This is 2 part | Architecture and Design homework help

211GuidedTourResearchProjectPart1.docx

Survey of World Architecture and Urbanism / ARLH 211 / Ritter / Winter 2025

Guided Tour Research Project Part 1

Due January 24th @ 11:59 PM

Purpose/Objectives:

This assignment provides students the opportunity to lay the groundwork for a research-based analysis of a significant global architectural or urban site. That groundwork includes selecting a site from the list of approved locations provided by the instructor, reading and taking notes on research sources, writing a thesis statement that presents the argument you will make about their chosen site's cultural and architectural significance, and an outline that establishes the order in which you will present evidence in support of the thesis argument.

In keeping with this course’s goals and outcomes, this assignment helps students achieve the following:

· synthesize research using appropriate tools and sources to effectively examine built environments

· strengthen their awareness of architectural terminology, typology, technology, materials, and symbolism

· advance their ability to discuss, analyze and interpret works of architecture, and urban design

· proficiently and ethically employ scholarly digital tools including on-line databases and image resources.

· consider diverse contexts and voices that inform an understanding of built environments.

Deliverables:

This assignment requires that you turn in:

1. Tour topic selected from the list of topics provided on Blackboard

2. Thesis Statement (250-300 words)

Present an argument that addresses:

· The site's historical and cultural significance

· Its architectural or urban planning innovations

· Its influence on subsequent developments

· Its role in shaping local and global architectural discourse

3. Detailed Outline

· Introduction and historical context

· Subtopic sections, each focusing on a key element of the design

· Conclusion synthesizing the subtopics and how they support the site’s importance

· Include brief notes about intended visual materials

4. Bibliography of a minimum of four sources, selected from the overall bibliography provided by the instructor for each topic, formatted correctly using Chicago-Turabian style.

Assignment phases:

The following required and optional phases for this assignment are:

· Class 2: In class overview for this assignment

· Class 4: Topic selection. Instructor provides time for students to ask questions about assignment in class.

· Optional: students are encouraged to meet with the Writers Studio or the instructor to solicit feedback on their rough draft

· Jan. 24th @ 11:59 PM: Assignment submission

Parameters:

· All elements (thesis, outline, and sources) should be included in a single Word document

· Header must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-[section #] Winter Guided Tour Part 1

· Thesis statement must be underlined

· Use 12 point Times New Roman font. Double spaced. 1-inch margins

· Materials should be free from grammatical and spelling errors

· Chicago-Turabian should be used for the bibliography

Tools and resources:

· The topic should be selected from the list provided as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· All sources must come from the pre-approved bibliography available as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· Students are encouraged to use the Writer’s Studio when crafting thesis statements and outlines.

Submission requirements:

This assignment will be submitted to Blackboard / Submit Assignments Here with the following file naming convention:

202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_StudentLastname_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

e.g: 202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_Wallace_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

Assignment weight:

This assignment counts for 10 points, or 10% of the overall course grade.

Feedback schedule and process:

1. Assignment introduced in week one

2. Students review assignment instructions and take notes in class 2

3. Submit assignment on Jan. 24th

Assessment criteria:

· Thesis statement: 35% of assignment grade

· Outline: 40% of assignment grade

· Source selection: 10% of assignment grade

· Chicago formatting: 15% of assignment grade

Grades, using a rubric and general comments, will be returned to students via Blackboard’s grade center no later than one week after submission.

Rubrics:

Rubrics for all assignments and exams can be found at Blackboard/Assignment Materials

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including but not limited to AI-generated content, automated writing assistance, and machine-generated responses, is strictly prohibited for the completion of assignments in this course.

Feedback.docx

I've started but I didn't get a good feed back on my thesis. I need help with it plus more. PLEASE DO NOT US AI! NO PLAGIARISM

I've included my The sis, Out line, and bibliography. I need to redo my the sis. This is her feedback:

There is a lot to say about de Silva- and sometimes that is a double edged sword. Her biography is important, but should take a back seat to her architecture and designs. For your final tour script, focus on her unique contributions as an architect, and how the three different sites can illustrate her impact. I would be glad to discuss further with you- see me in office hours and let's make this a really strong project.

