lets try this again

Week 8 Project

Student Name	Total Points Possible	Total Points Received	Late Work Percentage (select from drop down menu)	Late Work Deduction	Final Points Received
Edwards Windows User: Windows User: Enter student name.	75	65.45	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work.	0.00	65.45
Criterion	Superior Criteria (100%)	Excellent Criteria (95%)	Satisfactory Criteria (85%)	Marginal Criteria (75%)	Unacceptable Criteria (0%)	Points Possible	Evaluation (select from drop down menu)	Points Received	Faculty Feedback
Element 1: Description of the Decision (10 points maximum)	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the important decision he/she will need to make.	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the important decision he/she will need to make. There are one or two minor errors.	Student identifies the important decision he/she will need to make. Some details are lacking or missing.	Student vaguely identifies the decision he/she will need to make. Many details are missing.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	95% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.	9.5	Please incorporate references throughout! Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.
Element 2: Description of the Stakeholders Involved (10 points maximum)	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the stakeholders involved in the important decision he/she needs to make.	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the stakeholders involved in the important decision he/she needs to make. There are one or two minor errors.	Student identifies the stakeholders involved in the important decision he/she needs to make. Some details are lacking or missing.	Student vaguely identifies the decision he/she will need to make. Many details are missing.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	85% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	8.5	can you describe in terms of primary and secondary stakeholders? Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.
Element 3: Description of Decision Environment (10 points maximum)	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the decision environment.	Student's description is clear and concise, identifying the salient points related to the decision environment. There are one or two minor errors.	Student identifies the decision environment. Some details are lacking or missing.	Student vaguely identifies the decision environment. Many details are missing.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	85% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	8.5	What is the environment for your decision? Can you clarify states of nature? You should be very specific about your situation. Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.
Element 4: Individual or Student Decision (10 points maximum)	Student presents a detailed and thorough explanation of whether his/her decision is an individual or group decision. Excellent examples and resources support explanation.	Student presents a detailed and thorough explanation of whether his/her decision is an individual or group decision. Excellent examples and resources support explanation. There are one or two minor errors.	Student presents a good explanation with some details of whether his/her decision is an individual or group decision. Some examples and resources support explanation.	Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation of whether his/her decision is an individual or group decision. Few examples and resources support explanation.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	95% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	9.5
Element 5: Critical Thinking (10 points maximum)	The submission demonstrates exceptional ability to engage in scholarly thinking and writing. Applies new and original ideas to produce an effective, logical presentation on the selected organization. Recognizes industry-specific and generalized impacts and presents viable solutions. There are no errors related to the analysis or critical thinking exhibited on the assignment.	The submission demonstrates exceptional ability to engage in scholarly thinking and writing. Applies new and original ideas to produce an effective, logical presentation on the selected organization. Recognizes industry-specific and generalized impacts and presents viable solutions. However, there are one or two minor errors in the critical thinking exhibited on the assignment.	The submission demonstrates higher levels of thinking and writing. Applies somewhat new and original ideas to produce a plausible presentation on the selected organization. Recognizes industry-specific and generalized impacts.	The submission does not follow all instructions. Minimally demonstrates scholarly thinking and writing. The submission shows little creative application and is predictable. Minimally recognizes industry-specific and general impacts.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	75% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	7.5
Element 6: Organization (9 points maximum)	Student's submission is well organized. The format is easy to follow, flows smoothly and logically from one idea to another.	Student's submission is well organized. The format is easy to follow, flows smoothly and logically from one idea to another. There are one or two minor errors.	Student's submission is mostly well organized and most transitions are easy to follow but, at times, ideas are unclear.	Student's submission is inconsistent and confusing; format is difficult to follow; transitions of ideas are abrupt or distracting.	Does not meet minimal standards.	9	75% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	6.75	See my comments in the pdf. Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.
Element 7: Written Delivery Style & Grammar (8 points maximum)	Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.	Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.	Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.	Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.	Does not meet minimal standards.	8	95% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	7.6
Element 8: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations) (8 points maximum)	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.	Student mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.	Student demonstrates weak and/or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.	Does not meet minimal standards.	8	95% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	7.6
Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.

DIRECTIONS FOR STUDENT: For this week’s Assignment, write a 2- to 4-page paper that identifies an important decision you need to make. It can be a decision associated with your doctoral program, your dissertation research, your work, your family, your community, or any other area of your life. Include in your paper the following: 1) A description of the decision you need to make. 2) A description of the stakeholders involved. 3) A description of the decision environment. 4) An explanation of whether this is an individual or group decision. DIRECTIONS FOR FACULTY: 1) Enter student name. 2) When appropriate, select Late Work Percentage and enter percent using drop down menu. 3) Use the drop down menu for each criterion in the Evaluation box to grade assignment. 4) Enter student feedback in the Faculty Feedback box as needed.

APA Manual (6th edition): Chapter 3 - Writing Clearly and Concisely; Chapter 4 - The Mechanics of Style; Chapter 5 - Displaying Results; Chapter 6 - Crediting Sources; Chapter 7 - Reference Examples © 2015 Laureate Education, Inc.