Law Writing Assignment

profilekhalid89
chapter_12.ppt

Chapter 12
Contracts: Consideration

Miller  Cross

BUSINESS LAW
Alternate Edition 12thEd.

*

§1: Elements of Consideration

  • Consideration must have “legally sufficient value” and a “bargain-for-exchange.”
  • “Legal Value” can mean:
  • Promise,
  • Performance, or
  • Forbearance.
  • CASE 12.1 Hamer v. Sidway (1891).

*

Bargain-for-Exchange

  • Second element of consideration:
  • Must provide basis for the bargain.
  • Something of legal value (a promise, or a performance) must be exchanged between the parties.
  • The promise must be either:

Legally detrimental to the promisee, or Legally beneficial to the promisor.

*

§2: Adequacy of Consideration

  • A Court will not question the fairness of the bargain if legally sufficient.
  • Law does not protect a person from entering into an unwise contract.
  • In extreme cases, a court may find that a party lacks legal capacity or that contract was unconscionable.

*

§3: Agreements That Lack Consideration

  • Preexisting Duty.
  • A promise to do what one already has a legal duty to do does not constitute legally sufficient consideration.
  • Exceptions:

Unforeseen Difficulties.

Rescission and New Contract.

*

Consideration Issues

  • Past Consideration is no consideration because the bargained-for exchange element is missing.
  • CASE 12.3 Access Organics, Inc. v. Hernandez (2008).
  • Illusory Promises.
  • Promisor has not definitely promised to do anything (no promise at all).
  • Option-to-Cancel Clauses.
  • Requirements and Output Contracts.

*

§4: Settlement of Claims

  • Debtor offers to pay a lesser amount than the creditor purports to be owed.
  • Accord and Satisfaction.
  • Liquidated Debt.

Amount has been ascertained, fixed, agreed on, settled, or exactly determined.

  • Unliquidated Debt.

Parties give up legal right to contest the amount in dispute, and thus consideration is given.

*

Settlement of Claims

  • Release bars any further recovery beyond the terms stated in the release.
  • Covenant not to Sue is an agreement to substitute contractual obligation for some other type of legal action based on a valid claim.

*

  • Promissory Estoppel:
  • Must be clear and definite promise.
  • Promisee must justifiably rely on the promise.
  • Reliance is substantial.
  • Justice will be served by enforcing promise.
  • Promises to pay Debts Barred by Statute of Limitations.
  • Charitable Subscriptions.

§5: Exceptions to the Consideration Requirement

*

  • Promises to Pay Debt Barred by a Statute of Limitations.
  • Detrimental Reliance and Promissory Estoppel:
  • Must be definite promise.
  • Promisee must justifiably rely on the promise.
  • Reliance is substantial.
  • Justice will be served by enforcing promise.

§5: Exceptions to the Consideration Requirement

*