Thesis

Thesis present but lacks clarity or fails to fully capture the main arguments. Revise the thesis for clarity and relevance to better reflect the main arguments of the assignment

Criterion Feedback

This is all such interesting information, but it needs more focus. It's crucial that your thesis serves as a roadmap for your tour, clearly reflecting the key ideas you'll explore. I would like to see a more robust final thesis to guide your inquiry into de Silva. If you haven’t written a history paper in a while it can feel challenging. I recommend this website, which has great tips:

Outline

Basic outline present but lacks depth or clear organization of ideas. Topics are broadly defined or tangentially related to thesis. Details are general and barely support topic.

Criterion Feedback

Outline needs revision/Recommended Next Steps:

-Focus on core task- a guided tour of the site

-Conduct targeted research using sources listed in bibliography

-Refine thesis to a more manageable scope

-Ensure that you select 3 sites to focus the bulk of your writing on. And that they illuminate your thesis

-Reorganize outline with clear main points and supporting sub-points.

Visit my office hours to discuss outline refinement and strategy to make this a strong and well organized investigation of de Silva

My sources

Nunes, Ines Leonor. “Jane Drew and Minnette De Silva Pioneering Participatory Architecture in Mid-Century India and Sri Lanka.” Joelho Revista de Cultura Arquitectonica, no. 15 (May 9, 2024): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_15_4.

Robson, David. “Andrew Boyd and Minnette de Silva: Two Pioneers of Modernism in Ceylon.” thinkMATTER (blog), March 4, 2015. https://thinkmatter.in/2015/03/04/andrew-boyd-and-minnette-de-silva-two-pioneers-of-modernism-in-ceylon/.

Siddiqi, Anooradha Iyer. “Crafting the Archive: Minnette De Silva, Architecture, and History.” The Journal of Architecture 22, no. 8 (November 17, 2017): 1299–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1376341.

Singha, Sumita. “Remembering Minnette de Silva: The Architect in a Sari.” RIBA Blog (blog), 2024. https://www.architecture.com/about/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/remembering-minnette-de-silva.

MyThesisoutlineandbio.docx

Minnette de Silva (1918–1998)

Thesis Statement: Minnette de Silva was an accomplished architect in her time. She was known for blending traditional Sri Lankan building styles with modern ideas and creating unique designs. She grew up in an environment that greatly cared about politics and culture, influencing her work. Her work uses local materials and crafts, and she uses design principles like simplicity and practicality. Her house in Kandy and The Karunaratne House were her two most famous projects, and she showed her creative ideas in each of them. De Silva’s work was tremendously important because it helped Sri Lanka develop their own architectural identity after gaining independence. She worked with local crafters to help incorporate traditional skills into her projects and ensured her work included Sri Lanka’s culture. As one of the first women architects in Asia, she faced a great deal of challenges, but she still overcame them and became well-known for her bold and creative ideas. She faced financial struggles as well as working in a field dominated by men; her contributions are still remembered today. She also worked with a famous artist named Le Corbusier and brought attention to tropical modernism. That’s an architect’s style that fits warm climates. Minnette de Silva’s works continue to inspire the world to this day by showing how buildings can be created using local traditional style and modern needs. She was also a part of the international discussions about architecture, where she shared her views on blending cultural identity with modern design. She is a true inspiration for the architecture world, making the impossible possible.

I. Introduction and Personal Background

A. Her early life in Kandy, Sri Lanka

B. Her education and introduction to architecture

C. Her family’s influence on her career

II. Architectural Philosophy and Methods

A. Her belief in working with local craftspeople

B. Combining traditional Sri Lankan styles with modern architecture

C. Using materials and techniques that suit Sri Lanka’s Environment

III. Signature Works

A. Kandy Residence

B. Karunaratne House

C. Other Projects

IV. Contributions to Postcolonial Identity

A. Being one of the first female architects in Asia

B. Facing financial and social difficulties

C. gaining international recognition despite challenges

V. Global Influence and Legacy

A. Collaborating with Le Corbusier

B. Contributed ideas of tropical modernism

C. Inspiring future architects with her work

VI. Conclusion

A. Why Minnette de Silva’s work matter

B. How she connected tradition and modernity

Bibliography

Nunes, Ines Leonor. “Jane Drew and Minnette De Silva Pioneering Participatory Architecture in Mid-Century India and Sri Lanka.” Joelho Revista de Cultura Arquitectonica, no. 15 (May 9, 2024): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_15_4.

