Institution:
Course:
Date:
Inflation and Employment
Inflation is the overall escalation in the price of commodities and services provided by the market. Some scholars in economics believe that the rate of inflation and unemployment has the inverse relationship. The research paper will focus on analyzing the impact of inflation on unemployment. The research paper will borrow from the arguments of say who argued against prerogatives that businesses agonize because of individuals who do not have enough cash. He maintained that additional production could only augment the authority to purchase. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Rewrite this sentence
James Mill utilized Say's law in contrast to those who wanted to give the economy a boost via barren consumption. In his opinion, use terminates wealth, contrary to production, which is the basis of economic development. The demand for merchandise controls the price of the product. Conferring to Keynes, if Say's law is valid, widespread involuntary unemployment caused by insufficient demand cannot transpire. Classical economists in the contextual of Say's law enlighten unemployment as ascending from inadequate demand for local labor. That is, the supply of feasible labor surpasses demand in some sections of the economy. Therefore, the research question is: Was the rejection of Say's Law and the implementation of activist government comprehensive theoretically? Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Incorrect usage Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Wrong word
Although some economic scholars have criticized this argument, it has been supported by some since the increase in inflation implies increased spending on the labor force. When the level of inflation is great, businesses spend a lot of money on employing labor force to produce goods and offer services. When the economy shrinks, and most companies are closed down due to poor market performance unemployment rise. The level of competition in markets for firms decreases reducing unemployment is high since the demand for labor is low attracting low wages and hence low prices of goods and services in the market (Manki & Taylor, 2006). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: This sentence doesn’t make sense—it sounds contradictory. Try rewriting it for clairty
There are various types of inflation such as frictional unemployment, ;natural unemployment, cyclical unemployment or structural unemployment that will be explored in detail in the research to identify how they relate to inflation as well as various views about them from different scholars. Each type of unemployment is caused by certain factors that are unique in nature. According to Say, when more goods are manufactured than needed in certain sectors, then dealers in those areas miss out on revenue. This forfeiture of income, which would have been used to procure other merchandises from other firms, drops demand for the commodities of businesses in other segments, causing a broad general reduction in production and, therefore, sinking the demand for labor. This upshot in is what modern macroeconomics refers to as structural unemployment, the alleged mismatch amid the overall demand for labor in jobs presented and the unique job skills and position of labor. This varies differs from the Keynesian idea of cyclical unemployment, which is assumed to arise due to insufficient aggregate demand. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: A strong statement—it’s often hard to tell which type of unemployment is dominant at a given period. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: But Say and others argued that such unemployment was very temporary as capital and labor moved to other employments. Structural unemployment suggests that capital is mobile, labor is not, and that there may not be good substitute employments to soak up the excess labor that is not mobile (or with the requisite new skills).
The above economic costs and unemployment were understood by some economists, such as Marx and Keynes as a fundamental chattel of the capitalist scheme. The partition of labor leads to a state where one continuously has to expect what others will be enthusiastic to buy, and this tips to inaccuracies. Nevertheless, this theory single-handedly does not describe the presence of cyclical marvels in the economy, since such miscalculations would materialize with constant incidence, and to such a large measure that thousands of industries in multiple segments would concurrently misconstrue (Frydman, & Phelps, 2013). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Chattel makes no sense here. Rewrite. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Rewrite the whole sentence for clarity. I don’t follow. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Marvels? Do you mean cycles?
