Charlie tells her the story of his feelings of grief and anger about their divorce
during the shoot but he doesn’t have to blame Nicole for it. Here he expands it into self-pity, but
without turning the conversation into an altercation. This moment is consistent with Model’s
NVC principles of expression without blame of own observations and feelings. However, this
reciprocation is counterbalanced as soon as a conflict emerges, and both parties are hostile and
accusative towards the other. This transition is problematic in terms of NVC because the
participants move to blame and frustration instead of supporting empathy. As noted by Arieli and
Abboud Armaly (2023), empathy moves are important and temporal spans of the given
interactions are long enough to build empathy, but without support, they do not result in
improvement. In the case of Charlie and Nicole such attempts at non-violent communication
could have led to a much more significant conversation had the attempts been sustained
throughout the length of the movie.
Unlike Nicole who employs accusations and emotional fade out of communication and
therefore does not support NVC. In one of the most violent episodes of the series, Nicole
educates the character of Charlie’s behavior and his selfishness, and his inability to understand
23
her. The way of functioning of this approach is characterized by accusations and criticism typical
for a fight. While in NVC individuals can focus on their Feelings and Needs without blame,
Nicole’s language sets off Charlie’s defense. Such a breakdown in communication is useful in
sustaining the conflict and the two parties are not able to find their way to a solution. Koopman
and Seliga have made it very clear that when people fail to use NVC approaches like active
listening or empathic response, then the conflict rises. Nicole’s lack of ability to avoid using
violence on the attic entails that she cannot be understood by this man in a way that will lead to
the development of a solution to the emotional barrier between them, which the rage that persists
to this day and which keeps Nicole away from Charlie.
Overview of the Theory of Nonviolent Communication
If Charlie and Nicole had both employed the nonviolent communication the result would
have been one of them being able to understand the other as well as what actually happened
between the two of them. If both characters had engaged in active listening and used empathy
they could have met each other’s emotional needs without having to be aggressive. It could have
allowed them to seek out more profound political and psychological causes of actions and
concerns of the mob. In the words of Lasater and Lasater (2022), Empathy is a way of getting in
touch which is the cornerstone of conflict management. Remember the characters of Marriage
Story? Consider how things would have been if Charlie and Nicole, instead of arguing, used
NVC and all the techniques mentioned above, including reflective listening and feelings
expression, it would create a dialogue that has only one purpose, resolution and not a dialogue of
revenge. With these tools they could have understood what position they held and this could
have helped them sort out their differences without much aggression. Added to the above, the
union with the help of NVC could have not only prevented the further deterioration but also
24
display the way to how the relationship can be brought back and seek for better means of
effective communication in the future.
Theoretical Integration and Application
The Combination of Theoretical Frameworks and their Implementation
In order to analyze conflict dynamics of Marriage Story several conflict resolution
theories can be applied. One of the most relevant frameworks is Fisher and Ury’s Principled
Negotiation, which focuses on four key principles. Kundu (2022) says it is rather a way of
classifying the players so that they are not directly associated with the conflict; adopting stand
instead of postures; finding out and proposing ways that may benefit both parties; establishing
principles that cannot be easily dismissed. This approach has a kind of a tendency of making the
negotiators look for middle ground in coming up with solution that are in line with objectives as
opposed to adversarial or win/lose type. In the movie both Charlie and Nicole are worst winners
because they are unable to shift their focus of concern to what is best for their child, and the need
to let go. It could have been much easier indeed when addressed, if they had employed some of
the techniques laid down by Fisher and Ury such as, re-framing the idea or issues as a discussion
where both the parties declare their interest, wishes and needs, creation of new options beneficial
to both, and so on. This would have probably spared them a lot of money on their emotions and
lawyers during their divorce. Also, Holmström (2023) indicate that it is possible to use the
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) theory to identify the conflict solving
behavior of the characters. The TKI identifies five conflict-handling styles and some of the
categories of organizational behavior are; competing, cooperating, bargaining, avoiding and
accommodating. It appears that the only two tactics that Charlie and Nicole use are competition
and withdrawal. It is moderately to highly affectively charged communication, and they are not
25
inclined to establish the communication environment favorable for problem solving. As per TKI,
if more of a consultative selling approach had been used it would have been possible for both to
find a solution that would meet their needs. Had they focused on how each of them felt then, they
would not have let things turn sour.