Robson, David. “Andrew Boyd and Minnette de Silva: Two Pioneers of Modernism in Ceylon.” thinkMATTER (blog), March 4, 2015. https://thinkmatter.in/2015/03/04/andrew-boyd-and-minnette-de-silva-two-pioneers-of-modernism-in-ceylon/.

Siddiqi, Anooradha Iyer. “Crafting the Archive: Minnette De Silva, Architecture, and History.” The Journal of Architecture 22, no. 8 (November 17, 2017): 1299–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1376341.

Singha, Sumita. “Remembering Minnette de Silva: The Architect in a Sari.” RIBA Blog (blog), 2024. https://www.architecture.com/about/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/remembering-minnette-de-silva.

211GuidedTourResearchProjectPart21.docx

Survey of World Architecture and Urbanism / ARLH 211 / Ritter / Winter 2025

Guided Tour Research Project Part 2

Due February 28th @ 11:59 PM EST

Assignment Description

For this assignment, students will create a guided video tour of a historic architectural site that we have not covered in class. This project allows students to explore a new location, conducting rigorous and thorough research to uncover its architectural significance and historical context. Students will produce and narrate a video that showcases the site while narrating their findings through a well-crafted script. This is an opportunity to deepen their understanding of architectural history and enhance skills in research, storytelling, and digital presentation.

In keeping with this course’s goals and outcomes, this assignment helps students achieve the following:

· Synthesize research using appropriate tools and sources to effectively examine built environments

· Strengthen awareness of architectural terminology, typology, technology, materials, and symbolism

· Advance ability to discuss, analyze, and interpret works of architecture and urban design

· Consider diverse contexts and voices that inform an understanding of built environments

· Use appropriate terminology and concepts in oral, written, and visual communication conforming to Chicago/Turabian style

Deliverables:

1. Tour Script (between 1500-2000 words)

2. Tour Video

Assignment phases:

The following phases for this assignment are:

· Feb. 21st: Research Paper Drop-in Help Session 9:00-10:00 AM EST on Zoom

· Feb. 28th: Final Tour Video and Script due at 11:59 PM EST

Parameters:

Tour Script:

· Tour script and bibliography should be included in a single Word document

· Header must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-N01 Winter 2025, Guided Tour Part 2

· Length should be between 1500-2000 words

· Thesis must be underlined

· Use 12 point Times New Roman font. Double spaced. 1-inch margins.

· Script should be free from grammatical and spelling errors

· All sources must come from the pre-approved bibliography available at Blackboard / Assignment Materials.

· You must cite a minimum of 4 sources.

· Script must employ Chicago Style footnotes and bibliography

Tour Video:

· Title page must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-N01 Winter 2025, Guided Tour Part 2

· Tour video should be narrated by student using the tour script

· Video must be submitted in one of the following formats:

· .MP4

· YouTube video (submit the URL)

· Other formats (check with instructor)

Additional Guidelines:

Visuals:

· Ensure images link well with your tour script

· Use computer cursor (the simplest option) or other tools to highlight specific details

· Grades will focus on effective communication rather than sophisticated video production

Vocals:

· Maintain a steady pace

· Avoid speaking too quickly

· Vary intonation to highlight important points

· Record a short sample to check pace and intonation before full recording

Tools and Resources

· Use the Writer’s Studio to hone your Tour Script

· Visit SCADamp as you design your tour video

· Come to your professor’s office hours to ask questions and solicit feedback

· Guides to Chicago Style Footnotes and Bibliography are available on Blackboard/Assignment Resources

· Examples of student projects from previous years are available on Dropbox/Class Share

Submit in two places:

· Script and Tour Video to Blackboard/Submit Assignments Here

File names must follow this convention:

Script: 202520_ARLH_211_N01_Ritter_studentsurname_GuidedTourPart2script

Video: 202520_ARLH_211_N01_Ritter_studentsurname_GuidedTourPart2video

· Tour Video only to Blackboard/Discussions/Guided Tour Video

Feedback Schedule and Process:

Feedback from Part 2 will be returned within 1 week of submission.