The paper will also examine Frictional unemployment, which refers to the rate of unemployment caused by the temporary loss of jobs resulting from the process of changing from one employment to another. Certain factors are pointed out as the main causes of Frictional unemployment, and the paper will examine such issues including high labor turnover, lack of employee motivation among other causes. Structural unemployment results from the mismatch of employee’s skills with what is needed by employers. The changing nature of technology may be one of the leading causes of structural unemployment since it makes some skills which were previously required in an organization obsolete. Cyclical unemployment result from high levels of the labor force in the market more than what the labor supply can accommodate. It mostly occurs when a large number of graduates are released to the labor market than what the economy can absorb at that moment (Keynes, 2015). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Not necessarily graduates! In fact, the business cycle is not labor driven. Try to improve your understanding of cyclical unemployment
The criticism directed towards Say’s theory would also be examined in this paper to understand other methods that have been developed in response to his arguments. Say's law did not suggest that supply produces its demand nor was it founded on the impression that all that is saved will be traded. Relatively, Say wanted to disprove the notion that stumpy consumption restricted production and employment (Sherman, 2014). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Stumpy is a bad choice of words here.
Therefore, Say's law, in its unique concept, was not intrinsically linked nor logically dependent on the neutrality of money since the key proposal of the law is that however many individuals save, production is still a probability, as it is the requirement for the accomplishment of any extra consumption goods. Say's decree conditions that in a bazaar economy, products and services are made for exchange with others- employment multipliers consequently arise from the manufacture and not transfer only.
However, for some neoclassical economists, Say's law indicates that economy is constantly at its total employment level. This is not essentially what Say projected. In the Keynesian clarification, the central assumptions of Say's law are: a barter model of cash thus products are remunerated for with products; volatile prices, thus, all prices can promptly adjust downwards or upwards; and no government interference (Sowell, 2015).
Under these conventions, Say's law suggests that there cannot be overall excess so that a stable state cannot happen in which demand is normally less than fecund capacity and high redundancy results. Keynesians thus argued that the Great Depression revealed that Say's law is improper. In his General Theory, Keynes maintained that a country could go into a recession due to lack of aggregate demand (Beveridge, 2014) Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Poor choice of words.
Since there have been many tenacious economic catastrophes, one may cast-off one or more of the conventions of Say's law, its perceptive, or its conclusions. For instance, Circuits and some post-Keynesians differ with the barter classical of money, in a conflict that money is fundamentally different from merchandises and that credit bubbles can and do root depressions. Keynes contended that prices were not elastic. Laissez-faire economists argue that government interference is the reason for economic crises. Left to its strategies, the market will fine-tune competently (Watson, 2013). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: You are not developing a clear line of argument, but just mentioning lots of disconnected points.
As for the insinuation that displacements cannot cause persistent unemployment, some models of economic cycles admit Say's law and seek to enlighten high unemployment by other means, bearing in mind depressed demand for labor as a form of local disarticulation. Paul Krugman discharges Say's law as a useless duplication when people have the possibility of accruing money rather than acquiring actual goods and services. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: I don’t follow your language here at all.
Inflation and employment
Literature review
Unemployment is a common phenomenon in economies that are hit by high rates of inflation. Some studies suggest that the level of budget deficit has a direct effect on the level of inflation in the economy. Inflation affects the level of unemployment in economic spheres. When the government operates with low budget deficits there, a rate of domestic borrowing reduce. More money is available for borrowing from the public attracting less interest rate. Low-interest rates will act as an incentive to attract businesses and the members of the public to borrow from banks. What results are high levels of money supply in the market and creating more demand for goods and services in the market? The firms in the economy will react to increased demand by expanding the level of production. The labor cost as part of the factors of production will increase as more people will be hired to produce goods and offer services to the customers (Stock & Watson, 2008). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: I really can’t follow your logic here. You begin by talking about unemployment and inflation, and then talk about lower budget deficits leading to lower interest rates and thus expansion? Where are you going with this line of discussion?