These theories of conflict resolution explain the behaviors and activities of Charlie and
Nicole during the course of the movie. Both characters are limited to certain conflict tactics
especially on matters concerning child’s custody and property, assets and liabilities; these causes
force them to take a more aggressive conflict course. That is why their behavior is primarily
about the triumph of their position or “reasoning” of their position, for example, Charlie who
fought for the child custody or Nicole who stated that she needed freedom to do something.
Koopman and Seliga (2021) assert that they do not collaborate because they do not have specific
common interests, and as the most productive constructive conflict style that can lead to a
positive conflict outcome. Also, there is an avoiding mode where one or both parties avoid the
direct confrontation this is evident when, Charlie and Nicole leave most of their communication
issues to their lawyers thus avoiding direct confrontations of needs and feelings. This leads to
painful romantic situations, and litigation that could have been avoided if the characters just
talked. The principle negotiation could have been very helpful to them in attempting to identify
other interests that might have been met without them having to be so stubborn. Adriani et al.
(2024) state that since they are both parents they could have focused on the aggregation of their
child’s emotions and therefore any conversation they had with each other would not be a fight. In
today’s practice, if both of them were not interested in the competition, they can easily think how
could they can come to an agreement which was satisfactory to both the parties and meet their
need of success.
26
Worldview Conflict and Solutions
According to Sheikh (20022), it is theories of worldview conflicts that assist in
understanding the nature of Marriage Story concerning Charlie and Nicole’s perception of
divorce and their process of it. They all have the belief system which is formed by the
experiences, values and needs for success in life. It is these opposing perceptions that lie at the
heart of the matter because two totally different concepts of success, family, and individual
happiness are in question. Sheikh (2022) noted that, poor procedure order between the parties
mean that if they hold different worldview, then conflict will be escalated by the lack of respect
for the “other”. Here, the conflict escalates because Charlie and Nicole both engage the conflict
with what they believe they want for their lives (and for their son). According to Charlie, the
separation is a working loss, while Nicole sees it as a way of growth and the possibility of
working on one’s own. Both of them could have been able to appreciate the other’s point of view
and the things that each wanted by using Fisher and Ury’s approach of working on interests not
on positions. Klein may also have realized that Reynolds has to begin focusing on the following
season of Lip Service, had they been more certain of each of the other’s plans, they might not
have experienced this miscommunication. Sheik (2022) suggest that Nicole who wants to
become a painter might be said to have equally noble desire as Charlie, a businessman who
needs to support his family. Maybe she and the ex could have agreed on something where both
of them would feel that they are being valued. If these worldviews had been made explicit, it is
probable that, both of them could have reached a compromise that would respect each one
specific choice of direction in life while respecting their duty and responsibility as parents to
their son.
27
Also, interpersonal conflict and conflict of cultural or ideological origin is also seen in
how Charlie and Nicole, handle their separation. This is evident from the movie as the two
protagonists have different views on marriage, the role of man and woman respectively as well
as regarding individualism. This can be seen in the conflict between Nicole need for self-
actualization, her early stage of the formation of the self-ego, and Charlie’s more conventional
attitude towards family and submission. This enhances the conflict between these views because
none of the two parties can put themselves in the shoes of the other, or even tolerate the other’s
values and beliefs. Such a tension can be described via Morgan (2020), who focuses on
worldview clash, which occurs when the conflicting beliefs and values of the conflicting parties
prevent the parties from understanding each other and communicating about the conflict that
escalates the conflict. The culture of Charlie from Texas differ with that of Nicole from New
York because he has been a businessman and a father of three children while Nicole is an artist
who desires to be famous on her own. These deeper structural cultural clashes make them unable
to find a middle ground that will be favorable to both parties- which is where conflict theory on
worldview conflict comes in. As put by Valk (2021), the conflicts in the worldview dimensions
in intimate relationships also make the people involved unable to tackle and solve the conflict of
values. Although the two main characters never really discuss these two very different views of
the world, they are unable to go beyond it and therefore the characters do not grow or reconcile
in any way throughout the entire movie.