Assessment criteria:

Grades, using a rubric and general comments, will be returned to students via Blackboard’s grade center no later than one week after submission.

Rubrics:

Rubrics for all assignments and exams can be found at Blackboard/Assignment Materials

211GuidedTourResearchProjectPart1.docx

Survey of World Architecture and Urbanism / ARLH 211 / Ritter / Winter 2025

Guided Tour Research Project Part 1

Due January 24th @ 11:59 PM

Purpose/Objectives:

This assignment provides students the opportunity to lay the groundwork for a research-based analysis of a significant global architectural or urban site. That groundwork includes selecting a site from the list of approved locations provided by the instructor, reading and taking notes on research sources, writing a thesis statement that presents the argument you will make about their chosen site's cultural and architectural significance, and an outline that establishes the order in which you will present evidence in support of the thesis argument.

In keeping with this course’s goals and outcomes, this assignment helps students achieve the following:

· synthesize research using appropriate tools and sources to effectively examine built environments

· strengthen their awareness of architectural terminology, typology, technology, materials, and symbolism

· advance their ability to discuss, analyze and interpret works of architecture, and urban design

· proficiently and ethically employ scholarly digital tools including on-line databases and image resources.

· consider diverse contexts and voices that inform an understanding of built environments.

Deliverables:

This assignment requires that you turn in:

1. Tour topic selected from the list of topics provided on Blackboard

2. Thesis Statement (250-300 words)

Present an argument that addresses:

· The site's historical and cultural significance

· Its architectural or urban planning innovations

· Its influence on subsequent developments

· Its role in shaping local and global architectural discourse

3. Detailed Outline

· Introduction and historical context

· Subtopic sections, each focusing on a key element of the design

· Conclusion synthesizing the subtopics and how they support the site’s importance

· Include brief notes about intended visual materials

4. Bibliography of a minimum of four sources, selected from the overall bibliography provided by the instructor for each topic, formatted correctly using Chicago-Turabian style.

Assignment phases:

The following required and optional phases for this assignment are:

· Class 2: In class overview for this assignment

· Class 4: Topic selection. Instructor provides time for students to ask questions about assignment in class.

· Optional: students are encouraged to meet with the Writers Studio or the instructor to solicit feedback on their rough draft

· Jan. 24th @ 11:59 PM: Assignment submission

Parameters:

· All elements (thesis, outline, and sources) should be included in a single Word document

· Header must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-[section #] Winter Guided Tour Part 1

· Thesis statement must be underlined

· Use 12 point Times New Roman font. Double spaced. 1-inch margins

· Materials should be free from grammatical and spelling errors

· Chicago-Turabian should be used for the bibliography

Tools and resources:

· The topic should be selected from the list provided as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· All sources must come from the pre-approved bibliography available as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· Students are encouraged to use the Writer’s Studio when crafting thesis statements and outlines.

Submission requirements:

This assignment will be submitted to Blackboard / Submit Assignments Here with the following file naming convention:

202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_StudentLastname_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

e.g: 202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_Wallace_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

Assignment weight:

This assignment counts for 10 points, or 10% of the overall course grade.

Feedback schedule and process:

1. Assignment introduced in week one

2. Students review assignment instructions and take notes in class 2

3. Submit assignment on Jan. 24th

Assessment criteria:

· Thesis statement: 35% of assignment grade

· Outline: 40% of assignment grade

· Source selection: 10% of assignment grade

· Chicago formatting: 15% of assignment grade

Grades, using a rubric and general comments, will be returned to students via Blackboard’s grade center no later than one week after submission.

Rubrics:

Rubrics for all assignments and exams can be found at Blackboard/Assignment Materials

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including but not limited to AI-generated content, automated writing assistance, and machine-generated responses, is strictly prohibited for the completion of assignments in this course.

Feedback.docx

I've started but I didn't get a good feed back on my thesis. I need help with it plus more. PLEASE DO NOT US AI! NO PLAGIARISM

I've included my The sis, Out line, and bibliography. I need to redo my the sis. This is her feedback:

There is a lot to say about de Silva- and sometimes that is a double edged sword. Her biography is important, but should take a back seat to her architecture and designs. For your final tour script, focus on her unique contributions as an architect, and how the three different sites can illustrate her impact. I would be glad to discuss further with you- see me in office hours and let's make this a really strong project.

Thesis

Thesis present but lacks clarity or fails to fully capture the main arguments. Revise the thesis for clarity and relevance to better reflect the main arguments of the assignment

Criterion Feedback

This is all such interesting information, but it needs more focus. It's crucial that your thesis serves as a roadmap for your tour, clearly reflecting the key ideas you'll explore. I would like to see a more robust final thesis to guide your inquiry into de Silva. If you haven’t written a history paper in a while it can feel challenging. I recommend this website, which has great tips:

Outline

Basic outline present but lacks depth or clear organization of ideas. Topics are broadly defined or tangentially related to thesis. Details are general and barely support topic.

Criterion Feedback

Outline needs revision/Recommended Next Steps:

-Focus on core task- a guided tour of the site

-Conduct targeted research using sources listed in bibliography

-Refine thesis to a more manageable scope

-Ensure that you select 3 sites to focus the bulk of your writing on. And that they illuminate your thesis

-Reorganize outline with clear main points and supporting sub-points.

Visit my office hours to discuss outline refinement and strategy to make this a strong and well organized investigation of de Silva

My sources

Nunes, Ines Leonor. “Jane Drew and Minnette De Silva Pioneering Participatory Architecture in Mid-Century India and Sri Lanka.” Joelho Revista de Cultura Arquitectonica, no. 15 (May 9, 2024): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_15_4.

Robson, David. “Andrew Boyd and Minnette de Silva: Two Pioneers of Modernism in Ceylon.” thinkMATTER (blog), March 4, 2015. https://thinkmatter.in/2015/03/04/andrew-boyd-and-minnette-de-silva-two-pioneers-of-modernism-in-ceylon/.

Siddiqi, Anooradha Iyer. “Crafting the Archive: Minnette De Silva, Architecture, and History.” The Journal of Architecture 22, no. 8 (November 17, 2017): 1299–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1376341.

Singha, Sumita. “Remembering Minnette de Silva: The Architect in a Sari.” RIBA Blog (blog), 2024. https://www.architecture.com/about/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/remembering-minnette-de-silva.

MyThesisoutlineandbio.docx

Minnette de Silva (1918–1998)

Thesis Statement: Minnette de Silva was an accomplished architect in her time. She was known for blending traditional Sri Lankan building styles with modern ideas and creating unique designs. She grew up in an environment that greatly cared about politics and culture, influencing her work. Her work uses local materials and crafts, and she uses design principles like simplicity and practicality. Her house in Kandy and The Karunaratne House were her two most famous projects, and she showed her creative ideas in each of them. De Silva’s work was tremendously important because it helped Sri Lanka develop their own architectural identity after gaining independence. She worked with local crafters to help incorporate traditional skills into her projects and ensured her work included Sri Lanka’s culture. As one of the first women architects in Asia, she faced a great deal of challenges, but she still overcame them and became well-known for her bold and creative ideas. She faced financial struggles as well as working in a field dominated by men; her contributions are still remembered today. She also worked with a famous artist named Le Corbusier and brought attention to tropical modernism. That’s an architect’s style that fits warm climates. Minnette de Silva’s works continue to inspire the world to this day by showing how buildings can be created using local traditional style and modern needs. She was also a part of the international discussions about architecture, where she shared her views on blending cultural identity with modern design. She is a true inspiration for the architecture world, making the impossible possible.

I. Introduction and Personal Background

A. Her early life in Kandy, Sri Lanka

B. Her education and introduction to architecture

C. Her family’s influence on her career

II. Architectural Philosophy and Methods

A. Her belief in working with local craftspeople

B. Combining traditional Sri Lankan styles with modern architecture

C. Using materials and techniques that suit Sri Lanka’s Environment

III. Signature Works

A. Kandy Residence

B. Karunaratne House

C. Other Projects

IV. Contributions to Postcolonial Identity

A. Being one of the first female architects in Asia

B. Facing financial and social difficulties

C. gaining international recognition despite challenges

V. Global Influence and Legacy

A. Collaborating with Le Corbusier

B. Contributed ideas of tropical modernism

C. Inspiring future architects with her work

VI. Conclusion

A. Why Minnette de Silva’s work matter

B. How she connected tradition and modernity

Bibliography

Nunes, Ines Leonor. “Jane Drew and Minnette De Silva Pioneering Participatory Architecture in Mid-Century India and Sri Lanka.” Joelho Revista de Cultura Arquitectonica, no. 15 (May 9, 2024): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_15_4.

