Comparison Essay (Eng Comp 1)

profiledrae34
1101_final_nash_essay.pdf

1.

2.

3.

Children Are Technologically Skilled Techology and Society, 2007 Susan , "Has Technology Made Kids Smarter? Education and the Tech-Savvy Child," Smith Nash XplanaZine (Online Learning), June 2, 2006. www.xplanazine.com. Reproduced by permission of the author.

"Tech-savvy kids are adept at managing large amounts of data with technology ... [and] teaching themselves how to solve problems in an interactive environment."

In the following viewpoint, argues that children of the Information Age areSusan Smith Nash technologically gifted. This interaction with technology and vast amounts of data has made young people adept at manipulating and managing information. In addition, being part of new communications networks has aided children in developing useful learning and research skills. is aSusan Smith Nash contributing writer for , a Web-based magazine, and the associate dean of liberal arts atXplanaZine Excelsior College in Albany, New York.

As you read, consider the following questions:

What instructional benefits do modern video games have, according to Nash?

In the author's view, what do tech-savvy children do with information that is not immediately relevant to their lives?

What failures does Nash attribute to the Baby Boomer generation that are not shared by their modern, tech-savvy children?

I had an interesting conversation with my son about e-learning and social networking. He described the way the Internet makes one think and behave differently than in times past.

"We're smarter than your generation, Mom," he said. "We've moved beyond that. We evolved."

Could he be right? It occurs to me that Boomer and Gen-X parents do not quite realize that the Internet, watching media (including films and television), and playing video games are not the same passive activities that they were during or Colecovision days. Video games can be massively multi-player, soLeave It to Beaver, Pong playing them requires a great deal of skill, and communication ability. When they download and edit movies and music, play games, and communicate with friends, tech-savvy kids are problem-solving, recognizing patterns, increasing hand-eye coordination, cataloguing events, determining cause-effect relationships, predicting sequences, and more.

Further, as they download music and film, they develop extreme film and music literacy. Granted, it's not in a form that is easily tested, and the knowledge gained here won't make anyone a in the local No Childwunderkind Left Behind test battery. Nevertheless, they do know how to get the information. The trick is to turn it into knowledge, and knowledge that can be used.

Amazing Skills of Tech-Savvy Children

This brings me back to the original question. Are kids today smarter than my generation when we were kids?

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Part of me agrees, for the following reasons:

Tech-savvy kids are adept at managing large amounts of data with technology. They are also used to teaching themselves how to solve problems in an interactive environment. As James Paul Gee has described in his book, What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Teaching and Learning (2004), when playing a video game, the average child learns quickly how to do effective task analysis in a "real-time" setting and to obtain the necessary information which is available on-demand in order to achieve the goal. This is a perfect example of situated, outcomes-oriented learning, and children of this generation are extremely skilled at it by age 6 or 7, depending on how long they've been playing video games.

Today's generation of youth are exposed to vast quantities of information, and they learn to manage, classify, use, and dismiss what is not useful to them. While this is an excellent skill it also may result in distressingly extensive lacunae; that is to say, gigantic gaps in knowledge. If the information is not immediately applicable and relevant to one's life, it is ignored or dismissed. The positive aspect of this approach is that the average tech-savvy kid will have encyclopedic knowledge in areas that interest him or her. This might include audio files, "cheats" for games, movies on DVD. On the other hand, he or she may know little or nothing about world geography.

With the new social networking sites, tech-savvy kids are becoming adept at social development learning, which has been described by [developmental psychologist Lev] Vygotsky and others. According to this theory, people learn through social interaction, and it does not matter whether or not it is face-to-face or virtual. It follows, then, that kids who spend hours instant-messaging or interacting with social networking spaces such as myspace.com, livejournal.com, xanga.com and others, will have experienced an accelerated pace of learning.

Comfort with searching and finding information that helps them achieve their objectives in a short period of time is something to marvel at when seeing it in action. Teen-agers are creating web-based businesses of all sorts, and have been extremely effective at generating traffic and revenues. They are also adept at using the internet to solve logistical problems, and they use Mapquest, google-earth, UPS tracking, US Postal service (create your own stamps, etc.) with great success.

Image manipulation is not only easy for tech-savvy kids, it is also accompanied by the awareness that each digital image is manipulated, resulting in a worldview that does not necessarily trust appearances.

Comparing Generations

When one considers how kids have been spending their free time with information technology, it is no wonder that they are bored by school. You don't have to be an "Indigo Child" [especially gifted or advanced children] to find a 50-minute traditional class where students sit dutifully in hard chairs behind desks, listening to the teacher, taking notes, then taking tests, to be utterly stultifying. It is enough to convince a parent that homeschool or "unschooling" [self-directed learning philosophy] could actually be better than a structured classroom experience.

Thinking about my son's words, I try to imagine how the current generation of teen-agers might view their Generation X and Baby Boomer parents. The words "narcissistic" and "self-absorbed" occur to me immediately, as I think of the high divorce rates, the "me generation," the "yuppies," and bizarre custody battles in which more concern was given to the family cat and rights to the time-share than to the kids. I do believe that he has a point. Boomer generations can be seen as resisting the notion that everything is always in flux, and that nothing is permanent; thus one can never be smug or complacent. A failure to embrace the notion of constant technological change and upgrades sets up internal resistance to new ideas and structures. I can see how this could lead to a failure to communicate in any meaningful way about process and procedures.

