WEEK 5 DISCUSSION

Boopboop56

Main
Similar Questions

Home >Homework Answsers >Human Resource Management homework help

SEE ATTACHED

2 years ago
31.07.2024
10

Report issue

files (2)

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx
RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

Week 5 Discussion:

Time to Market is a British training consulting firm. Their site is chock full of training tips and tactics (and most all of the content is free!). Go to the following link to access Time to Market's "Top 20 Training Tips" podcast series:

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

You may choose any one of the Top 20 Tips that interests you – listen to them all, if you choose (they range from 1 to 3 minutes each). Critique the Tip of your choice and share your thoughts in your initial post. Be sure to discuss the following:

· What (if anything) did you learn from this presentation?

· What (if anything) will you do to change your own presentation style (behavior) based on what you learned?

· What made this method of training effective, in your opinion?

· What limitations did you notice about this method of training?

· If Time to Market invited you to help them improve their podcasts, what suggestions would you make and why?

Please cite the textbook source: References

Blanchard, P. & Thacker, J. (2023).Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (7th Edition). Sage Publication.

Chambers, R. (2023). Presenting Your Research Effectively. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2014/09/presenting-research

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 1/3

HRA Written Assignment Rubric Course: Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CONTENT -

Addressing the

assignment,

answering all

the questions,

following

instructions.

/ 10

CLARITY -

Organization

and flow, the

writing is

complete while

also concise

/ 10

Position, plan, or

thesis is very

credible, logical,

research sources

are credible and

sufficient to

support

arguments

Position, plan, or

thesis is credible,

sources are

credible; portions

of the assignment

may not be fully

addressed

Position, plan or

thesis lacks

credibility,

arguments are not

clear or not well

supported,

sources are not

credible or do not

support

arguments;

portions of the

assignment are

not addressed at

all

Concepts

presented are

clearly organized

and easy to

understand, early

information leads

to later

information,

coherently

summarized

Concepts

presented are not

organized

logically, no

coherent

summary

Concepts

presented are

unclear or difficult

to understand,

paper is

disorganized and

does not follow

logical

progression

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 2/3

Total / 50

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CREATIVITY -

Writing is

interesting,

considers old

ideas in new

ways, includes

illustrative

examples

/ 10

CRITICAL

THINKING -

identifying fact

vs. opinion,

action and

consequence,

recognizing

multiple

perspectives on

issues

/ 10

CORRECTNESS

- Grammar,

spelling,

punctuation,

formatting and

academic

writing style

/ 10

Presents new

ideas and/or old

ideas in

interesting ways,

writing style is

formal but

maintains interest,

includes real-

world

applications

Presents widely

accepted ideas or

discusses topics

that are already

well known

without much

attention to

original content or

reader interest

Presents ideas

that are clichéd or

imitative, does not

make topic

interesting for

reader

Clearly identifies

assumptions,

considers all

implications and

consequences of

outcomes, and

includes more

than one point of

view on the topic

Treats some

assumptions as

fact, and/or

considers some

implications but

not others, and/or

does not fully

consider point of

view

Fails to identify

assumptions,

and/or does not

consider

implications of

outcomes, and/or

is fixed on a single

point of view

without any

opposing

information

Grammar is

appropriate,

spelling,

punctuation &

formatting

accurate, follows

APA style

guidelines if

appropriate

Grammar is

appropriate, some

spelling,

punctuation or

formatting errors,

missing elements

of APA style

guidelines

Grammar, spelling,

punctuation

and/or formatting

are inappropriate,

incorrect and

unprofessional, no

APA style

guidelines

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 3/3

Overall Score

Level 4 11 points minimum

Level 3 8 points minimum

Level 2 5 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 1/3

HRA Written Assignment Rubric Course: Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CONTENT -

Addressing the

assignment,

answering all

the questions,

following

instructions.