Robson, David. “Andrew Boyd and Minnette de Silva: Two Pioneers of Modernism in Ceylon.” thinkMATTER (blog), March 4, 2015. https://thinkmatter.in/2015/03/04/andrew-boyd-and-minnette-de-silva-two-pioneers-of-modernism-in-ceylon/.

Siddiqi, Anooradha Iyer. “Crafting the Archive: Minnette De Silva, Architecture, and History.” The Journal of Architecture 22, no. 8 (November 17, 2017): 1299–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1376341.

Singha, Sumita. “Remembering Minnette de Silva: The Architect in a Sari.” RIBA Blog (blog), 2024. https://www.architecture.com/about/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/remembering-minnette-de-silva.

211GuidedTourResearchProjectPart21.docx

Survey of World Architecture and Urbanism / ARLH 211 / Ritter / Winter 2025

Guided Tour Research Project Part 2

Due February 28th @ 11:59 PM EST

Assignment Description

For this assignment, students will create a guided video tour of a historic architectural site that we have not covered in class. This project allows students to explore a new location, conducting rigorous and thorough research to uncover its architectural significance and historical context. Students will produce and narrate a video that showcases the site while narrating their findings through a well-crafted script. This is an opportunity to deepen their understanding of architectural history and enhance skills in research, storytelling, and digital presentation.

In keeping with this course’s goals and outcomes, this assignment helps students achieve the following:

· Synthesize research using appropriate tools and sources to effectively examine built environments

· Strengthen awareness of architectural terminology, typology, technology, materials, and symbolism

· Advance ability to discuss, analyze, and interpret works of architecture and urban design

· Consider diverse contexts and voices that inform an understanding of built environments

· Use appropriate terminology and concepts in oral, written, and visual communication conforming to Chicago/Turabian style

Deliverables:

1. Tour Script (between 1500-2000 words)

2. Tour Video

Assignment phases:

The following phases for this assignment are:

· Feb. 21st: Research Paper Drop-in Help Session 9:00-10:00 AM EST on Zoom

· Feb. 28th: Final Tour Video and Script due at 11:59 PM EST

Parameters:

Tour Script:

· Tour script and bibliography should be included in a single Word document

· Header must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-N01 Winter 2025, Guided Tour Part 2

· Length should be between 1500-2000 words

· Thesis must be underlined

· Use 12 point Times New Roman font. Double spaced. 1-inch margins.

· Script should be free from grammatical and spelling errors

· All sources must come from the pre-approved bibliography available at Blackboard / Assignment Materials.

· You must cite a minimum of 4 sources.

· Script must employ Chicago Style footnotes and bibliography

Tour Video:

· Title page must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-N01 Winter 2025, Guided Tour Part 2

· Tour video should be narrated by student using the tour script

· Video must be submitted in one of the following formats:

· .MP4

· YouTube video (submit the URL)

· Other formats (check with instructor)

Additional Guidelines:

Visuals:

· Ensure images link well with your tour script

· Use computer cursor (the simplest option) or other tools to highlight specific details

· Grades will focus on effective communication rather than sophisticated video production

Vocals:

· Maintain a steady pace

· Avoid speaking too quickly

· Vary intonation to highlight important points

· Record a short sample to check pace and intonation before full recording

Tools and Resources

· Use the Writer’s Studio to hone your Tour Script

· Visit SCADamp as you design your tour video

· Come to your professor’s office hours to ask questions and solicit feedback

· Guides to Chicago Style Footnotes and Bibliography are available on Blackboard/Assignment Resources

· Examples of student projects from previous years are available on Dropbox/Class Share

Submit in two places:

· Script and Tour Video to Blackboard/Submit Assignments Here

File names must follow this convention:

Script: 202520_ARLH_211_N01_Ritter_studentsurname_GuidedTourPart2script

Video: 202520_ARLH_211_N01_Ritter_studentsurname_GuidedTourPart2video

· Tour Video only to Blackboard/Discussions/Guided Tour Video

Feedback Schedule and Process:

Feedback from Part 2 will be returned within 1 week of submission.