While a great deal of effort is expended in creating online courses and education programs that will appeal to adults, operating under the assumption that the adult learner needs to have the course content presented in a certain way for learning to take place, perhaps it is not too far-fetched to say that the same principles apply to

1.

2.

3.

tech-savvy kids.

The specific activities required in the lessons will be different, and the way the material is used will vary. However, the following three learning outcomes can accommodate both generations. Upon successful completion of the course, the student should be able to

Make connections between unrelated and/or related items and to support the connections with a rationale based on close analysis of the items;

Solve problems using the material and concepts presented in the learning module;

Engage in metacognitive tasks and develop skills such as generalization, classification, and abstraction that can transfer from one course to another.

In the meantime, it probably would not be a bad idea to start putting a renewed emphasis on ethics and ethical behavior. After all, this generation and the one after it will be taking care of us one day.

Further Readings Books

Ronald Bailey . Amherst, NY:Liberation Biology: The Scientific and Moral Case for the Biotech Revolution Prometheus, 2005.

Maria Bakardjieva . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life

David M. Berube . Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2005.Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz

Amy Sue Bix Inventing Ourselves Out of Jobs? America's Debate over Technological Unemployment, . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.1929-1981

John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid . Boston: Harvard Business School Press,The Social Life of Information 2002.

Benjamin M. Compaine, ed. Cambridge, MA: MITThe Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? Press, 2001.

Larry Cuban . Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityOversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom Press, 2003.

Jan A. G. M. van Dijk . Thousand Oaks, CA:The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society Sage, 2005.

Editors of Scientific American . New York: Warner, 2002.Understanding Nanotechnology

Francis Fukuyama . New York:Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2002.

Joel Garreau Radical Evolution: The Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies—and What It . New York: Doubleday, 2005.Means to Be Human

Andrea R. Gooden Computers in the Classroom: How Teachers and Students Are Using Technology to . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.Transform Learning

Philip E. N. Howard and Steve Jones, eds. . Thousand Oaks, CA:Society Online: The Internet in Context Sage, 2004.

James Hughes Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the

. Cambridge, MA: Westview, 2004.Future

Institute of Medicine . Washington, DC: NationalStem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine Academy Press, 2002.

Leon R. Kass . Washington, DC: AEILife, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics Press, 2004.

Ray Kurzweil . New York:The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence Penguin, 2000.

Ray Kurzweil . New York: Viking, 2005.The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology

Jane Maienschein . Cambridge, MA: HarvardWhose View of Life? Embryos, Cloning, and Stem Cells University Press, 2003.

Maxwell J. Mehlman . Bloomington: IndianaWondergenes: Genetic Enhancement and the Future of Society University Press, 2003.

Alondra Nelson, Thuy Linh N. Tu, and Hines Alicia Headlam, eds. TechniColor: Race, Technology, and . New York: New York University Press, 2001.Everyday Life

Robert D. Oberst .2020 Web Vision: How the Internet Will Revolutionize Future Homes, Business and Society Parkland, FL: Universal, 2001.

Todd Oppenheimer . New York:The Flickering Mind: Saving Education from the False Promise of Technology Random House, 2004.

Ann B. Parsons . Washington, DC: Joseph Henry,Proteus Effect: Stem Cells and Their Promise for Medicine 2006.

President's Council on Bioethics Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President's Council . New York: Public Affairs, 2002.on Bioethics

Mark A. Ratner and Daniel Ratner . Upper SaddleNanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.

Toby Shelley . New York: Zed, 2006.Nanotechnology: New Promises, New Dangers

Lee M. Silver .Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family New York: HarperPerennial, 1998.

Mark Warschauer . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide 2004.

Brent Waters and Ronald Cole-Turner, eds. God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.Cloning

Simon Young . Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2005.Designer Evolution: A Transhumanist Manifesto

Periodicals Chronicle of Higher Education "Freshmen Arrive Bearing Gadgets and Great Expectations," September 22, 2006.

Shelia R. Cotton and Shameeka M. Jelenewicz "A Disappearing Digital Divide Among College Students? Peeling Away the Layers of the Digital Divide," , Winter 2006.Social Science Computer Review

Bob Doyle "Crossing the Digital Divide," , September 2006.EContent

Sue Ferguson "How Computers Make Our Kids Stupid," , June 6, 2005.Maclean's

Lisa Guernsey "When Gadgets Get in the Way," , August 19, 2004.New York Times

Wendy Haig "Bring the World Together, Online," , November 8, 2006. Business Week Online www.businessweek.com.

Vicky Hallett "Teaching with Tech," , October 17, 2005.U.S. News & World Report

Edward Miller "Fighting Technology for Toddlers," , November 2005.Education Digest

Peter D. Stephenson and Joan Peckham "Seeing Is Believing: Using Computer Graphics to Enthuse Students," , November/December 2006.IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications

Mark Toner "Back to the Future," , May/June 2006.Teacher Magazine

Patrick Tucker "Digitally Enhanced Teaching," , July/August 2005.Futurist

Jessica E. Vascellaro "Saying No to School Laptops," , August 31, 2006.Wall Street Journal

Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale.

Source Citation: Nash, Susan Smith. "Children Are Technologically Skilled." . Ed.Techology and Society

David Haugen and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. . Web. 4 Aug. 2011.Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context

Document URL http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?di splayGroupName=Viewpoints&disableHighlighting=false&prodId=OVIC&acti on=e&windowstate=normal&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010234245&mo de=view&userGroupName=lincclin_lcc&jsid=b58ce1e14a9ce9ce2c7a40e42b116909

GALE|EJ3010234245Gale Document Number: