Xd02assess

ASSESSMENT.docx

ASSESSMENT

Professional Presentation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities in a Particular Population

For this Competency Assessment, you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation to educate professionals in your healthcare field on healthcare disparities experienced by vulnerable populations, with attention to one particular population that you choose and with interventions you recommend to address healthcare disparities and improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

To Prepare:

· Review the outline of required content under “To Complete Your Competency Assessment.” Keep in mind that the purpose of your presentation is to educate fellow professionals in your particular healthcare field. You will begin with a general review of the social determinants of health, common healthcare disparities, and common causes of those disparities. Then, you will move to the example of a specific population to bring to the attention of your fellow professionals.

· Identify the focus population. This may be a group in your community or region and/or a population of particular interest to your professional role. The focus population should be a vulnerable group based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s). Be sure to choose a population for which you can find reliable information.

· Gather key data about the population to create a brief profile of this group.

· Identify one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus population to address in your presentation. Concentrate on healthcare disparities that are having the greatest impact on this group and for which you can recommend interventions.

· Explain causes of these healthcare disparities at the societal level, such as issues of economics, education, environment, and social views, including racism and other types of prejudice. Look for examples of the impact on the focus group in terms of patient/client experience and quality care.

· Identify up to three (3) specific interventions that could reduce or remove one (1) or more of the major healthcare disparities for your focus population. Provide examples of how the interventions can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

· To promote advocacy, consider how to conclude your presentation with a call to fellow professionals to address healthcare disparities.

· Access the PowerPoint template to prepare your presentation. Review the following resources for support in developing your presentation and adding audio narration:

· OASIS. (n.d.). Microsoft PowerPoint. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/microsoft-office/powerpoint

· Microsoft 365. (2021, January 26). How to add audio in your PowerPoint presentation [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlVC4f-fBrI

· Note: There is no specified time limit for your narrated presentation. However, keep your audience’s interest and attention in mind. Refer to the professional presentation skills in the rubric for guidance.

To Complete Your Competency Assessment

Create a PowerPoint presentation of 9–11 slides with narration, plus title and reference slides, to include the following:

· Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

· Describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

· Describe societal influences that cause common healthcare disparities.

· Identify a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity. Provide a brief profile of this group based on the social determinants of health.

· Analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

· For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain the impact on patient/client experience and care.

· For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain up to three (3) recommended interventions.

· Explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

· Conclude with a call for advocacy to motivate your professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

Complete and Submit.

XD3002_Rubric.pdf

XD3002: Social Influences of Healthcare Disparities: Analyze societal factors that drive healthcare disparities across diverse groups.

Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

Module 1: Understanding Social Determinants of Health and Healthcare Disparities

Part 1: Healthcare Disparities Impacting One Group

Using the PowerPoint Presentation template document, address the following:

• Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

Learning Objective 1.1: Explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives

Response does not adequately explain how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

Response adequately explains how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

Response accurately and thoroughly explains how social determinants of health influence individual healthcare experiences and perspectives.

• Describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

Learning Objective 1.2: Describe

common healthcare disparities

Response does not adequately describe common examples of healthcare disparities.

Response adequately describes common examples of healthcare disparities.

Response accurately and thoroughly describes common examples of healthcare disparities.

• Describe societal influences that cause common healthcare disparities.

Response does not adequately describe societal influences that cause common

Response adequately describes societal influences that cause common healthcare

Response accurately and thoroughly describes societal influences that cause common

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

Learning Objective 1.3: Describe societal influences that cause healthcare disparities

healthcare disparities.

disparities.

healthcare disparities.

• Identify a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity. Provide a brief profile of this group using the social determinants of health.

Learning Objective 1.4: Describe vulnerable populations using the social determinants of health

Response does not provide an adequate profile, using the social determinants of health, of a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity.

Response provides an adequate profile, using the social determinants of health, of a specific vulnerable population— based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)— who experiences healthcare disparity.

Response provides an accurate and thorough profile, using the social determinants of health, of a specific vulnerable population—based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, or other determining factor(s)—who experiences healthcare disparity.

• Analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze specific populations for healthcare disparities and causes

Response does not adequately analyze causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

Response adequately analyzes causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

Response accurately and thoroughly analyzes causes of one (1) or two (2) major healthcare disparities experienced by the focus group.

• For each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group, explain the impact on patient/client experience and care.

Learning Objective 1.6: Analyze impacts of healthcare disparities on patient/client experience and care

Response does not adequately explain the impact on patient experience and care for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

Response adequately explains the impact on patient experience and care for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

Response accurately and thoroughly explains the impact on patient experience and care for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

Module 2: Addressing Healthcare Disparities

Part 2: Interventions to Address Healthcare Disparities

Using the PowerPoint template document, address the following: • For each major healthcare

disparity experienced by the focus group, explain up to three (3) recommended interventions.

Learning Objective 2.1: Recommend interventions for healthcare disparities

Response does not adequately recommend up to three (3) interventions for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

Response adequately recommends up to three (3) interventions for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

Response accurately and thoroughly recommends up to three (3) interventions for each major healthcare disparity experienced by the focus group.

• Explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

Learning Objective 2.2: Explain how interventions improve health equity and outcomes

Response does not adequately explain how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

Response adequately explains how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the recommended intervention(s) can improve health equity and outcomes for the focus group.

• Conclude with a call for advocacy to motivate your professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

Learning Objective 2.3: Create a call for professional advocacy to address healthcare disparities

Response does not adequately provide a call for advocacy to motivate a professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

Response adequately provides a call for advocacy to motivate a professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

Response accurately and thoroughly provides a call for advocacy to motivate a professional audience to address healthcare disparities for other vulnerable populations.

Professional Skills Assessment

Professional Presentation Skills

Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow

Does not use a professional tone appropriate for the presentation context, audience, and purpose. Presentation content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use images, bullet points, and visual effects; contains long paragraphs or confusing sentences. Presenter is not engaging and professional; does not use proper voice, tone, volume, pace, and flow/speed. Presentation contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.

Mostly uses a professional tone appropriate for the presentation context, audience, and purpose. Presentation content is mostly clear, logical, and well- organized with adequate use of images, bullet points, and visual effects. Presenter is mostly engaging and professional, using adequate voice, tone, volume, pace, and flow/speed. Presentation contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.

Consistently uses a professional tone appropriate for the presentation context, audience, and purpose. Presentation content is consistently clear, logical, and well- organized with appropriate use of images, bullet points, and visual effects. Presenter is consistently engaging and professional, using appropriate voice, tone, volume, pace, and flow/speed. Presentation is free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.

Originality, Source Presentation does not Presentation adequately Presentation fully

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations

Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas

reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA or another format.

reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA or another format.

Professional Writing

Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well-organized.

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the

Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the

Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional

professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.

professional setting/workplace context.

setting/workplace context.

Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas

Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are numerous and/or significant errors.

Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.

Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.