The relationship between employment and inflation is a study that has elicited interests from various scholars. Since the invention of Philips curve large volume of literature has been devoted to explaining the relationship between inflation and the rate of unemployment. Philip showed a graph illustrating an inverse relationship between unemployment and wage inflation. Over history, several studies have discovered that Philips curve varies in different countries and different circumstances. For instance, the study of unemployment and inflation in U.S between 1999 and 1970 suggested the positive relationship between unemployment and inflation. Despite the long history of disagreements about the nature of Philips curve, most of the scholars deduce that the two variables are positively related. B anticipation of inflation has an effect of reducing labor supply in the economy and creating unemployment (King & Morley, 2007). The Higher rate of inflation increases the cost of production and discourages firms since there is a low level of income. The low level of profit also discourages other potential firms from entering into the market. This implies that the firms that could have created employment opportunities will not enter into the market. Some of the existing firms may be forced to closure down completely due to poor performance and losses, or others may opt to down size their labor force. All the above activities result in a high rate of unemployment in an economy. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Same problem. Here you are arguing that inflation causes unemployment, contrary to the Phillips’s curve analsyis. I still have no idea what your research question is. Your narrative is just rambling.
Another research complements the above findings through introducing a symmetrical inflation effects on the discussed models and examining the impact on labor outcomes and labor market decisions. One aspect of this discussion is the observation that both unemployment and inflation can be negative or positive based on labor and goods market institutions. From this perspective, high inflation rates lower the level of profits obtained by the firm’s thus discouraging creation of employment opportunities. On the other hand, there are symmetrical inflation effects on both employed and unemployed workers. In a decentralized and liberal economy, the unemployed individuals consume more cash intensive products than employed thus making them more exposed to inflation caused by high taxation. This reduces the preference of employees to outside options and lowers their bargaining power. Firms are therefore likely to create more vacancies when the wages and salaries of employees are not very high (Ball, 2009).
Several other studies have confirmed that the rate of inflation and unemployment are positively related. High inflation levels induce high prices for goods and services in the market. At the center of these arguments is the role played by inflation. The conclusive thought of the arguments has been pinned on the need to control the rate of inflation in a bid to regulate the level of unemployment in the economy. Comment by Green, Rodney D.: So it sounds like you want to write a critique of the Phillips Curve. Maybe you should make that your topic rather than a general rambling discussion of inflation and unemployment.
According to Karanassou & Snower (2010), Philips in his curve postulated that the high rate of inflation will cause the employees to demand higher wages and salaries. Consequently, the push will lead to higher costs of production and reduce the profits from the firm. The films may also push the additional costs to the consumers making the prices of products and services go higher. Philips curve suggested the role of policy makers in government to target controlling the rate of inflation while Keynes arguments emphasized more on job creation.
The experiences of stagflation and simultaneous high rates of unemployment and inflation experienced in the 1970s discredited the idea of Philips curve. Scholars began to question the validity of Philips curve in explaining the correlation between inflation rates and unemployment under such circumstances, and other scholars developed other theoretical knowledge. Some scholars started to introduce the concept of natural unemployment. They argued that should be the rate of unemployment fall below the natural unemployment the inflation rates will begin to accelerate. Many economists posted the theory of the natural rate of unemployment. Rather than focusing on either the higher rate of unemployment or inflation policy makers were to focus on maintaining the natural rate of unemployment. The main challenge with this approach was to determine the measurement of the natural rate of unemployment and maintaining price stability with the corresponding manageable level of unemployment (King & Morley, 2007).
Measuring the natural rate of unemployment has been extremely difficult to put down in practice. The fluctuation of natural rates of unemployment makes it even more challenging to determine it over time... For instance, in America, the rates increased from four percent in the 1960s to 6 percent in 70s and seven percent in 1980s. The rates then later reversed around the 1990s. During Clinton regime, the policy makers warned that if the rate of unemployment would remain unchecked and fall tremendously, this would result in the inflationary rate will extremely go out of control.