/ 10

CLARITY -

Organization

and flow, the

writing is

complete while

also concise

/ 10

Position, plan, or

thesis is very

credible, logical,

research sources

are credible and

sufficient to

support

arguments

Position, plan, or

thesis is credible,

sources are

credible; portions

of the assignment

may not be fully

addressed

Position, plan or

thesis lacks

credibility,

arguments are not

clear or not well

supported,

sources are not

credible or do not

support

arguments;

portions of the

assignment are

not addressed at

all

Concepts

presented are

clearly organized

and easy to

understand, early

information leads

to later

information,

coherently

summarized

Concepts

presented are not

organized

logically, no

coherent

summary

Concepts

presented are

unclear or difficult

to understand,

paper is

disorganized and

does not follow

logical

progression

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 2/3

Total / 50

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CREATIVITY -

Writing is

interesting,

considers old

ideas in new

ways, includes

illustrative

examples

/ 10

CRITICAL

THINKING -

identifying fact

vs. opinion,

action and

consequence,

recognizing

multiple

perspectives on

issues

/ 10

CORRECTNESS

- Grammar,

spelling,

punctuation,

formatting and

academic

writing style

/ 10

Presents new

ideas and/or old

ideas in

interesting ways,

writing style is

formal but

maintains interest,

includes real-

world

applications

Presents widely

accepted ideas or

discusses topics

that are already

well known

without much

attention to

original content or

reader interest

Presents ideas

that are clichéd or

imitative, does not

make topic

interesting for

reader

Clearly identifies

assumptions,

considers all

implications and

consequences of

outcomes, and

includes more

than one point of

view on the topic

Treats some

assumptions as

fact, and/or

considers some

implications but

not others, and/or

does not fully

consider point of

view

Fails to identify

assumptions,

and/or does not

consider

implications of

outcomes, and/or

is fixed on a single

point of view

without any

opposing

information

Grammar is

appropriate,

spelling,

punctuation &

formatting

accurate, follows

APA style

guidelines if

appropriate

Grammar is

appropriate, some

spelling,

punctuation or

formatting errors,

missing elements

of APA style

guidelines

Grammar, spelling,

punctuation

and/or formatting

are inappropriate,

incorrect and

unprofessional, no

APA style

guidelines

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 3/3

Overall Score

Level 4 11 points minimum

Level 3 8 points minimum

Level 2 5 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

Week 5 Discussion:

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

· What (if anything) did you learn from this presentation?

· What (if anything) will you do to change your own presentation style (behavior) based on what you learned?

· What made this method of training effective, in your opinion?

· What limitations did you notice about this method of training?

· If Time to Market invited you to help them improve their podcasts, what suggestions would you make and why?

Please cite the textbook source: References

Blanchard, P. & Thacker, J. (2023).Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (7th Edition). Sage Publication.

Chambers, R. (2023). Presenting Your Research Effectively. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2014/09/presenting-research

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 1/3

HRA Written Assignment Rubric Course: Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CONTENT -

Addressing the

assignment,

answering all

the questions,

following

instructions.

/ 10

CLARITY -

Organization

and flow, the

writing is

complete while

also concise

/ 10

Position, plan, or

thesis is very

credible, logical,

research sources

are credible and

sufficient to

support

arguments

Position, plan, or

thesis is credible,

sources are

credible; portions

of the assignment

may not be fully

addressed

Position, plan or

thesis lacks

credibility,

arguments are not

clear or not well

supported,

sources are not

credible or do not

support

arguments;