Assessment criteria:

Grades, using a rubric and general comments, will be returned to students via Blackboard’s grade center no later than one week after submission.

Rubrics:

Rubrics for all assignments and exams can be found at Blackboard/Assignment Materials

211GuidedTourResearchProjectPart1.docx

Survey of World Architecture and Urbanism / ARLH 211 / Ritter / Winter 2025

Guided Tour Research Project Part 1

Due January 24th @ 11:59 PM

Purpose/Objectives:

This assignment provides students the opportunity to lay the groundwork for a research-based analysis of a significant global architectural or urban site. That groundwork includes selecting a site from the list of approved locations provided by the instructor, reading and taking notes on research sources, writing a thesis statement that presents the argument you will make about their chosen site's cultural and architectural significance, and an outline that establishes the order in which you will present evidence in support of the thesis argument.

In keeping with this course’s goals and outcomes, this assignment helps students achieve the following:

· synthesize research using appropriate tools and sources to effectively examine built environments

· strengthen their awareness of architectural terminology, typology, technology, materials, and symbolism

· advance their ability to discuss, analyze and interpret works of architecture, and urban design

· proficiently and ethically employ scholarly digital tools including on-line databases and image resources.

· consider diverse contexts and voices that inform an understanding of built environments.

Deliverables:

This assignment requires that you turn in:

1. Tour topic selected from the list of topics provided on Blackboard

2. Thesis Statement (250-300 words)

Present an argument that addresses:

· The site's historical and cultural significance

· Its architectural or urban planning innovations

· Its influence on subsequent developments

· Its role in shaping local and global architectural discourse

3. Detailed Outline

· Introduction and historical context

· Subtopic sections, each focusing on a key element of the design

· Conclusion synthesizing the subtopics and how they support the site’s importance

· Include brief notes about intended visual materials

4. Bibliography of a minimum of four sources, selected from the overall bibliography provided by the instructor for each topic, formatted correctly using Chicago-Turabian style.

Assignment phases:

The following required and optional phases for this assignment are:

· Class 2: In class overview for this assignment

· Class 4: Topic selection. Instructor provides time for students to ask questions about assignment in class.

· Optional: students are encouraged to meet with the Writers Studio or the instructor to solicit feedback on their rough draft

· Jan. 24th @ 11:59 PM: Assignment submission

Parameters:

· All elements (thesis, outline, and sources) should be included in a single Word document

· Header must include: [Your first and last name], ARLH 211-[section #] Winter Guided Tour Part 1

· Thesis statement must be underlined

· Use 12 point Times New Roman font. Double spaced. 1-inch margins

· Materials should be free from grammatical and spelling errors

· Chicago-Turabian should be used for the bibliography

Tools and resources:

· The topic should be selected from the list provided as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· All sources must come from the pre-approved bibliography available as part of the assignment instructions on Blackboard.

· Students are encouraged to use the Writer’s Studio when crafting thesis statements and outlines.

Submission requirements:

This assignment will be submitted to Blackboard / Submit Assignments Here with the following file naming convention:

202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_StudentLastname_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

e.g: 202520_ARLH_211_[section#]_Ritter_Wallace_ GuidedResearchTourPart1

Assignment weight:

This assignment counts for 10 points, or 10% of the overall course grade.

Feedback schedule and process:

1. Assignment introduced in week one

2. Students review assignment instructions and take notes in class 2

3. Submit assignment on Jan. 24th

Assessment criteria:

· Thesis statement: 35% of assignment grade

· Outline: 40% of assignment grade

· Source selection: 10% of assignment grade

· Chicago formatting: 15% of assignment grade

Grades, using a rubric and general comments, will be returned to students via Blackboard’s grade center no later than one week after submission.

Rubrics:

Rubrics for all assignments and exams can be found at Blackboard/Assignment Materials

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including but not limited to AI-generated content, automated writing assistance, and machine-generated responses, is strictly prohibited for the completion of assignments in this course.