Natural unemployment rates are defined as the rates that prevail in the absence of any changes in monetary policy, and the production levels are optimal. The natural unemployment rates are a combination of cyclical, friction and structural unemployment. Frictional unemployment results where people leave one job to seek an alternative job opportunities. It is that unemployment level that results as the employee takes a time to find the new job. Structural unemployment result from the mismatch of skills owned by employees and the skills required in the labor markets. Technology changes may render some skills owned by employees obsolete. Such employees are no longer needed in the labor market and thus become unemployed. The last component of natural unemployment involves known as cyclical unemployment that results from fewer job opportunities than the labor supply in the market. There are several factors that can cause cyclical unemployment, and the major one is the nature of situation immediately after a large number of workforce graduates. When the graduates are more than what the economy can absorb what results is a cyclical unemployment (Galí, Smets & Wouters, 2011). Comment by Green, Rodney D.: No, the natural rate is supposedly made up of the sum of frictional and structural. Cyclical unemployment is not part of the natural rate.
Phelps and Friedman observed that Philips curve is only applicable in the short run but impractical in the long run. In the long run, natural unemployment rates will remain unaffected by prices. According to monetary neutrality principles nominal quantities like prices are unable to affect real variables like employment and output. When prices go up income levels also increases. In the long run, the Philips curve is vertical implying that it no longer depends on inflation but natural unemployment rates. That can change with time due to changes in collective bargaining, unemployment insurance, technology change, job training, and collective bargaining and minimum wages (Ball, 2009).
According to French economist, JB demand cannot exist without supply. He argued that the more goods and services are produced the more they create demand for other products. Consequently, the central argument of says law is that economic success should be stimulated by increasing production rather than consumption. In says arguments increase in money supply results in inflation and increased demand for the same product cannot reflect increased real demand. Classical economists argue that unemployment is due to the wages kept artificially higher than the equilibrium or other structural factors like absence of certain skills in particular industries. The focus should be on increasing the aggregate supply in the economy rather than increasing demand. Increased production will create its demand for the goods and services produced. However, say’s law had been criticized after prolonged recessions were witnessed in the 1930s suggesting that production does not match with demand levels. During economic recessions, the level of demand is low than the supply. There are times when there are excess savings caused by precautionary measures. Businesses may hoard some resources due to insufficient investment potentials (King & Morley, 2007). . Comment by Green, Rodney D.: Capitalize
References
Ball, L. M. (2009). Hysteresis in unemployment: old and new evidence (No. w14818). National
Bureau of Economic Research.
Beveridge, W. H. (2014). Full Employment in a Free Society (Works of William H. Beveridge):
A Report (Vol. 6). Routledge.
Frydman, R., & Phelps, E. S. (2013). Rethinking expectations: The way forward for macroeconomics. Princeton University Press.
Galí, J., Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2011). Unemployment in an estimated new keynesian
model (No. w17084). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gottschalk, J. (2007). Monetary policy and the German unemployment problem in macroeconomic models: Theory and evidence. Berlin: Springer.
In Hazlitt, H. (1960). The critics of Keynesian economics. Princeton, N.J: D. Van Nostrand Co.
Kates, S. (1998). Say's Law and the Keynesian Revolution: How Macroeconomic theory lost its way. Cheltenham, UK: E. Elgar Pub.
Karanassou, M., Sala, H., & Snower, D. J. (2010). Phillips curves and unemployment dynamics:
a critique and a holistic perspective. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(1), 1-51.
Keynes, J. M. (2015). The General Theories of Employment, Interest, and Money.
King, T. B., & Morley, J. (2007). In search of the natural rate of unemployment. Journal of
Monetary Economics, 54(2), 550-564.
Mankiw, N. G., & Taylor, M. P. (2006). Economics. London: Thomson.
Sherman, H. J. (2014). The business cycle: growth and crisis under capitalism. Princeton
University Press.
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2008). Phillips curve inflation forecasts (No. w14322). National
Bureau of Economic Research.
Sowell, T. (2015). Say's law: An historical analysis. Princeton University Press.
Watson, T. (2013). Management, organisation and employment strategy: New directions in
theory and practice. Routledge.
Zezo11
version_1_critique.docx
0