portions of the

assignment are

not addressed at

all

Concepts

presented are

clearly organized

and easy to

understand, early

information leads

to later

information,

coherently

summarized

Concepts

presented are not

organized

logically, no

coherent

summary

Concepts

presented are

unclear or difficult

to understand,

paper is

disorganized and

does not follow

logical

progression

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 2/3

Total / 50

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CREATIVITY -

Writing is

interesting,

considers old

ideas in new

ways, includes

illustrative

examples

/ 10

CRITICAL

THINKING -

identifying fact

vs. opinion,

action and

consequence,

recognizing

multiple

perspectives on

issues

/ 10

CORRECTNESS

- Grammar,

spelling,

punctuation,

formatting and

academic

writing style

/ 10

Presents new

ideas and/or old

ideas in

interesting ways,

writing style is

formal but

maintains interest,

includes real-

world

applications

Presents widely

accepted ideas or

discusses topics

that are already

well known

without much

attention to

original content or

reader interest

Presents ideas

that are clichéd or

imitative, does not

make topic

interesting for

reader

Clearly identifies

assumptions,

considers all

implications and

consequences of

outcomes, and

includes more

than one point of

view on the topic

Treats some

assumptions as

fact, and/or

considers some

implications but

not others, and/or

does not fully

consider point of

view

Fails to identify

assumptions,

and/or does not

consider

implications of

outcomes, and/or

is fixed on a single

point of view

without any

opposing

information

Grammar is

appropriate,

spelling,

punctuation &

formatting

accurate, follows

APA style

guidelines if

appropriate

Grammar is

appropriate, some

spelling,

punctuation or

formatting errors,

missing elements

of APA style

guidelines

Grammar, spelling,

punctuation

and/or formatting

are inappropriate,

incorrect and

unprofessional, no

APA style

guidelines

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 3/3

Overall Score

Level 4 11 points minimum

Level 3 8 points minimum

Level 2 5 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

Week 5 Discussion:

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

· What (if anything) did you learn from this presentation?

· What (if anything) will you do to change your own presentation style (behavior) based on what you learned?

· What made this method of training effective, in your opinion?

· What limitations did you notice about this method of training?

· If Time to Market invited you to help them improve their podcasts, what suggestions would you make and why?

Please cite the textbook source: References

Blanchard, P. & Thacker, J. (2023).Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (7th Edition). Sage Publication.

Chambers, R. (2023). Presenting Your Research Effectively. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2014/09/presenting-research

http://www.timetomarket.co.uk/presentation-training-podcast.htm

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 1/3

HRA Written Assignment Rubric Course: Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CONTENT -

Addressing the

assignment,

answering all

the questions,

following

instructions.

/ 10

CLARITY -

Organization

and flow, the

writing is

complete while

also concise

/ 10

Position, plan, or

thesis is very

credible, logical,

research sources

are credible and

sufficient to

support

arguments

Position, plan, or

thesis is credible,

sources are

credible; portions

of the assignment

may not be fully

addressed

Position, plan or

thesis lacks

credibility,

arguments are not

clear or not well

supported,

sources are not

credible or do not

support

arguments;

portions of the

assignment are

not addressed at

all

Concepts

presented are

clearly organized

and easy to

understand, early

information leads

to later

information,

coherently

summarized

Concepts

presented are not

organized

logically, no

coherent

summary

Concepts

presented are

unclear or difficult

to understand,

paper is

disorganized and

does not follow

logical

progression

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 2/3

Total / 50

Criteria Exceeds Expectations 10 points

Meets Expectations 8 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

CREATIVITY -

Writing is

interesting,

considers old

ideas in new

ways, includes

illustrative

examples

/ 10

CRITICAL

THINKING -

identifying fact

vs. opinion,

action and

consequence,

recognizing

multiple

perspectives on

issues

/ 10

CORRECTNESS

- Grammar,

spelling,

punctuation,

formatting and

academic

writing style

/ 10

Presents new

ideas and/or old

ideas in

interesting ways,

writing style is

formal but

maintains interest,

includes real-

world

applications

Presents widely

accepted ideas or

discusses topics

that are already

well known

without much

attention to

original content or

reader interest

Presents ideas

that are clichéd or

imitative, does not

make topic

interesting for

reader

Clearly identifies

assumptions,

considers all

implications and

consequences of

outcomes, and

includes more

than one point of

view on the topic

Treats some

assumptions as

fact, and/or

considers some

implications but

not others, and/or

does not fully

consider point of

view

Fails to identify

assumptions,

and/or does not

consider

implications of

outcomes, and/or

is fixed on a single

point of view

without any

opposing

information

Grammar is

appropriate,

spelling,

punctuation &

formatting

accurate, follows

APA style

guidelines if

appropriate

Grammar is

appropriate, some

spelling,

punctuation or

formatting errors,

missing elements

of APA style

guidelines

Grammar, spelling,

punctuation

and/or formatting

are inappropriate,

incorrect and

unprofessional, no

APA style

guidelines

7/16/24, 3:34 PM Rubric Assessment - Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1 - Saint Leo University

https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=165061&evalObjectId=504062&evalObjectType=1&… 3/3

Overall Score

Level 4 11 points minimum

Level 3 8 points minimum

Level 2 5 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

other Questions(10)

WEEK 5 DISCUSSION

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

Week5DiscussionHRA.docx

RubricAssessment-HumanResourceDevelopmentHRA-539-MBOL1-SaintLeoUniversity.pdf

HR 2 Application HRM-539

Response week 5 discussion