Cognitive conceptualization and an empirical review of cultural cognition and conflict
management
Marriage Story is analyzed as a narrative that captures worldview conflicts and using
conflict theories to explain the impact of differing beliefs when it comes to conflict management
28
as well as communication. According to Sweetman (2021), this occurs when people come to the
table with either a wrong perception or no perception at all of the views of the other party hence
the impasse. The characters cannot work out what is different or give and take in order to do so
and end up communicating through anger and pain instead. For Charlie and Nicole, material and
ideological differences put the divide in the separation as betrayal to the relationship. In order to
analyze this as a Worldview Conflict theories it may be best to look at this as a clash of basic
values that the two individual characters cannot tolerate in the other. This inability to come to a
middle ground in the conflict makes them romantically distant with each other, which is a source
of conflict between Cell. If these worldview conflicts could have been identified and discussed,
then it may have been possible to know how to stop them. They may have learnt how to avoid
whatever it was that was distressing them in such things as active listening or empathy
developing activities.
Interpersonal conflict theories also help explain how the way that Charlie and Nicole
handle emotions in the conflict makes the situation worse. Crawford (2020) states that these
arguments therefore capture fundamental personal issues that influence their communication and
interpersonal relationship with other people. It is possible to understand how inner frame of
references of characters shape their interaction with each other by concentrating on the above
mentioned personal values and emotional responses. As Brandt and Crawford (2020)
demonstrated, although working with intercultural conflict can be difficult, the main
counteraction is the desire to meet the “other” and discuss the conflict with him or her. If Charlie
and Nicole in the film Marriage Story had followed the suggested approach they would have
both agreed that they both needed different things in life and realized that they had different
perceptions that if acted on would make them opt to solve the problems of the marriage without
29
resorting to physical confrontations as was the case when they decided to go their separate ways.
It is quite possible that external mediation had to help them, and to bridge the emotional and
ideological divide that separates them, this conversation. Maybe, this is why, as mentioned
earlier, by defining the conflict as an "issue of values", or a "perceived difference in values"; and
not as moral opposition, both could have been brought to a more constructive kind of solution.
Conclusion
European Integration and Citizens' Rights
Specifically, the criticism of Marriage Story is discussed in respect of the critical
dynamics which underpin the marital discord between Charlie and Nicole and which are
predictable based on differences in worldview and the inability to communicate and/or solve
problems. The characters’ attitude towards marriage and self-governance and self-actualization
are therefore the actions and the continuation of the conflict. For example, Charlie is a
workaholic and is a fatherly figure to Charlie which contrasts with Nicloe’s interest in freedom
and the desire to become an artist. This ideological conflict prevents them from getting custody
because they do not comprehend each other’s motives; therefore, they become stubborn.
Moreover, they are found to be especially hard to relationally manage since they are unable to
engage in constructive interaction with each other; at times they fight and avoid each other.
When using the conflict resolution theories such as the Fisher and Ury’s Principled Negotiation it
is easier to see that if both of the characters were willing to look at what they both wanted, in this
case a child they both are portraying on the show, they could have probably come up with a
much better solution than they did. The same is also true with regard to the foregoing analysis of
the conflict which revealed that the conflict is rooted in frustrated need with personal
confirmation for control and derived self-satisfaction. Therefore, specialist lawyers are envisaged
30
as key in raising the conflict and ensuring the legal warfare between Charlie and Nicole rather
than coming up with a direct confrontation.
The effectiveness of Negotiation or Mediation Strategies
The tactics of negotiation and mediation in the movie as much as they offer legal remedy
to Charlie and Nicole fail to provide a solution to the emotional part of the relationship. This is
the case because the two main characters have lawyers who are dealing with custody and
financial matters on their behalf and this leaves them both rational and unable to look at things
from the other person’s perspective causing an impartment. The first overall strategy employed;
positional bargaining and the subsequent adversarial negotiations simply prolong the conflict
through this case. Thus, there is a probability of applying the model by Fisher and Ury,
Principled Negotiation which is more constructive, rather than positional, as it focuses on the
agreement, perception of the opponent, and the search for interests, not for the positions. If more
NVC listening and “empathy presence” could have been used so both the characters had the
chance to express their needs and to acknowledge the needs of the other that is, they would not
have been violent. In particular, the case under consideration reveals that the process of
mediation, during which all the issues that Charlie and Nicole had, could have been settled
without having to endure the pressure of the court, would have been useful. Not applying such
more cooperative models brings about the protracted feelings of alienation and dissatisfaction,
which does not permit them for reaching a state that would be beneficial to both of them as
individual entities and as parents who still have something in common, their child.
Efficient Methodologies and Theoretical Frameworks
Besides, the conflict described by Charlie and Nicole could have been solved using the
Principled Negotiation or Nonviolent Communication (NVC) theories. For instance, it could
31
have advocated for the move from an adversarial system to a cooperative one for Principled
Negotiation. Instead of hearing Charlie’s need for custody and Nicole’s need for freedom they
could have both repackaged their interests to sound more like co-ownership of the child for the
future. If they had applied more of the strategies from the problem solving model which is
founded on mutual self-interest and criteria approach, they could have been able to solve the
conflicts while taking into consideration the other party. Similar to the above, Nonviolent
Communication would have been useful in helping Charlie and Nicole to have a decent
conversation. NVC attempt(s) to enable people to attend to the needs and feelings of the other
party; to engage with more ease and less force. This would have assisted them at least to contain
each other in some way with regards to the language used in their communications. In addition,
if Sam and Audrey would have opted to seek mediation or therapy when they first started dating
they would have had the opportunity sort through their issues while talking to each other about
their future. External mediation could have helped in one way that the two could have been
provided for a channel through which they could solve their differences without the high level of
aggression that was evident in their able interactions. Perhaps they could have changed the flow
of their break up story; in a nutshell, they could have prevented the acrimony.
32
References
Adriani, P. A., Hino, P., Taminato, M., & Fernandes, H. (2023). Construction of educational
technology on non-violent communication between health professionals: an experience
report. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 76(Suppl 4), e20220414.
Adriani, P. A., Hino, P., Taminato, M., Okuno, M. F. P., Santos, O. V., & Fernandes, H. (2024).
Non-violent communication as a technology in interpersonal relationships in health work:
a scoping review. BMC health services research, 24(1), 289.
Arieli, D., & Abboud Armaly, O. (2023). Nonviolent communication (NVC) based mediation:
Practice insight. Conflict resolution quarterly, 40(3), 357-366.
Arieli, D., & Abboud Armaly, O. (2023). Nonviolent communication (NVC) based mediation:
Practice insight. Conflict resolution quarterly, 40(3), 357-366.
Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020). Worldview conflict and prejudice. In Advances in
experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 1-66). Academic Press.
Brummans, B. H., Higham, L., & Cooren, F. (2022). The work of conflict mediation: Actors,
vectors, and communicative relationality. human relations, 75(4), 764-791.
Crampton, A. (2024). Child custody cases now & then: From Kramer versus Kramer to Marriage
Story. Family Court Review.
Curhan, J. R., Overbeck, J. R., Cho, Y., Zhang, T., & Yang, Y. (2022). Silence is golden:
Extended silence, deliberative mindset, and value creation in negotiation. Journal of
applied psychology, 107(1), 78.
Ehidiamhen, M. L. A. (2022). A Synodal Alternative for Ecclesial Conflict: Marshall
Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication. Journal of moral theology, 11(2), 45-64.
33
Ferreira, A. (2023). Dilemmas, conflicts, and worldview diversity: Exploring the relevance of
Clare Grave’s legacy for planning practice and education. Journal of Planning Education
and Research, 43(3), 697-708.
Folberg, J., & Reynolds, J. (2021). Lawyer negotiation: theory, practice, and law. Aspen
Publishing.
Freeman, G. (2015). In-game marriage as intimacy-mediated collaboration: How multiplayer
online games shape interpersonal relationships (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana
University).
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E., Rogers, N. H., & Cole, S. R. (2020). Dispute resolution:
Negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and other processes. Aspen Publishing.
Holmström, É. (2023). Enhancing the effects of emotion-focused individual and couples therapy
by nonviolent communication. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 22(1),
23-40.
Kansky, R., & Maassarani, T. (2022). Teaching nonviolent communication to increase empathy
between people and toward wildlife to promote human–wildlife
coexistence. Conservation Letters, 15(1), e12862.
Koopman, S., & Seliga, L. (2021). Teaching peace by using nonviolent communication for
difficult conversations in the college classroom. Peace and conflict studies, 27(3), 2.
Koopman, S., & Seliga, L. (2021). Teaching peace by using nonviolent communication for
difficult conversations in the college classroom. Peace and conflict studies, 27(3), 2.
Kundu, V. (2022). Exploring the Gandhian Model of Nonviolent Communication and its
Significance. Editorial Team, 47.
34
Lasater, J. H., & Lasater, I. K. (2022). What we say matters: Practicing nonviolent
communication. Shambhala Publications.
Morgan, T. (2020). Solving the Wickedest Problem: Reconciling Differing Worldviews. Journal
of Futures Studies, 24(4).
Morgan, T. (2020). Solving the Wickedest Problem: Reconciling Differing Worldviews. Journal
of Futures Studies, 24(4).
Müller, J., & Potzel, K. (2024). Parental mediation and the relational practices of negotiation and
resistance: Insights from a qualitative panel study from Germany. Journal of Children
and Media, 18(4), 527-542.
Paquelet, D. R., & Brown, K. S. (2023). Parental alienating behaviors in Noah Baumbach’s high-
conflict divorce films, the squid and the whale and marriage story: a cinematherapy tool
for (training) mental health providers. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45(4), 450-462.
Pasricha, A. (2020). Conflicts and Conflict Resolution through Dialogue. Himachal Pradesh
University Journal, 8(1), 115-128.
Sciacca, B., Laffan, D. A., Norman, J. O. H., & Milosevic, T. (2022). Parental mediation in
pandemic: Predictors and relationship with children's digital skills and time spent online
in Ireland. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107081.
Sheikh, M. K. (2022). Worldviews and Conflict Analysis. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 383-396.
Sheikh, M. K. (2022). Worldviews and Conflict Analysis. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 383-396.
Stiglegger, M. (2024). Seduction and Ethics. In Film as a Medium of Seduction: Introduction to
the Seduction-Theory of Film (pp. 51-71). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Sweetman, B. (2021). The Crisis of Democratic Pluralism: The Loss of Confidence in Reason
and the Clash of Worldviews. Springer Nature.
35
Treuthart, M. P. (2020). Marriage Story: A Tale of Divorce, Love... and the Law. J. Legal
Prof., 45, 65.
Valk, J. (2021). Worldviews: A comprehensive approach to knowing self and others. Springer
Nature.
Zhyvko, Z., Mihus, I., Tkachuk, A., Holovach, T., Rodchenko, S., & Shehynska, A. (2024).
Conflict management.
